Tag: islam

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 43

On Fri­days I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

  1. Mid­dle Knowl­edge and the Calvin­ist-Armin­ian Debate (Craig Blomberg, per­son­al blog): This is what I was talk­ing about in my ser­mon this week. Also see the YouTube video where Dr. William Lane Craig explains it to a Sun­day School class.
  2. What Apple’s Encryp­tion Fight Has To Do With Reli­gious Free­dom (Chelsea Langston, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): “[Apple’s] exam­ple reminds us of the broad impor­tance of pro­tect­ing organizations—both sec­u­lar and reli­gious, for-prof­it and non-profit—from com­pul­sion to act against their most foun­da­tion­al val­ues.”
  3. How To Hack An Elec­tion (Jor­dan Robert­son, Michael Riley, and Andrew Willis, Bloomberg Busi­ness­week): this is a fas­ci­nat­ing and unset­tling arti­cle. ‘On the ques­tion of whether the U.S. pres­i­den­tial cam­paign is being tam­pered with, he is unequiv­o­cal. “I’m 100 per­cent sure it is,” he says.’
  4. Is Islam a Reli­gion of Peace? A For­mer Mus­lim Weighs In. (Dar­gan Thomp­son, Rel­e­vant Mag­a­zine): “What I’m say­ing is the foun­da­tions of Islam—I’m talk­ing about the Quran and the life of Muhammed—are very vio­lent. Islam can be for­mu­lat­ed in non-vio­lent ways, but to do so, you have to depart from its foun­da­tions, as many Mus­lims do.”
  5. Reli­gion is the Foun­da­tion of Democ­ra­cy and Pros­per­i­ty (Clay­ton Chris­tensen, Mor­mon Per­spec­tives): the author, a Har­vard pro­fes­sor, talks about a con­ver­sa­tion he had with a friend, “I learned the impor­tance of reli­gion for the strength of democ­ra­cy and cap­i­tal­ism in a con­ver­sa­tion 12 years ago with a Marx­ist econ­o­mist from Chi­na who was near­ing the end of a Ful­bright Fel­low­ship in Boston. I asked my friend if he had learned here any­thing that was sur­pris­ing or unex­pect­ed. His response was imme­di­ate and, to me, quite pro­found: ‘I had no idea how crit­i­cal reli­gion is to the func­tion­ing of democ­ra­cy and cap­i­tal­ism.’ ”
  6. Per­son­al Love and the Call to Chasti­ty (Saman­tha Schroed­er, The Pub­lic Dis­course): there is a lot I like and a lot I don’t like about this arti­cle.
  7. Here’s Every Bib­li­cal Ref­er­ence in ‘Hamil­ton’ (Alis­sa Wilkin­son, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): of inter­est to the Hamil­ton fanat­ics who seem to abound in Chi Alpha.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links (you can also have your non-Stan­ford friends sign up to receive them at that site)

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 28

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. Pay­ing, Pray­ing It For­ward (Hous­ton Chron­i­cle, Mag­gie Gor­don): an inspir­ing sto­ry — also not very long. If you just want a boost as finals draw near, read this one and skip down to the quick links.
  2. San Bernadi­no Vic­tim Was Upfront About Pol­i­tics and Reli­gion — With Farook Too (LA Times, Veron­i­ca Rocha): one of the shoot­ing vic­tims had been wit­ness­ing to one of the shoot­ers in the days before the car­nage. See some reflec­tion on this issue at Anoth­er First Amend­ment Ghost: Did Debate With Evan­gel­i­cal Trig­ger Farook? (GetRe­li­gion, Ter­ry Mat­ting­ly).
  3. Why The Pro-Life Move­ment Oppos­es Vio­lence (NY Times, Ross Douthat). “Giv­en anti-abor­tion premis­es, why is it not obvi­ous­ly rea­son­able to take up arms against abor­tion providers? Why isn’t the pro-lif­er who shoots an abor­tion­ist just like a man or woman who uses dead­ly force against a would-be child mur­der­er — a vig­i­lante, yes, but also a hero­ic one?” See also Rus­sell Moore for a more the­o­log­i­cal approach in Is Pro-Life Rhetoric Dead­ly?
  4. Relat­ed to the sto­ries that inspired the pieces in the two pre­vi­ous bul­let points: How Many Mass Shoot­ings Are There, Real­ly? (NY Times, Mark Foll­man). It turns out that there’s not a com­mon­ly accept­ed way to quan­ti­fy the data. I found this piece fas­ci­nat­ing. Foll­man is the nation­al affairs edi­tor of Moth­er Jones.
  5. Who Influ­ences Whom? Reflec­tions on U.S. Gov­ern­ment Out­reach to Think Tanks (Brook­ings Insti­tute, Jere­my Shapiro): this is an engag­ing peek behind the cur­tains at a world some of you will wind up enter­ing.
  6. Why The Pub­lic Can’t Read The Press (The Atlantic, John Helt­man): this piece is a bit long for my taste, but the sub­ject is impor­tant. There’s a lot of good jour­nal­ism you will nev­er be giv­en the chance to see.
  7. Quick Links:

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. 

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 27

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

To be frank, most of what I found inter­est­ing this week was turkey. The pick­ings are lit­tle slim­mer than oth­er weeks:

  1. The Chris­t­ian Cen­tu­ry No One Pre­dict­ed (Justin Tay­lor, per­son­al blog): “it was also a rever­sal in that Chris­tian­i­ty moved from being cen­tered in Chris­t­ian nations to being cen­tered in non-Chris­t­ian nations. Chris­ten­dom, that remark­able con­di­tion of church­es sup­port­ing states and states sup­port­ing Chris­tian­i­ty, died. The idea of Chris­t­ian priv­i­lege in soci­ety was all but killed. And yet the reli­gion seemed stronger than ever at the end of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry.”
  2. Ross Douthat on The Joy of ISIS (NY Times): “But if the West’s offi­cial alter­na­tive to ISIS is the full Bel­gium (basi­cal­ly good food + bureau­cra­cy + euthana­sia), if West­ern soci­ety seems like it’s closed most of the paths that human beings have tra­di­tion­al­ly fol­lowed to find tran­scen­dence, if West­ern cul­ture los­es the abil­i­ty to even imag­ine the joy that comes with full com­mit­ment, and not just the remis­sive joy of slough­ing com­mit­ments off — well, then we’re going to be sup­ply­ing at least some recruits to groups like ISIS for a very long to come.”
  3. Why Tol­er­ate Reli­gion? (First Things, Rafael Domin­go):  “The right to reli­gion is dif­fer­ent from free­dom of con­science. Con­science is a sort of pro­tec­tive shell around people’s pri­va­cy: it safe­guards them from abu­sive intru­sions by the law. Con­science marks a pri­vate lim­it of the legal sys­tem, not a pub­lic one.… The right to reli­gion demands tol­er­a­tion; free­dom of con­science demands accom­mo­da­tion.”
  4. Fear and Vot­ing on the Chris­t­ian Right (CNN, Thomas Lake). “They called her a big­ot, a homo­phobe, even a racist, which was strange, because the two gay men were white and so was Bet­ty Odgaard. The angry peo­ple on the Inter­net told Bet­ty she would die soon, that her death would be good for Amer­i­ca, and then she would prob­a­bly go to hell. Bet­ty had oth­er ideas about her final des­ti­na­tion, but she agreed it was time to go.”
  5. There’s an Awful Cost To Get­ting a Ph.D. That No One Talks About (Quartz). Also of inter­est to Chris­tians con­sid­er­ing a doc­tor­al pro­gram, The Illu­sion of Respectabil­i­ty (Chris­tian­i­ty Today, Allen Guel­zo).
  6. Chica­go School of Free Speech (Wall Street Jour­nal, L. Gor­don Crovitz): one school’s response to the tumult sweep­ing col­lege cam­pus­es. (may be behind a pay­wall)

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 25

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

There’s a lot of heavy con­tent in this one. Buck­le your seat­belt. With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. Alco­hol, Black­outs, and Cam­pus Sex­u­al Assault (Texas Month­ly, Sarah Hep­o­la): I think this is the most thought­ful sec­u­lar piece I’ve read on the issue. “Con­sent and alco­hol make tricky bed­fel­lows. The rea­son I liked get­ting drunk was because it altered my con­sent: it changed what I would say yes to. Not just in the bed­room but in every room and cor­ri­dor that led into the squint­ing light. Say yes to adven­ture, say yes to risk, say yes to karaoke and pool par­ties and argu­ments with men, say yes to a life with­out fear, even though such a life is nev­er pos­si­ble… We drink because it feels good. We drink because it makes us feel hap­py, safe, pow­er­ful. That it often makes us the oppo­site is one of alcohol’s das­tard­ly tricks.”
  2. Fatal Flaws In That Reli­gion And Gen­eros­i­ty Study (The Stream, George Yancey). Yancey is a soci­ol­o­gy prof. Relat­ed: Are Reli­gious Kids Real­ly Mean­er Than Their Coun­ter­parts? by a social psy­chol­o­gist.
  3. Now for a ton of links relat­ed to the racial inci­dents and respons­es at Yale and Miz­zou (which seem dif­fer­ent to me but which hap­pened in such close prox­im­i­ty that they are linked in the nation­al dia­log).
  4. In glob­al news: On The Brink: Chris­tian­i­ty Fac­ing Mid­dle East Purge With­in Decade, Group Says (Fox News). Sto­ries like this have led one law­mak­er to intro­duce a bill to Pri­or­i­tize Refugee Sta­tus For Chris­tians Flee­ing ISIS (The Hill). See also Islam Is A Reli­gion Of Vio­lence by Joel Miller, where­in he argues that the lack of Trini­tar­i­an doc­trine cor­rupts the Mus­lim con­cep­tion of God.
  5. Chris­t­ian Belief Cost This Man His Job: (Wall Street Jour­nal, Jason Riley): appar­ent­ly the fire chief of Atlanta was fired because of some­thing he said in a book he wrote. Note that this is an op-ed, not a news sto­ry.
  6. Hat­ing Queer­ness With­out Hat­ing The Queer (The Atlantic, Emma Green): basi­cal­ly an arti­cle-length inter­ac­tion with Albert Mohler’s book We Can­not Be Silent.
  7. Quick Links:

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 12

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

  1. From the too-close-to-home depart­ment: The Cod­dling of The Amer­i­can Mind (Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, The Atlantic): the the­sis of this essay is that a “cam­pus cul­ture devot­ed to polic­ing speech and pun­ish­ing speak­ers is like­ly to engen­der pat­terns of thought that are sur­pris­ing­ly sim­i­lar to those long iden­ti­fied by cog­ni­tive behav­ioral ther­a­pists as caus­es of depres­sion and anx­i­ety.” This is a long piece but is worth read­ing even if you sus­pect it will infu­ri­ate you. There is some insight­ful com­men­tary on Red­dit argu­ing that it’s not stu­dents who have changed but admin­is­tra­tors.
  2. From the race-and-reli­gion depart­ment: A Year After Fer­gu­son, Have White Chris­tians Learned Any­thing? (Rus­sell Moore, Wash­ing­ton Post)
  3. From the con­tem­po­rary events depart­ment:
  4. From the ISIS depart­ment:
  5. From the eat-your-wheaties depart­ment: Want ‘Sus­tained Hap­pi­ness’? Get Reli­gion, Study Sug­gests (Sarah Pul­liam Bai­ley, Wash­ing­ton Post): if you have the desire, check out the orig­i­nal study in the Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Epi­demi­ol­o­gy.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 1

[this was an email I sent to the stu­dents in Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford]

In the time of King David, the Bible says that the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). That’s a wor­thy goal — to under­stand our times and know how to live wise­ly in them. We need to learn how our faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I’m going to try some­thing: for the next few weeks I’ll send out three to five articles/resources I have found help­ful in think­ing about nation­al, glob­al and the­o­log­i­cal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). My hope is these read­ings nudge you into con­tin­u­ing the tra­di­tion of Issachar. If these emails are well-received then they may become an ongo­ing thing.

So here’s the first batch:

  1. The Spir­i­tu­al Shape of Polit­i­cal Ideas (Joseph Bot­tum, The Week­ly Stan­dard): many mod­ern polit­i­cal ideas are derived from Chris­t­ian the­o­log­i­cal con­cepts.

  2. What ISIS Real­ly Wants (Graeme Wood, The Atlantic): the key to under­stand­ing ISIS is under­stand­ing their faith, par­tic­u­lar­ly their escha­tol­ogy. A take­away for Chris­tians — your escha­tol­ogy mat­ters (so get it right).

  3. Evan­gel­i­cal Protes­tants Are The Biggest Win­ners When­ev­er Peo­ple Change Faiths (Leah Libresco, FiveThir­tyEight): this is the most inter­est­ing take I’ve seen on the Pew Forum study that filled the news recent­ly. If cur­rent trends con­tin­ue until they reach an equi­lib­ri­um point, then evan­gel­i­cal­ism will become the largest reli­gious iden­ti­ty in Amer­i­ca (fol­lowed by either the reli­gious­ly unaf­fil­i­at­ed or the Mor­mons depend­ing on whether fer­til­i­ty is fac­tored in).

  4. God’s For­ev­er Fam­i­ly: The Jesus Peo­ple Move­ment in Amer­i­ca (Lar­ry Eskridge, Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty Press): a schol­ar­ly his­to­ry of an oft-over­looked Great Awak­en­ing — the Jesus Peo­ple revival among the hip­pies. It is full of delight­ful anec­dotes, includ­ing this charmer: one cou­ple “began to talk to their friends about Jesus and even went so far as to name their dog ‘Repent’ so they could stand in the city’s parks and shout the canine’s name and their mes­sage at the top of their lungs.”  (p 148). The book is avail­able online through Stan­ford’s library sys­tem — the link will take you right there.

Sug­ges­tions for a bet­ter title / arti­cles to con­sid­er / best day to send the email on / etc. are wel­come, as is feed­back on the idea as a whole.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read stuff (and may there­fore share stuff) from all over the ide­o­log­i­cal map. I read wide­ly in part because I aspire to pass an ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and more gen­er­al­ly because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand.” I encour­age you to adopt a sim­i­lar per­spec­tive.

Also, for the first few install­ments I’ll prob­a­bly reach far­ther back than nor­mal for some arti­cles that stand out in my mem­o­ry. As time goes on I imag­ine the links will become more and more recent.