TGFI, Volume 528: Halloween, China, and Nihilistic Violent Extremists

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Inter­est­ing

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues like­ly to be of inter­est to Chris­tians in col­lege. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions, so if you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

1. Chris­tians Don’t Cel­e­brate Hal­loween (Tyler Krug, Sub­stack): “For years now, when some­one asks me if our fam­i­ly cel­e­brates Hal­loween, my reply has been the same: ‘No, we don’t cel­e­brate any­thing on Halloween—instead, our kids dress up and extort the neigh­bors for can­dy.’ My reply brings to the sur­face two relat­ed concepts—one explic­it, one implied. The first con­cept is cel­e­bra­tion. Cel­e­bra­tion is ‘the action of mark­ing one’s plea­sure at an impor­tant event or occa­sion.’ Cel­e­bra­tion, there­fore, involves knowl­edge, intent and endorse­ment.… But my Hal­loween retort also implies a sec­ond con­cept: par­tic­i­pa­tion. While cel­e­bra­tion requires par­tic­i­pa­tion, par­tic­i­pa­tion does not require celebration—playing in a foot­ball game and cel­e­brat­ing the sport are two dif­fer­ent things. Fur­ther, a defen­sive back might par­tic­i­pate in a play result­ing in a touch­down, but they won’t be cel­e­brat­ing in the end zone.”
   • Empha­sis in orig­i­nal.
2. Amer­i­ca Is Los­ing the Gray Zone War for the South Chi­na Sea (Ray­mond Pow­ell, The Dis­patch): “America’s con­tin­ued inabil­i­ty to devel­op any­thing approach­ing a counter-gray-zone strat­e­gy is exact­ly why Chi­na employs it. The CCP has fig­ured out that we real­ly like our neat cat­e­gories and rules-based order: We are either at peace or at war; an action is either legal or ille­gal; an asset is either mil­i­tary or civil­ian; a fact is either true or false; crises are to be avoid­ed and de-esca­lat­ed, not used as oppor­tu­ni­ties to reset the board in our favor. China’s gray-zone strat­e­gy is designed to exploit the myr­i­ad gaps and seams that define our con­ven­tion­al and ordered pol­i­cy frame­works and deter­rence mod­els.”
3. The Sus­pect­ed LA Arson­ist and the Rise of the Nihilis­tic Vio­lent Extrem­ists (Peter Savod­nik, The Free Press): “He was defined more by what he was against—climate change, Don­ald Trump, peo­ple who ate meat, peo­ple who believed in God—than what he was for.… Rinderknecht told the chat­bot that he ‘lit­er­al­ly burnt the Bible that I had. It felt amaz­ing. I felt so lib­er­at­ed.’ …Rinderknecht came from a reli­gious home. His par­ents, Joel and Jen­nifer, were Bap­tist mis­sion­ar­ies who lived in France.”
4. We All Live in a Vil­lage Now (Yascha Mounk, Sub­stack): “We all live in a vil­lage again.… For it turns out that the life of the city, with its atten­dant free­doms from neigh­bor­ly super­vi­sion and col­lec­tive con­straint, was real­ly just a short inter­lude in the his­to­ry of human­i­ty. Facil­i­tat­ed by social media, the vil­lage has returned with a vengeance—stripped of its warmth, and super­charged by the cru­el­ty of the crowd.”
5. Blue State Blues (Riv­er Page, The Free Press): “[The guid­ing prin­ci­ple of blue states] is pater­nal­ism for the law-abid­ing mass­es and per­mis­sive­ness for society’s anti­so­cial under­bel­ly. In oth­er words, liv­ing in a blue state means that the gov­ern­ment treats you like a child and does every­thing in its pow­er to make your life just a lit­tle more annoy­ing and inconvenient—unless you start open­ly smok­ing crack on the street.… I still sup­port labor unions. I still want Medicare for All. But I want my dig­ni­ty and san­i­ty too. I’d rather be ignored than annoyed.”
6. Is ter­mi­nal lucid­i­ty real? (Ariel Zeleznikow-John­ston, Sub­stack): “As a neu­ro­sci­en­tist, my first thoughts when encoun­ter­ing reports [of ter­mi­nal lucid­i­ty] are that they can’t pos­si­bly be real. By the time patients with severe demen­tia actu­al­ly die, their brains are cat­a­stroph­i­cal­ly dam­aged. They typ­i­cal­ly show no signs of rec­og­niz­ing fam­i­ly mem­bers. They often haven’t respond­ed mean­ing­ful­ly to their envi­ron­ment in months or years. Their brains are rid­dled with plaques and tan­gles. And they’ve lost 20–50% of their synap­tic con­nec­tions — so much that their brains have vis­i­bly shrunk on MRI scans.… And yet, ter­mi­nal lucid­i­ty keeps being report­ed.… The only prospec­tive study, which fol­lowed 100 hos­pice deaths, found it in 6% of cas­es. That’s not ubiq­ui­tous, but nor is it rare — in the US alone, it would mean around ten thou­sand cas­es per year.”
   • An inter­est­ing com­ple­ment to the Charles Mur­ray arti­cle argu­ing for the exis­tence of the soul I shared two weeks ago.
   • The author is a research sci­en­tist at Monash Uni­ver­si­ty in Aus­tralia.
7. The Debate Divid­ing the Supreme Court’s Lib­er­al Jus­tices (Jodi Kan­tor, New York Times): “Bad­ly out­num­bered, seat­ed for the long haul of life tenure, Jus­tices Kagan and Jack­son in par­tic­u­lar are divid­ed on the best approach to jobs in which they are more or less sen­tenced to fail.… Like many oth­ers across the left in the era of Don­ald J. Trump, the lib­er­al jus­tices are in a gen­er­a­tional and philo­soph­i­cal strug­gle over whether to safe­guard insti­tu­tions from with­in or protest their decline. But unlike politi­cians, they are doing so in a sealed world so tra­di­tion-bound and deco­rous that clos­ing an opin­ion ‘I dis­sent’ instead of ‘I respect­ful­ly dis­sent’ is con­sid­ered a dra­mat­ic state­ment.”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

• How easy is it to fudge your sci­en­tif­ic rank? Meet Lar­ry, the world’s most cit­ed cat (Christie Wilcox, Sci­ence): “Lar­ry Richard­son appeared to be an ear­ly-career math­e­mati­cian with poten­tial. Accord­ing to Google Schol­ar, he’d authored a dozen papers on top­ics rang­ing from com­plex alge­bras to the struc­ture of math­e­mat­i­cal objects, rack­ing up more than 130 cita­tions in 4 years. It would all be rather remarkable—if the stud­ies weren’t com­plete gib­ber­ish. And Lar­ry wasn’t a cat.… [This is not with­out prece­dent] In 1975, the­o­ret­i­cal physi­cist Jack Het­her­ing­ton added his Siamese to one of his sin­gle-author papers so the ref­er­ences to ‘we’ would make more sense. As of this year, ‘Felis Domes­ti­cus Chester Willard’ has 107 cita­tions.”
  • Note: this is from July 2024, so a bit out­dat­ed. I did check FDC Willard and his cita­tion count has gone up to 113.
• AI Will Ruin Social Media (SMBC)
• Sexy Cos­tumes for your Church Fall Fes­ti­val (Matthew Pierce, Sub­stack): “Prob­a­bly the sex­i­est man in the Bible is Sam­son, because he was an idiot with big pecs, and all the Chris­t­ian ladies are like ‘oooh, I could fix him.’ Sam­son is your friend from youth group who could walk into a room full of smart, pret­ty girls, and in five min­utes he will be talk­ing to the one crazy girl in the back. And then you are like ‘John, that girl is on pro­ba­tion for stab­bing her last boyfriend,’ but he is like ‘bro, I got this,’ but in fact he does not have this, and he nev­er will.”
• Your Brain’s Job (The Oat­meal)
• Doc­u­ment Forgery (xkcd) — I lowkey want to make one of these
• What’s Miss­ing From Your Favorite Choco­late Bar? It May Be Choco­late. (Claire Brown, New York Times): “As the Hal­loween sea­son boosts demand, some can­dy com­pa­nies are replac­ing expen­sive cocoa but­ter with oth­er fats, a swap that means their prod­ucts no longer meet the U.S. reg­u­la­to­ry def­i­n­i­tion of milk choco­late and can no longer be called that on pack­ag­ing.”
• The Night­mare Is Over: Supreme Court Out­laws Can­dy Corn (Baby­lon Bee)

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.