I love Brust’s nov­els, but I usu­al­ly find his phi­los­o­phiz­ing to be unper­sua­sive. Every once in a while, though, he drops a gem. I think his point here is indeed dis­putable (there is a dif­fer­ence between fal­si­fi­able in prin­ci­ple and fal­si­fi­able at the moment), but I also think that there is more phi­los­o­phy in sci­ence than some would like to think. We still call them Ph.D.s for a rea­son.

So, What IS Sci­ence, Any­way?

I know science–both the dis­cov­er­ies and method of–are impor­tant to me. I know that I believe we ought to deduce nat­ur­al laws from the facts, as opposed to impos­ing them on the facts. I know tha.…..

Leave a Reply