Columbia Doctoral Student Outs Herself As A Christian

I was inter­est­ed to stum­ble across this arti­cle: No Ordi­nary Path: Colum­bia doc­tor­al stu­dent Lau­ren Win­ner outs her­self as a Chris­t­ian linked on the Chris­tian­i­ty Today blog.

There are two things that caught my inter­est:
a) this young lady had a remark­able encounter with Jesus
b) it’s con­sid­ered news­wor­thy that a doc­tor­al can­di­date at a prestit­gious school believes in God

Why is this news­wor­thy? In her words: “It is not clear,” she says care­ful­ly, “that it is intel­lec­tu­al­ly respectable to be reli­gious. And pub­lish­ing a spir­i­tu­al auto­bi­og­ra­phy might fur­ther under­cut my abil­i­ty to be tak­en seri­ous­ly.”

Don’t wor­ry, sister–you’re not alone! There are many smart and well-edu­cat­ed com­pan­ions on your jour­ney of faith with Jesus.

And the Theologian of the Year Award Goes to… Buffy?

The Door (a reli­gious humor mag­a­zine) deems Buffy the Vam­pire Slay­er to be the The­olo­gian of the Year. Our nation’s sea­son of tri­al influ­enced The Door’s selec­tion of Buffy the Vam­pire Slay­er as The­olo­gian of the Year. Let’s face it. In per­ilous times, we need some­one who can not only decon­struct the prob­lem of evil, but kick its hiney. And that means Buffy and her Scoo­by Gang. Read all about it!

In an inter­est­ing coin­ci­dence, Annals of Improb­a­ble Research (a sci­ence humor mag­a­zine) has just issued the 2002 Ig Nobel prizes ami­tyville hor­ror the divx movie online to hon­or peo­ple whose achieve­ments “can­not or should not be repro­duced.” [update: the offi­cial 2002 list is online with ref­er­ences]

Among this year’s win­ners are Karl Kruszel­nic­ki, a Syd­ney Uni­ver­si­ty researcher who wrote the paper on bel­ly-but­ton lint. Dr Kruszel­nic­ki, at his own expense, stud­ied 5000 bel­ly-but­ton lint sam­ples. He con­clud­ed the lint was a com­bi­na­tion of cloth­ing fibres and skin cells that were led to the navel, via body hair, “as all roads lead to Rome”. “Your typ­i­cal gen­er­a­tor of bel­ly-but­ton lint or fluff is a slight­ly over­weight, mid­dle-aged male with a hairy abdomen,” he said. (source)

The Thinker At Stanford (Redux)

Final­ly, Rod­in’s rumi­na­tive repos­er is restored!

As you may recall, a few weeks ago I leapt atop the pedestal that usu­al­ly holds The Thinker and mused about Stan­ford’s spir­i­tu­al con­di­tion.

I was puz­zled that the pedestal was bar­ren, but I did­n’t know where The Thinker was. I was even more shocked when I lat­er passed by the same area and saw that even the pedestal had gone miss­ing!

It turns out that The Thinker was on tour in Aus­tralia and Sin­ga­pore (which explains the bar­ren pedestal)! Now Rod­in’s rumi­nat­ing repos­er is restored, and he’s been giv­en a new place on cam­pus (which explains the miss­ing pedestal).

Buried in the news piece is an inter­est­ing lit­tle fact–Stanford has the third-largest col­lec­tion of Rodin sculp­tures in the world!

Stupid Human Tricks

It’s been a few days since I post­ed any off­beat news items: here are some stu­pid human tricks.

Man Suf­fers Severe Burns Try­ing To Kill Lice: The 26-year-old doused a tow­el with rub­bing alco­hol, put it on his head and then lit a cig­a­rette, police said. The tow­el caught fire and engulfed the man. He suf­fered burns on about 50 per­cent of his body, police said. Ouch–that had to hurt!

Cana­di­an Man Tries To Bungee Jump Onto Ship–But His Cord Is Too Long: William Dean Sul­li­van mis­cal­cu­lat­ed the ship’s speed and suf­fered minor head injuries on Sun­day when he bounced off its ten­nis court, vol­ley­ball net and a deck rail­ing, before being left dan­gling in mid-air as the ship sailed away, Van­cou­ver Police said. Police said Sul­li­van has planned to bungee jump from the Lions Gate Bridge, which spans the entrance to Van­cou­ver har­bor, stop­ping just above the pass­ing ship so he could then low­er him­self a short dis­tance to the deck. That could­n’t have felt much bet­ter…

Final­ly, Man Clips 153 Clothes­pins To His Face For World Record: Gar­ry said that attach­ing the pegs to his cheeks hurt the most and after­wards you could see he was in a lot of pain. There were marks on his skin that he said would last an hour and he had to keep rub­bing his face. Aagh–what is it with peo­ple hurt­ing them­selves? I feel pain just read­ing these sto­ries!

Christian Big Sib/Little Sib Program

Here’s a mes­sage from Unit­ed in Christ: Chris­t­ian Broth­ers and Sis­ters (CBS) pairs incom­ing Stan­ford stu­dents with old­er stu­dents to form a sib­ling fam­i­ly that offers each of its mem­bers the oppor­tu­ni­ty for encour­age­ment in his or her own walk with the Lord, fel­low­ship with fel­low believ­ers, and con­nec­tion with cam­pus min­istries. John 13:34–35

Chris­t­ian lit­tle sibs:
— receive encour­age­ment and guid­ance in the adjust­ment to life at Stan­ford in a pos­i­tive, per­son­al, and fun man­ner that glo­ri­fies God.

- build rela­tion­ships with their broth­ers and sis­ters in Christ by hang­ing out infor­mal­ly as a sib fam­i­ly.
— meet fel­low Chris­t­ian class­mates by accom­pa­ny­ing their sibs to cam­pus-wide events that bring togeth­er the entire Chris­t­ian fam­i­ly at Stan­ford.

If you’d like to be a lit­tle sib, email the fol­low­ing to hconnell@stanford.edu.

1. Name
2. Year in school (besides fresh­men, trans­fer stu­dents are also wel­come as lit­tle sibs)
3. Res­i­dence next year
4. Home­town
5. Aca­d­e­m­ic inter­ests
6. Activities/hobbies
7. Do you have a per­son­al rela­tion­ship with Jesus Christ?
8. Why do you want to be a CBS lit­tle sib?

Isn’t Belief In God Just An Accident of Birth?

Over on Bound­less there’s a real­ly great dia­log between a stu­dent and a prof on the rea­son­able­ness of the­ism. The stu­dent is won­der­ing if he believes just because he was raised to believe.

Here’s an excerpt:
[stu­dent] “I was talk­ing with my friend Don. You know him.”

[pro­fes­sor] “Sure. It’s through him that I know you.”

“Well, the oth­er day he asked whether I believe in God, and I did­n’t know what to tell him.”

“You don’t know whether God is real?”

“It’s not that. I don’t know whether I believe in Him.”

“Isn’t that the same thing?”

“No. See, I do believe in God. But I don’t see why my belief should be true. So maybe I don’t believe in Him, if you see what I mean.”

“Maybe you’re try­ing to say that your belief does­n’t reflect real knowl­edge, so even though you believe in God, you also think maybe you should­n’t. Am I get­ting warm?

“Yeah, that’s it. See, one of my oth­er pro­fes­sors said that the only rea­son I believe in God is that I’ve been brought up that way. If I’d been brought up by pagans, prob­a­bly I’d believe in lots of gods. If I’d been brought up by athe­ists, prob­a­bly I would­n’t believe in any god. So I have this belief — but so what?”…

The rest of the dia­log gives a very satist­fy­ing answer to that ques­tion!

It’s a Cat-Eat-Cat World Out There…

I just ran across two web pages that jux­ta­pose too per­fect­ly to pass up.

On a sad note, a stray cat was shot in the eye with a horse tran­quil­iz­er dart. The dart was 7″ long and the cat wan­dered around with the dart stick­ing out of its head for a week before being picked up by author­i­ties. The Kansas City com­mu­ni­ty is out­raged.

On a fun­ny note, that ani­mal offi­cer sure is lucky he did­n’t pull that on these viking kit­tens!

Q: What does this have to do with Chi Alpha?
A: Noth­ing except that we have a good sense of humor!

Life in the Dorms

What life looks like in a fresh­man dorm at 3 AM.

I just ran across a real­ly inter­est­ing arti­cle about life in the Stan­ford dorms from the per­spec­tive of a fac­ul­ty mem­ber who’s been liv­ing in Don­ner House for 16 years.

One excerpt on the late-night scene: By day, fresh­men man­age the ins and outs of aca­d­e­m­ic and res­i­den­tial life; they are ded­i­cat­ed stu­dents, loy­al friends, com­mit­ted musi­cians, gift­ed ath­letes, devot­ed com­mu­ni­ty vol­un­teers. But an RF soon learns that this every­day world is to some extent a con­ces­sion on their part: they’re gen­er­al­ly very nice peo­ple and bear us no par­tic­u­lar grudges. They’ll play our detail- and sched­ule-laden game if that’s what we real­ly want. But when the adult world puts on its bathrobe and gets ready to turn in, anoth­er real­i­ty bub­bles up in the hall­ways and lounges.

Late at night, when the every­day has lost its grip, con­ven­tion, habit and expec­ta­tion fall away in a gen­er­al lib­er­a­tion from the demands of the clock. There is no eti­quette for paja­maed encoun­ters over Proust, MP3s, the Bud­dha, the Band. There are no cour­te­sies between two stu­dents with tooth­brush­es in hand and some­thing on their minds. Dur­ing these clock­less nights, stu­dents begin to find and edu­cate them­selves. The con­ver­sa­tions are not always tony ones on reli­gion or phi­los­o­phy; stu­dents also mix it up on the design of the dorm T‑shirt, the no-car pol­i­cy for frosh, the virtues of Willy Won­ka, the dif­fer­ence between “mankind” and “human­i­ty.” And these dis­cus­sions take place in the non­tra­di­tion­al space of no per­cep­ti­ble time at all.

The late-night com­mu­ni­ty stu­dents seem to cre­ate auto­mat­i­cal­ly is an impor­tant, per­haps even vital, rite of pas­sage from the world of inher­it­ed ideas to the world of real thought. In this noc­tur­nal place of chaot­ic chal­lenge and rev­e­la­tion, new worlds can be con­tem­plat­ed, along with the lat­est crush. And it was an invi­ta­tion to this con­ver­sa­tion that I refused when I remind­ed Bri­an of the time.

Except in the class­room, most of us at the Uni­ver­si­ty have lit­tle to do with under­grad­u­ate life. When we do become involved, we are often rep­re­sent­ing the University’s author­i­ty to its most insistent—and some­times troublesome—students. As a res­i­dent fel­low, I’ve had my share of dif­fi­cult dis­cus­sions. It falls to the RF, for instance, to tell a stu­dent that, delight­ful per­son that he is, he’s an ugly drunk. Or, as the care­tak­er of the whole com­mu­ni­ty, an RF will have the unpleas­ant task of let­ting a few stu­dents know that their par­tic­u­lar brand of hilarity—sexist, homo­pho­bic, or just plain loud or smelly—is a pain in the col­lec­tive tush. I remem­ber once hav­ing to remind a group of young men that when our facil­i­ties super­vi­sor (a won­der­ful woman who took vir­tu­al­ly every oth­er thing about dorm life in stride) was in the men’s bath­room, they need­ed to refrain from using the uri­nals. And I remem­ber rather twitchi­ly see­ing the stu­dents out, care­ful­ly shut­ting my door and col­laps­ing in laughter—at the sheer ridicu­lous­ness of hav­ing to remind smart young peo­ple of such a nor­mal cour­tesy; at the very real impor­tance of it; and final­ly, at the fact that no one had ever told me I’d have such a con­ver­sa­tion in my own home.

Stanford Law Prof Tries to Rein in Copyright Laws

Stan­ford prof tries to lessen the dura­tion of out-of-con­trol copy­right exten­sions.

Lawrence Less­ing, Stan­ford law prof, will be argu­ing Eldred vs Ashcroft before the Supreme Court, ask­ing the jus­tices (four of whom are Stan­ford alum­ni) to lessen the dura­tion of copy­right pro­tec­tion.

[note–edited for usage (thanks to Andrew for catch­ing a homonym error!)]

And Now For Something Completely Different…

Check out this opti­cal illu­sion.

Pret­ty wild, huh?

And while we’re on the sub­ject of per­cep­tion, peruse this Nature arti­cle about the sub­lim­i­nal image hid­den in a Zen gar­den.