Tag: American Christianity

TGFI, Volume 557: peer-reviewed miracles and AI-informed voting

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Inter­est­ing

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues like­ly to be of inter­est to Chris­tians in col­lege. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions, so if you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Peer-Reviewed Mir­a­cles: Are Mirac­u­lous Cures Pub­lished in Sci­en­tif­ic Jour­nals? (Caleb Jack­son, Sub­stack): “It is often sug­gest­ed that, if the evi­dence for mir­a­cle cures were tru­ly com­pelling, it would be expect­ed that such cas­es would be pub­lished in main­stream sci­en­tif­ic jour­nals. If these instances can­not stand the scruti­ny of peer review, then they ought to be dis­missed as noth­ing more than uncor­rob­o­rat­ed anec­dotes. I am not per­suad­ed. Indeed, this argu­ment remains tooth­less for a myr­i­ad of rea­sons. As we shall see below, there are no less than sev­er­al dozen instances of ‘mir­a­cle cures’ pub­lished in sci­en­tif­ic jour­nals, both main­stream and fringe, over the last cen­tu­ry. To claim oth­er­wise is to plead igno­rance of the pub­licly avail­able data.”
  2. Use AI This Elec­tion (Scott Alexan­der, Astral Codex Ten): “I’m not say­ing AI is super­in­tel­li­gent or can decide bet­ter than you can. I’m say­ing that if you — like me — spend an hour or so doing research before vot­ing on local seats, AI can aid that research very effec­tive­ly. And if you don’t do that research — because you weren’t will­ing to waste an hour on it before — AI makes it so much faster that you might want to start.”
    • He gives a ver­sion of the prompt he used to gen­er­ate a cus­tom voter’s guide, so I tried it with a cus­tomized ver­sion and was pleased with the results. I tried it on both Claude and Chat­G­PT, only Claude was will­ing to do it. Chat­G­PT seemed to think it was uneth­i­cal to help me. I rec­om­mend giv­ing it a try. For a start, just go through his prompt sen­tence by sen­tence and change it to what you believe.
  3. The Twin Fal­lac­i­es of Chris­t­ian Nation­al­ism and AI Max­i­mal­ism (Samuel D. James, Sub­stack): “Here are two ques­tions I think about a lot: How does Chris­tian­i­ty restrict someone’s use of tech­nol­o­gy? How does Chris­tian­i­ty restrict someone’s strat­a­gems in pol­i­tics? These ques­tions come from a con­vic­tion that the claims of Christ in Scrip­ture are such a nature that one can­not believe and obey them with­out expe­ri­enc­ing some kind of lim­it­ing prin­ci­ple on their tech­nol­o­gy and on their pol­i­tics. In oth­er words, if you real­ly take Christ seri­ous­ly, your tech use and your pol­i­tics will bear a con­spic­u­ous mark. ”
    • Rec­om­mend­ed by a stu­dent.
  4. Nihilism With a Busi­ness Mod­el (John Seel, Sub­stack): “At one lev­el, the gig econ­o­my reflects an under­stand­able eco­nom­ic adap­ta­tion to a rapid­ly chang­ing tech­no­log­i­cal envi­ron­ment. But every eco­nom­ic sys­tem even­tu­al­ly shapes not mere­ly how peo­ple make mon­ey, but how they imag­ine real­i­ty itself. The gig econ­o­my does not sim­ply cre­ate gig work. It cre­ates a gig mind­set. And that mind­set is increas­ing­ly reshap­ing the moral imag­i­na­tion among younger gen­er­a­tions in deeply con­se­quen­tial ways. At the cen­ter of the gig mind­set is the assump­tion that near­ly every­thing can become mon­e­tized, opti­mized, and con­vert­ed into mar­ket val­ue. Every­thing and every expe­ri­ence are now for sale. The self itself becomes a plat­form. Con­sid­er two rapid­ly expand­ing phe­nom­e­na among young adults: men are increas­ing­ly addict­ed to online sports bet­ting, and women are increas­ing­ly post­ing on plat­forms such as Only­Fans. These two are deeply con­nect­ed man­i­fes­ta­tions of the same cul­tur­al log­ic.”
    • Empha­sis in orig­i­nal.
  5. Are “Real” Catholics as Con­ser­v­a­tive as Evan­gel­i­cals? (Ryan Burge, Sub­stack): “I think this is the best test I can devise to real­ly com­pare devout, con­ser­v­a­tive Catholics to evan­gel­i­cals in the same seg­ment of the pop­u­la­tion. I just can’t look at these results and say that ‘real’ Catholics are just as social­ly con­ser­v­a­tive as ‘real’ evan­gel­i­cals. They aren’t — empir­i­cal­ly speak­ing — as con­ser­v­a­tive on these three core issues [abor­tion, gay mar­riage, and pre­mar­i­tal sex]… What I take away from all of this is that evan­gel­i­cal iden­ti­ty car­ries some­thing that can’t be ful­ly explained by how often you show up or how con­ser­v­a­tive you vote. There’s a the­o­log­i­cal and cul­tur­al foun­da­tion to evan­gel­i­cal­ism that shapes how adher­ents think about the body, sex­u­al­i­ty, and the fam­i­ly in ways that Catholic iden­ti­ty sim­ply doesn’t repli­cate — even among the most devout and polit­i­cal­ly con­ser­v­a­tive Catholics. The Church may teach the same things on paper, but the peo­ple in the pews aren’t inter­nal­iz­ing them the same way. And that gap between offi­cial teach­ing and lived belief is, frankly, one of the most inter­est­ing sto­ries in Amer­i­can reli­gion right now.”
    • Empha­sis in orig­i­nal.
  6. Search­ing for God in Sil­i­con Val­ley (Avi­tal Bal­wit, The Free Press): “AI work­ers tend to be less reli­gious than the rest of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion. They are most­ly lapsed in their faith, or were nev­er reli­gious to begin with. Per­haps they were cir­cum­cised or bap­tized; now they may occa­sion­al­ly med­i­tate. This is, for the most part, a mate­ri­al­ist lot—by which I mean peo­ple for whom the world is atoms and phys­i­cal laws with noth­ing super­nat­ur­al left over, and for whom moral­i­ty is some­thing worked out from intu­ition or from phi­los­o­phy, rather than received from out­side the world.… Not all of them would say they are miss­ing some­thing, and I take the ones who say so at their word. But enough are vis­i­bly _searching_ that it is worth ask­ing what they are search­ing for.”
    • The author is chief of staff to Dario Amod­ei, the CEO of Anthrop­ic.
  7. Per­fect ran­dom­ness real­ized for the first time (Gaby Clark, Phys.org): “…Wall­raf­f’s and Ren­ner’s teams have found a way to take imper­fect ran­dom­ness and still extract per­fect­ly ran­dom num­bers from it. They call their method ran­dom­ness ampli­fi­ca­tion.”

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

TGFI, Volume 550: Christianity in space

You’ve heard of TGIF? This is TGFI: Things Glen Found Inter­est­ing

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues like­ly to be of inter­est to Chris­tians in col­lege. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions, so if you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. There’s No Sep­a­ra­tion of Church and Space (Bethel McGrew, Wall Street Jour­nal): “It has long been an incon­ve­nient fact for angry athe­ists that some of America’s most intre­pid space explor­ers are devout reli­gious believ­ers. Buzz Aldrin per­formed the first Holy Com­mu­nion on the Moon, though at the time he was told to keep the moment pri­vate. The activist Mada­lyn Mur­ray O’Hair had sued NASA a few months ear­li­er over Apol­lo 8’s Christ­mas Eve broad­cast of the Gen­e­sis cre­ation nar­ra­tive.… Athe­ist biol­o­gist P.Z. Mey­ers recent­ly suf­fered a flash­back to that moment as he con­tem­plat­ed the ter­ri­fy­ing prospect of an East­er mini-ser­mon from Artemis II pilot Vic­tor Glover. Watch­ing the Apol­lo 8 broad­cast as a child was ‘one of the nails in the cof­fin’ of his reli­gious upbring­ing. For an athe­ist, mix­ing space explo­ration and reli­gion bor­ders on sac­ri­lege.”
  2. Things That Are Get­ting Bet­ter (Aaron Renn, Sub­stack): “We have man­aged to find a cure for about 90% of cys­tic fibro­sis cas­es, a con­di­tion that was pre­vi­ous­ly debil­i­tat­ing and fatal. We now have gene ther­a­py treat­ments that are enabling some chil­dren born deaf to hear. In a slew of oth­er areas from pre­ma­ture births to can­cer, we’ve made real progress even if long promised fun­da­men­tal break­throughs remain elu­sive. GLP‑1 treat­ments promise to basi­cal­ly cure obe­si­ty. Life expectan­cy, which was falling, has now risen back to an all-time high.”
  3. Ranked: America’s Biggest Chris­t­ian Groups (Julie R. Peasley, Visu­al Cap­i­tal­ist): “The com­par­i­son high­lights a key divide in how these groups are struc­tured. Catholics lead by mem­ber­ship, while the South­ern Bap­tist Con­ven­tion leads by church count. Non-denom­i­na­tion­al church­es also rank near the top on both mea­sures, reflect­ing how the com­po­si­tion of Amer­i­can Chris­tian­i­ty has shift­ed over time.”
    • The Assem­blies of God ranks high­er and high­er (#7 on this chart). We’ve got one more easy rank to climb, but after that it gets chal­leng­ing.
  4. The Pews Pre­pared the Way: Faith, Rev­o­lu­tion, and the Amer­i­can Creed (Cole Clay­bourn & Joshua Clay­bourn, Prov­i­dence): “Decades before Jef­fer­son draft­ed the Dec­la­ra­tion, min­is­ters from across the 13 colonies preached nat­ur­al rights and the equal stand­ing of all men before God. In 1638, in the new­ly formed Con­necti­cut Colony, a Puri­tan min­is­ter named Rev. Thomas Hook­er deliv­ered an auda­cious ser­mon for its time. He stood before the colony’s Gen­er­al Court and declared that ‘The foun­da­tion of author­i­ty is laid in the free con­sent of the peo­ple’ and that ‘The choice of pub­lic mag­is­trates belongs unto the peo­ple by God’s own allowance.’ In the 17th cen­tu­ry, a min­is­ter telling civ­il author­i­ties that the gov­ern­ment owed its exis­tence to the gov­erned, by God’s design, was sedi­tious. Hook­er ground­ed his argu­ment in scrip­ture and Puri­tan covenant the­ol­o­gy. Con­sent was God’s idea first.”
  5. Becom­ing Co-ed: a Protes­tant Gift to Chi­na (Ningn­ing Ma, Se Yan, and Yil­ing Zhao, SSRN): “A grow­ing lit­er­a­ture, start­ing with Beck­er and Woess­mann (2009), estab­lish­es the link between Protes­tantism and human cap­i­tal invest­ment. Accord­ing to the prin­ci­ple of sola scrip­tura, the Bible is the ulti­mate author­i­ty in the Chris­t­ian faith, and read­ing Scrip­ture pro­vides indi­vid­ual access to God’s word. The Protes­tant empha­sis on per­son­al Bible read­ing led to the pro­mo­tion of lit­er­a­cy, and Protes­tantism not only advo­cat­ed for uni­ver­sal edu­ca­tion but also made it acces­si­ble to women (Beck­er and Woess­mann, 2008). Close­ly relat­ed to our research is a lit­er­a­ture that demon­strates the par­tic­u­lar­ly pos­i­tive effect of Protes­tant mis­sions on women’s lit­er­a­cy in devel­op­ing coun­tries with low gen­der equal­i­ty (Calvi et al., 2020; Izu­mi et al., 2023; Meier zu Sel­hausen, 2014; Nunn et al., 2014). How­ev­er, we shift the focus from basic edu­ca­tion to high­er learn­ing, show­ing that by pio­neer­ing gen­der-inclu­sive uni­ver­si­ties, Protes­tant mis­sions gen­er­at­ed China’s first wave of female elites, thus extend­ing the link between Protes­tantism and gen­der equal­i­ty to upper-tail human cap­i­tal.”
    • I skimmed but did not thor­ough­ly read this paper.
  6. Does it help to be reli­gious? (Vic­to­ria Moul, Sub­stack): “Why is it that so many of the best con­tem­po­rary poets in Eng­lish are (broad­ly speak­ing) reli­gious? And in par­tic­u­lar, why does this seem (to me) to be more true now than it was thir­ty years ago when I start­ed read­ing poet­ry seri­ous­ly? If any­thing you might expect the like­li­hood that any indi­vid­ual good poet has a reli­gious for­ma­tion to have declined as reli­gious obser­vance has fall­en, albeit to dif­fer­ent degrees and from very dif­fer­ent start­ing points, in both the UK and the US. By ‘reli­gious’ I don’t mean Chris­t­ian — I’m think­ing equal­ly of poets like Khaled Hakim or Amit Maj­mu­dar — and I don’t nec­es­sar­i­ly mean ‘prac­tic­ing’ either, and cer­tain­ly not that the best _poems_ are reli­gious ones. But just that there does seem to be quite a strong cor­re­la­tion between a reli­gious for­ma­tion or frame­work influ­en­tial enough to be audi­ble in the poet­ry, and pro­nounced apti­tude.”
    • The author has a PhD in a relat­ed field, but has left acad­e­mia to focus on being a writer.
  7. $400 Bibles? Lux­u­ri­ous Scrip­ture Is on the Rise. (Ruth Gra­ham, New York Times): “Col­lec­tors of pre­mi­um Bibles tend to share a few char­ac­ter­is­tics, pub­lish­ers and experts say: They are typ­i­cal­ly evan­gel­i­cal Chris­tians who own mul­ti­ple oth­er Bibles already, and many of them are men. Mr. Arroyo esti­mates that at least 60 per­cent of his cus­tomers are men. Mr. Wild­smith, the Bible review­er, said his YouTube audi­ence was about three-quar­ters male. Some recent sur­veys have detect­ed Bible read­ing and church atten­dance sta­bi­liz­ing or even ris­ing after years of decline, shifts fueled in part by young men.”

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.