Author: Glen

Obvious and Brilliant

Mark Driscoll just began offer­ing his ser­mons on Google Video fast food nation movie down­load . Great idea–they han­dle the stor­age and the band­width!

And we thought it was bad here

Col­lege min­istry in the Unit­ed King­dom is even stick­i­er than it is here: “The Chris­t­ian Union was advised that the use of the words “men” and “women” in the con­sti­tu­tion were caus­ing con­cern because they could be seen as exclud­ing trans­sex­u­al and trans­gen­dered peo­ple.” (source)

Visiting Prof Condemns Porn

A fas­ci­nat­ing tid­bit from today’s Stan­ford Dai­ly: Texas prof con­demns porn.

Invit­ed speak­er Robert Jensen, a jour­nal­ism pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Texas, pre­sent­ed a fair­ly bit­ing crit­i­cism of the medi­um, warn­ing that the con­tent of pornog­ra­phy is “increas­ing­ly cru­el, degrad­ing and hos­tile to women.”

What I found most inter­est­ing at the end of the arti­cle is that no one want­ed to go on record as defend­ing pornog­ra­phy. Every pro-porn quote is anony­mous. Giv­en that there’s no real per­se­cu­tion of pornog­ra­phy lovers, I can only assume the desire for anonymi­ty is from shame. That says some­thing pret­ty pro­found about the extent to which they have doubts about the cause they advo­cate for.

Seven Things I Love About Chi Alpha Nationally

I was think­ing in the show­er about how won­der­ful Chi Alpha is.

Here are sev­en spe­cif­ic things I love about our move­ment:

  1. We have a great cul­ture in Chi Alpha. Almost all the big buzz­words in lead­er­ship (men­tor­ing, learn­ing orga­ni­za­tion, authen­tic­i­ty, being mis­sion­al, etc) have been core parts of our DNA for decades.
  2. Most of the best peo­ple I know are Chi Alpha lead­ers. Read that again if it’s con­fus­ing.
  3. Chi Alpha offers great train­ing. Whether it’s in the area of lead­ing a small group or sup­port-rais­ing, the train­ing is top-notch and use­ful.
  4. Chi Alpha con­sis­tent­ly offers life-trans­form­ing region­al and nation­al con­fer­ences (with some of the best wor­ship to be found any­where, I might add).
  5. Chi Alpha is part of the Assem­blies of God, and the Assem­blies of God rocks in ways I can­not even begin to describe here. Some­day I’ll have to make anoth­er list of sev­en things about them.
  6. Chi Alpha is very entre­peneur­ial. I have almost com­plete auton­o­my with­in my sphere of respon­si­bil­i­ty (the cam­pus I am assigned to). I can pret­ty much do what­ev­er I want, and yet I know that if I need help or coach­ing it’s just a phone call away.
  7. Chi Alpha is very mis­sion­al, both in what we do on cam­pus and in what we seek to do beyond it. We teach our stu­dents to be effec­tive for Christ in a non-Chris­t­ian envi­rone­ment and we do it so well that they have become the recruits of choice for some of our sharpest mis­sion­ar­ies around the globe. Which is why Assem­blies of God World Mis­sions sank over a mil­lion dol­lars into The World Mis­sions Sum­mit ear­li­er this year–and which is why they got over 700 recruits in return.

Chi Alpha’s Advisory Leadership Team

I just spent 16 hours trav­el­ing in order to spend 18 hours in Spring­field, MO.

First, an apol­o­gy to all my Spring­field friends, but I lit­er­al­ly had zero free min­utes the entire time that I was there (I am now at an age where I view sleep as non-option­al). I’ll try to carve out a more flex­i­ble sched­ule on future trips.

Which leads me to the point of this post: I’m on Chi Alpha’s new­ly formed Advi­so­ry Lead­er­ship Team (ALT). I would have pre­ferred to be in the CTRL or DEL group, but ALT is where they stuck me. 😉

This group is com­prised of three local Chi Alpha lead­ers (present­ly me, Dick Her­man and Mark Bri­ley) along with the res­i­dent nation­al Chi Alpha staff and meets every two months to advise the nation­al direc­tor on strate­gic deci­sions and pol­i­cy issues.

This is my own quirky and high­ly sub­jec­tive take on things.

Things I Learned:

  • Scott Mar­tin had to fight to keep the World Mis­sions Sum­mit from open­ing with a human video (and one involv­ing swords, at that). We all owe him a tremen­dous debt.
  • The biggest Chi Alpha min­istries are:
    • 600 stu­dents at San Diego State Uni­ver­si­ty with Sue Hegle.
    • 430 at West­ern Wash­ing­ton Uni­ver­si­ty with Brady Bob­bink.
    • 275 at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cen­tral Arkansas with Matt Car­pen­ter.
    • ??? at Uni­ver­si­ty of Louisiana-Lafayette with Eric Treuil (his num­bers aren’t on file, but I esti­mate his min­istry prob­a­bly fits here on the list).
    • 190 at Flori­da State Uni­ver­si­ty with Mario Solari.
    • 175 at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Min­neso­ta-Duluth with Chuck Haavik.
    • 175 at Ten­nessee Tech Uni­ver­si­ty with Jonathan Scales.
    • 160 at Mur­ray State with Mark Ran­doll.
    • 150 at Mis­souri State Uni­ver­si­ty with Noble Bow­man.
  • Most Chi Alpha groups meet on Thurs­day or Tues­day at 7pm.
  • Only 19% of Chi Alpha stu­dents have an Assem­blies of God back­ground.
  • Chi Alpha at Yale Uni­ver­si­ty saw 40 stu­dents get saved last year. Big props to Andy Cun­ning­ham.

Things We Dis­cussed There Which I Am Also Free To Dis­cuss Here:

  • Fill­ing out the annu­al Chi Alpha cen­sus needs to be part of the annu­al affil­i­a­tion process. Not fill­ing it out (and not affil­i­at­ing) will be grounds for hav­ing your pay­check with­held, just as with our month­ly finan­cial reports. Also, this needs to be doable online.
  • We spent a lot of time talk­ing about Chi Alpha’s deci­sion-mak­ing process and orga­ni­za­tion­al struc­ture. There’s a lot of that I can’t com­ment on yet because our Nation­al Direc­tor is going to be talk­ing to many peo­ple one on one to explain things to them. Here are things I think I can safe­ly say:
    • Chi Alpha does­n’t exist in a vac­u­um: we’re embed­ded in the Assem­blies of God and are absolute­ly gov­erned by its con­sti­tu­tion, bylaws, and pol­i­cy man­u­als. The most impor­tant take­away from that is that the Nation­al Direc­tor is pret­ty much the pope of Chi Alpha when it comes to nation­al deci­sions (as opposed to dis­trict and local deci­sions).
    • In addi­tion it is help­ful to real­ize that there are four tiers (for lack of a bet­ter word) of lead­er­ship with­in Chi Alpha.
      • The Nation­al Direc­tor
      • Nation­al Staff
      • Translo­cal Influ­encers (Area Direc­tors, CMIT Direc­tors, DXARs, nation­al Resource Per­son­nel, etc). This is the most con­fus­ing, because most of the groups at this lev­el are entan­gled (almost every­one who serves in one of these roles also serves in at least one oth­er translo­cal capac­i­ty) and there’s not real­ly a hier­ar­cy among them (for exam­ple, CMIT direc­tors are sub­or­di­nate to DXARs in cer­tain respects but not oth­ers and CMIT direc­tors are more influ­en­tial with­in Chi Alpha than DXARs). Real­iz­ing that they are all in rough­ly the same tier of lead­er­ship (which they express in very dif­fer­ent domains) is help­ful when try­ing to fig­ure out how this beast called Chi Alpha actu­al­ly works.
      • Local Staff
    • Func­tion­al­ly, each lev­el has auton­o­my with­in their assigned lev­el of respon­si­bil­i­ty (for exam­ple, no one can tell a local staffer what to preach on any giv­en week). Micro­manag­ing is the root of all kinds of evil.
    • We real­ly need to define for each group exact­ly what deci­sions they are empow­ered to make with­out fear of their deci­sions being med­dled with. We also need to clar­i­fy who reports to whom. This has to be in a pub­lic writ­ten doc­u­ment that every­one can look at.
    • The real chal­lenge that we face is trust. My own take on it: many of the tier 3 lead­er­ship lack con­fi­dence in tiers 1 and 2. Some lack trust in the com­pe­tence of the top tier lead­er­ship and oth­ers lack trust in the char­ac­ter of the top tier lead­er­ship (update: I do not mean that they lack trust com­plete­ly; rather, I mean that they lack com­plete trust–a non­triv­ial dif­fer­ence). Most Tier 4 lead­ers seem unaware of this dynamic–they tend to hold the Tier 3, 2, and 1 lead­er­ship in a cer­tain amount of awe and imag­ine that they’re all best friends. Many of them are good friends, and almost all like one anoth­er and are com­mit­ted to work­ing togeth­er effec­tive­ly. But there’s still a break­down in trust between the nation­al lead­ers and the rest. (update: I wrote an arti­cle explain­ing that this is a ten­den­cy intrin­sic to fed­er­al gov­er­nance)
  • We need a nation­al rep­re­sen­ta­tive to serve our stu­dent-led groups. We’ve invit­ed Dave Short to fill this posi­tion (con­tin­gent on his dis­tric­t’s approval).
  • The prob­a­ble (but by no means cer­tain) evo­lu­tion of the ALT will inl­cude all the Area Direc­tors along with a non-DXAR non-CMIT Direc­tor rep from their region. Sort of like the Gen­er­al Pres­bytery of the Assem­blies of God.

Any­way, I put all this online for two rea­sons:

  1. As a local cam­pus rep­re­sen­ta­tive I feel an oblig­a­tion to let the peo­ple I’m rep­re­sent­ing know what’s going on. As long as it’s not con­fi­den­tial I’ll talk about it freely. If it is con­fi­den­tial I’ll tell you as much as I can.
  2. To ask for feed­back. You can either com­ment on this post or email me direct­ly. I’ll be sure to post the agen­da for the next meet­ing once I get it so you can give me input on that head­ing into it.

Nothing Like Objective Reporting

There’s just noth­ing like an even-hand­ed pre­sen­ta­tion of per­spec­tives to get your day start­ed, is there?

Too bad I just could­n’t find an even-hand­ed pre­sen­ta­tion of per­spec­tives at the start of my day.

See if you can guess who the author of this arti­cle in the Stan­ford Dai­ly is sym­pa­thet­ic to. This is the open­ing para­graph:

Rows of cross­es lined White Plaza yes­ter­day, as the Stan­ford Stu­dents for Life spon­sored a memo­r­i­al for the sup­posed “vic­tims” of Roe vs. Wade. Mark­ing the anniver­sary of the land­mark Supreme Court case that pro­vid­ed women the right to abort preg­nan­cies under cer­tain con­di­tions, the memo­r­i­al was erect­ed to remem­ber the approx­i­mate­ly 45 mil­lion fetus­es that have been legal­ly abort­ed since 1973.

College Cuteness Quantified

In the spir­it of Freako­nom­ics, two U of Chica­go under­grads decid­ed to sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly quan­ti­fy the attrac­tive­ness of female frosh on their cam­pus and sev­er­al oth­ers. Stan­ford, I am sad to report, ranked a mere 8 out of 10. I feel as though my friends have had their hon­or impugned.

From An Email I Sent My Students Earlier Today

It’ll be like hav­ing that new car smell waft­ing around you all day long. Sort of like a pleas­ant body odor except not so weird.

Guilty As Charged

From a phone con­ver­sa­tion yes­ter­day: “[Our mutu­al friend] told me about your con­ver­sa­tion. Glen, only you would think to mock some­one who had just tried to kill them­selves.” In my defense, I was quite fun­ny (and the humor was well-received: the psych wards of hos­pi­tals are such drea­ry places).

I need the word for…

While lying abed this morn­ing, a ques­tion popped into my mind: “You know how some­times things go sour abrupt­ly and you have this detached sense of watch­ing your life col­lapse in slow motion? What’s the fam­i­ly-friend­ly word for that?”

There are over 500,000 words in the Eng­lish lan­guage, and most of us have nev­er heard 80% of them. Take didap­per, for exam­ple. It’s a real word (a small grebe as it turns out), but you’ve like­ly nev­er even heard it. You are no doubt an artic­u­late speak­er with a wide-rang­ing vocab­u­lary, and yet you could­n’t pick a didap­per out of a line­up if it mugged you. Grebe is just five let­ters and yet if I played it in Scrab­ble you’d make me whip out a dic­tio­nary to prove it was real.

There are hun­dreds of thou­sands of words just like that. There must be one for this! Every­one I’ve asked knows exact­ly the feel­ing I’m describ­ing, and yet they can’t think of a polite name for it.

In case you’re still con­fused about that feel­ing, here are some oth­er descrip­tions:

  • the sick­ly feel­ing that drowns your mind when you remem­ber that you left your presentation/homework/wallet at home
  • the sen­sa­tion of your bow­els plum­met­ing to your knees as you real­ize you’re not alone when you thought you were
  • the instant your mind achieves total calm and with per­fect clar­i­ty gazes upon your mis­take in all its splen­dor
  • the sud­den jolt that runs through your body at the sound of a shot­gun round being cham­bered unex­pect­ed­ly

That feel­ing. It’s not fear, although fear often fol­lows on its heels. It’s not surprise–surprise is hav­ing some­thing unex­pect­ed hap­pen whether good or bad. This is the sen­sa­tion that fol­lows sur­prise as you begin to process the event and real­ize that it is very, very bad.

Most emo­tions are des­ti­na­tions (the state of hap­pi­ness or sor­row, for instance), this one is more of a jour­ney.

What’s the word?