Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 63

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

1. How Can I Learn To Receive — And Give — Crit­i­cism In Light Of The Cross? (Justin Tay­lor, Gospel Coali­tion): “A believ­er is one who iden­ti­fies with all that God affirms and con­demns in Christ’s cru­ci­fix­ion. In oth­er words, in Christ’s cross I agree with God’s judg­ment of me; and in Christ’s cross I agree with God’s jus­ti­fi­ca­tion of me. Both have a rad­i­cal impact on how we take and give crit­i­cism.” This is based on a longer arti­cle (4 page PDF).
2. The Watch­men (Alan Jacobs, Harpers): this essay takes a while to get going, but once it does it is quite good. And this response piece by Jake Meador is even bet­ter: Fran­cis Scha­ef­fer and Chris­t­ian Intel­lec­tu­al­ism.
3. Report: Aver­age Christian’s Strat­e­gy To Fight Sin Com­prised Of Binge-Watch­ing Net­flix Shows (Baby­lon Bee): Baby­lon Bee is, of course, humor. This one was so real I decid­ed to put it under the news sec­tion. On a relat­ed note, see America’s Lost Boys.
4. The End of the Lib­er­al Tra­di­tion? (Mark L. Movs­esian, First Things) and Trump’s Good Polit­i­cal Tim­ing: Younger Amer­i­cans Are Shun­ning Democ­ra­cy (Cather­ine Ramp­bell, Wash­ing­ton Post): this is, frankly, ter­ri­fy­ing. Prob­a­bly also an inevitable con­se­quence of our cul­ture aban­don­ing the Chris­t­ian belief in deprav­i­ty.
5. What The Hell Is Wrong With The Nation­al Media? (Rod Dreher, The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive): I was in Louisiana when the rains came. It was shock­ing how much water fell in a short time. The scope of the dis­as­ter is stag­ger­ing, and it is sur­pris­ing that it took media orga­ni­za­tions so long to notice it. Sean Illing at Salon has a sim­i­lar arti­cle up: Louisiana’s Qui­et Cri­sis: Cable News and the Fol­ly of Dis­as­ter Porn Cov­er­age. Arti­cles like this are begin­ning to mul­ti­ply, but atten­tion is still scant (although it seems to be slow­ly turn­ing around). For an even salti­er read, con­sid­er Dreher’s more recent col­umn. I include these links in part because they are a use­ful reminder that what appears in the media is not what is hap­pen­ing, but rather what media per­son­nel are (a) aware is hap­pen­ing and (b) deem impor­tant.
6. Pros­ti­tu­tion Is Not Sex Work (Kat Ban­yard, Aeon): “Men who pay for sex are not help­less­ly react­ing to uncon­tain­able sex­u­al urges. Nor does the pros­ti­tu­tion trade rep­re­sent ‘a place of last resort’ for them. A study of 6,000 UK men by Uni­ver­si­ty Col­lege Lon­don in 2014 revealed that those most like­ly to have paid for sex were young pro­fes­sion­als with high num­bers of sex­u­al part­ners.”
7. In defense of Rud­yard Kipling and ‘The Jun­gle Books’ (Michael Dir­da, Wash­ing­ton Post): this is a good piece.

Things Glen Found Amusing

• Which Is Stronger: Log­ic or Emo­tion?
• The Impli­ca­tions of Gen­e­sis 2:22
• What If I Nev­er Exist­ed?
• Bible Lack­ing Sin­ners’ Prayer Returned For Full Refund (if this is a mys­tery to you, read a brief his­to­ry of the sin­ners’ prayer)

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

If you have a non-Stan­ford friend who might be inter­est­ed in these emails, they can sign up at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/subscribe, and if you want to view the archives they are at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.