An Apology For the Sign-Bearers

As a Chris­t­ian min­is­ter, I apol­o­gize to the cam­pus com­mu­ni­ty for for my well-mean­ing but mis­guid­ed broth­ers who bore the signs on White Plaza yes­ter­day.

You recall them, no doubt. They bore such charm­ing slo­gans as “The sin and the sin­ner go straight to hell togeth­er,” and “Warn­ing: For­ni­ca­tors, Drunk­ards, Thieves, Adul­ter­ers, God Haters, Liars, HOMOSEXUALS — JUDGMENT.”

I know you find it hard to believe, but they were under the impres­sion that they were act­ing with kind­ness and even love. They were try­ing to tell you some­thing impor­tant in the best way they could think of.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, their method under­mined their mes­sage.

To them, and to all the sign-bear­ers scat­tered across the cam­pus­es of Amer­i­ca, I direct the next few remarks.

I know you are doing your best to hon­or God, but when you bring such signs onto cam­pus and pro­voke stu­dents you are not accom­plish­ing your goal.

In fact, I sus­pect that a care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion of the Bible will lead you to rethink your actions.

Observe:

Always be pre­pared to give an answer to every­one who asks you to give the rea­son for the hope that you have. But do this with gen­tle­ness and respect, keep­ing a clear con­science, so that those who speak mali­cious­ly against your good behav­ior in Christ may be ashamed of their slan­der. 1 Peter 3:15–16, NIV

Gen­tle­ness and respect may have been your aspi­ra­tion, but the mes­sages on the signs belied your intent. You may not under­stand why, but peo­ple found your mes­sages extreme­ly dis­repect­ful. Respect is mea­sured by the recip­i­ent, so if an entire com­mu­ni­ty tells you that you are act­ing in a way that they find offen­sive and insult­ing then you must take them at their word and rethink the way that you com­mu­ni­cate your mes­sage.

Con­duct your­selves wise­ly toward out­siders, mak­ing the most of the time. Let your speech always be gra­cious, sea­soned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer every­one. Colos­sians 4:5–6, NRSV

My broth­ers, I humbly sug­gest that you act­ed with a great lack of wis­dom, as any­one who has spent time min­is­ter­ing on the col­lege cam­pus could have told you. Indeed, we would have made the point with great fer­vor. Some­thing like this hap­pens once or twice every year and it always detracts from the work of God on cam­pus — I have nev­er once seen it help.

If you doubt the effects of your vis­it, I direct you to the unof­fi­cial Stan­ford blog’s per­spec­tive on your actions.

If any place will not wel­come you and they refuse to hear you, as you leave, shake off the dust that is on your feet as a tes­ti­mo­ny against them. Mark 6:11, NRSV

And this, to me, is the clinch­er. Jesus told his dis­ci­ples to move on when peo­ple did­n’t want to lis­ten. And that’s the mod­el we see through­out the New Tes­ta­ment, par­tic­u­lar­ly in Paul. Paul, con­trary to his rep­u­ta­tion, was very can­ny and was a mas­ter at non-intru­sive evan­ge­lism. He sought to preach in places where peo­ple expect­ed to hear preach­ing. He went to syn­a­gogues, philo­soph­i­cal venues, and lec­ture halls and talked to peo­ple who were ready to lis­ten.

And so while I applaud your inten­tions, I beg you to rethink your evan­ge­lis­tic strat­e­gy and see if there is not a wis­er way to engage stu­dents with the claims of Christ.

And to the cam­pus com­mu­ni­ty I reit­er­ate my apol­o­gy. They meant well, but they act­ed in a way that caused many of you to have a low­er opin­ion of Christ and His fol­low­ers than you did before.

Ear­li­er today I was read­ing an arti­cle about Ein­stein’s reli­gious views and I was struck by the fol­low­ing com­ment: “I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the lumi­nous fig­ure of the Nazarene.”

If your per­cep­tion of Christ is shaped large­ly by the sign-bear­ers and oth­ers like them, then I urge you to look at Jesus your­self. Read the gospels and ask around in your dorm. I promise that you will find some Christ-fol­low­ers who would love noth­ing more than to have a respect­ful con­ver­sa­tion with you and help you to see why Jesus is still wor­shiped after these many years and across these many miles.

Pi Day at Chi Alpha

John Sillcox, mathematician extraordinaireAs most of you were com­plete­ly unaware, yes­ter­day was Pi Day.

If the ref­er­ence is con­fus­ing to you, yes­ter­day was March 14. This date can be writ­ten 3/14, and 314 are the first three dig­its of the infi­nite­ly-long num­ber pi.

Any­way, I made a ref­er­ence to Pi Day at the begin­ning of my mes­sage last night and I asked offhand­ed­ly if any­one in the audi­ence had pi mem­o­rized out to any sig­nif­i­cant length — more than 10 dig­its.

At first I did­n’t see any hands, but then I noticed that every­one was point­ing at some­one just out of my field of vision. I turned and John Sill­cox (pic­tured here) had his hand raised.

“John, how many dig­its do you have pi mem­o­rized out to?”

“100.”

“For real? You know the first 100 dig­its of pi?”

“Yeah.”

I was pret­ty floored. I had thought MAYBE some­one would know the first 10 or 25 dig­its.

“You know that I have no choice but to call you up here and have you recite them.”

After some cajol­ing he agreed and began recit­ing the num­bers. One of the graph­ics I had for pi day hap­pened to dis­play the first sev­er­al hun­dred num­bers and so we pro­ject­ed the graph­ic behind him while he rat­tled them off. His recall was per­fect.

Here’s the bit that I found most inter­est­ing about the entire expe­ri­ence: the response of the audi­ence. This is the sort of geeky thing that nor­mal­ly only I would find cool. But at Stan­ford, such dis­plays get a dif­fer­ent response. Our Chi Alpha group went wild. One of our rug­by play­ers got up and began bow­ing to John, cry­ing “We’re not wor­thy!”

So yeah. That’s what Pi Day at Chi Alpha is like. At least at Stan­ford.

For the record, my texts were Exo­dus 3:14 and Philip­pi­ans 3:14. 🙂

Things My Students Have Said About Me

Actu­al com­ments my stu­dents made about me on a recent sur­vey:

  1. the balder the bet­ter
  2. exu­ber­ant, zany, wacky, over the top
  3. Unique, John Stew­art meets the apos­tle Paul.
  4. prone to shout­ing in high pitched voic­es
  5. ped­a­gog­ic con­nois­seur — appre­ci­ates good teach­ing and apt quotes.
  6. occa­sion­al diar­rhea of the mouth
  7. …uncon­ven­tion­al
  8. won­der­ful­ly inap­pro­pri­ate­ly humor­ous, great at com­ing up with math­e­mat­i­cal-sci­en­tif­ic analo­gies for facets of spir­i­tu­al­i­ty (bal­loons and 2nd deriv­a­tives any­one?), best at rep­re­sent­ing Jesus on film

It’s great to feel loved. And mocked.

Visualizing the Authorship of the New Testament

Inspired by the folks over at the ESV and at Blo­gos, I sub­mit­ted a data set to the Many Eyes repos­i­to­ry show­ing the per­cent­age of the New Tes­ta­ment writ­ten by each author.

I got my data from Tis­chen­dor­f’s 8th edi­tion Greek New Tes­ta­ment because it was free and pub­licly avail­able — big kudos to them for mak­ing all their work so eas­i­ly usable.







It occurred to me to do this because count­ing the Greek words has always seemed to me to be a bet­ter mea­sure­ment of the New Tes­ta­ment doc­u­ment lengths than count­ing vers­es or chap­ters, which are less pre­cise mea­sure­ments and are con­tin­gent on the whim­sy of church his­to­ry rather than being an intrin­sic part of the text.

Plus I vivid­ly remem­ber the day in sem­i­nary when I real­ized that Luke had writ­ten more of the New Tes­ta­ment than Paul had. It was an epiphany for me.

The Big 1–0

I remem­ber see­ing a ser­mon series once titled “Mar­riage: Clos­est Thing To Heav­en, Clos­est Thing To Hell.” Bril­liant title.

Ten years ago at this time I had just fin­ished hid­ing my car from my grooms­men to pre­vent any unto­ward pranks and was at First Assem­bly of God in Lafayette, LA get­ting ready to be mar­ried under the aus­pices of Eric Treuil (who was using the author­i­ty invest­ed in him by God and the state of Louisiana).

Three quick mem­o­ries:

  • Paula was very beau­ti­ful in her bridal dress.
  • I began fid­get­ing with my ring while still in the sanc­tu­ary, a habit I’ve con­tin­ued to this day. I don’t know why, but when­ev­er I’m thinkig about some­thing I’ll either spin it around on my fin­ger or take it off and put it back on a few times. What­ev­er the cause, you can see me doing it on the wed­ding tape as we recess out of the sanc­tu­ary.
  • I had a pile of eclairs as my grooms cake cour­tesy of high school bud­dy George Byron Noel. He’s a real­ly good chef and my cake was deli­cious (as my broth­er can attest, since he ate approx­i­mate­ly half of it 🙂 ).

We head­ed out on a hon­ey­moon that includ­ed a stop in New Orleans and cul­mi­nat­ed in a stay at South­ern SALT (now known as the Upris­ing) where I will be preach­ing in just a few days. It’s fun­ny how things seem to come full-cir­cle some­times.

10 years. Much clos­er to heav­en than hell by my reck­on­ing.

Hap­py anniver­sary, Paula. I’d mar­ry you again in a heart­beat.

Revamped Website — RSS funkiness ensued

I just reworked the way this web­site is struc­tured pret­ty rad­i­cal­ly.

I’ve been using Word­Press as my blog­ging tool for quite a while, and I love it. But it was get­ting hard­er and hard­er to do all that I want­ed to through it. I’ve got lots of dif­fer­ent things hap­pen­ing on this site and try­ing to show them all through Word­Press using var­i­ous plu­g­ins and hacks just was­n’t work­ing well.

So I need­ed to change, but I did­n’t want to give up Word­Press.

So instead I decid­ed to use Plan­et as the cen­tral engine for this web­site — it inte­grates all the dif­fer­ent sub-appli­ca­tions I use (Word­Press, Gallery, my quotes data­base, deli­cious).

The big down­side is that my RSS feeds just got changed (and there­by became funky). If you’re a read­er by syn­di­ca­tion (this includes all of you in Face­book land) I apol­o­gize for the sud­den influx of old con­tent marked new.

I’ll be tweak­ing with the site for the next few days, but there should­n’t be a big change in the feeds like that again.

Humility Smackdown

Curt Har­low just found out that I have pub­licly called myself the world’s #1 speak­er on the sub­ject of humil­i­ty.

In case you were unaware, that’s Curt’s tagline. He prob­a­bly even has it tat­tooed in an indel­i­cate place.

So he called me up, “Glen, you are not the world’s num­ber one speak­er on the sub­ject of humil­i­ty and you know it. That’s my schtick.”

I believe my reply can best be sum­ma­rized as “neen­er-neen­er.”

So we have four options:
1) We can each humbly agree that the oth­er per­son is right. This option is appeal­ing, but I just can’t see Curt going for it.
2) I can apol­o­gize for steal­ing his joke and print up busi­ness cards for him pro­claim­ing his hum­ble sta­tus. I’m sure Curt would pre­fer this solu­tion, but he real­ly set him­self up to be knocked when he start­ed the joke. Jokes are made to be expand­ed, refract­ed, and revised.
3) We can rum­ble. Curt’s big­ger than me, so I don’t plan to pur­sue this course of action.
4) I can call myself the world’s num­ber two speak­er on the sub­ject of humil­i­ty in a tone of voice that implies I know that makes me more hum­ble than the num­ber one guy.

And so I choose option num­ber 4. I am clear­ly the world’s num­ber TWO speak­er on the sub­ject of humil­i­ty and I am hum­ble enough to be con­tent with that rank­ing.

Successful Seminarians

Some­where I heard that most of today’s best-known pas­tors did­n’t go to sem­i­nary. As I recall, this obser­va­tion was brought up in the con­text of crit­i­ciz­ing the very con­cept of grad­u­ate-lev­el min­is­te­r­i­al train­ing. The impli­ca­tion was that the time spent learn­ing about the Bible would have been bet­ter spent learn­ing about mar­ket­ing (or the inter­net or psy­chol­o­gy or some­thing prac­ti­cal).

This crit­i­cism did­n’t have a lot of weight for me — I just knew sem­i­nary had been good for me and I con­tin­ued to rec­om­mend it to any min­is­ter who loved learn­ing.

But I real­ized this morn­ing that the alle­ga­tion was untrue. Not only have lots of the big-name pas­tors gone to sem­i­nary, I would say that the major­i­ty of those that we first think of are sem­i­nar­i­ans.

  • Andy Stan­ley — Dal­las The­o­log­i­cal Sem­i­nary
  • Craig Groeschel — Phillips The­o­log­i­cal Sem­i­nary
  • Rob Bell — Fuller The­o­log­i­cal Sem­i­nary
  • John Ort­berg — Fuller The­o­log­i­cal Sem­i­nary
  • John Piper — Fuller and the Uni­ver­si­ty of Munich (Ph.D.)
  • Tim Keller — Gor­don Con­well and West­min­ster The­o­log­i­cal Sem­i­nary (Ph.D.)
  • Rick War­ren — Fuller The­o­log­i­cal Sem­i­nary

There are sev­er­al who haven’t. Bill Hybels has­n’t gone to sem­i­nary, for exam­ple. I don’t think Ed Young, Jr. has, either. Joel Osteen has­n’t. Mark Driscoll is, I believe, fin­ish­ing up a sem­i­nary degree right now.

But from what I can tell the major­i­ty of nation­al­ly-known Chris­t­ian pas­tors have gone to sem­i­nary.

I’m not say­ing that going to sem­i­nary will guar­an­tee you a numer­i­cal­ly fruit­ful min­istry — but I can guar­an­tee you that it won’t pre­vent you from build­ing a numer­i­cal­ly fruit­ful min­istry, either. And you’ll be a bet­ter per­son for hav­ing gone.

In an age when sem­i­nary gets a lot of knocks, I thought that was worth shar­ing.

Introducing Alexander Davis

Alexan­der Davis was born 11/17/2006 at 12:24pm after a very quick labor (from the time Paula began to push until the time he was com­plete­ly out­side was four min­utes). He weighed 6lbs and 7oz and was 19.75 inch­es long.

Our plan is to refer to him as Xan­der (instead of the full Alexan­der or the briefer Alex). We’ll see how it takes. Dana seems to like it, so that’s a plus.

We’re still decid­ing about the mid­dle name. We’ve got it nar­rowed down to three and we want to sleep on it before mak­ing our choice.

I’m too wiped to type much more now, check back lat­er for more details. Until then, enjoy the pho­to gallery.

Research On Glossolalia

I just read about some cut­ting-edge research about speak­ing in tongues (you may have also seen this referred to as “glos­so­lalia”).

Sum­ma­ry quote:

“We noticed a num­ber of changes that occurred func­tion­al­ly in the brain,” com­ments Prin­ci­pal Inves­ti­ga­tor Andrew New­berg, MD, Asso­ciate Pro­fes­sor of Radi­ol­o­gy, Psy­chi­a­try, and Reli­gious Stud­ies, and Direc­tor for the Cen­ter for Spir­i­tu­al­i­ty and the Mind, at Penn. “Our find­ing of decreased activ­i­ty in the frontal lobes dur­ing the prac­tice of speak­ing in tongues is fas­ci­nat­ing because these sub­jects tru­ly believe that the spir­it of God is mov­ing through them and con­trol­ling them to speak. Our brain imag­ing research shows us that these sub­jects are not in con­trol of the usu­al lan­guage cen­ters dur­ing this activ­i­ty, which is con­sis­tent with their descrip­tion of a lack of inten­tion­al con­trol while speak­ing in tongues.”

I pass this along because we so often focus on research find­ings which seem to chal­lenge the faith (or more fre­quent­ly on research find­ings which chal­lenge our inter­pre­ta­tion of the faith), it’s always inter­est­ing to spot those that cor­re­spond to exact­ly what we would expect based upon a straight­for­ward read­ing of the Bible.