Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 37

On Fri­days I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Also, I nor­mal­ly include arti­cles from a vari­ety of sources, but this week I noticed that I’m includ­ing a bunch from GetRe­li­gion. I guess they’ve been on fire late­ly. 

1. Death, The Pros­per­i­ty Gospel, and Me (Kate Bowler, NY Times): This piece is mov­ing and fun­ny and also not quite right… despite her study she still mis­un­der­stands some aspects of the Charis­mat­ic and Pen­te­costal world. All in all well worth read­ing. “No word of a lie: I once saw a megachurch pas­tor almost choke to death on his own fog machine. Some­one had cranked it up to the Holy Spir­it max­i­mum.”
2. Think Pieces on Jus­tice Scalia, Funer­al Ser­mons, Humil­i­ty, and the First Amend­ment (Ter­ry Mat­ting­ly, GetRe­li­gion): Scalia was such a fas­ci­nat­ing man.I like what one of our lawyer alum­ni post­ed on Face­book: “Jus­tice Scalia! You wrote your opin­ions with so much life, I guess I thought you’d nev­er die. The world has lost a great grumpy con­ser­v­a­tive. Rest easy.”
3. Why Is The Atlantic Sur­prised That Ear­ly Pro-Lif­ers Were, Uh, Lib­er­als? (Julia Dulin, GetRe­li­gion): This is an arti­cle about some arti­cles about a book. Meta but fas­ci­nat­ing.
4. Lit­tle Sis­ters of the Poor on Supreme Court case: Why we can’t “just sign the form” (Con­stance Veit, Catholic Review): Moth­er Theresa’s com­pa­tri­ots explain their con­sci­en­tious objec­tion in their own words.
5. Vote For Trump! Vote For Hilary! Vote For Jesus At This Racial­ly Diverse S.C. Megachurch! (Bob­by Ross, GetRe­li­gion): Inter­est­ing. Also, a reminder that reporters’ per­spec­tives on church­es often miss signif­i­cant details.  “None of the rough­ly 1,300 words in the Times report is ‘Jesus.’”
6. Caus­es and Con­se­quences of the Protes­tant Ref­or­ma­tion (Beck­er, Pfaff & Rubin, a work­ing paper): There’s a lot here. Rec­om­mend­ed for social sci­en­tists. One cool bit: “They argue that the spread of uni­ver­si­ty stu­dents from Protes­tant strong­holds (Wit­ten­berg and Basel, the intel­lec­tu­al homes of Luther and Zwingli) and ortho­dox Catholic strong­holds (Cologne and Lou­vain) had a sig­nif­i­cant impact on whether a town ulti­mate­ly adopt­ed the Ref­or­ma­tion.” Which is a very fan­cy way of say­ing God uses uni­ver­si­ty stu­dents.
7. On the ran­dom side:
   • What is the coolest math­e­mat­i­cal fact that you know of? (red­dit): the top respons­es are uni­form­ly fas­ci­nat­ing. Build your nerd cred!
   • The Via­gra bill: I know it’s sup­posed to be a joke, but I would be in favor of this bill with very slight amend­ments. The fact that the law­mak­er thinks it self-evi­dent­ly ridicu­lous is evi­dence of how vast the chasm is between us.
   • When To Stop Dat­ing And Set­tle Down, Accord­ing To The Math (Ana Swa­son, Wonkblog): I’ve post­ed some­thing sim­i­lar before. Always worth con­sid­er­ing. By the way, this is prob­a­bly dif­fer­ent from when to stop dat­ing and set­tle down accord­ing to your par­ents.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links