Tag: apologetically interesting

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 26

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

On this half-year mark, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. Reli­gious Lib­er­ty and Human Dig­ni­ty: Tale Of Two Dec­la­ra­tions (Har­vard Jour­nal of Law and Pub­lic Pol­i­cy, Kevin Has­son). This arti­cle from 2003 argues that reli­gious free­dom is the fun­da­men­tal free­dom. It starts slow as it lays a foun­da­tion, but picks up about halfway through.
  2. While you’re on Thanks­giv­ing break, please reg­is­ter to vote if you have not already done so. I strong­ly sug­gest you reg­is­ter as a Per­ma­nent Vote-By-Mail Vot­er, which sim­ply means that you will receive a bal­lot in the mail before every elec­tion. It gives you plen­ty of time to research the can­di­dates and issues from the com­fort of your dorm room with your bal­lot in front of you. If you pre­fer to vote in anoth­er state then vis­it http://www.brennancenter.org/student-voting). If you’re a cit­i­zen of anoth­er coun­try, do what­ev­er you’re sup­posed to do there. 🙂
  3. Some glob­al per­spec­tive:
  4. More cam­pus activism links: Pres­i­dent Oba­ma weighs in (real­ly). See also A Cri­sis Our Uni­ver­si­ties Deserve (NY Times, Ross Douthat): this is a help­ful big-pic­ture overview of the col­lege scene. Also, Yale’s Activists Deserve Con­struc­tive Crit­i­cism (The Atlantic, Conor Frieder­s­dorf).
  5. Are Non-Reli­gious Chil­dren Real­ly More Altru­is­tic? (Robert Wood­ber­ry) — this is prob­a­bly the last thing I will post on this. I almost didn’t, but WOW what a smack­down. Wood­ber­ry is the author of that arti­cle I keep shar­ing about Chris­tian­i­ty and democ­ra­cy.
  6. Quick Links:

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 25

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

There’s a lot of heavy con­tent in this one. Buck­le your seat­belt. With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. Alco­hol, Black­outs, and Cam­pus Sex­u­al Assault (Texas Month­ly, Sarah Hep­o­la): I think this is the most thought­ful sec­u­lar piece I’ve read on the issue. “Con­sent and alco­hol make tricky bed­fel­lows. The rea­son I liked get­ting drunk was because it altered my con­sent: it changed what I would say yes to. Not just in the bed­room but in every room and cor­ri­dor that led into the squint­ing light. Say yes to adven­ture, say yes to risk, say yes to karaoke and pool par­ties and argu­ments with men, say yes to a life with­out fear, even though such a life is nev­er pos­si­ble… We drink because it feels good. We drink because it makes us feel hap­py, safe, pow­er­ful. That it often makes us the oppo­site is one of alcohol’s das­tard­ly tricks.”
  2. Fatal Flaws In That Reli­gion And Gen­eros­i­ty Study (The Stream, George Yancey). Yancey is a soci­ol­o­gy prof. Relat­ed: Are Reli­gious Kids Real­ly Mean­er Than Their Coun­ter­parts? by a social psy­chol­o­gist.
  3. Now for a ton of links relat­ed to the racial inci­dents and respons­es at Yale and Miz­zou (which seem dif­fer­ent to me but which hap­pened in such close prox­im­i­ty that they are linked in the nation­al dia­log).
  4. In glob­al news: On The Brink: Chris­tian­i­ty Fac­ing Mid­dle East Purge With­in Decade, Group Says (Fox News). Sto­ries like this have led one law­mak­er to intro­duce a bill to Pri­or­i­tize Refugee Sta­tus For Chris­tians Flee­ing ISIS (The Hill). See also Islam Is A Reli­gion Of Vio­lence by Joel Miller, where­in he argues that the lack of Trini­tar­i­an doc­trine cor­rupts the Mus­lim con­cep­tion of God.
  5. Chris­t­ian Belief Cost This Man His Job: (Wall Street Jour­nal, Jason Riley): appar­ent­ly the fire chief of Atlanta was fired because of some­thing he said in a book he wrote. Note that this is an op-ed, not a news sto­ry.
  6. Hat­ing Queer­ness With­out Hat­ing The Queer (The Atlantic, Emma Green): basi­cal­ly an arti­cle-length inter­ac­tion with Albert Mohler’s book We Can­not Be Silent.
  7. Quick Links:

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 24

News News News 98/365In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. I heard a mov­ing Radi­o­lab episode: Gray’s Dona­tion. If you’ve nev­er lis­tened to Radi­o­lab before, I high­ly rec­om­mend the episodes Col­ors and Oops. If you’re into pod­casts, check out a list of thought­ful Chris­t­ian pod­casts I com­piled a while back.
  2. ’A Tour of Burned Church­es’ Explores Race, Resilience, and Reli­gion in Amer­i­ca (Huff­in­g­ton Post, Christo­pher Math­ias): an inter­view with a pod­cast­er about a series he did on the burn­ing of black church­es in Amer­i­ca. I have not lis­tened to the series, but the inter­view was good.
  3. Data about Adults Who Do Not Believe In God (Pew Forum) — one of the charts makes me think of a fun­ny clip about athe­ism as white priv­i­lege [the whole thing is worth watch­ing, but you can jump to the sound bite at 5:45]. There is a good sum­ma­ry of some of the take­aways at GetRe­li­gion. On a relat­ed note, there is a study in Cur­rent Biol­o­gy: The Neg­a­tive Asso­ci­a­tion Between Reli­gious­ness and Children’s Altru­ism Across The World. The com­ments on red­dit are inter­est­ing (more inter­est­ing to me than the study itself).
  4. A some­what con­trar­i­an piece: Lib­er­als Are Los­ing The Cul­ture War (Mol­ly Ball, The Atlantic). A semi-response piece: This Isn’t A Cul­ture War, It’s A War On Cul­ture (The Fed­er­al­ist, David Harsanyi).
  5. File under sad: The State Depart­ment Turns Its Back on Syr­i­an Chris­tians and Oth­er Non-Mus­lim Refugees (Nation­al Review, Nina Shea)
  6. The sto­ry I allud­ed to in my ser­mon: How Prop 47 Helped One Man Keep His Job (KQED,  Sara Hos­sai­ni). This is an illus­tra­tion of what jus­ti­fi­ca­tion involves — a legal decree that exempts you from penal­ties the law would oth­er­wise apply (when I quote stuff in my ser­mon I try to remem­ber to share it here).
  7. Quick Links:

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 20

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. From the Glen-allud­ed-to-this-in-his-ser­mon depart­ment:
  2. From the cur­rent events depart­ment
  3. From the all-things-sex­u­al depart­ment:
  4. From the Stan­ford depart­ment: this Dai­ly op-ed caught my eye: Peti­tion To Stu­dent Activ­i­ties and Lead­er­ship to End Open Mem­ber­ship. There was a swift nuh-uh from the admin­is­tra­tion. The peti­tion itself is on change.org. For the record, Chi Alpha has no desire to exclude peo­ple from our min­istry. I do, how­ev­er, think that Stanford’s open mem­ber­ship pol­i­cy need­less­ly abridges stu­dents’ con­sti­tu­tion­al right to free­dom of asso­ci­a­tion. As a pri­vate insti­tu­tion, Stan­ford is allowed to do that… but it is unwise to do so.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 14

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived athttp://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

  1. From the big-bang-faith depart­ment: May­im Bia­lik: Hol­ly­wood is not friend­ly to peo­ple of faith (Sasha Bogursky, Fox News): Bia­lik, a devout Jew, is an actress on the Big Bang The­o­ry and in real life holds a Ph.D. in neu­ro­science. This inter­view caused such com­ment that she post­ed a fol­low-up on her blog: Where Faith Meets Sci­ence.

  2. From the his­tor­i­cal analy­sis depart­ment: Did Reli­gion Make The Civ­il War Worse? (Allen Guel­zo, The Atlantic): the author is a respect­ed pro­fes­sor with a sem­i­nary back­ground. I’m not sure what I think of his argu­ment, but I did find it inter­est­ing. The arti­cle made me think about Lincoln’s Sec­ond Inau­gur­al Address, which is always worth a re-read.

  3. From the hap­py news depart­ment: Chris­t­ian Mis­sions and the Spread of Democ­ra­cy (Greg Scan­dlen, The Fed­er­al­ist): This is a sum­ma­ry of some rather won­der­ful research Robert Wood­ber­ry pub­lished in The Amer­i­can Polit­i­cal Sci­ence Review back in 2012: The Mis­sion­ary Roots of Lib­er­al Democ­ra­cy. If it looks famil­iar it’s because I allude to it from time to time in my ser­mons and con­ver­sa­tions.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 12

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

  1. From the too-close-to-home depart­ment: The Cod­dling of The Amer­i­can Mind (Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, The Atlantic): the the­sis of this essay is that a “cam­pus cul­ture devot­ed to polic­ing speech and pun­ish­ing speak­ers is like­ly to engen­der pat­terns of thought that are sur­pris­ing­ly sim­i­lar to those long iden­ti­fied by cog­ni­tive behav­ioral ther­a­pists as caus­es of depres­sion and anx­i­ety.” This is a long piece but is worth read­ing even if you sus­pect it will infu­ri­ate you. There is some insight­ful com­men­tary on Red­dit argu­ing that it’s not stu­dents who have changed but admin­is­tra­tors.
  2. From the race-and-reli­gion depart­ment: A Year After Fer­gu­son, Have White Chris­tians Learned Any­thing? (Rus­sell Moore, Wash­ing­ton Post)
  3. From the con­tem­po­rary events depart­ment:
  4. From the ISIS depart­ment:
  5. From the eat-your-wheaties depart­ment: Want ‘Sus­tained Hap­pi­ness’? Get Reli­gion, Study Sug­gests (Sarah Pul­liam Bai­ley, Wash­ing­ton Post): if you have the desire, check out the orig­i­nal study in the Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Epi­demi­ol­o­gy.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 9

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

  1. From the par­ty-with-puri­tans depart­ment: Our Puri­tan Her­itage (Democ­ra­cy, Jim Sleep­er): the author, a polit­i­cal sci­ence lec­tur­er at Yale, is not a Chris­t­ian. I think parts of his argu­ment are wrong, but I found the whole thing stim­u­lat­ing (the com­ments are worth read­ing as well). For some­thing more prac­ti­cal­ly help­ful, see Puri­tan Resources For Bib­li­cal Coun­sel­ing (Jour­nal of Bib­li­cal Coun­sel­ing, Tim Keller): good stuff about how to grow spir­i­tu­al­ly.
  2. From the sis­ter-in-Christ-doing-good depart­ment: Griev­ing Gov. Nik­ki Haley For­ev­er Changed By Church Mas­sacre (Post and Couri­er, Jen­nifer Berry Hawes): Nik­ki Haley, the gov­er­nor of South Car­oli­na, is an adult con­vert to Chris­tian­i­ty. There’s a 2012 inter­view about her faith at Chris­tian­i­ty Today.
  3. From the still-work­ing-to-show-the-world-that-we-are-one depart­ment: Dear Pas­tor, Can I Come To Your Church? (Chris­tian­i­ty Today, Bradley Wright): an inter­est­ing study on implic­it racial bias in wel­com­ing new­com­ers to church. It may be behind a pay­wall — I was able to access the whole thing but some­one else told me they only got a snip­pet. The author, a soci­ol­o­gist at U Conn, gives ref­er­ences on his web­site (the Chris­tian­i­ty Today arti­cle is a pop­u­lar­iza­tion of a forth­com­ing aca­d­e­m­ic arti­cle).
  4. From the it-sounds-clever-the-first-time-you-hear-it-depart­ment: Why Pri­va­tiz­ing Mar­riage Would Be A Dis­as­ter (The Week, Shikha Dalmia): I’ve heard some Chris­tians sug­gest that we erect a wall of sep­a­ra­tion between mar­riage and state. This arti­cle sug­gests that is a fool­ish idea. For a Chris­t­ian take (the author of the pre­vi­ous arti­cle is agnos­tic) that comes to sim­i­lar con­clu­sion, read Dou­glas Wilson’s In Which First Things Does Some Fourth Things (Doug Wil­son is a fas­ci­nat­ing and polar­iz­ing fig­ure: read The Con­tro­ver­sial­ist from Chris­tian­i­ty Today to learn more about him).
  5. From the mak­ing-a-dif­fer­ence-is-hard depart­ment: The Myth of the Eth­i­cal Shop­per (Huff­in­g­ton Post, Michael Hobbes): I post­ed a sim­i­lar piece a few weeks ago. You have less con­trol as a con­sumer than you think because com­pa­nies have less con­trol than you think.
  6. From the in-our-back­yard depart­ment: Spir­i­tu­al Oppor­tu­ni­ty in Sil­i­con Val­ley (Lead­er­ship Jour­nal, Daniel Dar­ling): an inter­view with the author of a forth­com­ing book about Chris­tian­i­ty in Sil­i­con Val­ley. The book looks inter­est­ing. The author blogs at http://findinggodinsiliconvalley.com/

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 3

In the time of King David, the Bible says that the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

  1. From the everyone’s a crit­ic depart­ment: The Media Loves The Gates Foun­da­tion — These Experts Are More Skep­ti­cal (Juli­a­Bel­luz, Vox). This piece nev­er men­tions God, but I found it the­o­log­i­cal­ly fas­ci­nat­ing for three rea­sons:
    1. This arti­cle reminds me that no mat­ter how much good you do there will always be crit­ics. Jesus was per­fect and the world nailed him to a cross.
    2. This arti­cle reminds me that it is far eas­i­er to crit­i­cize than to accom­plish. The arti­cle left me far more impressed with the Gates than with their crit­ics. And I reflect­ed upon the fact that the crit­ics are unwit­ting­ly stor­ing up judg­ment for them­selves in heav­en where they will be mea­sured by the same stan­dards they apply to Bill and Melin­da Gates (Romans 2).
    3. But Bill and Melin­da do not get off scot-free. This arti­cle also reminds me of Isa­iah 64:6 — our right­eous deeds are like filthy rags before the Lord. These crit­i­cisms (at least those which are well-found­ed) are mere hints of the lim­i­ta­tions God sees in the right­eous deeds of Bill and Melin­da Gates. All of us need Jesus — even our most moral friends.
  2. From the respond­ing to crit­i­cisms depart­ment: On Con­ser­v­a­tive Reli­gious Activism, The Num­bers Speak For Them­selves (orig­i­nal­ly Wash­ing­ton Post, but bet­ter-for­mat­ted at RNS)  Peo­ple some­times claim that Chris­tians spend too much of their time and mon­ey fight­ing polit­i­cal bat­tles rather serv­ing the poor. This op-ed pro­vides num­bers to rebut the claim. A relat­ed arti­cle by a non-Chris­t­ian jour­nal­ist explains why many peo­ple believe the charge despite the data:  Ver­i­ly I Say Unto You: Chris­tians Care About the Poor (Megan McAr­dle, Bloomberg  View).
  3. From the self-decep­tion depart­ment: If You Use Face­book to Get Your News, Please — For the Love of Democ­ra­cy — Read This First (Cait­lyn Dewey, Wash­ing­ton Post): Nan­cy sent me this inter­est­ing arti­cle about how Facebook’s fil­ter­ing algo­rithms sub­tly rein­force our bias­es. In relat­ed news, Ezra Klein at Vox explains Why The Most Informed Vot­ers Are Often The Most Bad­ly Mis­led.
  4. From the laugh­ter is good depart­ment: Dil­bert meets an Inter­net star. The last pan­el kills me. Yesterday’s strip about brain­storm­ing was insight­ful­ly fun­ny as well.

Sug­ges­tions for a bet­ter title/frequency/best day to send the email on/articles to consider/etc are wel­come. My cur­rent plan is to send out an email with 3–5 top­ics every Fri­day.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and will at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 1

[this was an email I sent to the stu­dents in Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford]

In the time of King David, the Bible says that the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). That’s a wor­thy goal — to under­stand our times and know how to live wise­ly in them. We need to learn how our faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I’m going to try some­thing: for the next few weeks I’ll send out three to five articles/resources I have found help­ful in think­ing about nation­al, glob­al and the­o­log­i­cal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). My hope is these read­ings nudge you into con­tin­u­ing the tra­di­tion of Issachar. If these emails are well-received then they may become an ongo­ing thing.

So here’s the first batch:

  1. The Spir­i­tu­al Shape of Polit­i­cal Ideas (Joseph Bot­tum, The Week­ly Stan­dard): many mod­ern polit­i­cal ideas are derived from Chris­t­ian the­o­log­i­cal con­cepts.

  2. What ISIS Real­ly Wants (Graeme Wood, The Atlantic): the key to under­stand­ing ISIS is under­stand­ing their faith, par­tic­u­lar­ly their escha­tol­ogy. A take­away for Chris­tians — your escha­tol­ogy mat­ters (so get it right).

  3. Evan­gel­i­cal Protes­tants Are The Biggest Win­ners When­ev­er Peo­ple Change Faiths (Leah Libresco, FiveThir­tyEight): this is the most inter­est­ing take I’ve seen on the Pew Forum study that filled the news recent­ly. If cur­rent trends con­tin­ue until they reach an equi­lib­ri­um point, then evan­gel­i­cal­ism will become the largest reli­gious iden­ti­ty in Amer­i­ca (fol­lowed by either the reli­gious­ly unaf­fil­i­at­ed or the Mor­mons depend­ing on whether fer­til­i­ty is fac­tored in).

  4. God’s For­ev­er Fam­i­ly: The Jesus Peo­ple Move­ment in Amer­i­ca (Lar­ry Eskridge, Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty Press): a schol­ar­ly his­to­ry of an oft-over­looked Great Awak­en­ing — the Jesus Peo­ple revival among the hip­pies. It is full of delight­ful anec­dotes, includ­ing this charmer: one cou­ple “began to talk to their friends about Jesus and even went so far as to name their dog ‘Repent’ so they could stand in the city’s parks and shout the canine’s name and their mes­sage at the top of their lungs.”  (p 148). The book is avail­able online through Stan­ford’s library sys­tem — the link will take you right there.

Sug­ges­tions for a bet­ter title / arti­cles to con­sid­er / best day to send the email on / etc. are wel­come, as is feed­back on the idea as a whole.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read stuff (and may there­fore share stuff) from all over the ide­o­log­i­cal map. I read wide­ly in part because I aspire to pass an ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and more gen­er­al­ly because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand.” I encour­age you to adopt a sim­i­lar per­spec­tive.

Also, for the first few install­ments I’ll prob­a­bly reach far­ther back than nor­mal for some arti­cles that stand out in my mem­o­ry. As time goes on I imag­ine the links will become more and more recent.