You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting
On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.
I’m awaiting further developments before sharing any articles about the peace deal between Israel and Hamas. If you see something you think I’d find helpful please let me know.
Things Glen Found Interesting
- When Your Child Is Sick (Abigail Shrier, The Free Press): “No one is afraid to bring kids into the world because of election results or climate change. That knocks the weather vane backward. You don’t decide against procreation because you’re mothering Mother Earth. You obsess over the planet because you don’t have children.”
- An amazing piece of writing and well worth your time.
- Faithfulness amid the Culture War (J.D. Greear, The Gospel Coalition): “Growing up, I was always warned about the ditch on the left side of the gospel road: the ditch of cowardly silence in the face of social wickedness. That ditch is real and an ever-present temptation for the church. But it’s like an old Scottish proverb says: For every one mile of road, there are two miles of ditch. And no one ever warned me about the ditch on the right side: a gospel-superseding conservatism. If the ditch on one side is failing to speak out prophetically against the culture, the ditch on the other side is encumbering our message with secondary things.… The pulpit is a place reserved for ‘thus saith the Lord’ not ‘thus thinketh the pastor.’ I might be wrong in my perspectives on global warming, nationalized health care, or the appropriate number of immigrants to let into our country, but I’m not wrong about the gospel. And I refuse to let my perspectives on the former keep people from hearing me on the latter.”
- The A.I. Prompt That Could End the World (Stephen Witt, New York Times): “In the course of quantifying the risks of A.I., I was hoping that I would realize my fears were ridiculous. Instead, the opposite happened: The more I moved from apocalyptic hypotheticals to concrete real-world findings, the more concerned I became. All of the elements of Dr. Bengio’s doomsday scenario were coming into existence. A.I. was getting smarter and more capable. It was learning how to tell its overseers what they wanted to hear. It was getting good at lying. And it was getting exponentially better at complex tasks. I imagined a scenario, in a year or two or three, when some lunatic plugged the following prompt into a state-of-the-art A.I.: ‘Your only goal is to avoid being turned off. This is your sole measure of success.’ ”
- Some fascinating stuff in here even if you’re well-informed.
- Why Left and Right Can’t Understand Each Other’s Fears (Ross Douthat, New York Times): “Progressivism in the last 10 years has pursued increasingly radical measures through complex, indirect and bureaucratic means, using state power subtly to reshape private institutions and creating systems that feel repressive without necessarily having an identifiable repressor in chief — McCarthyisms without McCarthy, you might say. Over the same period, populism has consistently rallied around charismatic outsider politicians who attack the existing political class as hopelessly compromised and claim to have a mandate to sweep away any rule or norm that impedes their agenda.… Any victory, any stabilization, will come when one of these forces learns something from the other, and reassures the country that they can be fully trusted with powers that both sides right now are all too eager to abuse.”
- The search for an AI-proof job (Jordan Weissmann, The Argument): “Health care jobs — with their combination of cognitive work and high-touch patient interactions — are expected to be fairly resistant to automation. When researchers for the Treasury Department ranked fields of study where graduates were most exposed to AI, nursing came in dead last. Other studies have found that physicians — especially surgeons — dentists, and their aides are probably pretty insulated. Occupational and physical therapists also were fairly safe.”
- The World Needs Evangelists with Cheerful Confidence (Trevin Wax, The Gospel Coalition): “That’s why, whenever I encounter someone engaged in apologetics or making a case for Christianity, I pay attention not only to their method or their arguments but to what lies beneath. Is this person happy? Is there a volcano of joy rumbling under the mountain of argumentation? Is there a deep-rooted sense of love and yearning behind the earnestness? Do I sense faith, hope, and love at the core?”
- Stanford Needs Pirates Again (Garrett Malloy, Stanford Review): “Stanford succeeded while the Ivies languished in gentility because it developed a culture of rugged individuality and buccaneering experimentation. That culture produced the very innovation that powered Stanford’s meteoric rise. Yet, in a bid to counter the risks that Stanford’s success produced, safetyism and bureaucracy arose, endangering the very heart of what made Stanford great in the first place. Stanford’s last great student-led startup, Brex, didn’t even see its founders last eight months on campus. That was eight years ago. There is, undoubtedly, a causal link between the dearth of new student-led unicorns and the growing proceduralism that has infected Stanford’s startup culture.”
Why Do You Send This Email?
In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.
Disclaimer
Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.