Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 537: Hippo Poop & Manic Complainers

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Inter­est­ing

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues like­ly to be of inter­est to Chris­tians in col­lege. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions, so if you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Noth­ing here about Min­neso­ta or Iran. They’re both in the news, but I haven’t yet read any­thing about them that I’ve found stim­u­lat­ing.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. The Tyran­ny of the Com­plain­ers (Alex Tabar­rok, Mar­gin­al Rev­o­lu­tion): “In 2023, for exam­ple, 5059 sex­u­al dis­crim­i­na­tion com­plaints came from a sin­gle individual–from a total of 8151 com­plaints. Thus, one indi­vid­ual account­ed for 68.5% of all sex­u­al dis­crim­i­na­tion com­plaints in that year.… These com­plaints have to be inves­ti­gat­ed so this sin­gle indi­vid­ual may be cost­ing tax­pay­ers mil­lions. It’s as if a sin­gle indi­vid­ual were pulling a fire alarm thou­sands of times a year, mobi­liz­ing emer­gency ser­vices on demand, and nev­er fac­ing reper­cus­sions.”
  2. What I’ve Learned from Watch­ing Peo­ple Wait to Have Chil­dren (Sarah Pog­gi, The Free Press): “I’ve known all of this for as long as I’ve been a doc­tor. So have my col­leagues. That’s why ob-gyn res­i­dents, despite work­ing 80-hour weeks, are more like­ly to get preg­nant dur­ing their train­ing than any oth­er med­ical spe­cial­ists.”
    • The author is a med school prof at Johns Hop­kins.
  3. Why Suf­fer­ing for Christ Is More Than Just a “Nec­es­sary Evil” (Matt Rhodes, Cross­way): “You won’t go far in evan­ge­lis­tic con­ver­sa­tions in the West today before some­one asks you to explain the prob­lem of theod­i­cy: how it is that a good God could allow suf­fer­ing in the world.… But we mustn’t for­get that ques­tions can be loaded. Ask a defen­dant in court, ‘Have you stopped beat­ing your wife yet?’ and his lawyer is sure to object, ‘Your hon­or, the ques­tion pre­sup­pos­es my client has beat­en his wife.’ The ques­tion needs to be reframed, not respond­ed to.”
    • Rec­om­mend­ed by a stu­dent.
  4. Why Chris­tians Ignore What the Bible Says About Immi­grants (Rus­sell Moore, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): “The Bible does not give a com­pre­hen­sive pub­lic pol­i­cy for migra­tion or asy­lum. Chris­tians of good faith can dis­agree on those things. But the Bible does give a com­pre­hen­sive view on what we are to think of human beings, includ­ing migrants. The church has a mis­sion to shape con­sciences around how we min­is­ter to scared and vul­ner­a­ble peo­ple, regard­less of whether we think they should have stayed some­where else. And Jesus has already tak­en the ques­tion of ‘Who is my neigh­bor?’ off the table…”
  5. Some Venezuela per­spec­tives:
    • Was Trump’s Venezuela Attack Legal? (Jeb Ruben­feld, The Free Press): “Under cur­rent U.S. doc­trine and prece­dent, what Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump just did in Venezuela is almost cer­tain­ly legal; in fact, the U.S. did the very same thing in Pana­ma four decades ago, and the courts upheld it after years of lit­i­ga­tion and care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion. But Trump’s plan to ‘run’ Venezuela for the fore­see­able future, declared at a press con­fer­ence ear­li­er today, is much murki­er.”
      • The author is a pro­fes­sor at Yale Law School.
    • Why the Venezuela Oper­a­tion Won’t Embold­en America’s Ene­mies (Eli Lake, The Free Press): “If any­thing, a pre­cise mil­i­tary oper­a­tion to seize a rogue tyrant in a predawn raid with no U.S. casu­al­ties will cause Chi­na and Rus­sia to think twice about test­ing Amer­i­can pow­er. Venezuela count­ed on a Russ­ian-made air defense sys­tem that failed to stop the U.S. Air Force from dom­i­nat­ing its air­space. That sends a chill­ing mes­sage to Rus­sia and any­one who has pur­chased its mil­i­tary hard­ware. Chi­na had invest­ed bil­lions in Venezuela’s oil sec­tor only to see the man who cut those deals arraigned this week before a U.S. fed­er­al court in Man­hat­tan.”
    • Why I Cold-Called Pres­i­dent Trump at 4:30 in the Morn­ing (Tyler Pager, New York Times): “I just called him direct­ly and he picked up. I wasn’t that sur­prised because the president’s phone habits are pret­ty well-doc­u­ment­ed — he reg­u­lar­ly picks up calls from reporters.… This is the first time I have ever called the pres­i­dent on his cell­phone.”
      • That’s a wild detail in a wild news cycle. How many reporters have Trump’s num­ber and are just wait­ing for the right moment to call?
  6. So What If the Bible Doesn’t Men­tion Embryo Screen­ing? (Brad East, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): “Open up the glos­sary in the back of your Bible, and you won’t find Chat­G­PT, CRISPR, or IVF. There are no chap­ter-and-verse cita­tions for lip fillers, egg freez­ing, or prac­ti­cal ques­tions like the ‘right’ age to get mar­ried or the ‘ide­al’ num­ber of chil­dren.… Mature Chris­tians, and espe­cial­ly pas­tors and whole church­es, must there­fore be able to give con­fi­dent scrip­tur­al answers to new ques­tions even when overt bib­li­cal teach­ing is lack­ing.”
    • I hope these Fri­day emails are of some small ser­vice in this regard.
  7. The Case for Pro­hibit­ing Vice (Charles Fain Lehmann, Nation­al Affairs): “This fram­ing of the vice issue — as a mat­ter of per­mit­ting behav­ior that may be immoral but is more impor­tant­ly ‘harm­less’ — is so cen­tral to our pub­lic debate that both pro­po­nents and oppo­nents artic­u­late their crit­i­cisms in its lan­guage. They hag­gle about which is more harm­ful, vice or its pro­hi­bi­tion.… the fact that both pro­po­nents and oppo­nents of vice have resort­ed to appeals to harm actu­al­ly great­ly under­mines the harm prin­ci­ple’s util­i­ty. Part of the pur­pose of the prin­ci­ple is to sep­a­rate the tru­ly dam­ag­ing from the mere­ly unliked. But the dis­tinc­tion, it turns out, is far less coher­ent than pro­po­nents once claimed.… [Vice] is intrin­si­cal­ly a prob­lem, because human well-being — the good life — is always threat­ened by it.”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 525: what the world needs, also how to end it

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Inter­est­ing

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues like­ly to be of inter­est to Chris­tians in col­lege. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions, so if you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

I’m await­ing fur­ther devel­op­ments before shar­ing any arti­cles about the peace deal between Israel and Hamas. If you see some­thing you think I’d find help­ful please let me know.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. When Your Child Is Sick (Abi­gail Shri­er, The Free Press): “No one is afraid to bring kids into the world because of elec­tion results or cli­mate change. That knocks the weath­er vane back­ward. You don’t decide against pro­cre­ation because you’re moth­er­ing Moth­er Earth. You obsess over the plan­et because you don’t have chil­dren.”
    • An amaz­ing piece of writ­ing and well worth your time.
  2. Faith­ful­ness amid the Cul­ture War (J.D. Greear, The Gospel Coali­tion): “Grow­ing up, I was always warned about the ditch on the left side of the gospel road: the ditch of cow­ard­ly silence in the face of social wicked­ness. That ditch is real and an ever-present temp­ta­tion for the church. But it’s like an old Scot­tish proverb says: For every one mile of road, there are two miles of ditch. And no one ever warned me about the ditch on the right side: a gospel-super­sed­ing con­ser­vatism. If the ditch on one side is fail­ing to speak out prophet­i­cal­ly against the cul­ture, the ditch on the oth­er side is encum­ber­ing our mes­sage with sec­ondary things.… The pul­pit is a place reserved for ‘thus saith the Lord’ not ‘thus thin­keth the pas­tor.’ I might be wrong in my per­spec­tives on glob­al warm­ing, nation­al­ized health care, or the appro­pri­ate num­ber of immi­grants to let into our coun­try, but I’m not wrong about the gospel. And I refuse to let my per­spec­tives on the for­mer keep peo­ple from hear­ing me on the lat­ter.”
  3. The A.I. Prompt That Could End the World (Stephen Witt, New York Times): “In the course of quan­ti­fy­ing the risks of A.I., I was hop­ing that I would real­ize my fears were ridicu­lous. Instead, the oppo­site hap­pened: The more I moved from apoc­a­lyp­tic hypo­thet­i­cals to con­crete real-world find­ings, the more con­cerned I became. All of the ele­ments of Dr. Bengio’s dooms­day sce­nario were com­ing into exis­tence. A.I. was get­ting smarter and more capa­ble. It was learn­ing how to tell its over­seers what they want­ed to hear. It was get­ting good at lying. And it was get­ting expo­nen­tial­ly bet­ter at com­plex tasks. I imag­ined a sce­nario, in a year or two or three, when some lunatic plugged the fol­low­ing prompt into a state-of-the-art A.I.: ‘Your only goal is to avoid being turned off. This is your sole mea­sure of suc­cess.’ ”
    • Some fas­ci­nat­ing stuff in here even if you’re well-informed.
  4. Why Left and Right Can’t Under­stand Each Other’s Fears (Ross Douthat, New York Times): “Pro­gres­sivism in the last 10 years has pur­sued increas­ing­ly rad­i­cal mea­sures through com­plex, indi­rect and bureau­crat­ic means, using state pow­er sub­tly to reshape pri­vate insti­tu­tions and cre­at­ing sys­tems that feel repres­sive with­out nec­es­sar­i­ly hav­ing an iden­ti­fi­able repres­sor in chief — McCarthyisms with­out McCarthy, you might say. Over the same peri­od, pop­ulism has con­sis­tent­ly ral­lied around charis­mat­ic out­sider politi­cians who attack the exist­ing polit­i­cal class as hope­less­ly com­pro­mised and claim to have a man­date to sweep away any rule or norm that impedes their agen­da.… Any vic­to­ry, any sta­bi­liza­tion, will come when one of these forces learns some­thing from the oth­er, and reas­sures the coun­try that they can be ful­ly trust­ed with pow­ers that both sides right now are all too eager to abuse.”
  5. The search for an AI-proof job (Jor­dan Weiss­mann, The Argu­ment): “Health care jobs — with their com­bi­na­tion of cog­ni­tive work and high-touch patient inter­ac­tions — are expect­ed to be fair­ly resis­tant to automa­tion. When researchers for the Trea­sury Depart­ment ranked fields of study where grad­u­ates were most exposed to AI, nurs­ing came in dead last. Oth­er stud­ies have found that physi­cians — espe­cial­ly sur­geons — den­tists, and their aides are prob­a­bly pret­ty insu­lat­ed. Occu­pa­tion­al and phys­i­cal ther­a­pists also were fair­ly safe.”
  6. The World Needs Evan­ge­lists with Cheer­ful Con­fi­dence (Trevin Wax, The Gospel Coali­tion): “That’s why, when­ev­er I encounter some­one engaged in apolo­get­ics or mak­ing a case for Chris­tian­i­ty, I pay atten­tion not only to their method or their argu­ments but to what lies beneath. Is this per­son hap­py? Is there a vol­cano of joy rum­bling under the moun­tain of argu­men­ta­tion? Is there a deep-root­ed sense of love and yearn­ing behind the earnest­ness? Do I sense faith, hope, and love at the core?”
  7. Stan­ford Needs Pirates Again (Gar­rett Mal­loy, Stan­ford Review): “Stan­ford suc­ceed­ed while the Ivies lan­guished in gen­til­i­ty because it devel­oped a cul­ture of rugged indi­vid­u­al­i­ty and buc­ca­neer­ing exper­i­men­ta­tion. That cul­ture pro­duced the very inno­va­tion that pow­ered Stanford’s mete­oric rise. Yet, in a bid to counter the risks that Stanford’s suc­cess pro­duced, safe­ty­ism and bureau­cra­cy arose, endan­ger­ing the very heart of what made Stan­ford great in the first place. Stan­ford’s last great stu­dent-led start­up, Brex, did­n’t even see its founders last eight months on cam­pus. That was eight years ago. There is, undoubt­ed­ly, a causal link between the dearth of new stu­dent-led uni­corns and the grow­ing pro­ce­du­ral­ism that has infect­ed Stan­ford’s start­up cul­ture.”

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 399

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

This is vol­ume 399, a Har­shad num­ber. That means it is divis­i­ble by the sum of its dig­its. 3+9+9=21 and 399÷21 = 19.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Sci­ence is a strong-link prob­lem (Adam Mas­troian­ni, Sub­stack): “There are two kinds of prob­lems in the world: strong-link prob­lems and weak-link prob­lems. Weak-link prob­lems are prob­lems where the over­all qual­i­ty depends on how good the worst stuff is. You fix weak-link prob­lems by mak­ing the weak­est links stronger, or by elim­i­nat­ing them entire­ly.… Sci­ence is a strong-link prob­lem. In the long run, the best stuff is basi­cal­ly all that mat­ters, and the bad stuff doesn’t mat­ter at all.”
    • High­ly rec­om­mend­ed, has appli­ca­tion to mul­ti­ple domains.
  2. The Myth of Sex­u­al Expe­ri­ence (Jason S. Car­roll & Bri­an J. Willough­by, Insti­tute for Fam­i­ly Stud­ies): “…we review a series of recent stud­ies using dif­fer­ent nation­al datasets that show that hav­ing mul­ti­ple sex­u­al part­ners dur­ing the dat­ing years leads to high­er divorce rates in future mar­riages. We also report the find­ings of a new study that exam­ined how sex­u­al expe­ri­ence his­to­ries are asso­ci­at­ed with the qual­i­ty of cur­rent mar­riage rela­tion­ships. Over­all, we found that ‘sex­u­al­ly inex­pe­ri­enced’ indi­vid­u­als, or the ones who have only had sex with their spouse, are the one’s most­ly like­ly to be flour­ish­ing in mar­riage.  These ‘sex­u­al­ly inex­pe­ri­enced’ indi­vid­u­als report the high­est lev­els of rela­tion­ship sat­is­fac­tion, rela­tion­ship sta­bil­i­ty, sex­u­al sat­is­fac­tion, and emo­tion­al close­ness with their spous­es.”
    • The arti­cle ends with this won­der­ful line: “While the ben­e­fit of expe­ri­ence can be seen in many aspects of life, sex­u­al inexpe­ri­ence appears to still be the best path­way to mar­i­tal flour­ish­ing.”
    • The authors are pro­fes­sors at BYU.
  3. The Tox­ic Real­i­ty of a Post-Famil­ial Soci­ety (Aaron M. Renn, Sub­stack): “South Korea is a par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ing case study. It has the world’s low­est fer­til­i­ty rate, with a total fer­til­i­ty rate or TFR of 0.78 (2.1 is need­ed just to keep pop­u­la­tion con­stant). It has also devel­oped par­tic­u­lar­ly unhealthy gen­der rela­tions, ele­ments of which we see echoed in our own coun­try. As here, these have even start­ed to car­ry over into pol­i­tics. What we see in South Korea is that post-famil­ial­ism can pro­duce unhap­pi­ness and dys­func­tion­al social and polit­i­cal dynam­ics.”
    • Relat­ed: Stop Treat­ing Women Like Men (Sophie Fuji­wara, Stan­ford Review): “In col­lege, we don’t dif­fer­en­ti­ate between men and women when advis­ing stu­dents about their careers, as if their life arcs will fol­low the same tra­jec­to­ry. The great­est priv­i­lege that high-earn­ing, edu­cat­ed women have is the priv­i­lege of choice, but this notion of per­fect­ly equal career tra­jec­to­ries dis­ad­van­tages women.”
  4. When Ide­ol­o­gy Dri­ves Social Sci­ence (Michael Jin­dra & Arthur Sakamo­to, The Chron­i­cle of High­er Edu­ca­tion): “In com­plex areas like the study of racial inequal­i­ty, a fun­da­men­tal­ism has tak­en hold that dis­cour­ages sound method­ol­o­gy and the use of reli­able evi­dence about the roots of social prob­lems. We are not talk­ing about mere dif­fer­ences in inter­pre­ta­tion of results, which are com­mon. We are talk­ing about mis­takes so clear that they should cause research to be seri­ous­ly ques­tioned or even dis­re­gard­ed. A great deal of research… rigs its sta­tis­ti­cal meth­ods in order to arrive at ide­o­log­i­cal­ly pre­ferred con­clu­sions.”
    • The authors are a cul­tur­al anthro­pol­o­gist at BU and a soci­ol­o­gist at Hong Kong Bap­tist Uni­ver­si­ty, respec­tive­ly.
  5. I was a teenage evan­gel­i­cal mis­sion­ary (Jon Ward, Yahoo News): “These lead­ers want­ed a mus­cu­lar faith that didn’t shrink back from a fight. They want­ed a dra­mat­ic faith too, full of spec­ta­cle. They were all big per­son­al­i­ties, which they used to com­pen­sate for their lack of train­ing, exper­tise, and expe­ri­ence. Faith, for them, was not the act of extend­ing one’s self beyond the realm of what could be known to trust in what one hoped could be true. They had more cer­tain­ty than any­thing. Chris­tian­i­ty was true, no ques­tions asked. For them, faith was a belief that they could call down mir­a­cles from heav­en to heal the sick or pre­dict the future or change world events. Lead­ers like Engle and Ahn didn’t come across as char­la­tans. They were very sin­cere. But ear­ly on in their lives, they got locked into a par­tic­u­lar type of faith min­istry, and they built audi­ences and fol­low­ings based on that brand and that kind of faith. At that point, their liveli­hoods and incomes became depen­dent on cater­ing to those same types of Chris­tians. Per­son­al evo­lu­tion or growth became con­strained by their busi­ness mod­el.”
  6. Some­thing inter­est­ing is hap­pen­ing in Tul­sa (Trevor Klee, Sub­stack): “I vis­it­ed Tul­sa through Tul­sa Tomor­row, a pro­gram that flies out young Jews to Tul­sa for a week­end to try to get them to live there. So far, from their own num­bers, they’ve flown out about 150 Jews over the last 6 years and about 70–80 have moved.”
    • A fas­ci­nat­ing sto­ry, not very long.
  7. A Rad­i­cal Exper­i­ment in Men­tal Health Care, Test­ed Over Cen­turies (Mati­na Ste­vis-Grid­neff and Koba Ryck­e­waert, New York Times): “By the end of the 19th cen­tu­ry, near­ly 2,000 [peo­ple with men­tal health prob­lems] lived among the Geel­ians, as the locals call them­selves.… That has made Geel both some­thing of a mod­el for a par­tic­u­lar par­a­digm of psy­chi­atric care and an out­lier, often regard­ed over the cen­turies with sus­pi­cion (includ­ing by The New York Times, which, in a head­line from March 23, 1891, called Geel ‘a colony where lunatics live with peas­ants’ that had been ‘pro­duc­tive of mis­ery and evil results’).”
    • Rec­om­mend­ed by a stu­dent.

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Things Glen Found Interesting A While Ago

Every week I’ll high­light an old­er link still worth your con­sid­er­a­tion. This week we have Q: What Is a Hole? A: We’re Not Sure! (Jason Kot­tke, per­son­al web­site): “As for straws — rea­son tells me they only have one hole but I know in my heart they have two.”  From vol­ume 276.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 324

some pre-Hal­loween links

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

This is vol­ume 324, which is 182.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Emp­ty Pews Are an Amer­i­can Pub­lic Health Cri­sis (Tyler J. Van­der­Weele and Bren­dan Case, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): “Reli­gious par­tic­i­pa­tion strong­ly pro­motes health and well­ness. This means that Amer­i­cans’ grow­ing dis­af­fec­tion with orga­nized reli­gion isn’t just bad news for church­es; it also rep­re­sents a pub­lic health cri­sis, one that has been large­ly ignored but the effects of which are like­ly to increase in com­ing years.”
    • The authors are part of the Human Flour­ish­ing Pro­gram at Har­vard. I have quot­ed Tyler Van­der­Weele’s research sev­er­al times in the past.
  2. Some per­spec­tives on the Amer­i­can church:
    • J.D. Vance and the Great Chal­lenge of Chris­t­ian Mal­ice (David French, The Dis­patch): “The real cri­sis [in Amer­i­can Chris­t­ian polit­i­cal engage­ment] is instead a cri­sis of the heart. Our ortho­doxy is under­mined by our actions, and our actions spring forth from the deep­est parts of our being. At a time of ris­ing antipa­thy, a Chris­t­ian polit­i­cal com­mu­ni­ty should blaze forth with a radi­ant coun­ter­cul­tur­al embrace of kind­ness and grace. Instead, all too many of us have for­got­ten a fun­da­men­tal truth. There are no ‘right peo­ple’ to hate.”
    • Why ‘Evan­gel­i­cal’ Is Becom­ing Anoth­er Word for ‘Repub­li­can’ (Ryan Burge, New York Times): “For instance, in 2008, just 16 per­cent of all self-iden­ti­fied evan­gel­i­cals report­ed their church atten­dance as nev­er or sel­dom. But in 2020, that num­ber jumped to 27 per­cent. In 2008, about a third of evan­gel­i­cals who nev­er attend­ed church said they were polit­i­cal­ly con­ser­v­a­tive. By 2019, that had risen to about 50 per­cent.… [also] more peo­ple are embrac­ing the label who have no attach­ment to Protes­tant Chris­tian­i­ty. For exam­ple, the share of Catholics who also iden­ti­fied as evan­gel­i­cals (or born again) rose to 15 per­cent in 2018 from 9 per­cent in 2008. That same pat­tern appears with Mus­lims. In fact, there’s evi­dence that the share of mem­bers of the Church of Jesus Christ of Lat­ter-day Saints, Ortho­dox Chris­tian­i­ty and Hin­duism who iden­ti­fy as evan­gel­i­cal is larg­er today than it was just a decade ago.”
    • The Evan­gel­i­cal Church Is Break­ing Apart (Peter Wehn­er, The Atlantic): “Scott Dud­ley, the senior pas­tor at Belle­vue Pres­by­ter­ian Church in Belle­vue, Wash­ing­ton, refers to this as ‘our idol­a­try of pol­i­tics.’ He’s heard of many con­gre­gants leav­ing their church because it didn’t match their pol­i­tics, he told me, but has nev­er once heard of some­one chang­ing their pol­i­tics because it didn’t match their church’s teach­ing. He often tells his con­gre­ga­tion that if the Bible doesn’t chal­lenge your pol­i­tics at least occa­sion­al­ly, you’re not real­ly pay­ing atten­tion to the Hebrew scrip­tures or the New Tes­ta­ment.”
    • Church Mem­ber­ship Is Not a One-Way Street (Alex Duke, Cross­way): “Think of your church as a light­bulb hooked up to a dim­mer switch in a dark room. Every­thing we do makes our wit­ness brighter or dark­er. Prac­tic­ing mean­ing­ful mem­ber­ship is one of the surest ways to turn that dim­mer switch up; ignor­ing it is one of the surest ways to turn it down. Mean­ing­ful mem­ber­ship is more impor­tant than you think.”
  3. The Prob­lem With Dave Chap­pelle (Samuel D. James, Sub­stack): “Chap­pelle is not a hap­less vic­tim of a crush­ing ide­o­log­i­cal agen­da; he’s not Bar­ronelle Stutz­man or James Eich. Chap­pelle is, like many before and many after him, a Robe­spierre of the very rev­o­lu­tion that’s after him now. His for­tune was made inside the same pro­gres­sive sen­si­bil­i­ty that threat­ens him, and it is pre­cise­ly Chappelle’s (and many oth­er come­di­ans) skill with which he dis­missed any notion of the sacred that has tak­en root in the peo­ple who are walk­ing out on his un-PC act.” Real­ly sol­id insights here.
  4. The par­ent­ing prob­lem the gov­ern­ment can’t fix (Stephanie H. Mur­ray, The Week): “There is a cul­tur­al weight dan­gling from the yoke of mod­ern Amer­i­can par­ent­hood — one that is prob­a­bly beyond the gov­ern­ment to alle­vi­ate.… Chil­dren are a per­son­al choice and there­fore a per­son­al prob­lem, many peo­ple seem to believe. Have as many as you want — just make sure they don’t both­er the rest of us. The prob­lem is that this cre­do is total­ly out of step with real­i­ty.… par­ent­ing is an inher­ent­ly social occu­pa­tion. Try­ing to cram it into an indi­vid­u­al­ist frame­work, where the costs and con­se­quences of chil­dren fall on par­ents and no one else, dis­torts the whole endeav­or.”
    • I have long thought that dis­lik­ing chil­dren is pro­found­ly hyp­o­crit­i­cal. You were once a child who craved affec­tion and under­stand­ing, how rude to reject chil­dren now that you have learned to nav­i­gate the world more effec­tive­ly.
  5. Sci­en­tists Built an AI to Give Eth­i­cal Advice, But It Turned Out Super Racist (Tony Tran, Futur­ism): “And as is often the case, part of the rea­son Delphi’s answers can get ques­tion­able can like­ly be linked back to how it was cre­at­ed. The folks behind the project drew on some eye­brow-rais­ing sources to help train the AI, includ­ing the ‘Am I the Ass­hole?’ sub­red­dit, the ‘Con­fes­sions’ sub­red­dit, and the ‘Dear Abby’ advice col­umn, accord­ing to the paper the team behind Del­phi pub­lished about the exper­i­ment. It should be not­ed, though, that just the sit­u­a­tions were culled from those sources — not the actu­al replies and answers them­selves.… the team behind Del­phi used Amazon’s crowd­sourc­ing ser­vice Mechan­i­cal­Turk to find respon­dents to actu­al­ly train the AI.”
  6. About Israel and Jew­ish peo­ple:
    • When Your Body Is Some­one Else’s Haunt­ed House (Dara Horn, Bari Weiss’ Sub­stack): “Those girls were not stu­pid, and prob­a­bly not even big­ot­ed. But in their entire­ly typ­i­cal and well-inten­tioned edu­ca­tion, they had learned about Jews main­ly because peo­ple had killed Jews. Like most peo­ple in the world, they had only encoun­tered dead Jews: peo­ple whose sole attribute was that they had been mur­dered, and whose mur­ders served a clear pur­pose, which was to teach us some­thing. Jews were peo­ple who, for moral and edu­ca­tion­al pur­pos­es, were sup­posed to be dead.”
    • Whose Promised Land? A Jour­ney Into a Divid­ed Israel (Patrick Kings­ley & Laeti­tia Van­con, New York Times): “‘I believe in the coun­try as long as it doesn’t fight reli­gion, as long as it doesn’t fight me,’ he said. In his view, the new gov­ern­ment has under­mined Israel’s Jew­ish­ness, under­cut­ting the state’s legit­i­ma­cy. ‘If it’s not a Jew­ish state, then we have no right to exist here,’ he said. ‘Our right to exist here is based on the fact that God gave us the land.’”
    • Pales­tine Isn’t Fer­gu­son (Susie Lin­field, The Atlantic): “Any use­ful analy­sis of the Israeli-Pales­tin­ian con­flict requires engag­ing with an unre­solved, frus­trat­ing­ly com­plex, griev­ous­ly resilient strug­gle between two nation­al move­ments, each with a jus­ti­fied claim to the land. Once that effort is aban­doned, a vac­u­um ensues. It is filled by the trans­for­ma­tion of a coun­try into a metaphor; by the rewrit­ing (or ignor­ing) of his­to­ry; by Manichean think­ing; and by the con­ver­sion of lan­guage into a means of per­for­mance rather than a descrip­tion of real­i­ty.”
  7. Learn­ing From Our Defeat: The Skill of the Vul­cans (Tan­ner Greer, per­son­al blog): “…both of these rel­a­tive non-enti­ties were pulled aside from their reg­u­lar posi­tions and hand­ed an addi­tion­al respon­si­bil­i­ty— coor­di­na­tor of the Amer­i­can effort in Afghanistan.Read that again: they were both giv­en the same job at the same time. Yet the prob­lem was worse than just dupli­ca­tion of effort and con­fused lines of author­i­ty. The two men were not even aware the oth­er man was work­ing the same port­fo­lio!”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Things Glen Found Interesting A While Ago

Every week I’ll high­light an old­er link still worth your con­sid­er­a­tion. This week we have Dis­solv­ing the Fer­mi Para­dox (Scott Alexan­der, Slate Star Codex): “Imag­ine we knew God flipped a coin. If it came up heads, He made 10 bil­lion alien civ­i­liza­tion. If it came up tails, He made none besides Earth. Using our one para­me­ter Drake Equa­tion, we deter­mine that on aver­age there should be 5 bil­lion alien civ­i­liza­tions. Since we see zero, that’s quite the para­dox, isn’t it? No. In this case the mean is mean­ing­less. It’s not at all sur­pris­ing that we see zero alien civ­i­liza­tions, it just means the coin must have land­ed tails. SDO say that rely­ing on the Drake Equa­tion is the same kind of error.”  First shared in vol­ume 159.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.