Why Jesus?

a dilemmaI men­tioned I’d be adding more writ­ings to my list of essays and Bible stud­ies. I’ve just uploaded an essay called Why Jesus?

I wrote it to give away to guests who come to our wor­ship meet­ings. It’s rel­a­tive­ly short (about 3,600 words). In it I high­light three sim­ple rea­sons to believe in God and then show the read­er how to decide whether Jesus is indeed the way to God that he claimed to be.

I have some more stuff on my hard dri­ve I’ll put up here even­tu­al­ly.

Stuff I’ve Written

ManuscriptI’ve final­ly put up a col­lec­tion of essays and Bible stud­ies that I’ve writ­ten. I’ve been com­pos­ing them off and on for years, usu­al­ly in response to ques­tions I receive from stu­dents.

I have more hid­den away in the recess­es of my hard dri­ve. I’ll add them to the list as I have time.

I hope you find them help­ful. Feel free to share them with oth­ers or use them for any non­com­mer­cial pur­pos­es.

Group Text Messaging

7001 New Messages?
For a few years, Face­book was one of the best ways to con­nect with col­lege stu­dents. Not any more. It’s still use­ful, but not near­ly as use­ful as it used to be. The nov­el­ty has worn off and so stu­dents aren’t as respon­sive on it.

So like Steve Lutz I’ve been think­ing about text mes­sag­ing late­ly. My younger stu­dents (frosh and sopho­mores) seem to be much more like­ly to have unlim­it­ed tex­ting plans than my upper­class­men and grad stu­dents.

In the past I’ve just texted peo­ple indi­vid­u­al­ly, but now I’m exper­i­ment­ing with group text mes­sag­ing ser­vices.

I con­sid­ered using Twit­ter and telling peo­ple to sub­scribe via text. A few prob­lems:
a) Col­lege stu­dents don’t use twit­ter.
b) It cen­tral­izes the com­mu­ni­ca­tion too much.
c) I don’t feel con­fi­dent in twit­ter’s reli­a­bil­i­ty.
d) The verb “tweet”.

So I’ve been look­ing into oth­er ser­vices. So far I’m drawn to txtBlaster. The thing I like best is that I can dep­u­tize as many of the sub­scribers as I want and allow them to text the entire group, so I can make this a stu­dent-dri­ven thing. It’s a free (ad-sup­port­ed) ser­vice. They claim to screen their ads care­ful­ly and to tar­get them based on the type of group you set up. So far so good on that front.

Do you have
a) any thoughts on using text mes­sag­ing effec­tive­ly as a min­istry tool?
b) anoth­er ser­vice to rec­om­mend (such as TextMarks or txtSig­nal or even the maligned Twit­ter)?

P.S. If you want to see txtBlaster in action, feel free to text xas­tan­ford to 25278. I’ll be play­ing around with it for the next few days.

Evaluating Sermons

I eval­u­ate a lot of ser­mons. I don’t just mean that I lis­ten to ser­mons and decide whether I like them or not — every­one who goes to church does that. I mean that I pro­fes­sion­al­ly eval­u­ate ser­mons and give for­mal feed­back to the preach­er. Some I eval­u­ate in my role as a min­istry train­er and oth­ers I eval­u­ate in my role on a preach­ing team (before one of us preach­es we preach the ser­mon to each oth­er and get feed­back on how to strength­en it).

So I’ve thought about this a lot. Most ser­mon eval­u­a­tion forms you find on the inter­net and at sem­i­nar­ies are not very help­ful because they mea­sure too many things.

These were the top hits when I googled for “ser­mon eval­u­a­tion forms”
Calvin Sem­i­nary’s (30 ques­tions)
The Ortho­dox Pres­by­ter­ian Church’s Form for Min­istry Interns (41 ques­tions)
Reformed Bap­tist Sem­i­nary’s (35 ques­tions).

Do all the things these long forms ask about mat­ter? A lit­tle. But using that to eval­u­ate a ser­mon is like eval­u­at­ing your church’s state­ment of faith based on its gram­mar. It sort of miss­es the point. Of course you want a state­ment of faith that is gram­mat­i­cal, but if its con­tent is sketchy then every moment spent improv­ing its gram­mar is wast­ed time. Sin­ful­ly wast­ed time.

In the same way, focus­ing on the super­fi­cials of a ser­mon when the under­ly­ing con­tent is bogus is ridicu­lous. I real­ize that’s not the intent of these forms, but that is what they encour­age.

So this is the form I use:

Point­ers (what should I change?)

Keep­ers (what was so good I should be sure not to take it out)?

That’s it — two ques­tions. I some­times do it on a 3x5 index card. Keep­ers on the front, point­ers on the back (a tip I got from Earl Creps).

And this is the grid I’m putting it through:
1) Was Christ pro­claimed clear­ly?
2) Was the ser­mon Bib­li­cal­ly sound?
3) Was it inter­est­ing?
4) Did it ask me to do some­thing appro­pri­ate in response?

I try to nev­er give them more than three point­ers and three keep­ers, and I try to be as spe­cif­ic as pos­si­ble.

There are lots of oth­er aspects of a ser­mon I could nit­pick, but if the per­son is preach­ing an inter­est­ing, Bib­li­cal­ly sound ser­mon that exalts Christ and chal­lenges me to obey Him then they’re doing fab­u­lous. Why would I nit­pick them at that point? To demor­al­ize them? To clone my habits (“at this point I would have told a joke — you should tell a joke”)?

Any­way, this post prob­a­bly was­n’t rel­e­vant to most of you. But for those of you who have to eval­u­ate preach­ing on a reg­u­lar basis, I hope I’ve giv­en you some food for thought.

And to those in my min­istry, now you know what I’m try­ing to do when I pre­pare a ser­mon: pro­claim the good news of Jesus in a way that is faith­ful to the Bib­li­cal text I’m work­ing with in an inter­est­ing way that chal­lenges you to whole­heart­ed­ly respond. From time to time, be sure to let me know how I’m doing. 🙂

Jacob Goldman rocks

I recent­ly updat­ed the Rec­om­mend­ed Read­ing Google Shared Items plu­g­in for Word­Press to the lat­est ver­sion and it stopped work­ing.

I con­tact­ed Jacob Gold­man, the plu­g­in devel­op­er, who went above and beyond the call of duty to help me fix the prob­lem. The issue was all on my end, and he helped me straight­en it out quick­ly.

The man deserves a shout-out.

To Jacob: con­sid­er your­self shout­ed out. Or shout out­ed. Or some­thing.

To the rest of the world: if you need a web devel­op­er check out the com­pa­ny he works for C. Mur­ray Con­sult­ing. I can attest that they’ve got excel­lent cus­tomer-ser­vice skills and know what they’re doing.

Roku Rocks

Roku Box BackendFor Paula’s birth­day I bought her a lit­tle device called the Roku Dig­i­tal Video Play­er. Basi­cal­ly, it takes Net­flix stream­ing videos and dis­plays them on your tele­vi­sion.

This is very good for us since we don’t have any tele­vi­sion ser­vice. When we moved into our new place a year ago we decid­ed that our cable bill was 90% waste, so we can­celled it and we watch tele­vi­sion series on DVD through Net­flix or on the com­put­er now.

So I bought this Roku device which takes the 12,000 or so stream­ing videos avail­able on Net­flix (and the 40,000 or so avail­able on Ama­zon as pay-per-view) and lets you watch them on your nor­mal tele­vi­sion.

The Roku box is amaz­ing. It only does one thing and it does it well. The images are crisp, the audio is clear, and the inter­face is very easy to use. In my opin­ion, the videos dis­play much bet­ter than they ever did on my lap­top or our desk­top com­put­er.

If you use Net­flix and ever watch stream­ing videos, you should seri­ous­ly con­sid­er the Roku. It rocks.

And it costs less than a few months of cable — even when you com­bine it with your month­ly Net­flix bill.

Tell Us How You Really Feel, Don…

I was just read­ing an essay by D. A. Car­son, “Wor­ship Under The Word”.

Car­son is, in my esti­ma­tion, one of the great­est bib­li­cal schol­ars in the world today. And I don’t just say that because he loves uni­ver­si­ty min­istry. 🙂 Approx­i­mate­ly one gazil­lion (round­ing up from three hun­dred and forty-four) of his writ­ings are avail­able for free online. They’re worth read­ing. Or at least sav­ing to your hard dri­ve so you can find them when you search your com­put­er using Google Desk­top…

Any­way, in foot­note 39 on page 47 of this essay, he makes a rather point­ed obser­va­tion. I have bold­ed my favorite line.

Per­haps this is the place to reflect on the fact that many con­tem­po­rary “wor­ship lead­ers” have train­ing in music but none in Bible, the­ol­o­gy, his­to­ry, or the like. When pressed as to the cri­te­ria by which they choose their music, many of these lead­ers final­ly admit that their cri­te­ria oscil­late between per­son­al pref­er­ence and keep­ing the con­gre­ga­tion rea­son­ably happy—scarcely the most pro­found cri­te­ria in the world. They give lit­tle or no thought to cov­er­ing the great themes of Scrip­ture, or the great events of Scrip­ture, or the range of per­son­al response to God found in the Psalms (as opposed to cov­er­ing the nar­row themes of being upbeat and in the midst of “wor­ship”), or the nature of bib­li­cal locu­tions (in one cho­rus the con­gre­ga­tion man­ages to sing “holy” thir­ty-six times, while three are enough for Isa­iah and John of the Apoc­a­lypse), or the cen­tral his­tor­i­cal tra­di­tions of the church, or any­thing else of weight. If such lead­ers oper­ate on their own with lit­tle guid­ance or train­ing or input from senior pas­tors, the sit­u­a­tion com­mon­ly degen­er­ates from the painful to the piti­ful.

Heh. Heh. Heh.

I would “heh” more, but appar­ent­ly three times is enough. 🙂

Worship for Believers and Unbelievers

One of my favorite MP3s is Tim Keller’s Preach­ing to Believ­ers and Unbe­liev­ers. I des­per­ate­ly want to preach in such a way that I nour­ish believ­ers while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly engag­ing non­be­liev­ers.

I don’t know of any com­pa­ra­ble resource that talks about musi­cal wor­ship. Does any­one know of a good MP3, arti­cle or book along these lines?

I’m not just look­ing for some­thing that says, “We should do this.” I’m look­ing for some­thing that says, “We should do this, and here is how.”

You can leave a com­ment the hurt lock­er dvd or send me an email/Facebook mes­sage.

Why People Are Getting Married Later

The Freako­nom­ics blog tipped me off to a fas­ci­nat­ing inter­view with the author of a recent book on mar­riage in Amer­i­ca. Two of the author’s respons­es stood out to me (empha­sis added):

Fifty years ago you had to be mar­ried to be a respectable adult in the Unit­ed States. Today, mar­riage is optional—you can get most of your emo­tion­al and eco­nom­ic needs by liv­ing with partner—and sin­gle par­ents can also get by. But odd­ly enough, mar­riage is, if any­thing, more impor­tant than ever to peo­ple as a sym­bol of hav­ing made it in life—of hav­ing a suc­cess­ful per­son­al life. Most young Amer­i­cans still want to get mar­ried, but they do it only when all the oth­er steps to adult­hood are in place—when they have com­plet­ed their edu­ca­tion, when they and their part­ners have jobs, when they have saved up enough for a down pay­ment on a house, or even have had chil­dren togeth­er. Mar­riage used to be the first step into adult­hood, but now it is the last. It’s the cap­stone of per­son­al life—the final brick put in after all the oth­ers are in place.

free bad day at black rock

down­load per­vert free

So mar­riage is still impor­tant, but in a dif­fer­ent way than in the past. It’s a sym­bol of per­son­al achievement—the ulti­mate mer­it badge, the mar­riage badge.

And

One sta­tis­tic that stunned me: take two chil­dren, one grow­ing up with mar­ried par­ents in the Unit­ed States, and one grow­ing up with unmar­ried par­ents in Sweden—which child has the high­er like­li­hood of see­ing his par­ents’ rela­tion­ship break up? Answer: the Amer­i­can kid, because chil­dren liv­ing with mar­ried par­ents in the Unit­ed States have a high­er prob­a­bil­i­ty of expe­ri­enc­ing a break-up than do chil­dren liv­ing with unmar­ried par­ents in Swe­den. That’s how high our break-up rates are.

So… yeah. If it sounds inter­est­ing to you, check out The Mar­riage-Go-Round. Inter­est­ing­ly, the Google Books page is very sparse right now. How long does it take for new books to get a full list­ing?

1776 dvd

orgaz­mo divx online

Sermon Templates

One of the best books I’ve read in the last few years has been Made to Stick by Chip and Dan Heath. It’s chock-full of well-researched good­ness. One of the most intrigu­ing stud­ies they cite is The Fun­da­men­tal Tem­plates of Qual­i­ty Ads. If you read the arti­cle (or just the sum­ma­ry in Made to Stick), you learn that if you make an ad using one of a hand­ful of tem­plates, it will be much bet­ter (and per­ceived to be more cre­ative) than if you put a group of peo­ple in a room and tell them to be as cre­ative as they can.

Ever since I stum­bled upon that study, I’ve been think­ing about how it applies to ser­mons. There are lots of ways to struc­ture ser­mons, but only a few seem to work real­ly well.

As a result, I’ve com­piled a list of ser­mon tem­plates. When I’m preach­ing, I try to think through these tem­plates to see if one nat­u­ral­ly match­es my sub­ject, and I use as that the frame­work that I build the mes­sage around.

Tem­plate #1: Clas­sic Expos­i­to­ry Preach­ing
Sim­ply use the outline/plot of the text as your preach­ing out­line. This tem­plate is tran­scen­dent when done well, and painful when done poor­ly. It’s prob­a­bly the most com­mon tem­plate out there.

Tem­plate #2: Prac­ti­cal

watch crazy eights online

down­load kiss of the vam­pire aka immor­tal­ly yours dvd
In Acts 2 Peter struc­tures his ser­mon around the answers to three ques­tions.

  1. What?
  2. So what?
  3. Now what?

Tem­plate #3: How To
One of the sim­plest ways to struc­ture a mes­sage:

  1. Tell them why.
  2. Show them how.

Tem­plate #4: Solve The Prob­lem (Andy Stan­ley)

  1. Cre­ate Atten­tion: “here’s a prob­lem that needs to be resolved
  2. Inte­grate Scrip­ture: “for­tu­nate­ly, we’re not the first ones to wres­tle with this”
  3. Clar­i­fy The Sig­nif­i­cance: “here’s why this answer mat­ters”
  4. Apply The Con­cept: “and here’s how to make it work in real life”

Tem­plate #5: Pro­nouns (Andy Stan­ley)

  1. Me (Ori­en­ta­tion): Intro­duce your­self to the audi­ence and to your per­son­al expe­ri­ence of the prob­lem you’re talk­ing about.
  2. We (Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion): Show how the audi­ence has the same (or a suf­fi­cient­ly sim­i­lar) prob­lem.
  3. God (Illu­mi­na­tion): Tell them what the Bible says about how to respond to this prob­lem.
  4. You (Appli­ca­tion): Call for a per­son­al response
  5. We (Inspi­ra­tion): Explain how things would be change if we all respond­ed in obe­di­ence.

Tem­plate #6: Life Change (Rick War­ren)

  1. Estab­lish a need
  2. Give per­son­al exam­ples
  3. Present a plan
  4. Offer hope
  5. Call for com­mit­ment
  6. ogden breast aug­men­ta­tion

    free invin­ci­ble

Tem­plate #7: The Sto­ry With a Punch (Induc­tive)

  1. Tell an engag­ing, care­ful­ly-cho­sen sto­ry (usu­al­ly fun­ny).
  2. Bring the sur­prise punch­line from the Bible.

Tem­plate #8: The Ques­tion & Answer Out­line (Thomas Aquinas)

  1. Make a bold claim (or ask a tough ques­tion and give an answer)
  2. Antic­i­pate the objec­tions raised by your claim/answer
  3. Answer the objec­tions
  4. Repeat steps 2 & 3 as long as nec­es­sary to estab­lish your orig­i­nal claim.

I hope these serve you well. I should has­ten to add that these aren’t based on research — they’re the byprod­uct of obser­va­tion and of what I learned at a few con­fer­ences. In oth­er words, you can take what the arti­cle said about adver­tise­ments to the bank. You should only take my advice to the lemon­ade stand.