Really Famous Stanford Alumni

A brief overview of Stan­ford’s real­ly famous alum­ni.

Really Famous Stanford Alumni

I’ve talked about the incred­i­ble Stan­ford alum­ni ros­ter before, but I had occa­sion recent­ly to make a post­card fea­tur­ing them. I thought upload­ing the pho­to mon­tage I cre­at­ed might help you get a han­dle on exact­ly who I’m talk­ing about (not all are pic­tured):

In oth­er words, Stan­ford is one of the most strate­gic mis­sion fields in the world! For an even fuller list of alum­ni, check out the famous alum­ni list main­tained by Stan­ford itself!

RSS Feed from Chi Alpha @ Stanford!

Hear ye, hear ye: you can now check out both our per­son­al site and the Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford site at once!

Check this out: look at the bot­tom right of this screen. Notice any­thing dif­fer­ent?

Of course you do–all the post­ings from Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford are now list­ed in an RSS feed! (Thanks to Scrip­ty­God­dess for mak­ing me aware of this great code snip­pet avail­able at the Trom­me­ter Times).

Woohoo!

Postcards Are Very Confusing…

Just a lit­tle note to myself on the legal def­i­n­i­tion of a post­card

This is a bit of a ran­dom entry, but I’m about to send out a post­card to all the church­es in my new dis­trict, and I’ve had the hard­est time fig­ur­ing out what the rules and rates are for post­cards.

You’d think it would be extreme­ly easy to find that infor­ma­tion on the US Post Office web­site trans­porter 3 online , but it’s not.

After much search­ing, here are the basic rules: post­cards cost $.23 to mail and must be between a min­i­mum of 3–1/2 inch­es high by 5 inch­es long by 0.007 inch thick and a max­i­mum of 4–1/4 inch­es high by 6 inch­es long by 0.016 inch thick.

I don’t know if you’ll ever find that infor­ma­tion use­ful, but by blog­ging it here I’ll save myself a huge headache next time around!

What Jefferson Really Thought About Church And State

Here’s an inter­est­ing tid­bit report­ed by The Wash­ing­ton Times: Thomas Jef­fer­son did not want a wall built between church and state. There are two books by two dif­fer­ent schol­ars ref­er­enced in the above arti­cle: Daniel Dreis­bach’s Thomas Jef­fer­son and The Wall of Sep­a­ra­tion Between Church and State and Sep­a­ra­tion of Church and State by Philip Ham­burg­er.

Alan Wolfe, direc­tor of the Boisi Cen­ter for Reli­gion and Pub­lic Life at Boston Col­lege, is impressed by the new find­ings but doubts they can make a dif­fer­ence.

“I think it is ter­rif­ic schol­ar­ship, but I don’t think it can change any­thing,” said Mr. Wolfe, who reviewed the Ham­burg­er book and has sur­veyed pub­lic opin­ion on pol­i­tics and reli­gion.

“The ‘wall’ idea has tak­en on a life of its own and is part of our cus­tom and law,” Mr. Wolfe said. “Amer­i­cans love God and hate pol­i­tics, so they ask, ‘Why mix the two?’ ”

You can read some reviews from Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty Press here and here.

Newsweek In Favor Of Hell

Rel­e­vant Mag­a­zine brought an unex­pect­ed arti­cle to my atten­tion. In Why We Need Hell, TooNewsweek jour­nal­ist Ken­neth Wood­ward argues for the impor­tance of Hell as an induce­ment for moral liv­ing.

This is a side­bar arti­cle to the main Why We Need Heav­en, which is a dis­cus­sion of the rival Jew­ish, Mus­lim, and Chris­t­ian per­spec­tives on the after­life and the way they impact the news.

I found quote par­tic­u­lar­ly amus­ing: (Speak­ing of the Koran’s promise of heav­en­ly orgies) Georgetown’s Voll doesn’t think that the vir­gins car­ry much weight with the Pales­tin­ian mar­tyrs; unlike the Ira­ni­ans in the 1980s, teenagers on the West Bank do have access to sex. More seduc­tive is that you would have “a house, reg­u­lar food, pros­per­i­ty,” he says. “You would have flow­ing water; some­one wouldn’t be bomb­ing your well. If you had lived with­out all that stuff for the first 15 or 20 years of your life, heav­en would sound pret­ty good with or with­out 72 vir­gins.” Hmmm… I’m guess­ing Voll does­n’t know any teenage boys.

And of course, Ernest Hem­ing­way wrote that he thought of heav­en as “two love­ly hous­es in town; one where I would have my wife and chil­dren and be monog­a­mous and love them tru­ly and well and the oth­er where I would have my nine beau­ti­ful mis­tress­es on nine dif­fer­ent floors.” Hmm… log­i­cal con­sis­ten­cy was­n’t one of Hem­ing­way’s dom­i­nant con­cerns.

The author buys some unfor­tu­nate inter­pre­ta­tions of the devel­op­ment of the after­life in Jew­ish the­ol­o­gy, and enjoys play­ing with the notion that both the sui­cide bombers and their vic­tims think they’re going to heav­en (and that their ene­mies are going to hell). Over­all, it’s a pret­ty inter­est­ing read (if not a good course in the­ol­o­gy).

Supper With Pastor Richard Cook

A great meet­ing with our exec­u­tive pres­byter is cloud­ed by some bad news about Chi Alpha.

Tonight Paula and I were able to meet Richard Cook and his wife for sup­per at the local Chili’s. Pas­tor Cook pas­tors Spir­it of Life Church in San Car­los, and is also one of the North­ern California/Nevada exec­u­tive pres­byters.

We had a great time! Unfor­tu­nate­ly, Broth­er Cook was able to con­firm some bad news that I received when I met with Pas­tor Beis­er. It seems that Chi Alpha has a very neg­a­tive rep­u­ta­tion with the Assem­blies of God church­es in the Bay Area. The rea­sons aren’t par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant (at least not worth broad­cast­ing over the Inter­net), but the ram­i­fi­ca­tions for our min­istry are going to be pret­ty rad­i­cal. It will def­i­nite­ly affect how quick­ly we can reach full fund­ing so that we can begin min­is­ter­ing on cam­pus.

Please pray that God will give us favor with local church­es and will give us wis­dom in relat­ing to the church­es that feel they’ve been burned by Chi Alpha in the past.

Funding Evangelical Scholarship

Emergesque just turned me on to a great arti­cle about evan­gel­i­cals in acad­e­mia.

The arti­cles focus­es on the neces­si­ty of large foun­da­tions (espe­cial­ly the Lil­ly Endow­ment and the Pew Char­i­ta­ble Trusts) to pro­vide fund­ing for evan­gel­i­cal schol­ars (things like research and sab­bat­i­cals cost mon­ey!)

Some­thing I find pret­ty inter­est­ing: the evan­gel­i­cal schol­ars seem to be good invest­ments: “As mea­sured by schol­ar­ly pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, foun­da­tions sup­port­ing evan­gel­i­cal schol­ar­ship have received an unusu­al­ly high return on their invest­ment. A study by the Nation­al Endow­ment for the Human­i­ties found that 45 per­cent of their grant recip­i­ents had pub­lished books with­in six years of receiv­ing their grants. By con­trast, a study of schol­ars receiv­ing grants from the Pew Evan­gel­i­cal Schol­ars Pro­gram found that 90 per­cent had fin­ished their books with­in six years.”

There’s a relat­ed arti­cle from 2000 in the The Atlantic Month­ly

John Ashcroft: Son of a Preacher Man

The August 4th San Fran­cis­co Chron­i­cle has a fas­ci­nat­ing arti­cle on John Ashcroft called Son of a Preach­er Man. The arti­cle is pret­ty fac­tu­al, although the jour­nal­ist’s dis­like of Ashcroft’s val­ue sys­tem shows through.

In case you did­n’t know it, John Ashcroft (our cur­rent U.S. Attor­ney Gen­er­al) is an Assem­blies of God layper­son, and his father J. Robert Ashcroft was respon­si­ble for the found­ing of Chi Alpha.

Scientists And Their Gods

Note: this was orig­i­nal­ly an excerpt from the arti­cle men­tioned at the begin­ning. Since then, I’ve added a few oth­ers and I’ve also done some fur­ther research on most of the sci­en­tists.

In Sci­en­tists And Their Gods, Dr. Hen­ry F. Schae­fer (Chris­t­ian, Nobel nom­i­nee, Stan­ford grad, and the third most-quot­ed chemist in the world) writes about the fact that there are many Chris­tians who work in the hard sci­ences. I was par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ed to note that three (four count­ing the author) have con­nec­tions to Stan­ford.

Some nota­bles:

Robert Grif­fiths, “mem­ber of our U.S. Acad­e­my of Sci­ences, Otto Stern pro­fes­sor of physics at Carnegie Mel­lon Uni­ver­si­ty received one of the most cov­et­ed awards of the Amer­i­can Phys­i­cal Soci­ety in 1984 on his work in phys­i­cal mechan­ics and ther­mo­dy­nam­ics. Physics Today said he is an evan­gel­i­cal Chris­t­ian who is an ama­teur the­olo­gian and who helps teach a course on Chris­tian­i­ty and sci­ence.” (inci­den­tal­ly, he’s a Stan­ford grad)

Richard Bube “For many years, Bube was the chair­man of the depart­ment of mate­ri­als sci­ence at Stan­ford and car­ried out foun­da­tion­al work on sol­id state physics con­cern­ing semi­con­duc­tors. He said:There are pro­por­tion­ate­ly as many athe­is­tic truck dri­vers as there are athe­is­tic sci­en­tists.”

John Suppe, “Mem­ber of the U.S. Acad­e­my of Sci­ences and not­ed pro­fes­sor of geol­o­gy at Prince­ton, expert in the are of tec­ton­ics, began a long search for God as a Chris­t­ian fac­ul­ty mem­ber. He began attend­ing ser­vices in the Prince­ton Chapel, read­ing the Bible and oth­er Chris­t­ian books.”

Charles H. Townes “My can­di­date for the sci­en­tist of the cen­tu­ry is Char­lie Townes. (Of course, he is a friend of mine and there could be some bias here.) He did some­thing fair­ly sig­nif­i­cant when he dis­cov­ered the laser. He almost got a sec­ond Nobel Prize for the first obser­va­tion of an inter­stel­lar mol­e­cule.”

Arthur Schawlow: “won a Nobel Prize in physics, 1981, serves as physics pro­fes­sor at Stan­ford and iden­ti­fies him­self as a Chris­t­ian.”

Allan Sandage: “the world’s great­est obser­va­tion­al cos­mol­o­gist, an astronomer at the Carnegie Insti­tu­tion, was called the Grand Old Man of cos­mol­o­gy by The New York Times when he won a $1 mil­lion prize from the Roy­al Swedish Acad­e­my of Sci­ences.”

William Phillips yet anoth­er Nobel lau­re­ate. Read a fas­ci­nat­ing arti­cle about him.

David Cole: a Berke­ley bio­chemist. Could­n’t find a bio page on him.

Fran­cis Collins: direc­tor of the Human Genome Project, the largest sci­en­tif­ic project ever under­tak­en, Dr. Collins once said I’d call myself a seri­ous Chris­t­ian. That is some­one who believes in the real­i­ty of Christ’s death and res­ur­rec­tion, and who tries to inte­grate that into dai­ly life and not just rel­e­gate it to some­thing you talk about on Sun­day morn­ing. (source) Inci­den­tal­ly, Collins was an athe­ist who became a believ­er after attain­ing his doc­tor­ate.

Arno Pen­zias said “The best data we have are exact­ly what I would have pre­dict­ed had I had noth­ing to go on but the five books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole.” (read more about him)

Owen Gin­gerich, pro­fes­sor of astron­o­my at Har­vard and a devout Chris­t­ian, said “I can only imag­ine that God, as a pow­er­ful force in the uni­verse, could put on many dif­fer­ent faces. If God is in fact all-pow­er­ful, there’s no rea­son why this all-pow­er­ful force in the uni­verse could not rep­re­sent itself and relate to the self-con­scious human beings, in some fash­ion, through com­mu­ni­ca­tion with human beings. And how do you com­mu­ni­cate? Through prophets of all ages.” (source)

Relat­ed Sto­ries

last updat­ed 5/21/2005: added Owen Gin­gerich

Emil and Vipul Come to Visit

Host­ing a prospec­tive Stan­ford stu­dent while he checks out the cam­pus.

emil_and_vipul_pic.jpg Right now we’re blessed to have under our roof one Emil Geiger and one Vipur Shar­ma. Emil is a Chi Alpha stu­dent from Lou­siana State Uni­ver­si­ty, and is hop­ing to get his mas­ter’s in engi­neer­ing from Stan­ford.

It’s a lot of fun hav­ing them around (side note: they’re very appre­cia­tive of the XBox that the South­west Mis­souri State Chi Alpha group blessed up with).