Research On Glossolalia

I just read about some cut­ting-edge research about speak­ing in tongues (you may have also seen this referred to as “glos­so­lalia”).

Sum­ma­ry quote:

“We noticed a num­ber of changes that occurred func­tion­al­ly in the brain,” com­ments Prin­ci­pal Inves­ti­ga­tor Andrew New­berg, MD, Asso­ciate Pro­fes­sor of Radi­ol­o­gy, Psy­chi­a­try, and Reli­gious Stud­ies, and Direc­tor for the Cen­ter for Spir­i­tu­al­i­ty and the Mind, at Penn. “Our find­ing of decreased activ­i­ty in the frontal lobes dur­ing the prac­tice of speak­ing in tongues is fas­ci­nat­ing because these sub­jects tru­ly believe that the spir­it of God is mov­ing through them and con­trol­ling them to speak. Our brain imag­ing research shows us that these sub­jects are not in con­trol of the usu­al lan­guage cen­ters dur­ing this activ­i­ty, which is con­sis­tent with their descrip­tion of a lack of inten­tion­al con­trol while speak­ing in tongues.”

I pass this along because we so often focus on research find­ings which seem to chal­lenge the faith (or more fre­quent­ly on research find­ings which chal­lenge our inter­pre­ta­tion of the faith), it’s always inter­est­ing to spot those that cor­re­spond to exact­ly what we would expect based upon a straight­for­ward read­ing of the Bible.

3 thoughts on “Research On Glossolalia”

  1. Now that’s pret­ty slick. Great find as always, Glen.

    You hap­pen to have an stud­ies a/b mes­sages in tongues or gen­er­al glos­so­lalia relat­ing to actu­al lan­guages? That’d be inter­est­ing.

  2. Such stud­ies have been done and are not near­ly as encour­ag­ing. The tongues-speech observed in the stud­ies matched no known earth­ly lan­guages and also proved to have non-lin­guis­tic prop­er­ties when scru­ti­nized care­ful­ly.

    Hav­ing said that, three respons­es come to mind. First, there’s that whole “tongues of angels” thing in Paul’s think­ing. Sec­ond, the non-lin­guis­tic prop­er­ties involved exces­sive rep­e­ti­tion — which makes me won­der if the researchers were com­par­ing the tongues with every­day speech or worship/prayer — because there’s a TON of rep­e­ti­tion in wor­ship and prayer. Third, depend­ing on your the­ol­o­gy of tongues there’s the whole “pri­vate prayer lan­guage” vs pub­lic utter­ance phe­nom­e­na.

    But I think it would be fair to say that this is one of the only tru­ly encour­ag­ing tongues stud­ies.

  3. Right. Well, as one who leans towards the gift of tongues Bib­li­cal­ly sup­posed to being actu­al­ly, Earth­ly lan­guages, a lot of the “tongues” I hear — to be gut lev­el hon­est — are lit­tle more than two to five syl­la­bles repeat­ed over and over again.

    I love being Pen­te­costal, absolute­ly, and I val­ue pray­ing in tongues myself. I just have to won­der how much of the “tongues” that gets prayed in church­es today is an authen­tic gift of the Spir­it.

Leave a Reply