Scientists And Their Gods

Note: this was orig­i­nal­ly an excerpt from the arti­cle men­tioned at the begin­ning. Since then, I’ve added a few oth­ers and I’ve also done some fur­ther research on most of the sci­en­tists.

In Sci­en­tists And Their Gods, Dr. Hen­ry F. Schae­fer (Chris­t­ian, Nobel nom­i­nee, Stan­ford grad, and the third most-quot­ed chemist in the world) writes about the fact that there are many Chris­tians who work in the hard sci­ences. I was par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ed to note that three (four count­ing the author) have con­nec­tions to Stan­ford.

Some nota­bles:

Robert Grif­fiths, “mem­ber of our U.S. Acad­e­my of Sci­ences, Otto Stern pro­fes­sor of physics at Carnegie Mel­lon Uni­ver­si­ty received one of the most cov­et­ed awards of the Amer­i­can Phys­i­cal Soci­ety in 1984 on his work in phys­i­cal mechan­ics and ther­mo­dy­nam­ics. Physics Today said he is an evan­gel­i­cal Chris­t­ian who is an ama­teur the­olo­gian and who helps teach a course on Chris­tian­i­ty and sci­ence.” (inci­den­tal­ly, he’s a Stan­ford grad)

Richard Bube “For many years, Bube was the chair­man of the depart­ment of mate­ri­als sci­ence at Stan­ford and car­ried out foun­da­tion­al work on sol­id state physics con­cern­ing semi­con­duc­tors. He said:There are pro­por­tion­ate­ly as many athe­is­tic truck dri­vers as there are athe­is­tic sci­en­tists.”

John Suppe, “Mem­ber of the U.S. Acad­e­my of Sci­ences and not­ed pro­fes­sor of geol­o­gy at Prince­ton, expert in the are of tec­ton­ics, began a long search for God as a Chris­t­ian fac­ul­ty mem­ber. He began attend­ing ser­vices in the Prince­ton Chapel, read­ing the Bible and oth­er Chris­t­ian books.”

Charles H. Townes “My can­di­date for the sci­en­tist of the cen­tu­ry is Char­lie Townes. (Of course, he is a friend of mine and there could be some bias here.) He did some­thing fair­ly sig­nif­i­cant when he dis­cov­ered the laser. He almost got a sec­ond Nobel Prize for the first obser­va­tion of an inter­stel­lar mol­e­cule.”

Arthur Schawlow: “won a Nobel Prize in physics, 1981, serves as physics pro­fes­sor at Stan­ford and iden­ti­fies him­self as a Chris­t­ian.”

Allan Sandage: “the world’s great­est obser­va­tion­al cos­mol­o­gist, an astronomer at the Carnegie Insti­tu­tion, was called the Grand Old Man of cos­mol­o­gy by The New York Times when he won a $1 mil­lion prize from the Roy­al Swedish Acad­e­my of Sci­ences.”

William Phillips yet anoth­er Nobel lau­re­ate. Read a fas­ci­nat­ing arti­cle about him.

David Cole: a Berke­ley bio­chemist. Could­n’t find a bio page on him.

Fran­cis Collins: direc­tor of the Human Genome Project, the largest sci­en­tif­ic project ever under­tak­en, Dr. Collins once said I’d call myself a seri­ous Chris­t­ian. That is some­one who believes in the real­i­ty of Christ’s death and res­ur­rec­tion, and who tries to inte­grate that into dai­ly life and not just rel­e­gate it to some­thing you talk about on Sun­day morn­ing. (source) Inci­den­tal­ly, Collins was an athe­ist who became a believ­er after attain­ing his doc­tor­ate.

Arno Pen­zias said “The best data we have are exact­ly what I would have pre­dict­ed had I had noth­ing to go on but the five books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole.” (read more about him)

Owen Gin­gerich, pro­fes­sor of astron­o­my at Har­vard and a devout Chris­t­ian, said “I can only imag­ine that God, as a pow­er­ful force in the uni­verse, could put on many dif­fer­ent faces. If God is in fact all-pow­er­ful, there’s no rea­son why this all-pow­er­ful force in the uni­verse could not rep­re­sent itself and relate to the self-con­scious human beings, in some fash­ion, through com­mu­ni­ca­tion with human beings. And how do you com­mu­ni­cate? Through prophets of all ages.” (source)

Relat­ed Sto­ries

last updat­ed 5/21/2005: added Owen Gin­gerich

10 thoughts on “Scientists And Their Gods”

  1. hi there,
    u’ve tak­en quite an effort to com­pile those stuffs. it’s not just inter­est­ing but fas­ci­nat­ing as well. well i will put in more of my thoughts lat­er coz have to get up for my 8 am class for topol­o­gy and func­tion­al analy­sis @ iit del­hi. just wan­na make sure i got to be the first to answer! hah this crazy race.

  2. Sim­ply point­ing out that a com­mon assump­tion isn’t true: name­ly the assump­tion that none of today’s lead­ing sci­en­tists believe in God or the Bible.

    Clear­ly a list like this does­n’t prove that Chris­tian­i­ty is true any­more than a list of athe­is­tic or Mus­lim sci­en­tists would prove their respec­tive cas­es. But a list like this ought to cause peo­ple to reex­am­ine some of their assump­tions about the rela­tion­ship of mod­ern sci­ence and reli­gion.

    And so what I am say­ing is this: if you’ve writ­ten off reli­gious belief under the assump­tion that there’s an inher­ent con­tra­dic­tion between faith and sci­ence, you should give both faith and sci­ence a clos­er look.

  3. I feel as though I owe Mr. Gar­land’s imper­son­ator some wit­ty response, giv­en how much thought he obvi­ous­ly put into his dev­as­tat­ing attack upon my faith.

    But I will refrain.

    But since I’m always try­ing to help peo­ple improve their writ­ing style, I will point out that the sec­ond “you” in his well-craft­ed essay is redun­dant.

  4. if sci­ence could be a means to spread the Gospel of God then so be it.

  5. Hel­lo read­ers,
    It is strange that peo­ple of today can­not per­ceive the won­der­ful works of God all around us. To me it does not require any proof about God’s existence.Yet in any case more than 90% of the great­est sci­en­tists through the ages are sci­encere believ­ers in God.It is real­ly great to note that great sci­en­tists of today are also fol­low­ing the steps of the giants.I sub­scribe to what Albert Ein­stein said,” Reli­gion with­out Sci­ence is blind and Sci­ence with­out Reli­gion is lame”

  6. God is our Father, God is the mak­er of all men while Sci­en­tists is the mak­ers of all inven­tions and discoveries.But, that too from their Gods

Comments are closed.