Author: Glen

Footnotes Are Infinitely Superior To Endnotes

I hate end­notes. In fact, I loathe them. They force me to read with two book­marks and for no good rea­son. Foot­notes are a fun­da­men­tal­ly supe­ri­or way to attribute infor­ma­tion and are even bet­ter for digress­ing with­out inter­rupt­ing an argu­ment.

Yet more books use end­notes than foot­notes. Why?

Jesus Is Quantum

There is no obser­va­tion with­out par­tic­i­pa­tion. Alter­na­tive­ly: there is no inves­ti­ga­tion with inter­ac­tion, there is no analy­sis with­out alter­ation, and there is no look­ing with­out chang­ing.

Turning A Phrase

Our neigh­bor is apply­ing for a job as a pro­fes­sor and part of her job inter­view will involve lec­tur­ing to a class, so last night a bunch of us got togeth­er and lis­tened to her prac­tice her Salem Witch Hunt lec­ture (her exper­tise is in colo­nial his­to­ry). It was quite good. She’s got a lot of knowl­edge and presents it well.

At one point she men­tioned how the con­fess­ing witch­es described in lurid detail their covenant with the Dev­il which, along with sev­er­al oth­er intrigu­ing details, involved kiss­ing his butt. Lit­er­al­ly. To make a deal with the Evil One they believed you had to apply your lips to his pos­te­ri­or.

And they described this in lurid detail. Lurid.

Being a lover of words, I imme­di­ate­ly began to think of ways to allude to the act of kiss­ing demon tush that would fall short of lurid but would nonethe­less be evoca­tive. I came up with three:

  • giv­ing the Ene­my of All Flesh a hiney hick­ey
  • kiss­ing the heinous anus
  • smooching the sul­furous sphinc­ter (alter­nate end­ing: Satan­ic sphinc­ter)

Com­ing soon to a ser­mon near you…

update: my neigh­bor has blogged about the evening as well. With a pho­to. And yes, I am the one who remains name­less. Also, I edit­ed one of my word­plays because I felt a verb that I had cho­sen for vari­ety was stronger than I had intend­ed to be. There’s a dis­tinc­tion between humor and vul­gar­i­ty, and I think my orig­i­nal verb was too crass.

Neologisms

Two new words have bounced into my head recent­ly, and I have gra­cious­ly decid­ed to bestow them upon the world.

  1. Gloth: glut­tony plus sloth. Exam­ple: “Over the Christ­mas break many stu­dents are afflict­ed with a strong case of gloth.”
  2. Proc­to­log­i­cal: the adjec­ti­val form of proc­tol­o­gist. Exam­ple: “Q: How does this pup­pet work, any­way? A: You have to get proc­to­log­i­cal with it.”

Be the first on your block to use them–impress your neigh­bors!

Students Drive Me Crazy

Today I met with a frosh who is try­ing to choose between Chi Alpha and anoth­er ministry–we’ll call them Min­istry X. A sum­ma­ry ensues:

“What I like best about Chi Alpha is the mes­sages. Min­istry X’s mes­sages aren’t very good. And it isn’t clear what they believe. And I real­ly don’t like their Bible study. Chi Alpha’s Bible study is much bet­ter. And I’ve found a place to serve at Chi Alpha–it would be much hard­er for me to find some­thing to do at Min­istry X because they’re so large. But I think I should choose Min­istry X.”

That sound you hear is me slam­ming the door shut on my head repeat­ed­ly.

Federal Governance And Its Discontents

This is sort of ran­dom, but I find it fas­ci­nat­ing so please bear with me:

When­ev­er pow­er is split between one cen­tral and sev­er­al region­al author­i­ties, we are talk­ing about a fed­er­al sys­tem of gov­er­nance. The most obvi­ous Amer­i­can exam­ple is the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment (Wash­ing­ton, D.C.) ver­sus the state gov­ern­ments.

In a fed­er­al sys­tem of gov­er­nance there is a built-in ten­den­cy towards ten­sion between the cen­tral author­i­ty and the region­al author­i­ties.

Each side is try­ing to do the best they can from their per­pec­tive, yet each side keeps mak­ing deci­sions that don’t make sense from the oth­er side’s per­spec­tive. This results in a lack of con­fi­dence in the oth­er side. Most region­al author­i­ties prob­a­bly have a 85–95% con­fi­dence fac­tor in the nation­al lead­er­ship (which is rec­i­p­ro­cat­ed by the nation­al author­i­ty). This dis­trust cen­ters on two areas: com­pe­tence and char­ac­ter.

  • incom­plete trust in com­pe­tence: I believe that you mean well, but that you lack the nec­es­sary atten­tion to detail/big pic­ture perspective/fundraising knack/writing ability/knowledge of the issues/etc.
  • incom­plete trust in char­ac­ter: I don’t think that you’re evil, but I do think that you’re oper­at­ing with a dif­fer­ent set of val­ues than I am. You define hon­esty dif­fer­ent­ly than I do, or you have a per­son­al as well as an orga­ni­za­tion­al agen­da, or you lack the courage to dis­ap­point peo­ple, etc.

I’m not talk­ing about a com­plete lack of con­fi­dence, mind you. I’m mere­ly talk­ing about a lack of com­plete con­fi­dence. A com­plete lack of con­fi­dence calls for dras­tic action. A lack of com­plete con­fi­dence calls for mid-course adjust­ments.

Some spe­cif­ic exam­ples of a lack of com­plete con­fi­dence:

  • “Will this real­ly hap­pen or is it just a big todo about noth­ing?” (char­ac­ter)
  • “This is what they say here and now, what will the emails say in three months?” (char­ac­ter)
  • “This is what they want to do, but can they real­ly pull it off?” (com­pe­tence)
  • “Are they will­ing to actu­al­ly enforce this pol­i­cy or it real­ly going to be the same-old same-old?” (com­pe­tence and char­ac­ter)

The Assem­blies of God tends to use a fed­er­al sys­tem of gov­er­nance:

  • Spring­field, MO ver­sus Dis­trict Offi­cials
  • Dis­trict Offi­cials ver­sus Sec­tion­al Pres­byters
  • the nation­al youth depart­ment ver­sus the dis­trict youth depart­ments
  • Chi Alpha (see my notes on a Chi Alpha lead­er­ship team meet­ing)

Since we have a fed­er­al sys­tem of gov­er­nance we should­n’t be sur­prised when the same ten­sions emerge in our move­ment that we see in oth­er fed­er­al orga­ni­za­tions. But we are sur­prised. Not only are we sur­prised, we tend to diag­nose it as a spir­i­tu­al prob­lem such as dis­uni­ty, a fail­ure to sub­mit to author­i­ty, an exam­ple of uneth­i­cal lead­er­ship, or the politi­ciza­tion of a spir­i­tu­al orga­ni­za­tion.

While a spir­i­tu­al prob­lem may be present and exac­er­bat­ing the sit­u­a­tion, it’s not the causal fac­tor. The ten­den­cy towards ten­sion is pro­duced by the struc­ture itself.

Is the fed­er­al sys­tem a bad sys­tem of gov­er­nance? No. It just pro­vides us with chal­lenges that we need to over­come: oth­er sys­tems pro­vide oth­er chal­lenges and there is no panacea.

So what should we do if we real­ize that a lack of con­fi­dence is hin­der­ing our effec­tive­ness?

A few things occur to me:

  1. Remem­ber that this is a nat­ur­al prob­lem, not an intrin­si­cal­ly spir­i­tu­al one.
  2. Remem­ber that this is not evi­dence of a fail­ing orga­ni­za­tion or fail­ing lead­er­ship. This will recur over time regard­less of the orga­ni­za­tion’s health or the lead­er­ship’s com­pe­tence (although the fre­quen­cy and dura­tion of the cycles of mis­trust will tell you some­thing sig­nif­i­cant about the orga­ni­za­tion and its lead­ers).
  3. Real­ize that you would prob­a­bly agree with the oth­er side if you had their respon­si­bil­i­ties and resources. You’ve seen it a mil­lion times: some­one who pre­vi­ous­ly agreed with you changed posi­tions and all of a sud­den became unrea­son­able. You would do the same thing.
  4. Be reluc­tant to crit­i­cize where you are not will­ing to help. I say “be reluc­tant” rather than “refuse” because some­times you’re asked for feedback–giving it hon­est­ly is a mat­ter of integri­ty.
  5. Be frank about the ten­sions and their rea­sons. Forth­right­ness is the long-term key to health. Pre­tend­ing that they aren’t there exac­er­bates the ten­sion.
  6. Focus on the issues and not the per­son­al­i­ties (and most assured­ly not on the his­to­ry).
  7. Pray.

Obvious and Brilliant

Mark Driscoll just began offer­ing his ser­mons on Google Video fast food nation movie down­load . Great idea–they han­dle the stor­age and the band­width!

And we thought it was bad here

Col­lege min­istry in the Unit­ed King­dom is even stick­i­er than it is here: “The Chris­t­ian Union was advised that the use of the words “men” and “women” in the con­sti­tu­tion were caus­ing con­cern because they could be seen as exclud­ing trans­sex­u­al and trans­gen­dered peo­ple.” (source)

Visiting Prof Condemns Porn

A fas­ci­nat­ing tid­bit from today’s Stan­ford Dai­ly: Texas prof con­demns porn.

Invit­ed speak­er Robert Jensen, a jour­nal­ism pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Texas, pre­sent­ed a fair­ly bit­ing crit­i­cism of the medi­um, warn­ing that the con­tent of pornog­ra­phy is “increas­ing­ly cru­el, degrad­ing and hos­tile to women.”

What I found most inter­est­ing at the end of the arti­cle is that no one want­ed to go on record as defend­ing pornog­ra­phy. Every pro-porn quote is anony­mous. Giv­en that there’s no real per­se­cu­tion of pornog­ra­phy lovers, I can only assume the desire for anonymi­ty is from shame. That says some­thing pret­ty pro­found about the extent to which they have doubts about the cause they advo­cate for.

Seven Things I Love About Chi Alpha Nationally

I was think­ing in the show­er about how won­der­ful Chi Alpha is.

Here are sev­en spe­cif­ic things I love about our move­ment:

  1. We have a great cul­ture in Chi Alpha. Almost all the big buzz­words in lead­er­ship (men­tor­ing, learn­ing orga­ni­za­tion, authen­tic­i­ty, being mis­sion­al, etc) have been core parts of our DNA for decades.
  2. Most of the best peo­ple I know are Chi Alpha lead­ers. Read that again if it’s con­fus­ing.
  3. Chi Alpha offers great train­ing. Whether it’s in the area of lead­ing a small group or sup­port-rais­ing, the train­ing is top-notch and use­ful.
  4. Chi Alpha con­sis­tent­ly offers life-trans­form­ing region­al and nation­al con­fer­ences (with some of the best wor­ship to be found any­where, I might add).
  5. Chi Alpha is part of the Assem­blies of God, and the Assem­blies of God rocks in ways I can­not even begin to describe here. Some­day I’ll have to make anoth­er list of sev­en things about them.
  6. Chi Alpha is very entre­peneur­ial. I have almost com­plete auton­o­my with­in my sphere of respon­si­bil­i­ty (the cam­pus I am assigned to). I can pret­ty much do what­ev­er I want, and yet I know that if I need help or coach­ing it’s just a phone call away.
  7. Chi Alpha is very mis­sion­al, both in what we do on cam­pus and in what we seek to do beyond it. We teach our stu­dents to be effec­tive for Christ in a non-Chris­t­ian envi­rone­ment and we do it so well that they have become the recruits of choice for some of our sharpest mis­sion­ar­ies around the globe. Which is why Assem­blies of God World Mis­sions sank over a mil­lion dol­lars into The World Mis­sions Sum­mit ear­li­er this year–and which is why they got over 700 recruits in return.