Chi Alpha’s Advisory Leadership Team

I just spent 16 hours trav­el­ing in order to spend 18 hours in Spring­field, MO.

First, an apol­o­gy to all my Spring­field friends, but I lit­er­al­ly had zero free min­utes the entire time that I was there (I am now at an age where I view sleep as non-option­al). I’ll try to carve out a more flex­i­ble sched­ule on future trips.

Which leads me to the point of this post: I’m on Chi Alpha’s new­ly formed Advi­so­ry Lead­er­ship Team (ALT). I would have pre­ferred to be in the CTRL or DEL group, but ALT is where they stuck me. 😉

This group is com­prised of three local Chi Alpha lead­ers (present­ly me, Dick Her­man and Mark Bri­ley) along with the res­i­dent nation­al Chi Alpha staff and meets every two months to advise the nation­al direc­tor on strate­gic deci­sions and pol­i­cy issues.

This is my own quirky and high­ly sub­jec­tive take on things.

Things I Learned:

• Scott Mar­tin had to fight to keep the World Mis­sions Sum­mit from open­ing with a human video (and one involv­ing swords, at that). We all owe him a tremen­dous debt.
• The biggest Chi Alpha min­istries are:
  • 600 stu­dents at San Diego State Uni­ver­si­ty with Sue Hegle.
  • 430 at West­ern Wash­ing­ton Uni­ver­si­ty with Brady Bob­bink.
  • 275 at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cen­tral Arkansas with Matt Car­pen­ter.
  • ??? at Uni­ver­si­ty of Louisiana-Lafayette with Eric Treuil (his num­bers aren’t on file, but I esti­mate his min­istry prob­a­bly fits here on the list).
  • 190 at Flori­da State Uni­ver­si­ty with Mario Solari.
  • 175 at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Min­neso­ta-Duluth with Chuck Haavik.
  • 175 at Ten­nessee Tech Uni­ver­si­ty with Jonathan Scales.
  • 160 at Mur­ray State with Mark Ran­doll.
  • 150 at Mis­souri State Uni­ver­si­ty with Noble Bow­man.
• Most Chi Alpha groups meet on Thurs­day or Tues­day at 7pm.
• Only 19% of Chi Alpha stu­dents have an Assem­blies of God back­ground.
• Chi Alpha at Yale Uni­ver­si­ty saw 40 stu­dents get saved last year. Big props to Andy Cun­ning­ham.

Things We Dis­cussed There Which I Am Also Free To Dis­cuss Here:

• Fill­ing out the annu­al Chi Alpha cen­sus needs to be part of the annu­al affil­i­a­tion process. Not fill­ing it out (and not affil­i­at­ing) will be grounds for hav­ing your pay­check with­held, just as with our month­ly finan­cial reports. Also, this needs to be doable online.
• We spent a lot of time talk­ing about Chi Alpha’s deci­sion-mak­ing process and orga­ni­za­tion­al struc­ture. There’s a lot of that I can’t com­ment on yet because our Nation­al Direc­tor is going to be talk­ing to many peo­ple one on one to explain things to them. Here are things I think I can safe­ly say:
  • Chi Alpha does­n’t exist in a vac­u­um: we’re embed­ded in the Assem­blies of God and are absolute­ly gov­erned by its con­sti­tu­tion, bylaws, and pol­i­cy man­u­als. The most impor­tant take­away from that is that the Nation­al Direc­tor is pret­ty much the pope of Chi Alpha when it comes to nation­al deci­sions (as opposed to dis­trict and local deci­sions).
  • In addi­tion it is help­ful to real­ize that there are four tiers (for lack of a bet­ter word) of lead­er­ship with­in Chi Alpha.
    • The Nation­al Direc­tor
    • Nation­al Staff
    • Translo­cal Influ­encers (Area Direc­tors, CMIT Direc­tors, DXARs, nation­al Resource Per­son­nel, etc). This is the most con­fus­ing, because most of the groups at this lev­el are entan­gled (almost every­one who serves in one of these roles also serves in at least one oth­er translo­cal capac­i­ty) and there’s not real­ly a hier­ar­cy among them (for exam­ple, CMIT direc­tors are sub­or­di­nate to DXARs in cer­tain respects but not oth­ers and CMIT direc­tors are more influ­en­tial with­in Chi Alpha than DXARs). Real­iz­ing that they are all in rough­ly the same tier of lead­er­ship (which they express in very dif­fer­ent domains) is help­ful when try­ing to fig­ure out how this beast called Chi Alpha actu­al­ly works.
    • Local Staff
  • Func­tion­al­ly, each lev­el has auton­o­my with­in their assigned lev­el of respon­si­bil­i­ty (for exam­ple, no one can tell a local staffer what to preach on any giv­en week). Micro­manag­ing is the root of all kinds of evil.
  • We real­ly need to define for each group exact­ly what deci­sions they are empow­ered to make with­out fear of their deci­sions being med­dled with. We also need to clar­i­fy who reports to whom. This has to be in a pub­lic writ­ten doc­u­ment that every­one can look at.
  • The real chal­lenge that we face is trust. My own take on it: many of the tier 3 lead­er­ship lack con­fi­dence in tiers 1 and 2. Some lack trust in the com­pe­tence of the top tier lead­er­ship and oth­ers lack trust in the char­ac­ter of the top tier lead­er­ship (update: I do not mean that they lack trust com­plete­ly; rather, I mean that they lack com­plete trust–a non­triv­ial dif­fer­ence). Most Tier 4 lead­ers seem unaware of this dynamic–they tend to hold the Tier 3, 2, and 1 lead­er­ship in a cer­tain amount of awe and imag­ine that they’re all best friends. Many of them are good friends, and almost all like one anoth­er and are com­mit­ted to work­ing togeth­er effec­tive­ly. But there’s still a break­down in trust between the nation­al lead­ers and the rest. (update: I wrote an arti­cle explain­ing that this is a ten­den­cy intrin­sic to fed­er­al gov­er­nance)
• We need a nation­al rep­re­sen­ta­tive to serve our stu­dent-led groups. We’ve invit­ed Dave Short to fill this posi­tion (con­tin­gent on his dis­tric­t’s approval).
• The prob­a­ble (but by no means cer­tain) evo­lu­tion of the ALT will inl­cude all the Area Direc­tors along with a non-DXAR non-CMIT Direc­tor rep from their region. Sort of like the Gen­er­al Pres­bytery of the Assem­blies of God.

Any­way, I put all this online for two rea­sons:

1. As a local cam­pus rep­re­sen­ta­tive I feel an oblig­a­tion to let the peo­ple I’m rep­re­sent­ing know what’s going on. As long as it’s not con­fi­den­tial I’ll talk about it freely. If it is con­fi­den­tial I’ll tell you as much as I can.
2. To ask for feed­back. You can either com­ment on this post or email me direct­ly. I’ll be sure to post the agen­da for the next meet­ing once I get it so you can give me input on that head­ing into it.