On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions. If you read something fascinating please pass it my way.
Things Glen Found Interesting
- Why Christians Oppose Euthanasia (Brad East, Christianity Today): “Unlike many topics in theology and ethics, this is not an issue on which the church has ever been ambiguous. There were no early church councils to debate the taking of innocent life. It didn’t take centuries of conflict to adjudicate. On the contrary, Christians were known from the start for their adamant rejection of pagan disrespect for those unwanted by their families or deemed socially useless—the unborn and newborn, disabled and elderly.”
- When Was Jesus Born? Italian Researcher Puts Christ’s Birth in December, 1 BC (Edward Pentin, National Catholic Register): “[Herod was alive when Jesus was born, and we know Herod died after a lunar eclipse.] Ultimately, based on the most accurate analysis possible today of the visibility to the naked eye of the lunar eclipses, the search for one of it really visible in Judea 2,000 years ago, placed in relation to other chronological and historical elements deduced from the writings of Josephus Flavius and Roman history, leads to a single possible solution — namely, a dating of the death of Herod the Great occurring in AD 2–3, compatible with the conventional beginning of the Christian era — i.e., the Nativity occurred at the end of the year 1 BC.”
- Science and Religious Dogmatism (Matías Cabello, SSRN): “But why were nonbelievers and other freethinkers particularly creative? Not because of lack of mysticism. Deists, with their mystical belief in some sort of deity, have been as productive in science as outright atheists (if not more). One possible explanation for their joint abnormally high productivity is that freethinking and atheism opened up a whole path of ideas disconnected from the prevailing thought system.… By the same token, however, it follows that, in a world overwhelmingly populated by atheists, the most ingenious ideas should instead come from the few religiously minded (as long as their theology offers a sufficiently stimulating thought system to discover the secrets of nature). A result consistent with this interpretation is the decline of the atheism coefficient among 20th-century born scientists of table 1. By then, atheism had gone from being a dangerous and unconventional worldview to become widespread among the scientific elite.”
- An interesting paper. I don’t buy all its conclusions, but I enjoyed reading it. The excerpt is from at the end and is an important point: nonconformity brings some benefits, but nonconformity changes over time. It looks like heresy when orthodoxy reigns, but nonconformity often looks like orthodoxy when heresy has dominance. And we live in an era of heresy. As Tyler Cowen often comments: the important thinkers of the future will be religious.
- The author is, funnily enough, an economist teaching at a university named after Martin Luther.
- Two articles making similar points: our current aversion to involuntary commitment is cruel to some people who would greatly benefit from the help that their mental illness causes them to resist.
- Jordan Neely Needed to Be Institutionalized (Josh Barro, Substack): “One through-line in the story is the immense amount of government resources that were thrown at trying to keep Neely out of trouble. Through police, courts, jails, homeless outreach, and treatment facilities, New York’s taxpayers spent lavishly on an effort to keep Neely alive, in mental health care, and not posing a danger to the public or himself. But it didn’t work because he was insane and he was not forced to accept the care he needed — except during a stint he spent in jail on Rikers Island, when he was successfully medicated.… it would behoove progressives with pat takes about how what Neely really needed was housing and care to know that he was offered these things over and over again by an extremely well-funded social services apparatus. If you wanted him to have housing and care, you needed to be prepared to force them upon him; and if you weren’t, then you don’t have a solution to the problems of people like him.”
- The Tragedy of Jordan Neely and Daniel Penny (Brendan Ruberry, Persuasion): “[Ending involuntary commitment had a perverse effect, because] as it happens, many patients are, in fact, unwilling to submit to treatment, because nothing does more to harm one’s powers of self-awareness, and one’s ability to recognize the necessity of often lengthy protocols, than debilitating mental illness.”
- Make Villains Wicked Again (Germán Saucedo, First Things): “The clear images of true evil present in the best fairy tales, ballads, myths, and legends offer both a vision of what is to be avoided at all costs, as well as a vision of virtue. As such, the ‘sympathetic villain’ genre is a symptom of a society that disagrees on what is good and what is evil, or that tries to explain evil away as trauma, psychopathy, or pathology. But to identify and avoid evil, we must first learn to recognize the good. The insistence on subverting villains is a sign we have lost confidence in our belief that we can know what heroism looks like, a heroism that displays the good that would oppose their unrighteousness.”
- Insurance companies aren’t the main villain of the U.S. health system (Noah Smith, Substack): “It’s not hard to understand why people hate health insurers. When you interact with the U.S. health care system, the providers — the hospital staff, the doctor, the nurses, the technicians — all just take care of you. The only time they ask you for money during your doctor visit is when you pay your copay at the front desk, and that’s usually not that big — if the bill is big, they’ll send it to you later. So for the most part, your interaction with the providers is just you walking up and asking to be taken care of, and them taking care of you. Your interaction with the health insurer, on the other hand, feels like a struggle against an enemy who wants to destroy you.”
- ‘Huge setback’: SF’s massive psychedelic church is leaving the city (Lester Black, SF Gate): “Hodges founded his church in 2019 around the belief that cannabis, magic mushrooms and other psychedelic substances are religious sacraments that give humans spiritual insights. Any adult can join by signing up and paying a $5 membership fee, which gives them access to purchase a wide range of psychedelic products. Last year, the church expanded from its original location in Oakland to a vacant building on Howard Street in San Francisco. The church now counts over 115,000 members.”
- Please note that the author is the “Cannabis editor” at SF Gate. Sometimes San Francisco becomes a parody of itself.
Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen
- Things Rich People and Poor People Have In Common (Adam Carolla, YouTube): five minutes, a lil’ on the edge but overall quite good
- Advent Calendar Advent Calendar (xkcd)
- God Announces He Believes In Jordan Peterson But Only As A Metaphorical Idea (Babylon Bee)
- The Maritime Approximation (xkcd)
- After 3rd Reschedule, Christian Friends Agree To Just Have Dinner Together In Heaven Sometime (Babylon Bee)
Why Do You Send This Email?
In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.
Disclaimer
Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.