You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Interesting
On Fridays I share articles/resources about broad cultural, societal and theological issues likely to be of interest to Christians in college. Be sure to see the explanation and disclaimers at the bottom. I welcome your suggestions, so if you read something fascinating please pass it my way.
Things Glen Found Interesting
- The quiet surge of France’s evangelicals (ENTR, YouTube): twelve minutes. Highly recommended, brought to my attention by a student. The first half is one of the better (albeit inadvertent) apologias for low-church Protestantism you’ll run across.
- Male students show more tolerance for political enemies than females show for their own allies (Chapin Lenthall-Cleary, Substack): “…overall tolerance for opposing views is low among both male and female students — but the males consistently display far more tolerance than females, regardless of their politics.… In fact, men are over 3.5 times more likely than women to be ‘perfectly tolerant’ of opposing views, meaning they would definitely allow any campus speaker.”
- One of the embedded charts is actually stunning. And this sentence: “Amazingly, it turns out men are often more tolerant of the opposite side than women are of their own side.”
- Debunking “When Prophecy Fails” (Thomas Kelly, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences) : “In 1954, Dorothy Martin predicted an apocalyptic flood and promised her followers rescue by flying saucers. When neither arrived, she recanted, her group dissolved, and efforts to proselytize ceased. But When Prophecy Fails (1956), the now-canonical account of the event, claimed the opposite: that the group doubled down on its beliefs and began recruiting—evidence, the authors argued, of a new psychological mechanism, cognitive dissonance. Drawing on newly unsealed archival material, this article demonstrates that the book’s central claims are false, and that the authors knew they were false.”
- The author has a PhD in political science from Cal and now works at a thinktank in biosecurity. The excerpt is from the abstract.
- I am overwhelmed by how absolutely insane this is and that the lies have endured for seven decades. SEVEN DECADES. I care because this study is sometimes used by skeptics to argue against Christianity. As the author says: “When Prophecy Fails spread its influence across psychology, sociology, New Testament studies, and religious studies. Ironically, some [skeptical] New Testament scholars whose raison d’être and specialization is piecing together events from thousands of years ago, eagerly embraced a false narrative that was trivial to fact check.”
- The Editor Got a Letter From ‘Dr. B.S.’ So Did a Lot of Other Editors. (Gina Kolata, New York Times): “Letters to the editor from writers using chatbots are flooding the world’s scientific journals, according to new research and journal editors.… There’s a reason authors might turn to A.I., Dr. Rubin noted in an interview. Letters to the editor published in scientific journals are listed in databases that also list journal articles, and Dr. Rubin said that ‘they count as much as an article. For doing a very small amount of work, someone can get an article in The New England Journal of Medicine on their C.V.,’ he said. ‘The incentive to cheat is high,’ he added.”
- The opening anecdote is pretty funny.
- Some stuff on antisemitism and Zionism:
- Why Antisemitism Is ‘Moral Pornography’ (Mary Eberstadt, The Free Press): “Online antisemitism is the new pornography. It is moral pornography. And pornography it is—because like pornography, internet antisemitism is mostly engaged in secretly; like pornography, it delivers illicit thrills to degraded users; and like pornography, its consumption embarrasses users when it comes to light, as is seen whenever people are exposed in public for spewing Jew-hatred online. Christians who were in the forefront of understanding that pornography causes harm should be in the forefront of opposing the moral pornography of antisemitism.”
- This is an adaptation of a speech given by a Catholic at a Catholic event, which explains some of the language.
- Tucker Carlson Is Wrong About Christian Zionism (Samuel Goldman, The Free Press): “Beginning in the 1980s, a whole genre of books and articles contended that American Christians’ enthusiasm for Israel was based on an ‘end-times’ scenario derived from the Victorian theologian John Nelson Darby, and mainstreamed by Scofield in the early 20th century.… [In reality, the] history of Christian Zionism in America is far longer and more various than that.”
- Why Antisemitism Is ‘Moral Pornography’ (Mary Eberstadt, The Free Press): “Online antisemitism is the new pornography. It is moral pornography. And pornography it is—because like pornography, internet antisemitism is mostly engaged in secretly; like pornography, it delivers illicit thrills to degraded users; and like pornography, its consumption embarrasses users when it comes to light, as is seen whenever people are exposed in public for spewing Jew-hatred online. Christians who were in the forefront of understanding that pornography causes harm should be in the forefront of opposing the moral pornography of antisemitism.”
- China’s Christians Are America’s Allies (Elisa Zhai Autry, Substack): “Since its inception, the Communist Party has viewed Christianity as a destabilizing force that undermines party authority and opens doors to foreign interference. Yet, from Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping, every effort to stamp it out has failed. Christianity has flourished amid wars, famine, political purges, the Cultural Revolution, the Tiananmen Square massacre, and modern censorship. Today, Chinese Christians are estimated to number as high as 100 million. The party frames Christianity as ‘foreign,’ but history disputes that.… Christians were pillars of China’s modernization long before the party claimed credit. Their contribution was indigenous, not foreign—rooted deeply in Chinese traditions and driven by Chinese believers.”
- This is the Substack of Stanford’s Hoover Institution.
- Some stuff on contemporary American politics, presented in a nonpartisan manner. I am not endorsing the perspectives of the authors, I am merely saying that I found their arguments intriguing:
- 16 takeaways from Democrats’ big night (Jerusalem Demsas, Jordan Weissmann, Lakshya Jain , & Kelsey Piper, The Argument): “Anti-Trumpism is a really, really powerful force in American politics. especially in non-presidential elections. In Virginia and New Jersey, the Republican nominees were tied to a very, very unpopular president — and sometimes by choice. Yes, 2026 is going to have higher turnout than 2025 did, but it won’t be on the level of 2024, and from the evidence we have, the drop-off is likely to be disproportionately Republican.”
- The cosmopolitan conservative (Janan Ganesh, Financial Times): “There is such a thing as a cosmopolitan conservative. When I want to discuss Dubai — and when do I not? — I have to turn to apolitical or right-leaning acquaintances.…. Often, it is fear of causing offence that stops liberal-minded people engaging with vast tracts of the world. And so cultural sensitivity turns into its own kind of parochialism.”
- A fascinating (and very brief) article.
- Inside the DSA’s Hostile Takeover of the Democratic Party (Olivia Reingold, The Free Press): “The Free Press reviewed thousands of pages of internal Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) documents, which show that the organization’s leaders view Mamdani as a tool in their agenda to abolish prisons and borders, and ultimately end in [sic] what they call the ‘barbaric order of capitalism.’ The DSA, founded in 1982, is a political body dedicated to the doctrine of democratic socialism, which is a variety of socialism that simply specifies how it would like revolution to occur: peacefully, through the subversion of democracy. Mamdani, a dues-paying DSA member since 2017, is the tip of that spear.”
- The Tocqueville Paradox (Rob Henderson, Substack): “I am 35, one year older than Mamdani, and I can tell you that Millennials and Gen Zers have not really been taught about the failures of socialism. I will point out, with a bit of hyperbole, that in US high schools we get 155 hours on Hitler, three minutes on Stalin, zero on Mao and zero on Pol Pot. And socialism is an idea that sounds good on face value. It promises to take from the rich and give to the poor. That means not only ‘free stuff’ for everyone, but also a sense of fairness.”
- Progressives Can’t Bear Pregnancy (Kara Kennedy, The Free Press): “There’s a sense on the left that the act of giving birth is an insane, traumatic thing to do, an infringement on all women’s bodily autonomy.… My most progressive friends talk in hushed tones about wanting kids, as if confessing a vice. One of them, after a few glasses of wine, told me she dreams of being a stay-at-home mother. She couldn’t tell her boyfriend. She couldn’t even tell her closest friend. To say it aloud would feel like a betrayal of everything she is supposed to believe. Extreme progressives turn on women who express entirely ordinary wishes about family.”
Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen
- Heart Mountain (xkcd): I looked the story behind this comic up — it’s WILD.
- Idiot Tries To Rob Bank In Gotham City, Where Batman Lives (Babylon Bee): recommended by an alumnus
- Hero Costumes (Texts From Superheroes): same alumnus recommended this one
Why Do You Send This Email?
In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar produced shrewd warriors “who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a similar way, we need to become wise people whose faith interacts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may continue the tradition of Issachar.
Disclaimer
Chi Alpha is not a partisan organization. To paraphrase another minister: we are not about the donkey’s agenda and we are not about the elephant’s agenda — we are about the Lamb’s agenda. Having said that, I read widely (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ideological Turing test and in part because I do not believe I can fairly say “I agree” or “I disagree” until I can say “I understand”) and may at times share articles that have a strong partisan bias simply because I find the article stimulating. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with everything an author says in an article I mention, much less things the author has said in other articles (although if I strongly disagree with something in the article I’ll usually mention it). And to the extent you can discern my opinions, please understand that they are my own and not necessarily those of Chi Alpha or any other organization I may be perceived to represent. Also, remember that I’m not reporting news — I’m giving you a selection of things I found interesting. There’s a lot happening in the world that’s not making an appearance here because I haven’t found stimulating articles written about it. If this was forwarded to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.