Rejected Texts For a Mother’s Day Sermon

Moth­er’s Day is an odd Sun­day in most church­es. Pas­tors get up and talk about Proverbs 31 or some oth­er pre­dictible text, and then give every lady a rose.

I’m not actu­al­ly preach­ing this week­end (Paula is, as it turns out), but if I was I’d be look­ing for a more unusu­al angle. For instance, here are some less­er-known vers­es which touch on the theme of moth­er­hood.

  1. Psalm 109:14 — may the sin of his moth­er nev­er be blot­ted out.
  2. Isa­iah 50:1 — This is what the LORD says: “Where is your moth­er’s cer­tifi­cate of divorce with which I sent her away?
  3. Jere­mi­ah 22:26 — I will hurl you and the moth­er who gave you birth into anoth­er coun­try, where nei­ther of you was born, and there you both will die.
  4. Hosea 2:2 Rebuke your moth­er
  5. Hosea 4:5 I will destroy your moth­er
  6. Luke 12:53 They will be divid­ed, father against son and son against father, moth­er against daugh­ter and daugh­ter against moth­er, moth­er-in-law against daugh­ter-in-law and daugh­ter-in-law against moth­er-in-law.
  7. Deuteron­o­my 22:7 You may take the young, but be sure to let the moth­er go
  8. Exo­dus 23:19 Do not cook a young goat in its moth­er’s milk.
  9. Job 17:14, CEV: say to the worms, “Hel­lo, moth­er!”
  10. Lev 18:7, MSG She is your moth­er. Don’t have sex with her.

Maybe Proverbs 31 isn’t such a bad choice after all… 😉

Please note that most of these vers­es have been hor­ri­bly wrenched from their con­text to make them even less appro­pri­ate for a moth­er’s day ser­mon.

Yes, today is my birthday.

In response to those who have asked, today is indeed my birth­day. My 32nd birth­day, to be pre­cise. Thank you for all the warm wish­es.

If you hap­pen to be a Stan­ford stu­dent, I would appre­ci­ate it if you would trans­late your warm wish­es into a vis­it to our Chi Alpha meet­ing tonight. 🙂

If you’re not a Stan­ford stu­dent, a vis­it to a near­by church this Sun­day would warm my heart as well.

Does Anyone Else Smell Irony?

Am I the only one who finds it iron­ic that the mul­ti-site church con­fer­ences are all sin­gle-loca­tion events? Just google for “mul­ti-site church con­fer­ences” and you’ll see what I mean.

It just seems… odd.

As pro­gram­mers are want to say, eat your own dog food.

Gleaning #2966

Auto­mat­i­cal­ly pulled from Glen’s ever-grow­ing list of ser­mon­ic mulch (with which he may or may not agree):

“The rev­e­la­tion was one thing, the rep­e­ti­tion quite anoth­er.”

some NPR host tags: For­give­ness Hon­esty

“The rev­e­la­tion was one thing, the rep­e­ti­tion quite anoth­er.”

Source: some NPR host tags: For­give­ness Hon­esty

The Assemblies of God and Campus Freedom

A thought­ful friend drew my atten­tion to this sto­ry about North Cen­tral Uni­ver­si­ty and the Equal­i­ty Rid­ers. To sum­ma­rize: gay activists are barred from hold­ing events at an Assem­blies of God uni­ver­si­ty.

I find sto­ries like this very inter­est­ing, because I find myself in the same sit­u­a­tion as the Equal­i­ty Rid­ers. I am on a pri­vate uni­ver­si­ty not exact­ly enthu­si­as­tic about my views and have to labor under cer­tain restric­tions as a result. Hav­ing said that, Stan­ford is much more gra­cious to me than North Cen­tral has been to the Equal­i­ty Rid­ers (even if the rid­ers’ ver­sion of events proves to be exag­ger­at­ed). I am allowed to be on cam­pus, to hold meet­ings with oth­er inter­est­ed stu­dents on cam­pus, and
to uti­lize cam­pus resources.

At first blush, it seems that the Assem­blies of God (who spon­sors both my min­istry and that of North Cen­tral Uni­ver­si­ty) wants to have it both ways: they want to be allowed to express their views via peo­ple like me at pri­vate uni­ver­si­ties while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly deny­ing oth­er groups that right at their own schools (such as NCU).

I’m not sure that’s a com­plete­ly fair assess­ment, since there’s a cat­e­go­ry dif­fer­ence between denom­i­na­tion­al schools and some­place like Stan­ford or Yale. These lat­ter schools, although pri­vate, like to think of them­selves as self-con­scious­ly neu­tral on reli­gious and moral mat­ters, where­as denom­i­na­tion­al schools have reli­gious and moral
posi­tions to which all stu­dents are required to con­form. The upshot is that NCU can rep­re­sent the stu­dent body in a way that Stan­ford can­not.

Still, it does seem a lit­tle hyp­o­crit­i­cal (the gold­en rule seems rel­e­vant in this con­text) and unwise. As a pro­fes­sion­al who works with col­lege stu­dents, I assure you that NCU did every­thing they could to intrigue stu­dents with the Equal­i­ty Rid­ers’ mes­sage. If they tru­ly want­ed to side­line the rid­ers, the admin­is­tra­tion should have invit­ed them onto cam­pus, giv­en them a pub­lic forum, and then offered a calm and
thor­ough rebut­tal. As it is, they’ve like­ly fanned a spark into flame.

And fir­ing reporters for report­ing is always a short­sight­ed move (although legal). Fir­ing reporters always leaves peo­ple feel­ing suspicious–what is being hid­den? Again, the way to derail any sto­ry is by being calm and rea­son­able in your response (sup­pos­ing that you have a bet­ter case, that is). If the reporters write sto­ries that the admin­is­tra­tors find trou­bling, let­ters to the edi­tor (or even an edi­to­r­i­al col­umn, depend­ing on the paper’s gov­er­nance) are supreme­ly appro­pri­ate.

Still, I would be very inter­est­ed to hear NCU’s offi­cial per­spec­tive on the events described by the Equal­i­ty Rid­ers. It does­n’t take much read­ing between the lines to notice that the Equal­i­ty Rid­ers were hyp­ing the lev­el of force used by the uni­ver­si­ty, so per­haps oth­er details are also mis­lead­ing.

[UPDATE: this is pre­cise­ly the uni­ver­si­ty’s asser­tion. They claim that the Equal­i­ty Rid­ers have mis­rep­re­sent­ed the events. Read the uni­ver­si­ty’s response at http://www.northcentral.edu/news/soulforce.php

and also hear a mes­sage from the uni­ver­si­ty pres­i­dent about the events.]

Gleaning #888

Auto­mat­i­cal­ly pulled from Glen’s ever-grow­ing list of ser­mon­ic mulch (with which he may or may not agree):

Gen­e­sis 30.18: Leah inter­prets the birth of Issachar as God reward­ing her for giv­ing her ser­vant to be Jacob’s wife. This is a great exam­ple of bas­ing the­ol­o­gy on poor­ly-under­stood expe­ri­ence.

Glen, Devo­tion­al 9/6/2000 tags: Bible The­ol­o­gy

Gen­e­sis 30.18: Leah inter­prets the birth of Issachar as God reward­ing her for giv­ing her ser­vant to be Jacob’s wife. This is a great exam­ple of bas­ing the­ol­o­gy on poor­ly-under­stood expe­ri­ence.

Glen, Devo­tion­al 9/6/2000 tags: Bible The­ol­o­gy

Gleaning #2965

Over Spring Break in March of 2006, 30 Chi Alpha stu­dents from Boze­man, MT trav­eled three days by bus to New Orleans to help peo­ple recov­er in the after­math of Hur­ri­can Kat­ri­na: “the most poignant moment came when a stu­dent, who is a rel­a­tive­ly new Chris­t­ian, walked into a ruined home and found a Bible still open on the kitchen table — where it has sat adhered by the orig­i­nal (and now dis­si­pat­ed) flood waters for months. ‘The Bible was opened to Psalm 90 where it says you are my dwelling place for­ev­er,’ Lant recalls. ‘That moment real­ly changed his life as he came to grips with the fact that earth was just a tem­po­rary res­i­dence … he now views things from a more spir­i­tu­al per­spec­tive, what’s most last­ing in his life and how tem­po­ral mate­ri­al­ism is.’ ”

AG News #1246: April 19, 2006

Over Spring Break in March of 2006, 30 Chi Alpha stu­dents from Boze­man, MT trav­eled three days by bus to New Orleans to help peo­ple recov­er in the after­math of Hur­ri­can Kat­ri­na: “the most poignant moment came when a stu­dent, who is a rel­a­tive­ly new Chris­t­ian, walked into a ruined home and found a Bible still open on the kitchen table — where it has sat adhered by the orig­i­nal (and now dis­si­pat­ed) flood waters for months. ‘The Bible was opened to Psalm 90 where it says you are my dwelling place for­ev­er,’ Lant recalls. ‘That moment real­ly changed his life as he came to grips with the fact that earth was just a tem­po­rary res­i­dence … he now views things from a more spir­i­tu­al per­spec­tive, what’s most last­ing in his life and how tem­po­ral mate­ri­al­ism is.’ ”

AG News #1246: April 19, 2006

Gleaning #2964

It is eas­i­er to sup­press the first desire than to sat­is­fy all that fol­low it.

Ben­jamin Franklin

down­load back to school It is eas­i­er to sup­press the first desire than to sat­is­fy all that fol­low it.

Ben­jamin Franklin

Terminology

Since shav­ing my head, many peo­ple have walked up to me and said, “I love the new hair­do!”

After a moment, a hes­i­tant “or lack of a hair­do” creeps out and then, fol­low­ing a brief pause, they utter “or what­ev­er” and final­ly a genial “what­ev­er it is, it looks great on you!” escapes their lips.

To pre­vent fur­ther con­fu­sion, I offer ter­mi­no­log­i­cal exac­ti­tude.

I don’t have a hair­do. I have a look.

So walk up to me and say, “I love the new look!”

See how much eas­i­er that is?