8 Random Facts About Me

Will Phillips asked me to make 8 quirky com­ments about myself, so here goes:

  1. When I reheat foods, I like to set the microwave for a prime num­ber of sec­onds (i.e., 17, 23, 37, etc).
  2. I tend to dis­dain “lit­er­ary fic­tion” — I find that the typ­i­cal sci­ence fic­tion or fan­ta­sy nov­el is just as insight­ful and vast­ly more enter­tain­ing.
  3. I write PHP pro­grams to relax.
  4. I hard­ly ever watch TV any­more — I’m pret­ty much exclu­sive­ly devot­ed to watch­ing pro­grams on Net­flix. My wife and I are cur­rent­ly on a Veron­i­ca Mars kick.
  5. I used to hate talk radio, but now I love lis­ten­ing to Den­nis Prager. I find him very stim­u­lat­ing.
  6. I don’t like the New York Times most­ly because it does­n’t car­ry comics. Seri­ous­ly. I want my Get Fuzzy and my Pearls Before Swine!
  7. I don’t eat the meal before I preach. Maybe it’s psy­cho­log­i­cal, but I feel that the food in my bel­ly makes me slow-wit­ted.
  8. The main rea­son I haven’t writ­ten a book is that I feel that there are too many books out there already — the great stuff is get­ting lost in the flood.

So there. 8 things about me you prob­a­bly did­n’t know.

Advice From A Design Expert

Last night at Chi Alpha we inter­viewed George Kem­bel, co-founder and exec­u­tive direc­tor of the Stan­ford d.school about his faith and how it inte­grates with his pro­fes­sion­al life.

It was lots of fun. Dur­ing the inter­view he shared a help­ful metaphor about his cri­sis of faith as a young adult. “It’s like my baby teeth. They had to go so my per­ma­nent teeth could come in. Some­thing sim­i­lar hap­pened with my faith. I need­ed to move from a child’s faith to an adult faith, but what I got in the end was some­thing bet­ter and more endur­ing.”

Any­way, after­wards we were able to talk briefly and I asked him about apply­ing the prin­ci­ples of his pro­fes­sion­al life to min­istry. How would a d.school per­son approach improv­ing the expe­ri­ence of a reg­u­lar or a guest at a min­istry func­tion?

We only talked briefly, but one tid­bit he shared real­ly struck me. “When we’re doing feed­back we find it help­ful to have peo­ple restrict them­selves to three types of state­ments: ‘I like…’, ‘I wish…’, and ‘We should try…’. For exam­ple, ‘I liked it when you talked about x, I wish you had spent more time on that and less on this oth­er point.’ It forces feed­back to be more per­son­al and also push­es it in a con­struc­tive direc­tion.”

I think we’ll exper­i­ment with that and see how it works out for us. It sounds promis­ing.

Any­way, I hope you find his com­ments as inter­est­ing and help­ful as I did.

Kudos Where Kudos Are Due

My pas­tor just got an arti­cle pub­lished in Rick War­ren’s Min­istry Tool­box. Way to go, Scott!

An Apology For the Sign-Bearers

As a Chris­t­ian min­is­ter, I apol­o­gize to the cam­pus com­mu­ni­ty for for my well-mean­ing but mis­guid­ed broth­ers who bore the signs on White Plaza yes­ter­day.

You recall them, no doubt. They bore such charm­ing slo­gans as “The sin and the sin­ner go straight to hell togeth­er,” and “Warn­ing: For­ni­ca­tors, Drunk­ards, Thieves, Adul­ter­ers, God Haters, Liars, HOMOSEXUALS — JUDGMENT.”

I know you find it hard to believe, but they were under the impres­sion that they were act­ing with kind­ness and even love. They were try­ing to tell you some­thing impor­tant in the best way they could think of.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, their method under­mined their mes­sage.

To them, and to all the sign-bear­ers scat­tered across the cam­pus­es of Amer­i­ca, I direct the next few remarks.

I know you are doing your best to hon­or God, but when you bring such signs onto cam­pus and pro­voke stu­dents you are not accom­plish­ing your goal.

In fact, I sus­pect that a care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion of the Bible will lead you to rethink your actions.

Observe:

Always be pre­pared to give an answer to every­one who asks you to give the rea­son for the hope that you have. But do this with gen­tle­ness and respect, keep­ing a clear con­science, so that those who speak mali­cious­ly against your good behav­ior in Christ may be ashamed of their slan­der. 1 Peter 3:15–16, NIV

Gen­tle­ness and respect may have been your aspi­ra­tion, but the mes­sages on the signs belied your intent. You may not under­stand why, but peo­ple found your mes­sages extreme­ly dis­repect­ful. Respect is mea­sured by the recip­i­ent, so if an entire com­mu­ni­ty tells you that you are act­ing in a way that they find offen­sive and insult­ing then you must take them at their word and rethink the way that you com­mu­ni­cate your mes­sage.

Con­duct your­selves wise­ly toward out­siders, mak­ing the most of the time. Let your speech always be gra­cious, sea­soned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer every­one. Colos­sians 4:5–6, NRSV

My broth­ers, I humbly sug­gest that you act­ed with a great lack of wis­dom, as any­one who has spent time min­is­ter­ing on the col­lege cam­pus could have told you. Indeed, we would have made the point with great fer­vor. Some­thing like this hap­pens once or twice every year and it always detracts from the work of God on cam­pus — I have nev­er once seen it help.

If you doubt the effects of your vis­it, I direct you to the unof­fi­cial Stan­ford blog’s per­spec­tive on your actions.

If any place will not wel­come you and they refuse to hear you, as you leave, shake off the dust that is on your feet as a tes­ti­mo­ny against them. Mark 6:11, NRSV

And this, to me, is the clinch­er. Jesus told his dis­ci­ples to move on when peo­ple did­n’t want to lis­ten. And that’s the mod­el we see through­out the New Tes­ta­ment, par­tic­u­lar­ly in Paul. Paul, con­trary to his rep­u­ta­tion, was very can­ny and was a mas­ter at non-intru­sive evan­ge­lism. He sought to preach in places where peo­ple expect­ed to hear preach­ing. He went to syn­a­gogues, philo­soph­i­cal venues, and lec­ture halls and talked to peo­ple who were ready to lis­ten.

And so while I applaud your inten­tions, I beg you to rethink your evan­ge­lis­tic strat­e­gy and see if there is not a wis­er way to engage stu­dents with the claims of Christ.

And to the cam­pus com­mu­ni­ty I reit­er­ate my apol­o­gy. They meant well, but they act­ed in a way that caused many of you to have a low­er opin­ion of Christ and His fol­low­ers than you did before.

Ear­li­er today I was read­ing an arti­cle about Ein­stein’s reli­gious views and I was struck by the fol­low­ing com­ment: “I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the lumi­nous fig­ure of the Nazarene.”

If your per­cep­tion of Christ is shaped large­ly by the sign-bear­ers and oth­ers like them, then I urge you to look at Jesus your­self. Read the gospels and ask around in your dorm. I promise that you will find some Christ-fol­low­ers who would love noth­ing more than to have a respect­ful con­ver­sa­tion with you and help you to see why Jesus is still wor­shiped after these many years and across these many miles.

Pi Day at Chi Alpha

John Sillcox, mathematician extraordinaireAs most of you were com­plete­ly unaware, yes­ter­day was Pi Day.

If the ref­er­ence is con­fus­ing to you, yes­ter­day was March 14. This date can be writ­ten 3/14, and 314 are the first three dig­its of the infi­nite­ly-long num­ber pi.

Any­way, I made a ref­er­ence to Pi Day at the begin­ning of my mes­sage last night and I asked offhand­ed­ly if any­one in the audi­ence had pi mem­o­rized out to any sig­nif­i­cant length — more than 10 dig­its.

At first I did­n’t see any hands, but then I noticed that every­one was point­ing at some­one just out of my field of vision. I turned and John Sill­cox (pic­tured here) had his hand raised.

“John, how many dig­its do you have pi mem­o­rized out to?”

“100.”

“For real? You know the first 100 dig­its of pi?”

“Yeah.”

I was pret­ty floored. I had thought MAYBE some­one would know the first 10 or 25 dig­its.

“You know that I have no choice but to call you up here and have you recite them.”

After some cajol­ing he agreed and began recit­ing the num­bers. One of the graph­ics I had for pi day hap­pened to dis­play the first sev­er­al hun­dred num­bers and so we pro­ject­ed the graph­ic behind him while he rat­tled them off. His recall was per­fect.

Here’s the bit that I found most inter­est­ing about the entire expe­ri­ence: the response of the audi­ence. This is the sort of geeky thing that nor­mal­ly only I would find cool. But at Stan­ford, such dis­plays get a dif­fer­ent response. Our Chi Alpha group went wild. One of our rug­by play­ers got up and began bow­ing to John, cry­ing “We’re not wor­thy!”

So yeah. That’s what Pi Day at Chi Alpha is like. At least at Stan­ford.

For the record, my texts were Exo­dus 3:14 and Philip­pi­ans 3:14. 🙂

Things My Students Have Said About Me

Actu­al com­ments my stu­dents made about me on a recent sur­vey:

  1. the balder the bet­ter
  2. exu­ber­ant, zany, wacky, over the top
  3. Unique, John Stew­art meets the apos­tle Paul.
  4. prone to shout­ing in high pitched voic­es
  5. ped­a­gog­ic con­nois­seur — appre­ci­ates good teach­ing and apt quotes.
  6. occa­sion­al diar­rhea of the mouth
  7. …uncon­ven­tion­al
  8. won­der­ful­ly inap­pro­pri­ate­ly humor­ous, great at com­ing up with math­e­mat­i­cal-sci­en­tif­ic analo­gies for facets of spir­i­tu­al­i­ty (bal­loons and 2nd deriv­a­tives any­one?), best at rep­re­sent­ing Jesus on film

It’s great to feel loved. And mocked.

Visualizing the Authorship of the New Testament

Inspired by the folks over at the ESV and at Blo­gos, I sub­mit­ted a data set to the Many Eyes repos­i­to­ry show­ing the per­cent­age of the New Tes­ta­ment writ­ten by each author.

I got my data from Tis­chen­dor­f’s 8th edi­tion Greek New Tes­ta­ment because it was free and pub­licly avail­able — big kudos to them for mak­ing all their work so eas­i­ly usable.







It occurred to me to do this because count­ing the Greek words has always seemed to me to be a bet­ter mea­sure­ment of the New Tes­ta­ment doc­u­ment lengths than count­ing vers­es or chap­ters, which are less pre­cise mea­sure­ments and are con­tin­gent on the whim­sy of church his­to­ry rather than being an intrin­sic part of the text.

Plus I vivid­ly remem­ber the day in sem­i­nary when I real­ized that Luke had writ­ten more of the New Tes­ta­ment than Paul had. It was an epiphany for me.

The Big 1–0

I remem­ber see­ing a ser­mon series once titled “Mar­riage: Clos­est Thing To Heav­en, Clos­est Thing To Hell.” Bril­liant title.

Ten years ago at this time I had just fin­ished hid­ing my car from my grooms­men to pre­vent any unto­ward pranks and was at First Assem­bly of God in Lafayette, LA get­ting ready to be mar­ried under the aus­pices of Eric Treuil (who was using the author­i­ty invest­ed in him by God and the state of Louisiana).

Three quick mem­o­ries:

  • Paula was very beau­ti­ful in her bridal dress.
  • I began fid­get­ing with my ring while still in the sanc­tu­ary, a habit I’ve con­tin­ued to this day. I don’t know why, but when­ev­er I’m thinkig about some­thing I’ll either spin it around on my fin­ger or take it off and put it back on a few times. What­ev­er the cause, you can see me doing it on the wed­ding tape as we recess out of the sanc­tu­ary.
  • I had a pile of eclairs as my grooms cake cour­tesy of high school bud­dy George Byron Noel. He’s a real­ly good chef and my cake was deli­cious (as my broth­er can attest, since he ate approx­i­mate­ly half of it 🙂 ).

We head­ed out on a hon­ey­moon that includ­ed a stop in New Orleans and cul­mi­nat­ed in a stay at South­ern SALT (now known as the Upris­ing) where I will be preach­ing in just a few days. It’s fun­ny how things seem to come full-cir­cle some­times.

10 years. Much clos­er to heav­en than hell by my reck­on­ing.

Hap­py anniver­sary, Paula. I’d mar­ry you again in a heart­beat.

Revamped Website — RSS funkiness ensued

I just reworked the way this web­site is struc­tured pret­ty rad­i­cal­ly.

I’ve been using Word­Press as my blog­ging tool for quite a while, and I love it. But it was get­ting hard­er and hard­er to do all that I want­ed to through it. I’ve got lots of dif­fer­ent things hap­pen­ing on this site and try­ing to show them all through Word­Press using var­i­ous plu­g­ins and hacks just was­n’t work­ing well.

So I need­ed to change, but I did­n’t want to give up Word­Press.

So instead I decid­ed to use Plan­et as the cen­tral engine for this web­site — it inte­grates all the dif­fer­ent sub-appli­ca­tions I use (Word­Press, Gallery, my quotes data­base, deli­cious).

The big down­side is that my RSS feeds just got changed (and there­by became funky). If you’re a read­er by syn­di­ca­tion (this includes all of you in Face­book land) I apol­o­gize for the sud­den influx of old con­tent marked new.

I’ll be tweak­ing with the site for the next few days, but there should­n’t be a big change in the feeds like that again.

Humility Smackdown

Curt Har­low just found out that I have pub­licly called myself the world’s #1 speak­er on the sub­ject of humil­i­ty.

In case you were unaware, that’s Curt’s tagline. He prob­a­bly even has it tat­tooed in an indel­i­cate place.

So he called me up, “Glen, you are not the world’s num­ber one speak­er on the sub­ject of humil­i­ty and you know it. That’s my schtick.”

I believe my reply can best be sum­ma­rized as “neen­er-neen­er.”

So we have four options:
1) We can each humbly agree that the oth­er per­son is right. This option is appeal­ing, but I just can’t see Curt going for it.
2) I can apol­o­gize for steal­ing his joke and print up busi­ness cards for him pro­claim­ing his hum­ble sta­tus. I’m sure Curt would pre­fer this solu­tion, but he real­ly set him­self up to be knocked when he start­ed the joke. Jokes are made to be expand­ed, refract­ed, and revised.
3) We can rum­ble. Curt’s big­ger than me, so I don’t plan to pur­sue this course of action.
4) I can call myself the world’s num­ber two speak­er on the sub­ject of humil­i­ty in a tone of voice that implies I know that makes me more hum­ble than the num­ber one guy.

And so I choose option num­ber 4. I am clear­ly the world’s num­ber TWO speak­er on the sub­ject of humil­i­ty and I am hum­ble enough to be con­tent with that rank­ing.