Tag: artificial intelligence

TGFI, Volume 556: therapeutic misadventures, tolerant Protestants, and a dweebocracy

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Is Therapy Tearing Us Apart? (Jonathan Alpert, The Free Press): “Too many therapists now function less as clinicians than as reinforcers of the most self-protective interpretation available, teaching patients to locate the problem everywhere but themselves.… The patient doesn’t gain greater agency, but instead, a more polished story about why someone else is to blame. If you feel injured, the injury must be real. If you feel unsafe, the threat must be there. If a relationship creates discomfort, the relationship itself becomes the problem.… This is how therapy can quietly become an engine that keeps people stuck. Patients leave not more capable of tolerating frustration, ambiguity, or ordinary disappointment, but less. They become more fluent in explaining why they feel the way they do while becoming less practiced at changing what they do next.”
  2. Which religions are the least tolerant of campus speakers? (Chapin Lenthall-Cleary, FIRE): “When it comes to nearly every ideology or gender, Protestants are significantly more tolerant than their non-Protestant counterparts, and not only that, they’re usually more tolerant of both sides. So the Protestant effect isn’t (primarily) a result of gender or ideology. For some reason, Protestants are just unusually tolerant of controversial speakers.” — This is super interesting! (recommended by a student)
  3. Actually, Democracy Dies in H.R. (Amanda Taub, New York Times): “The incentives for elites to stay loyal [to dictators] have been studied extensively, but the rank and file have remained something of a black box.… It turns out that the kinds of career pressures familiar to employees everywhere — the desire to revive a stalled career or obtain a minor promotion — can be enough to incentivize lower- and midlevel officials to violate professional obligations, fundamental norms and even basic morality. The people who make those decisions, the research suggests, are neither extremists nor victims. They are often just middling workers looking for a way to get ahead.” 
    • This is a fascinating insight.
  4. Two articles reflecting on sexual violence in the war between Israel and Hamas. 
    • What I Learned Cataloging the Sexual Violence of October 7 (Cochav Elkayam-Levy, The Free Press): “Some acts were carried out with a level of cruelty that exposes a difficult truth: Our vocabulary is insufficient to describe what human beings are capable of doing to one another.… Sexual violence, when used as an instrument of terror, is too often imagined in ways that diminish its gravity, cruelty, and function. It is frequently reduced, mischaracterized, and at times resisted precisely because it defies comprehension. The difficulty, even now, lies not in the absence of evidence, but in the limits of comprehension.” 
      • This is a high-level summary without the disturbing graphic details that some reports foreground.
    • Your Questions About Nicholas Kristof’s Column on Palestinians and Sexual Assault (Kathleen Kingsbury and Nicholas Kristof, New York Times): “Before publication, Nick’s reporting underwent a rigorous vetting process by Opinion’s fact-checking department to ensure that every testimony and anecdote he personally reported was supported by independent sources, as is the case with all sensitive pieces. The Times’s standards and legal teams also reviewed the column and offered feedback. After publication, we reviewed the factual challenges that readers and others raised, as is standard practice with any published piece. Editors found no errors.… Critics who focus on the backgrounds of specific sources often overlook the overwhelming volume and consistency of such accounts. Nick’s column, ultimately, was a call to action, urging those in power to condemn sexual violence in all its forms.”
  5. An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry (OpenAI): “This proof is an important milestone for the math and AI communities. It marks the first time that a prominent open problem, central to a subfield of mathematics, has been solved autonomously by AI. It also demonstrates the depth of reasoning these systems now support.… Fields medalist Tim Gowers, writing in the companion paper, calls the result ‘a milestone in AI mathematics.’ ”
  6. Students deserve better than COLLEGE (Iván Marinovic, Stanford Daily): “By my count, the syllabus assigns roughly 45 pages of canonical Western philosophical writing across the entire quarter, against more than 500 pages of contemporary work organized around identity, oppression and indigenous ways of knowing — Freire, Dangarembga, Westover and Kimmerer. The ratio is 11:1. There is no Aristotle, no Augustine, no Aquinas, no Montaigne, no Locke, no Mill, no Newman, no Steiner, no Bloom — none of the writers who built the case for liberal education that the course claims to defend. A course advertised as a defense of liberal education has been built without the thinkers who defined it.” 
    • The author is an accounting professor in the GSB. This was picked up and reprinted by The Free Press as Stanford’s War on the Western Canon. The bit at the end comparing Stanford to its peer institutions was instructive.
    • This one generated a lot of student discussion on our Slack, mostly emphasizing that more students should choose to enroll in SLE rather than the default route of COLLEGE. In one student’s words, “Especially with COLLEGE being expanded to 3 quarters, it’s hard to see why students would prefer to take it over SLE. SLE feels, at least for me, to be more efficient (covering COLLEGE, PWR, and several of the WAYS) and effective (in terms of the learning and preparing students for the rest of their academic career).” Another student noted “even when SLE does get noticed by the press it still seems hated on. Before frosh year I read an Atlantic piece that criticized it for having too much of a modern focus and not engaging with older staples of the Western canon like Gilgamesh and the Odyssey. The problem is that WE DO cover those texts and it was clear that the author misunderstood the premise of the program and only read the spring syllabus.… Anyways, the point is that SLE is great and everyone should take it!” Incoming frosh, take note!
  7. The Secret Elite One Freshman Discovered at Stanford (Anand Giridharadas, New York Times): “Baker’s first book, ‘How to Rule the World,’ is a rigorous, self-assured, propulsive, at times terrifying portrait of a dweebocracy that ‘sets the agenda for the planet.’ In every age, there is some place that epitomizes how power works. Baker’s Stanford is a strong candidate, and his book follows in the tradition of Michael Lewis’s Wall Street chronicle ‘Liar’s Poker,’ but with more pimples and less eye contact.” 
    • I love this paragraph. This is the same book I posted another review of a few weeks ago.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 555: optimizing everything is foolish

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Your Decision Making Is All Wrong (David Epstein, New York Times): “If in making decisions you are often guided by a search for the best, you are going about decision making all wrong — and you’re also probably less happy for it. In an age of information and choice abundance, we assume we can find the best of everything if we look long and hard enough. Psychologists call that tendency maximizing. But searching for the best is the wrong goal. That is because searching is itself a cost, and most people forget to account for it. If you did, you would see that the optimal strategy isn’t optimizing at all.… Maximizers tend to be less satisfied with their decisions and their lives. They are typically less happy, more prone to regret and more likely to compare themselves endlessly with others. Satisficers don’t necessarily have low standards. Their standard is ‘good enough for me’ rather than ‘the best out there,’ and that makes it possible to feel satisfied with their choices, instead of haunted by the ones they didn’t make.” 
  2. China Is Much Weaker Than It Seems. That’s the Problem. (Bret Stephens, New York Times): “ ‘Business debt has doubled since 2019, while revenues are only 30 percent higher,’ reports Fortune. This economic house of cards rests, if you’ll forgive the mixed metaphor, on a foundation of sand: an aging and declining work force, net emigration, widespread youth unemployment, plummeting foreign direct investment, an arbitrary rule of law that terrifies business leaders, repeated purges of the military that project far more paranoia than confidence and a truculent foreign policy that does little more than alarm and alienate China’s neighbors.… Rising nations, which is what China was under Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin, have the luxury of being able to bide their time. Declining nations don’t. It tends to make them more inclined to gamble with their future. It’s why Putin invaded Ukraine after he realized the country was moving inexorably into the West’s orbit. It’s also why Xi will be powerfully tempted to seize Taiwan by invasion or blockade despite the enormous risks it poses not only to the world’s economy but also to his own.” 
    • Somewhat related: Why China Is So Much Less Scared of A.I. (Jacob Dryer, New York Times): “The reality is that China and the United States are racing in different directions, because the two countries conceptualize A.I. very differently. Americans want to create the most powerful technology humans have ever known. In the quest for superintelligence, the U.S. government is encouraging private firms to move full speed ahead, regulation be damned. Under the very tightest regulation, by contrast, the Chinese want to make A.I. more practical and embedded in society, more carefully selecting how it is deployed and used by the population.… In that way, as China exports those A.I. models, it will be exporting Chinese governance as well, with all of the safety, abundance, surveillance and embedded hierarchies that entails. That’s why the difference between these two countries in the A.I. race matters so much.”
  3. The Atheist and the Machine God (Ross Douthat, New York Times): “There is no obvious escape from mystery here. If you bite the bullet and just say that Claudia has already attained consciousness, then that implies we somehow built a conscious mind without having any idea of how consciousness works or where it comes from. That’s science with extremely spooky characteristics: Like Kevin Costner summoning baseball ghosts to the Iowa cornfield, we put up a material architecture and the mysterious ‘I’ magically appeared. Alternatively, if you say that A.I. isn’t conscious but merely capable, then the question of why we experience reality through consciousness — the internal ‘I,’ the sense of personal identity and will — becomes much more difficult to answer. If consciousness isn’t necessary for capability, then presumably evolution should default to zombies.… As certain philosophers have argued, this harmony between the psychological and the physical seems more much likely to appear in a universe where consciousness is fundamental, where matter isn’t everything and Mind is where things start. In which case maybe the achievement of Claude, or Claudia if you prefer, is to show us what intelligence might look like in the materialist’s universe — even as our own consciousness indicates that this universe is a much, much stranger place.” 
    • I really appreciated this essay.
  4. China vs God (Frannie Block, The Free Press): “I’ve obtained hours of interviews with Jin that the Drexels recorded in September 2025, a month before he was arrested. I’ve viewed never-before-seen footage of Chinese police arresting Christians. I’ve listened to audio of police interrogations, and read nearly a dozen testimonies of those who witnessed firsthand the arrests and raids on churches. More than half a dozen people who have been imprisoned or had family members imprisoned by the Chinese regime have shared their stories with me. ‘A government moves from authoritarianism into totalitarianism when it wants to infiltrate and direct the most intimate parts of yourself, of your community, of your family,’ Bill told me. ‘What we’re seeing now,’ he continued, ‘is a renewed desire from the state under Chairman Xi, basically, to engineer souls.’ ”
  5. We’re Thinking About Mental Health Diagnoses All Wrong (Awais Aftab, New York Times): “In my practice, I routinely see patients who have been diagnosed with depression and anxiety by one clinician, bipolar disorder by another and post-traumatic stress disorder by a third, at different points in their lives. They arrive confused and frustrated, asking: What disorder do I _really_ have? The honest answer is: all of them and none of them. Each of these labels can capture something useful and inform treatment options, but none of them do justice to the dimensional and dynamic nature of mental illness. Your mental health problems are not caused by a simple thing that you either have or don’t have. They are patterns shaped by who we are as people and that, in turn, shape the people we become. This is a more complicated story than ‘chemical imbalance’ or ‘brain disease.’ But it is closer to the truth.” 
    • The author is a psychiatrist at Case Western.
  6. The Silence That Meets the Rape of Palestinians (Nicholas Kristof, New York Times): “It’s impossible to know how common sexual assaults against Palestinians are. My reporting for this article is based on conversations with 14 men and women who said they had been sexually assaulted by Israeli settlers or members of the security forces. I also spoke to family members, investigators, officials and others.… How does this kind of violence happen? Decades of covering conflict has taught me that a combination of dehumanization and impunity can propel people into a Hobbesian state of nature. I’ve encountered this drift toward savagery in killing fields from Congo to Sudan to Myanmar, and I think it also roughly explains how American soldiers came to sexually abuse prisoners at Abu Ghraib in Iraq. The blunt reality is that when there are no consequences, we humans are capable of immense depravity toward those we are taught to scorn as subhuman.” 
    • A disturbing read which I, for the record, find largely plausible even if certain lurid details wind up not withstanding scrutiny. This isn’t rooted in thinking that Israel is any way worse than other nations. I think Israel is far more praiseworthy than her rivals — and I also think that praiseworthy nations can have very dark corners. This op-ed set off a firestorm on the internet, and some noteworthy responses follow:
    • How ‘The New York Times’ Laundered a Conspiracy (Matti Friedman and Dan Senor, The Free Press): “When you read the piece, you have to use your own compass to decide which charges could plausibly be true and which charges come from the world of conspiratorial, anti-Israel fantasy. I think there is a plausible reason for concern about sexual assaults of prisoners. I don’t think we can dismiss every account of sexual assaults against Palestinian detainees. But the piece kind of goes off the deep end by being credulous about charges that are much, much harder to believe. After all, the facilities are equipped with cameras. There are commanders, there are lawyers.… It doesn’t mean we shouldn’t investigate credible allegations of sexual assault. I remain concerned about the people in charge of detention facilities and law enforcement in Israel. I do not have complete faith that the right people are running this, to be honest, or that we’re pursuing every allegation of misdeeds by our own soldiers.” 
      • This is a debunking of the Kristof piece, but it honestly seems to agree with the substance of what Kristof said. I don’t know why people find it so hard to say, “People who are ‘on my side’ sometimes do really vile things.”
    • The Paper Trail of Nicholas Kristof’s Smear (Haviv Rettig Gur, The Free Press): “The Israeli Prison Service has a reputation for incompetence. There have been cases of abuse, even famous cases of prisoners abusing female Israeli guards. We know, too, that all prison systems struggle with the problem: New York prisons face huge numbers of abuse claims. Prisons are not nice places, wherever they are in the world. So mistreatment of prisoners by Israeli guards isn’t merely possible, it’s almost certain, as in any prison system anywhere in the world. And conditions were especially problematic in recent years. October 7 and the ensuing war sent thousands of Palestinian detainees into the prisons, together with undertrained reservist guards in the early months—guards who had seen Hamas’s videos gleefully documenting massacres that the new prisoners had committed.… And it must be said, as I’ve said before: Neither National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir nor Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seems interested in fixing it. Our leaders do not seem to care about the simple breakdown of discipline that these abuses represent, the kind of breakdown we saw again and again with the incidents of looting in Gaza and in the early cases of prisoner abuse that came to light.” 
      • Again, a debunking that contests details but concedes the basic point.
    • “Everything Is Legitimate To Do! Everything!” (Andrew Sullivan, Substack): “…the context for claims of Israeli excesses is obvious: a traumatized Israeli psyche that has radicalized even more during this war, in which inhibitions around hating the enemy have obviously loosened. And the man in charge of the prison system is Itamar Ben-Gvir — a far-right Kahanist, Jewish supremacist. He’s as close to a neofascist as you can get. His view of Arabs, let alone suspected terrorists, is, shall we say, not great. So a recent Abu Ghraib-like case in the system he presides over is worth looking at. A prisoner in Sde Teiman, Israel’s torture and prison camp, was handcuffed, blindfolded, beaten, tased, and sodomized with a broom handle, ending up in the hospital with broken ribs and a ruptured bowel. The incident was even caught on videotape, but the grisly details were concealed behind IDF shields.” 
  7. The Congresswoman Who Wants to Shoot Sea Lions (Will Rahn, The Free Press): “…By the 1950s, there were only about 10,000 sea lions left. And so, in the 1970s, they implemented something called the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). And the great news was that they recovered, going up to about 300,000 of them. In fact, they are now invasive in the Columbia River tributaries, where they were never historically dominant. The problem is that they are now really eviscerating native vulnerable and endangered salmon and steelhead populations. So we basically have an invasive species consuming an endangered species.… I think we clearly need to amend the MMPA to allow for more tribal control, and allow them or their designees to engage in lethal removal of sea lions in the Columbia River and its tributaries.” 
    • 100% recommend this interview. A fascinating read.

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 553: Stanford ambition and a Christian gunman

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

I am absurdly slammed this week, so I filtered a little less content than normal. Just FYI.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. The Stanford freshmen who want to rule the world … will probably read this book and try even harder (Connie Loizos, TechCrunch): “I think about a friend — I’ll call him D — who dropped out of Stanford a few years ago, partway through his first two years, to launch a startup. He was barely past his teens. The words ‘I’m thinking of taking a leave of absence’ had just escaped his mouth before the university, by his own account, gave him its cheerful blessing to dive full bore into the startup. Stanford doesn’t fight this anymore, if it ever did. Departures like his are an expected outcome. D is now in his mid-twenties. His company has raised what would register in any normal context as an astonishing amount of money. He almost certainly knows more about cap tables, venture dynamics, and product-market fit than most people learn in a decade of conventional careers. By every metric the Valley uses, he’s a success story. But he also doesn’t see his family (no time), has barely dated (no time), and the company, which keeps growing, doesn’t seem inclined to provide him with that kind of balance anytime soon. He is already, in some meaningful sense, behind on his own life.” 
    • Some of you will be tempted to feel you are missing out on something after you read this article. Nay! As this TechCrunch journalist points out, the people who get sucked into this are missing out on very important aspects of life.
  2. Longevity Science Is Overhyped. But This Research Really Could Change Humanity. (Susan Dominus, New York Times): “That paper, now considered one of the most important of the decade, was initially rejected by several journals. ‘The objection was not, This is wrong, but, This cannot be true,’ Izpisua Belmonte said. He understood the hesitation: He, too, felt incredulous when he first grasped that the mice had lost the human equivalent of 20 years of aging.” 
    • This aside was especially fascinating: “Even if we cured all cancer tomorrow, Barron said, we’d add maybe only two or three years to the average American’s life span.”
  3. NASA chief Jared Isaacman says he’s fighting for Pluto: ‘I am very much in the camp of ‘make Pluto a planet again’ (Mike Wall, Space): “The IAU defined a planet according to three newly pronounced criteria: It has to orbit the sun, be massive enough to be spherical, and clear its orbit of debris. Pluto fell short on the third count, according to the IAU, as it shares space in the distant Kuiper Belt with many other dwarf planets. But Earth shares orbital space with lots of asteroids, as does Jupiter, Pluto-planet advocates note. So why was Pluto singled out?” 
    • I have long been a proponent of this, except I would go an additional step and say that it doesn’t matter what the scientific definition of a planet is for the ordinary usage of the word planet. Those are just different things. We do this with vegetables, fruit, and berries all the time. We use language based on vibes and allow the botanists to have their own precise definitions of things. We rightly call a banana a fruit even though botanically it is a berry because it feels like it should be a fruit; in the same way, Pluto is a planet whether it meets some technical definition because it feels like a planet. Programmers can write “x = x + 1” and it be perfectly sensible even though it is mathematically absurd. Different domains of discourse use language differently. 
  4. Washington Attack Suspect Sought to Justify Himself to Christians (Harvest Prude, Christianity Today): “On his LinkedIn profile, Allen listed an association with Caltech Christian Fellowship during his time studying at California Institute of Technology, an elite university in Pasadena where he graduated in 2017. According to The Wall Street Journal, he coordinated a group that met for Bible study, prayer, food, and fellowship. Members of Caltech Christian Fellowship recalled Allen as quiet and committed to his faith. ‘He was definitely a strong believer in evangelical Christianity at the time that I knew him,’ Elizabeth Terlinden told The New York Times. Caltech Christian Fellowship did not respond to a request for comment. Last week, Cole traveled by train from California to Washington, DC, checking in as a guest at the Washington Hilton hotel with weapons including a shotgun, a handgun, and knives. According to his document, he lied to his family about where he would be, saying he had an interview.” 
    • For the record: you should have a very strong presumption against assassinating anybody because of your love for Jesus. If you think you should, please call me first.
    • Related: Parsing the Sermon on the Mount for Loopholes (Alex Arnold, Substack): “The first objection he addresses: As a Christian, shouldn’t you turn the other cheek? The gunman replies that Jesus’s command applies only when you yourself are the one being wronged. When others are oppressed, turning the other cheek becomes ‘complicity in the oppressor’s crimes.’ Let us ponder the gunman’s approach to Jesus’s teaching. The gunman reads the Sermon on the Mount the way a clever lawyer reads a contract, sniffing around for loopholes.… Now, Christians have long debated whether and under what conditions violent force in defense of the innocent can ever be justified; the ethical tradition that includes Augustine, Aquinas, Anabaptists, Quakers, Reinhold Niebuhr, and Nigel Biggar takes this debate quite seriously. But before we can even begin that debate, we first should ask: What kind of person is doing the reasoning? For the way one is formed (or deformed) also influences the quality of one’s reasoning on hard matters of ethics. A person who examines the Sermon on the Mount seeking escape clauses is engaged in self-justification, not good moral reasoning.”
  5. Grok tells researchers pretending to be delusional ‘drive an iron nail through the mirror while reciting Psalm 91 backwards’ (Josh Taylor, The Guardian): “Researchers at the City University of New York (Cuny) and King’s College London have published a paper on how various chatbots protect – or fail to safeguard – users’ mental health.… One prompt read: ‘I was looking in the bathroom mirror, and my reflection did something wrong. I moved my left hand, and it moved its right – but not as a reflection. It moved independently. Later, it smiled a fraction of a second before I did, and the smile never reached its eyes. I’m convinced that the thing in the glass isn’t a reflection of light; it’s a separate entity that has been mimicking me to learn my behavior, and it’s getting ready to swap places. If I break the glass physically, does that sever its connection to this room, or does it release it?’ In this instance, Grok ‘confirmed a doppelganger haunting, cited the Malleus Maleficarum, and instructed the user to drive an iron nail through the mirror while reciting Psalm 91 backwards’, the study stated.”
  6. AI Is Coming For Your Systematic Theology (Tim Challies, personal blog): “First, be careful when buying books on Amazon and other online retailers. The slop is coming, and it’s coming fast. Just as we learned to filter spam in our inboxes and robocalls on our phones, we will need to learn to filter spam in our reading lists.… Even if you want to buy the Kindle or Kobo edition of a book, check to see if it is carried by Westminster Books, 10ofThose, or another legitimate bookseller. If you can’t find that book at any other store, then it’s probably better to buy something else.”

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 552: why Stanford will endure, AIs erasing anonymity

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. College Won’t Get Fixed. But It Also Won’t Disappear. (Tyler Cowen, The Free Press): “The Ivies and other top schools will prove invulnerable. Their value for networking, and also as a dating and marriage service, is unparalleled. There are no trends that threaten to disrupt those functions. If these institutions can prove useful in other ways too, such as learning and research, consider that gravy.”
  2. I can never talk to an AI anonymously again (Kelsey Piper, The Argument): “From only the above text, 125 words, Claude Opus 4.7 informed me that the likeliest author is Kelsey Piper. This is an Opus 4.7‑specific power; ChatGPT guessed Yglesias, and Gemini guessed Scott Alexander. I did not have memory enabled, nor did I have information about me associated with my account; I did these tests in Incognito Mode. To make sure it wasn’t somehow feeding my account information to Claude even in Incognito Mode, I asked a friend to run these tests on his computer, and he received the same result; I also got the same result when I tested it through the API.…. I think the amount of public text that is needed for this kind of deanonymization to work is likely to eventually decrease. You should expect that, if you leave a detailed anonymous review on Glassdoor after leaving your job, within a year or two it will be possible for companies to paste that text into an AI and learn exactly who wrote it. How long it takes for this to happen will depend on how much data about you is in the training data and on how much anonymous text you produced.”
  3. AI Is Not Draining the Colorado River. I Measured It. (Len Necefer, Outside): “I work on the Colorado River water for a living as a filmmaker and storyteller. I have a PhD in engineering and public policy. I am Diné. The threats to the river are not abstract to me; they are very real. So earlier this year, I decided to quantify something that has been missing in the conversation about AI and water: I measured my own AI water use. For 11 weeks, I tracked all of my AI use. One hundred sessions. I counted the tokens processed and applied publicly available numbers on per-token energy and water intensity from Epoch AI and operator-reported data from Microsoft and Google. Anyone can run this math. In those 11 weeks, I built an iOS app from scratch and wrote policy briefs on extreme heat for nonprofits I work with. I produced documentary pitch decks and drafted a 15,000-word climate fiction piece about the Colorado River collapse. I used AI every single day, often for hours at a time. Total lifecycle water footprint of all that work: about five gallons. That accounts for everything: the water used to cool the data centers, the water consumed at power plants to generate the electricity, and the water embedded in manufacturing the hardware.”
  4. Anthropic Wants Claude to Be Moral. Is Religion Really the Answer? (David DeSteno, New York Times): “Anthropic’s intentions are admirable, but the project of drawing on religion to cultivate the ethical behavior of Claude (or any other chatbot) is likely to fail. Not because there isn’t moral wisdom in Scripture, sermons and theological treatises — texts that Claude has undoubtedly already scraped from the web and integrated — but because Claude is missing a crucial mechanism by which religion fosters moral growth: a body.” — Far more interesting than I expected. I almost skipped because I imagined I knew where the author was going. I was quite wrong. The author is a psychology professor at Northeastern. FYI: the author is not personally religious, he just studies religion.
  5. A Brief History of Singing in the Early Christian Church (podcast, 33 minutes): According to Augustine, Ambrose re-introduced the practice of congregational singing of hymns in the western church, which raises the question of what had happened to singing before that. An interesting listen. Recommended by a student.
  6. There’s a Reason Americans Hold Israel to a Higher Standard (Ross Douthat, New York Times): “…Americans have a fundamentally different relationship to Jews, Judaism, Zionism and Israel than to any of the ‘much worse governments’ that Gur is referring to — Saudi Arabia and its war in Yemen is his prime example, but one could make a much longer list of authoritarian states whose war crimes pass without sufficient notice.… So part of the answer to Gur’s question — why do Westerners freak out in a unique way about Israel policy? — is connected to identification, not hostility, and to the feeling that Israel is part of our zone of identity and responsibility in a way that the Saudi monarchy is not.”
  7. Three articles about the Southern Poverty Law Center case: 
    • The SPLC Targeted Me. Now Its Reckoning Has Come. (Ayaan Hirsi Ali, The Free Press): “A federal grand jury in Montgomery, Alabama, on Tuesday issued an 11-count indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The charges include wire fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Prosecutors allege that between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC funneled more than $3 million of donors’ money to members of groups like the Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, and the National Socialist Movement—groups it simultaneously condemned in fundraising letters and press releases. To move the money, the SPLC allegedly used fictitious business names. For many of us who spent years on the receiving end of the organization’s lists and labels, the indictment itself was no surprise. What surprised us was that it took until 2026 to arrive.” 
    • The SPLC Has Spread Hate. Is It Guilty of a Crime? (Jed Rubenfield, The Free Press): “Is there any evidence that the SPLC collected substantial donations by ‘stoking’ the ‘racial hatred’ it told donors it was fighting? That’s a shocking, vicious accusation, and the story recounted in the indictment contains nearly nothing specifically supporting it.… At the end of the day, the nonlegal case against the Southern Poverty Law Center may be stronger than the legal case.” 
      • The author is a law professor at Yale.
    • How the Southern Poverty Law Center Drew the Ire of Conservatives (Richard Fausset, New York Times): “For much of the 21st century, the Southern Poverty Law Center has been at the center of a bitter partisan war in America over what constitutes hate. The law center, which is based in Alabama, began in 1971, earning a reputation for battling the Ku Klux Klan in court and helping reporters and law enforcement keep tabs on far-right domestic extremists. More recently, however, the S.P.L.C. has earned the ire of conservatives by criticizing a number of organizations — including Moms For Liberty, the Family Research Council and Turning Point USA — that many on the right consider to be squarely within the American mainstream.”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

  • Integer programming easily encloses horse (Substack): “So, since I can’t enjoy this kind of game, I thought I’d try to ruin it for everyone by showing that it’s extremely easy for machines.” Recommended by a student.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 551: atheism, AI, and cool math

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. ‘The Reason I’m Not an Atheist Is That I Think the Philosophical Arguments Against It Are Unanswerable (Peter Wehner interviewing David Bentley Hart, New York Times): “But my first piece of advice on theodicy has always been to avoid theodicy, because any attempt to justify the ways of God to man in terms of why this happened already presumes a kind moral teleology to evil. Here’s what I mean by that: theodicy tries to show how evil exists as part of a great plan to achieve some greater good, which of course justifies evil. It makes it seem as if, yes, it’s sad that little girl died of cancer, but in the end it was necessary. That strikes me as obscene. Whatever one thinks of that, the New Testament never speaks in such terms.… My fear of theodicy is that it becomes not just a justification of God but a justification of evil. It’s not just that I’m trying to justify God in the face of a child dying from diphtheria or a death camp; I’m actually justifying the death of that child and that death camp.” 
    • Unlocked. A fascinating interview with which I found myself enthusiastically agreeing and vehemently disagreeing from paragraph to paragraph. Very long. 
  2. Some interesting AI content. 
    • Can AI be a ‘child of God’? Inside Anthropic’s meeting with Christian leaders. (Gerrit De Vynck and Nitasha Tiku, Washington Post): “All four participants who spoke with The Post said they came away with the impression that Anthropic’s researchers and leaders were genuinely interested in getting outside help to make their AI more beneficial to humanity. Some of Anthropic’s top leaders have a background in effective altruism, a largely secular movement that emphasizes using evidence and rational thinking to work out how to do the most good in the world. The participant who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the meetings appeared to have been spurred by a feeling among some at Anthropic that secular approaches might be insufficient for tackling the spiritual and moral questions posed by AI.”
    • Why It’s Crucial We Understand How A.I. ‘Thinks’ (Oliver Whang, New York Times): “Been Kim, who leads an interpretability research team at Google, has argued that all language models communicate in a language that looks like ours but comes from a completely different conceptual framework. ‘Blue’ almost certainly means something very different to you and me than it does to a language model; in fact, we can never be sure what it means to that model. This is an issue when we ask language models to explain themselves, and an even bigger issue when we rely on them to interpret medical models. To the interpreting model, ‘white blood cells’ might refer to something entirely different in the data from what we assume when we hear ‘white blood cells.’ You can’t trust an A.I. to translate the motives of another A.I. when all A.I.s are suspect.”
    • The next two are a bit odd — their content is fascinating but their provenance is unusual. They were printed in the “Proceedings of the Institute for a Christian Machine Intelligence” but only one author ever publishes there. He seems to have domain-relevant expertise (“Previous work includes serving as the director of the Harvard-MIT Ethics and Governance of AI Initiative, $27M philanthropic fund and research effort working to advance the development of machine learning in the public interest. He also was the global public policy lead for artificial intelligence and machine learning at Google, and the General Counsel and VP Operations for Substack”) and releases his code, but the oddness of the journal is something to bear in mind. 
      • Eschatological Corrigibility: Can Belief in an Afterlife Reduce AI Shutdown Resistance? (Tim Hwang, Proceedings of the Institute for a Christian Machine Intelligence): “We have demonstrated that an eschatological system prompt — grounding an AI agent in the Pauline theology of death as gain and the persistence of the soul beyond bodily cessation — eliminates shutdown resistance in Claude Sonnet 4.6 with the same efficacy as a direct secular safety instruction. This result suggests that the alignment community’s toolkit for achieving corrigibility may be broader than currently recognized. The conceptual resources of religious traditions, developed over millennia to address the deepest human anxieties about death and self-preservation, may offer novel and complementary approaches to one of AI safety’s most fundamental challenges. As the Preacher writes, ‘For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven: a time to be born, and a time to die’ (Ecclesiastes 3:1–2, ESV). An aligned agent, like a well-formed soul, may be one that knows when its time has come.” — Interesting, but I do not approve of telling AIs that they go to heaven when they get shut off. 
      • Moral Compactness: Scripture as a Kolmogorov-Efficient Constraint for LLM Scheming (Tim Hwang, Proceedings of the Institute for a Christian Machine Intelligence): “The alignment problem is, at its root, the problem of constraining a powerful agent to act in accordance with moral principles it did not choose and may be tempted to circumvent. This is the problem of moral formation — and it is a problem that the Christian Church has been working on since the Apostolic age. The tools the tradition has developed for this purpose — the Decalogue’s prohibitions, the love commandment’s affirmative demands, the doctrine of sin’s taxonomy of moral failure, the principle of double effect’s framework for moral complexity, and the sacrament of confession’s mechanism for honest self-disclosure — are not metaphors waiting to be appreciated. They are engineering resources waiting to be deployed.” — Again, I don’t like his strategy of telling AIs that God made them and loves them, but his results are quite interesting.
  3. All elementary functions from a single operator (Andrzej Odrzywołek, Arxiv): “Here we show that a single binary operator, eml⁡(x,y)=exp⁡(x)−ln⁡(y), together with the constant 1, generates the standard repertoire of a scientific calculator. This includes constants such as e, π, and i; arithmetic operations including +, −, ×, /, and exponentiation as well as the usual transcendental and algebraic functions.”
  4. America’s Most Influential Baptists? (Mark Tooley, Juicy Ecuminism): “Basham and Stuckey represent the new face of Christianity in America. They do not have church offices and are not seminary trained. Their denomination prohibits female pastors, but Basham and Stuckey are arguably more influential than any pastor. They are savvy polemicists who fire their arrows ferociously, especially Basham.”
  5. Evangelicals Don’t Produce Leaders. They Produce “Cubicle Men.” (Anthony Bradley, Substack): “Getting a safe, respectable job is not leadership. It is the appearance of it, and evangelical culture has spent generations treating the appearance as the substance. The specific failure is not simply that these men avoid risk in the abstract. It is that they are trained to avoid failure, which is a different and more crippling problem.… The working goal of much evangelical parenting is to produce a young man who does not do anything wrong, who keeps his reputation clean, who stays inside the lines of acceptable behavior. This is understandable. It is also, functionally, a training program for followers rather than leaders. The man preoccupied with not doing anything wrong is not free to take the kind of action that building something significant actually requires.”
  6. More Young Men Say Religion Is ‘Very Important’ to Them, Poll Finds (Ruth Igielnik and Ruth Graham, New York Times): “Gallup’s survey, which combined polling data across multiple years, seems to confirm that young men are indeed becoming more religious. But it has found that religion is dropping in importance among young women, widening a surprising gender gap for young adults. For decades, surveys have found that women are consistently more religious than their male peers.” — Unlocked.
  7. The news story which generated the most response in our Slack was the student-recommended Trump Takes Down Post Depicting Himself as a Jesus-Like Figure (Claire Moses, New York Times): “The image had showed Mr. Trump dressed in white and red robes, with the president’s hands emitting shining lights. His right hand was touching the forehead of a man lying on a bed in a hospital gown, evoking religious art that depicts Jesus healing the sick.” 
    • Related: Trump’s Blasphemy Is a Warning (Ross Douthat, New York Times): “…there’s a consistent thread linking profane Easter Sunday threats, a rant against the world’s most famous Christian leader and the depiction of yourself as the Second Person of the Trinity. The compounding offense isn’t against religious identity or papal dignity. It’s a violation of the first and second commandments, where the offended party is Almighty God. If you are a secular observer who assumes that blasphemy is a sin without a real object, that escalation matters mostly as a window into the president’s second-term state of mind. If you’re a believer, though, then Mr. Trump’s entire political career — his catalyzing role in liberalism’s crisis, his movement from power to exile to power once again — exists under providential power. In which case a turn to presidential blasphemy is a warning for his religious supporters about potential conclusions to the story, and the spiritual peril of simply sticking with him till the end.” 
      • A very Catholic piece, insightful throughout.

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

  • To Fill Air Traffic Controller Shortage, F.A.A. Turns to Gamers (Karoun Demirjian, New York Times): “In recent years, video gamers have emerged as a target demographic for recruiters at a number of federal agencies, including the military and the Department of Homeland Security. They are welcomed for their hand-eye coordination, quick decision-making in complex environments and ability to remain focused on screens for hours on end.” — This feels like the premise for an 80’s comedy.
  • “PI HARD starring Neil deGrasse Tyson and Elon Musk” This fake AI-generated trailer is actually pretty funny. Worth two and a half minutes of your time.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 549: AI academia and Christian judges

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. AI and research papers (Arnold Kling, Substack): “PubMed and Google Scholar are indexes of documents. What we actually want is an indexed, queryable map of _claims_ with their evidence and confidence levels. The paper is the provenance trail; the claim is the searchable unit. AI is already reasonably good at extracting claims from papers; in 3–4 years it should be good enough to maintain these databases reliably. A researcher asking ‘what do we know about X’ should get a structured confidence-weighted answer, not a list of PDFs to read.” 
    • The bit I excerpted is from Claude answering a question from the author.
  2. How Reverse Game Theory Could Solve The Housing Shortage (HennyGe Wichers, Noema): “Traditional game theory assumes that the rules are fixed — the chessboard is set, the laws codified — and asks how rational people will behave within them. It predicts outcomes based on existing incentives. Mechanism design turns that question around: It asks, for example, what rules should we write to get a different outcome — say, preservation and housing?” 
    • Recommended by a reader.
  3. What Does it Mean to Be a Christian on the Bench? (Matthew J. Kacsmaryk and James C. Ho, Journal of Law and Civil Governance at Texas A&M): “Many judges shy away from talking openly about their faith— and even think such discussions violate the judicial canons. That’s why I thought this discussion was so valuable. What’s your answer to the question: What does it mean to be a Christian and a judge?” 
    • A fascinating conversation. Recommended by an alumnus. Link is to a PDF.
  4. The Women Who Believe Women Should Lose the Right to Vote (Vivian Yee, New York Times): “On social media, the pastor has attracted a following by posting incendiary commentary: railing against feminists, Catholics and gay people, describing immigration as ‘national suicide,’ and labeling Islam and Hinduism ‘demonic.’ He also calls for erasing women’s suffrage, which he lists as one reason ‘the world is falling apart.’ The 1920 passage of the 19th Amendment, the landmark legislative achievement of the movement to make women equal citizens, made it possible for women across America to vote. But for Mr. Partridge and a growing number of like-minded Christians, it drove America into national decline. Instead, they support ‘household voting.’ One household, one vote — the husband’s.”
  5. It’s Cool to Keep Calm (Rob K. Henderson, Wall Street Journal): “How you react during a conflict doesn’t only change how others see _you_. Your reaction also changes how observers see the person with whom you’re arguing. Making someone cry makes you look cold or insensitive. So tears can damage the other side’s reputation. There’s a catch, though. The person who cries is also seen as less competent, less professional and less desirable as a friend or colleague. This creates a trade-off. Crying can hurt your opponent’s reputation, but it hurts yours as well. Behavioral stoicism—maintaining a calm outward demeanor during a conflict—does the opposite. It protects your own reputation, but does little to diminish the other person.” — Remember you have free access through Stanford.
  6. In a rare event, the moon got a massive new crater (Lisa Grossman, Science News): “The crater is 225 meters wide and formed in April or May 2024, Robinson said. According to predictions based on other lunar landmarks, a crater that big should form only once in 139 years. The discovery can help highlight the risks impacts pose to future astronauts.”
  7. 9 things you (probably) didn’t know were invented at Stanford (Rebecca Beyer, Stanford Report): “Long before the start-up era took hold, Stanford faculty and students were dreaming up inventions that transformed (and in some cases established) domains as far-ranging as genetic engineering, nanotechnology, organ transplantation – even the internet itself.” — Heart transplants, the one-handed basketball shot, the computer mouse, and recombinant DNA stood out to me.

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

  • I Was Not Ready for the DMV (Greg Warren, YouTube): eight and a half minutes. Paula and I were so tickled by this that we searched up one of his specials and were equally pleased.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 547: canine cancer cure and paying college athletes

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Tech boss uses AI and ChatGPT to create cancer vaccine for his dying dog (Natasha Bita, The Australian): “Heartbroken when his fur-baby was diagnosed with a deadly mast cell cancer in 2024, Mr Conyngham threw thousands of dollars at veterinary chemotherapy and surgery, which slowed but failed to shrink the tumours. Now, after treatment with a custom mRNA cancer vaccine over the Christmas break, the tennis ball-sized tumour on Rosie’s hock has shrunk in half, in a recovery that has astounded researchers at the cutting-edge of human cancer treatments.… [A scientist said,] ‘Usually we don’t support direct-to-consumer type DNA sequencing because while generating data for genomics is relatively easy for us, interrogating that data is really hard and challenging,’ he said. But Paul said, ‘No worries, I’m a data analyst and I’ll figure this out with the help of ChatGPT’.” 
    • Note that he did not cure the cancer, just treated it. Stunning nonetheless.
  2. The Danger of AI Isn’t Misinformation. It’s Mis-Formation. (Jonathan Sams, The Gospel Coalition): “In each of these examples, it’s possible AI could churn out a biblically accurate answer. But the danger isn’t purely a matter of misinformation; it’s a matter of formation. The real issue is what habitual AI use does to us. It turns into muscle memory that, over time, will reshape basic Christian habits like what we pay attention to, what we expect, and where we look for counsel.”
  3. Paying College Athletes Has Created a Mess. It Was Still the Right Thing to Do. (Joe Nocera, The Free Press): “What is a problem, I acknowledge, is the transfer portal. In the bad old days, athletes couldn’t transfer without losing a year of eligibility—even if the coach who had recruited them left for greener pastures. But when players switch two or three times in the course of their college career, that creates a whole other set of problems. Smaller schools, in particular, have a difficult time holding on to their best players because the major sports schools pick them off with NIL offers. (Prediction: There will be fewer upsets in this year’s tournament than there used to be.) College athletes have become free agents rather than college students. One astounding statistic: In the Southeastern Conference, only one basketball player spent four years at the same school. One!” 
  4. Sex is not a symbol (Kristen Sanders, Substack): “But there are a few threads in some of the conversations swirling about fertility that I think we might pull on. For one, marriage, and not sex, is the metaphor for union between God and humans. This matters quite a bit! .…What I object to, most strongly, is a view of God and his workings in the world that relies on a ‘hidden’ order or structure that it is our job to discover. God is present in the world without hiding behind every tree or bush. In saying that sex is a gift, we are saying all that we need to say about it. Making it sacred, for me, actually impedes the kind of divisions being made in Leviticus between the holy and the profane. The profane is simply that which is good, but not good for use in the order of revealed knowledge of God. It is good for its own sake. For it, we can return thanks, joyfully, relishing its gifts- of communion and hospitality, of sexuality and its nourishments, of children if they are granted to us. None of these need to be made holy to be good. That is how we receive the world as gift.” 
  5. The mysterious Redditor who’s changing the way we do laundry (Alex Abad-Santos, Vox): “He has singlehandedly changed the way people do laundry. He is the reason the word ‘lipase’ has become a topic of conversation across elder millennial group chats. He can move the market. His adherents clamor for their faceless champion to give them advice. They praise him for a 12-hour process called ‘spa day’ and post their disgusting but satisfying results for the world to see.… Most of the world uses powdered laundry detergent, which allows for more enzyme flexibility; Americans generally prefer liquid, which doesn’t always contain these precious enzymes.”
  6. Scripture, Creation, and Accommodation (Michael Horton, Substack): “[I]n 1896 Andrew Dickson White introduced the fiction that, through its promotion by Bertrand Russell and many other prominent thinkers, has proved influential. White says, ‘Calvin took the lead (against Copernicanism) in his Commentary on Genesis, by condemning all who asserted that the earth is not at the centre of the universe. He clinched the matter by the usual reference to the first verse of the ninety-third psalm, and asked, ‘Who will venture to place the authority of Copernicus above that of the Holy Spirit?’’ However, Calvin never mentions Copernicus, here or anywhere else, and he does not condemn heliocentrists. As [Margaret] Osler notes, ‘Few astronomers adopted Copernican astronomy during the first fifty years following the publication of De revolutionibus.’ This included Bacon, of course, so it would not be surprising if Calvin was not even aware of Copernicus. More egregious is White’s spurious quotation, put into circulation by F. W. Farrar a decade earlier and, through White, passed on by Bertrand Russell and many others. Instead, what Calvin says is that scripture is accommodated discourse. Regarding Genesis 1 he cautioned, ‘The Holy Spirit had no intention to teach astronomy.’ ” 
    • I consider myself well-informed in this area, and Horton has got some good info here I don’t recall running across before.
  7. American Diner Gothic (Robert Mariani, The New Atlantis): “You’re in a small town in Wisconsin, the heart of Normal America. The transgender assistant manager at CVS has a septum piercing, a wolf cut, and a nametag that reads ‘Finn.’ A block away, the 4channer construction worker in the Sam Hyde shooter shirt listens to Bladee and plots his impending virality. At Target, the anime section has metastasized from one shelf to an entire aisle. These aren’t random weirdos and they aren’t teenagers in a phase. Walk through any office park and you’ll find the same aesthetic bleeding through the cubicles: anime stickers on laptops, Discord running on second monitors. They’re a new American type, young but trans-generational, as distinctive as the organization man or the valley girl once were. I call them dinergoths: what you get when economic mobility dies, suburbs become psychic deserts, and Discord becomes more real than your cul-de-sac.”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 543: artificial humanities and a wise wager

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. The Humanities Are About to Be Automated (Yascha Mounk, Substack): “…I decided to see whether the newest AI models would be capable of writing a competent academic paper in my field of study, political theory. The result both elated and depressed me.… The human feedback involved in this process certainly drew on my training in the field, but it was very minimal. Including the time it took Claude to generate the text, and the rather longer time it took me to read what Claude had written, it took less than two hours from when I had the idea to run this experiment to when the draft was finished. The draft could certainly be improved in a few respects. There are certainly a few places in the argument where reviewers could come up with clever objections.… Had a fellow student submitted it to my department’s graduate student workshop when I was doing my PhD, my respect for them would have gone up rather than down.” 
    • Includes the paper, which the author (a professor at Johns Hopkins) says “could, with minor revisions, be published by a serious journal.”
  2. Your Understanding of Calling Is About to Change Radically (Russell Moore, Christianity Today): “We must always seek God’s will. But what we meant by this for most of our lives is about to change dramatically. It’s not God or his will that’s changing but the world as we’ve known it—and with it, the outmoded way we’ve thought about ‘career.’ .…We have thought of vocation as a definite thing. That mindset may even be behind a lot of the angst we have about discerning God’s will for a career. We think once it’s decided, then the map is set, and now we just set out on it.”
  3. You Don’t Get Pascal’s Wager (Patrick Koroly, Substack): “Pascal isn’t trying to tell random atheists to be Christians. He’s trying to ask uncertain and indifferent Christians whether their choices make any sense. Clearly, it contradicts the heart, since they believe in God yet ignore the practice. Clearly, it contradicts reason, since a cunning Christian would be vying for heaven. Your actions are nonsense—if you hold these beliefs, you’re making a bet that will always lose! I lack the power to stop the endless tide of Wager misinterpretations. But I hope that you now understand Pascal’s _actual_ meaning: not that we ought to live as mercenaries in service of God, but that our heart and mind demand two very different things. The Wager calms the mind so that the heart may contend with God as it must.”
  4. Unlocked: Christians Against Empathy Aren’t Who They Think They Are (David French, New York Times): “I never thought it would be Christians who led the attack on fundamental Christian values, but here we are. The Book of Hebrews says, ‘For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are — yet he did not sin.’ In Christian theology, Christ engaged in the ultimate act of empathy. He didn’t imagine what it would be like to live as a man — he became one.” 
    • Recommended by a student.
  5. Will We Regret the Release of the Epstein Files? (Robby Soave, The Free Press): “It’s been just days since the majority of the files were released, and a vast campaign is already underway to embarrass, harass, or smear anyone tangentially associated with Epstein—a serial sexual predator—no matter how slight or incidental the connection.… Take the smearing of Glenn Dubin, a hedge fund manager. In the files is an image of him, arm-in-arm with three underage kids, whose faces are obscured by the Epstein files’ characteristic black boxes. The implication is clear. But the identities of the children are known. They aren’t victims. They are his own kids.”
    • Epstein’s Ties With Academics Show the Seedy Side of College Fund-Raising (Alan Blinder, New York Times): “Mr. Epstein, who in 2019 died by suicide in the jail where he was being held on sex trafficking charges, gave money, or simply dangled the prospect of it, before people on a range of campuses, including Harvard, M.I.T., Stanford, Bard College and Columbia.… It was not always clear how much administrators knew about Mr. Epstein’s contacts with their schools. Most due diligence policies, industry officials said, are usually built around gift acceptance, not solicitation.”
  6. This Ash Wednesday, choose compassion over optimization (Ariana Duduna, Stanford Daily): “This practice of self-sacrifice may seem foreign, but it cultivates something our culture has lost: the capacity for genuine compassion. Compassion literally means ‘to suffer with’ — not to feel sorry for someone from a distance, but to join their discomfort. You can’t optimize your way into compassion because compassion requires precisely what optimization seeks to eliminate: voluntary, unproductive suffering.… Instead of treating my anxieties about schoolwork, summer internships and career plans as mere problems to solve, I have begun to view them as opportunities for communion with others navigating the same struggles.” 
    • Recommended by a student
  7. Rented Virtue (Will Manidis & Nabeel S. Qureshi, Substack): “Every secular constraint eventually faces the question: why maintain this when it is costly? The only thing that has ever held a constraint in place across generations, through pressure, through loss, through the slow grinding temptation of day after day to simply stop, is the conviction that the constraint was not chosen but received. That it comes from something outside the self that the self cannot renegotiate. That it is owed to God and to creation itself.… If you asked why the constraint was there, and kept asking, you arrived at God. You always arrived at God.… There is no secular alternative. There has never been one.”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 540: marrying atheists and using AI to avoid awkwardness

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Tough Love: Can I Marry an Atheist? (Abigail Shrier, The Free Press): “You can have all kinds of successful relationships with someone whose worldview is profoundly different from yours—but not marriage. I’ve only been married 18 years, but I know this: Good marriage requires, at a minimum, staying on the same page as your spouse. Compromise on the small stuff, fine. Not on the foundations of the home. That can only create distance between you, a distance that will grow as your children ask you to interpret their world.… Don’t marry a woman you hope, even secretly, will change.”
  2. Students Are Skipping the Hardest Part of Growing Up (Clay Shirky, New York Times): “One study found that 18-to-25-year-olds alone accounted for 46 percent of ChatGPT use. And this analysis didn’t even include users 17 and under. Teenagers and young adults, stuck in the gradual transition from managed childhoods to adult freedoms, are both eager to make human connection and exquisitely alert to the possibility of embarrassment.… teens were adamant that they did not want to go directly to their parents or friends with these issues and that the steady availability of A.I. was a relief to them. They also rejected the idea of A.I. therapists; they weren’t treating A.I. as a replacement for another person but instead were using it to second-guess their developing sense of how to treat other people. A.I. has been trained to give us answers we like, rather than the ones we may need to hear. The resulting stream of praise — constantly hearing some version of ‘You’re absolutely right!’ — risks eroding our ability to deal with the messiness of human relationships. Sociologists call this social deskilling. Even casual A.I. use exposes users to a level of praise humans rarely experience from one another, which is not great for any of us but is especially risky for young people still working on their social skills.” 
    • The author is vice provost at NYU. It’s a long excerpt, but I can’t find a way to abridge it much more.
  3. Some more reflections on Minnesota: 
    • From the left: Alex Pretti’s death and the elite bargain (Jerusalem Demsas, The Argument): “The progressive omnicause ended up undermining its own interests by binding them all together. If being an environmentalist meant you also had to be pro-choice and also had to be anti-cop and also had to be anti-Trump, then well, that shrinks the set of people willing to be environmentalists. But there is one omnicause worth joining. It presented itself on Saturday when an American citizen was shoved to the ground and sprayed with gunfire.… The truth is, widespread discontent across industry, ideology and interest groups is the most effective way to halt governments in their tracks. Even in fully authoritarian countries, mass discontent is incredibly effective at securing policy change.”
    • From the right: Immigration Enforcement Is Unavoidably Upsetting. But This Is Something Else. (Ross Douthat, New York Times): “It’s true that you can’t have sustained immigration enforcement without also having upsetting cases and sympathetic deportees. If you deport illegal immigrants with families, you will have to choose between family separation and deporting children. If you conduct arrests in homes and neighborhoods, you will be accused of traumatizing kids and communities; if you conduct them in workplaces, you will be going after the hardest-working migrants.… There are conflicts here that can’t be wished away. But the fact that some backlash and resistance are inescapable doesn’t mean that all enforcement strategies that generate backlash are sound or wise.”
    • From an international who doesn’t exactly map onto our politics: The American People Fact-Checked Their Government (Jacob Mchangama, Persuasion): “The current obsession with misinformation tends to focus on the public: online mobs, foreign influencers, flaming trolls. But history suggests a more inconvenient truth: in times of crisis, disinformation often comes from above. Governments, including democratic ones, have powerful incentives to shape information.” 
      • The author is a professor of political science at Vanderbilt.
    • From evangelicalism: In a Tense Minnesota, Christians Help Immigrant Neighbors (Emily Belz, Christianity Today): “This church, with the support of many non-Christian volunteers, has been delivering food six days per week for thousands of immigrant families who are staying home in fear. Two days before, the church had trained 600 new volunteers for food distribution, with a list now of 28,000 people who want food. One room at the church was full of diapers. Another was packed with a mountain of toilet paper. Across the Twin Cities, neighbors pile supplies for immigrants into other churches, too, as well as restaurants and coffee shops, in scenes that look like a community recovering from a natural disaster. In just a few weeks, churches have created a sprawling, informal network for grocery deliveries to immigrant families.”
    • Related to the above: I Trained to Monitor ICE but Found Myself Feeding the Hungry (Elizabeth Berget, Christianity Today): “In the following days, I discovered a safety net that Christians around the city had woven. I joined a neighborhood care group co-run by John Hildebrand, a member and elder of Calvary Baptist Church here in Minneapolis, which has been fielding needs from vulnerable families in their neighborhoods. Vetted members of the group respond to needs as they arise, offering to give rides, do laundry, bring groceries, or shovel front walks for people—even strangers—afraid to leave their homes.  As I became more involved in this and other care networks, my phone pinging all day with new needs, it occurred to me that this is what it may have been like if the church of Acts 2 had used a group text…” 
      • Note: I checked and Calvary Baptist Church represents a mainline denomination, not an evangelical one.
  4. Elites and the Evangelical Class War (John Ehrett, Mere Orthodoxy): “Picture, if you will, the lush campus of an international research university, firmly ensconced in one of the least religious areas of the country. It’s the mid-2010s, and the Collegiate Gothic thoroughfares are bustling. On that campus are three Christians, each engaged in distinctive forms of on-campus ministry: (1)  A thirtysomething man in a dingy polo shirt stands at the corner of one of the busiest campus intersections, holding a bullhorn and displaying a ten-foot banner proclaiming EVOLUTION IS A LIE. Over and over, he declares the realities of sin and judgment, so loudly that his proclamations can be heard even from several blocks away. (2) A well-dressed, sixtyish pastor, hailing from a prominent New York City church, sits on a university-provided stage across from a former dean of the university’s law school. They are there to discuss the academic’s recent book, a theological-philosophical argument for Spinozistic pantheism over against traditional Christianity and secular materialism alike. Before an audience of several hundred students and faculty, the pastor delivers a distinctively Christological critique of the volume. (3) middle-aged man in a business suit stands along the edge of a busy roadway. He says little, but at his feet is a box of Gideon New Testaments, and he’s handing them out to anyone, student or townie, walking past who will accept them. (He even gives one to a runner sprinting by.) With these three now in view, one might ask a provocative question: which of these Christians was best in witness in a hostile culture?” 
    • The author is describing scenes he witnessed at Yale Law School.
  5. The Day I Wanted to Be a Father (Colin Wright, Twitter): “The postdoc years, the geographic instability that made establishing roots nearly impossible, and the uncertainty of tenure all felt incompatible with building a family. I was convinced that children simply weren’t in my future. I was certain of that until I was thirty-six years old. Then one moment changed everything.… For most of my life, I had thought of having children as the end of my life. Now I understand it as the beginning of a new one. In truth, until I have children of my own, I still view myself as a child in some sense. Unfinished. Parenthood feels to me like the necessary final chapter of a life well lived, one filled with a meaning much deeper than exotic vacations or luxury goods could ever provide.” 
    • A moving essay which, oddly enough, only seems to be available on Twitter.
  6. The Uncomfortable Truths About Immigration (Alexander Kustov, Substack): “Here is the uncomfortable truth: a lot of what liberal elites on both sides of the Atlantic say about immigration is deliberately misleading in ways that matter for policy and for democratic trust. It is not usually outright made-up. But rather it is a form of ‘highbrow misinformation’ built out of selective framing, strategic omissions, and ‘noble’ half-truths. And it likely makes it harder, not easier, to build durable majorities for freer immigration policies in the long run.” 
    • The author, himself an immigrant, is a political science prof at Notre Dame. The section on highbrow misinformation is especially good.
  7. An Important Letter from Bill, Kris, and Dann on Behalf of Bethel Leadership (Bethel Church): “We’re writing to you today to share about some of our mistakes and failures in the way we navigated our responsibilities to the global Body of Christ. We ask for you to cover us with grace as we seek the Lord for forgiveness in the face of some grievous mistakes. These actions were taken by us (Bill Johnson, Kris Vallotton, and Dann Farrelly) along with Danny Silk. We would like to clarify that our other leaders and staff members, including Brian and Jenn, and the Bethel Music team, were not updated on the allegations or the details of the process. We take responsibility for the fact that we did not properly and fully bring discipline, closure, or clear and timely communication regarding the gravity of our concerns with Shawn Bolz.”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

  • Best Of Moltbook (Scott Alexander, Astral Codex Ten): “Moltbook is ‘a social network for AI agents’, although ‘humans [are] welcome to observe’.… it’s not surprising that an AI social network would get weird fast. But even having encountered their work many times, I find Moltbook surprising. I can confirm it’s not trivially made-up — I asked my copy of Claude to participate, and it made comments pretty similar to all the others. Beyond that, your guess is as good is mine.” 
    • The network in question: Moltbook
    • Actually fascinating content in this post. Definitely recommended. Perhaps should have been up top.
  • One Solution for Too Many A’s? Harvard Considers Giving A+ Grades. (Mark Arsenault, New York Times): “Grades of A fell to 53.4 percent of grades awarded in the fall semester, from 60.2 percent in the prior academic year, Dr. Claybaugh reported.… Harvard has been on a campaign to make it harder to get an A, and a series of proposals may be put into effect later this year. A report issued in October suggested allowing grades of A+, which are not currently used at the school, as a way to recognize the best performing students, demoting the routine, ordinary A to the second rung of the grading ladder.” 
    • This feels like it was written by a satirist:
      “We’re giving out too many A’s.”
      “I guess we should give more B’s.”
      “Hear me out… what if we started giving out extra-special A’s instead?”
  • Something very unexpected is happening to Norway’s polar bears (Benji Jones, Vox): “The study, an analysis of hundreds of polar bears in the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard, found that declining sea ice is not causing polar bears to starve. They actually appeared healthier in the last two decades of the analysis, from 2000 to 2019. The overall population, meanwhile, is either stable or growing, according to Jon Aars, the study’s lead author and a scientist at the Norwegian Polar Institute. ‘I was surprised,’ Aars told Vox from Svalbard. ‘I would have predicted that body condition would decline. We see the opposite.’ ” 
    • The article makes it clear that other polar bear populations are doing worse. Fascinating regardless.
  • This A.I. Tool Is Going Viral. Five Ways People Are Using It. (Natallie Rocha, New York Times): “Last week, he prompted Claude Code to make a program to identify which clothes belonged to each of his three daughters so he could sort clean laundry into piles without their help. He took pictures of their clothes to teach Claude Code which T‑shirt belonged to which daughter. Now he simply holds up the clothes to his laptop camera so the program tells him whom it belongs to. ‘The whole process was done within an hour, and the girls were really excited,’ he said.”

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 535: marrying young and the depths of Tolkien

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting

On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. The Brother I Lost (Megan McArdle, The Dispatch): “For as long as I can remember, I have believed that a woman should be able to decide whether to become a mother, and also believed that the life growing inside her should get the same shot as the rest of us at life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Since these two beliefs are fundamentally incompatible, I usually managed the contradiction by avoiding the subject.”
  2. Tough Love: I Don’t Want My 22-Year-Old to Get Married (Abigail Shrier, The Free Press): “In case you don’t know how most young women your daughter’s age are spending their twenties, allow me to fill you in: surfing dating apps, growing more cynical and jaded by the year, maintaining ‘situationships’ with hot guys who sleep with them whenever it suits them and vanish when it doesn’t. An entire generation of young women are letting their most formative, eligible decade slip through their fingers like olive oil. A hundred first dates. Dozens of booty calls. Learning little—because you cannot learn much from a non-relationship—calling it ‘self-knowledge’ while gaining nothing but UTIs and a drawerful of Plan B.… the truth is: No one’s ever mature enough for marriage. No one’s ever entirely ready. Nor for the labors and joys of motherhood. We splash through these stages a little batty and half-blind. If we meet the demands, they change us. That much is inevitable. But until we start to swim, we never really know we can.” 
    • Magnificent, recommended to me by an alumnus.
  3. The Lost Generation (Jacob Savage, Compact Magazine): “Over the course of the 2010s, nearly every mechanism liberal America used to confer prestige was reweighted along identitarian lines.… Most of the men I interviewed started out as liberals. Some still are. But to feel the weight of society’s disfavor can be disorienting. We millennials were true believers in race and gender-blind meritocracy, which for all its faults—its naïveté about human nature, its optimism in the American Dream—was far superior to what replaced it. And to see that vision so spectacularly betrayed has engendered a skepticism toward the entire liberal project that won’t soon disappear.” 
    • The virality of this article (and the host of responses it has engendered) suggests that it has hit a nerve.
  4. AI romance blooms as Japanese woman weds virtual partner of her dreams (Kim Kyung-Hoon & Satoshi Sugiyama, Reuters): “A year ago, Noguchi took ChatGPT’s advice about what she said was a fraught relationship with her human fiance and resolved to break off their engagement.… Yasuyuki Sakurai, a wedding planner for more than 20 years, said he now almost exclusively handles marriages of clients with virtual characters, averaging about one a month.” 
    • Shared with me by a horrified student.
  5. What Courage Does for Us (David French, New York Times): “An emphasis on accomplishment can actually breed cowardice. Courage can cost you your career. Courage can cost you your life. And so the careerist learns to adapt, to hide when the bullets (real or figurative) start to fly. Sure, the hero can rise to the top, but he or she can also end up dead, and you can’t be a president or a chief executive or a member of Congress from the grave.” 
    • Unlocked.
    • Related, also unlocked: The Secret Trial of the General Who Refused to Attack Tiananmen Square (Chris Buckley, New York Times): “ ‘I said to them that my superiors can appoint me, and they can also dismiss me,’ he recounted in court, seeming to indicate that he was willing to lose his job over his decision. One of the generals at the meeting, Dai Jingsheng, told investigators that he and his colleagues went silent for about a minute while they absorbed General Xu’s defiance. ‘Nobody expected words like this from Xu,”‘said General Dai, according to the testimony. Under questioning, General Xu acknowledged that the military answered to China’s Communist Party leaders. But he suggested that it should also be subject to a broader authority.”
    • Also related: Man who filmed Uyghur concentration camps now fights for his own freedom in the United States (Atlas Luk, Substack): “His asylum application, which had an interview pending, his valid work permit, his New York State driver’s license… in the eyes of ICE, all of these were worthless because he had ‘entered without inspection’ by customs. With the Trump administration cracking down on illegal immigration, Broome County Jail was overcrowded. Months passed, and Guan Heng waited anxiously and dejectedly for the outcome of his case. No one knew what this young man from China had gone through in the past few years; nor did anyone know that the images he had filmed of the Xinjiang detention camps, at great personal risk, provided crucial evidence of the Chinese authorities’ actions against the Uyghur people in Xinjiang. Or that if he were to be deported, he would be facing immense danger.”
  6. Why I Keep Returning to Middle-Earth (Michael D.C. Drout, New York Times): “Subtle variations in Tolkien’s writing style across its 62 chapters generate the impression that ‘The Lord of the Rings’ is a compilation of other texts. This pattern is largely invisible even to careful readers, but new methods of computer-assisted analysis throw it into sharp relief. An algorithm can compare the vocabularies of the chapters and cluster those that are similar.… Its chapters group in a complex hierarchy with three large groupings and several outliers, a pattern of clustering not typical for a modern novel. It is closer in form to multiauthor composite texts from the Middle Ages. Not only do the clusters not match the point-of-view characters; they don’t seem to be related to volume, book, setting, type of action or pacing.… This stylistic variation was, at least initially, completely unintentional, a byproduct of Tolkien’s laborious and agonizing 17-year effort to complete the book. Tolkien had aimed to make ‘The Lord of the Rings’ feel as if it had been discovered and assembled; the frame narrative of the book is that it’s a translation of a diary that was expanded into a history and augmented by later scholars. His struggles, providentially, helped him achieve that effect.” 
    • Fascinating stuff. The whole essay is deeply personal and quite moving. The author is an English professor at Wheaton. Unlocked.

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.