<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Thoughts On Jesus and History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/archives/2006/05/31/some-thoughts-on-jesus-and-history/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/archives/2006/05/31/some-thoughts-on-jesus-and-history</link>
	<description>disciple, husband, father, college minister, blowhard</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: scott aughtmon</title>
		<link>http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/archives/2006/05/31/some-thoughts-on-jesus-and-history#comment-12521</link>
		<dc:creator>scott aughtmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glenandpaula.com/archives/2006/05/31/some-thoughts-on-jesus-and-history/#comment-12521</guid>
		<description>Glen,

When read the article I couldn't believe the "arguments" this guy was using!  They're pretty lame!  The problem is people will read this and think of him as an authority and believe it.  I was about to comment on the website, but then I read your response here, which is good.  

I think you should copy and paste your response here and comment on the article or write the editor.  They really should allow an opposing since this guy's arguments are so out there!  Anyway, just a thought.  

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glen,</p>
<p>When read the article I couldn&#8217;t believe the &#8220;arguments&#8221; this guy was using!  They&#8217;re pretty lame!  The problem is people will read this and think of him as an authority and believe it.  I was about to comment on the website, but then I read your response here, which is good.  </p>
<p>I think you should copy and paste your response here and comment on the article or write the editor.  They really should allow an opposing since this guy&#8217;s arguments are so out there!  Anyway, just a thought.  </p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
