Category: Links

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 76

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Some thoughts about slav­ery and the Bible — Does The Bible Sup­port Slav­ery? (a lec­ture giv­en by the war­den of Tyn­dale House at Cam­bridge Uni­ver­si­ty, the link is to the video with notes) and Does God Con­done Slav­ery In The Bible? (Part One — Old Tes­ta­ment) and also Part Two — New Tes­ta­ment (longer pieces from Glenn Miller at Chris­t­ian Think­tank). All three are quite help­ful.
  2. Struc­tur­al Racism (John Piper, Desir­ing God): “if your mind is Bible-sat­u­rat­ed, you would con­sid­er it absolute­ly aston­ish­ing if struc­tur­al racism were not per­va­sive wher­ev­er sin is per­va­sive. In oth­er words, Bible-shaped peo­ple should expect to see struc­tur­al racism almost every­where in a fall­en world.”
  3. How Methodists Invent­ed Your Kid’s Grape Juice Sug­ar High (Luke Har­ring­ton, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): why many church­es use grape juice for com­mu­nion.
  4. More post-elec­tion thoughts:
    1. Why Can’t I Mourn? (Kyle James Howard, per­son­al blog): “For many, it appears that it is unac­cept­able for me to grieve racism and abor­tion equal­ly. That for many, a Chris­t­ian only has the capac­i­ty to grieve one or the oth­er but not both.”
    2. No, the Major­i­ty of Amer­i­can Evan­gel­i­cals Did Not Vote for Trump (Joe Carter, Gospel Coali­tion): you may recall that I sug­gest­ed some­thing sim­i­lar in last week’s email — here’s a wide-rang­ing expla­na­tion. There is no doubt more to be said on this.
    3. You Are Still Cry­ing Wolf (Scott Alexan­der, Slat­eStar­Codex): “I real­ize that all of this is going to make me sound like a crazy per­son and put me com­plete­ly at odds with every respectable thinker in the media, but luck­i­ly, being a crazy per­son at odds with every respectable thinker in the media has been a pret­ty good tick­et to pre­dic­tive accu­ra­cy late­ly, so what­ev­er.” This is a long and detailed argu­ment that Trump is not racist (or at least not more racist than lots of peo­ple). I was sur­prised at how well it held my inter­est. See also Ross Douthat’s insight­ful twit­ter cri­tique of the arti­cle. For a con­trary point of view (sort of — it’s less about Trump and more about what Trump sig­ni­fies), see Racism Prob­a­bly Is Get­ting Worse. (I Hope I’m Wrong.) (Tyler Cowen, Bloomberg View). If you read one, read all three.
    4. Stunned By Trump, The New York Times Finds Time For Some Soul-Search­ing (Michael Cieply, Dead­spin): “By and large, tal­ent­ed reporters scram­bled to match sto­ries with what inter­nal­ly was often called ‘the nar­ra­tive.’ We were occa­sion­al­ly asked to map a nar­ra­tive for our var­i­ous beats a year in advance, square the plan with edi­tors, then gen­er­ate sto­ries that fit the pre-des­ig­nat­ed line.” This piece is impor­tant and depress­ing.
    5. The coali­tion for diver­si­ty whose diver­si­ty did diver­si­ty just win? (Tyler Cowen, Mar­gin­al Rev­o­lu­tion): do not let the con­fus­ing title put you off. Cowen argues that the Repub­li­cans are in some sens­es sig­nif­i­cant­ly more diverse than the Democ­rats.
    6. #Nev­erTrump And Pres­i­dent Trump (Jake Meador, Mere Ortho­doxy): “The church’s great­est the­olo­gians have long said that a prop­er­ly Chris­t­ian com­mon­wealth will be con­cerned not with the greater good—the most good for the most people—or with the pri­vate good of Chris­tians alone, but with the com­mon good.”
    7. How cov­er­ing the Red­skins name debate pre­pared me for Don­ald Trump’s win (Dan Stein­berg, Washing­ton Post): “They told me that media Twit­ter wasn’t the real world, that it cre­at­ed a pho­ny idea of con­sen­sus for a stance that wasn’t actu­al­ly ascen­dant. And they argued that a polit­i­cal­ly cor­rect onslaught from big-city elites would only strength­en their con­vic­tions.”
    8. Don­ald Trump can absolute­ly ban Mus­lims from enter­ing the US, with­out Con­gress (Zack Beauchamp, Vox): “I [asked] sev­er­al experts on US immi­gra­tion law. Their answer was unan­i­mous: Trump would be able to imple­ment his ban. In fact, he would be able to do it eas­i­ly.” I didn’t know the pres­i­dent had this pow­er. Sur­pris­ing giv­en our sys­tem of checks and bal­ances.
    9. The Cul­ture That Cre­at­ed Don­ald Trump Was Lib­er­al Not Con­ser­v­a­tive (Jim Lewis, The Inter­cept): “Lib­er­als were sure the dev­il would come slouch­ing out of Alaba­ma or Texas, beat­ing a bible and shout­ing about sodomy and sin. They didn’t expect him to be a busi­ness­man who lives on Fifth Avenue and 57th Street.” This is some­thing I saw allud­ed to in the pri­maries but haven’t seen men­tioned in a while. 

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting — Election Edition (vol 75)

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting — Election Edition

Before I say any­thing else, I feel the need to say I did­n’t have an agen­da when select­ing these arti­cles oth­er than try­ing to under­stand what hap­pened and what it means. I’m not try­ing to make a case for or against any­one — I just want some insight.

The Elec­tion: What Hap­pened?

  1. Few pre­dict­ed Trump had a good shot of win­ning. But polit­i­cal sci­ence mod­els did. (Andrew Prokop, Vox). Social sci­en­tists — believe in your dis­ci­pline! 
  2. How Half Of Amer­i­ca Lost It’s F**king Mind (David Wong, Cracked): If you can’t under­stand how peo­ple vot­ed for Trump, read this. Apolo­gies for the lan­guage, but I seri­ous­ly think this piece should be con­sid­ered for a Pulitzer. 
  3. The smug style in Amer­i­can lib­er­al­ism (Emmitt Rensin, Vox): “If the smug style can be reduced to a sin­gle sen­tence, it’s, Why are they vot­ing against their own self-inter­est? But no par­ty these past decades has effec­tive­ly rep­re­sent­ed the inter­ests of these dis­pos­sessed. Only one has made a point of open­ly dis­dain­ing them too.” This is an old­er piece which turned out to have strong pre­dic­tive val­ue. Shared by a stu­dent. There is one fac­tu­al error I feel oblig­ed to point out: Kim Davis won. She got what she want­ed. It’s reveal­ing that even some­one sym­pa­thet­ic like Rensin doesn’t seem to real­ize that. 
  4. Fur­ther Thoughts: How Social Jus­tice Ide­ol­o­gy Fuels Racism and Sex­ism (Alas­tair Roberts, blog): “the over­reach of pro­gres­sive lib­er­als, who are chron­i­cal­ly out of touch with social and nat­ur­al real­i­ty, has played a promi­nent part in pro­vok­ing the rise of a move­ment that is resis­tant to shame and guilt, as these had for­mer­ly been weaponized to con­trol them.”
  5. What This Means, How This Hap­pened, What To Do Now (Nathan Robin­son, Cur­rent Affairs): “Pro­gres­sives need to under­stand how peo­ple who are dif­fer­ent from them think. No more writ­ing them off as racist and deplorable. Even if they are, what good does that do? You need to under­stand racists not so you can sym­pa­thize with them, but so you can fig­ure out what shapes people’s beliefs, and help them reach dif­fer­ent beliefs.”
  6. The Age Of Accept­able Lies (Mike Cosper, Gospel Coali­tion): “In oth­er words, we don’t want Trump to be a misog­y­nist, since it under­mines our abil­i­ty to vote for him. So his words find new inter­pre­ta­tions. Or we don’t want Hillary to have a record of dis­re­gard for both the rule of law and poli­cies that pro­tect nation­al secu­ri­ty. So we don’t believe her email scan­dal means any­thing. Or we don’t want the Bible to say hard things about sex­u­al­i­ty. So we don’t believe it does.” This arti­cle is about some­thing broad­er than but ger­mane to the elec­tion. Read this one even if you skip most arti­cles in this sec­tion.

Thoughts From Peo­ple Who Vot­ed For Trump
I have over­heard sev­er­al peo­ple ask­ing how any­one could have vot­ed for Trump. Here are a few first-per­son accounts.

  1. Bethel Church’s Bill John­son: Why I Vot­ed For Don­ald Trump (Bill John­son, Gospel Her­ald) 
  2. Don­ald Trump Key To Isa­iah 45 Prophe­cy? (Lance Wall­nau, Charis­ma News): I’ve heard more than one per­son ref­er­ence this idea.
  3. After much prayer and soul-search­ing, I have reluc­tant­ly decid­ed to vote for the Trump-Pence tick­et. Here’s why. (Joel Rosen­berg, per­son­al blog)
  4. I Am  (Cassie Hewlett, per­son­al blog). The title is not a reli­gious ref­er­ence. A stu­dent shared this one with me.

Impli­ca­tions / Con­se­quences Of The Elec­tion

  1. What Trump Might Mean For The Econ­o­my (Chris­tos Makridis, Fast Com­pa­ny): yes, that’s our Chris­tos. Proud of the way you put your schol­ar­ship out there for the pub­lic, man. Keep it up!
  2. Two Con­cerns for the Reli­gious Right Under Pres­i­dent Trump (Col­in Hansen, Gospel Coali­tion): “First, many evan­gel­i­cal lead­ers had lost touch with the rest of the move­ment. And sec­ond, the rest of the move­ment had lost touch with the con­cerns with their minor­i­ty broth­ers and sis­ters.” If you only read one thing in this sec­tion, read this.
  3. 4 Prob­lems Asso­ci­at­ed With White Evan­gel­i­cal Sup­port Of Don­ald Trump (Thabiti Anyab­wile, Gospel Coali­tion): one sig­nif­i­cant caveat about both this and the pre­vi­ous arti­cle — I expect that the 80% sta­tis­tic will dwin­dle under more care­ful inves­ti­ga­tion. Con­sis­tent­ly in the polls before the elec­tion there was a marked dif­fer­ence between peo­ple who self-iden­ti­fied as evan­gel­i­cal and those who actu­al­ly attend­ed evan­gel­i­cal church­es. The 80% num­ber is about the for­mer. We don’t yet have data on the lat­ter.
  4. A rash of racist attacks have bro­ken out in the US after Don­ald Trump’s vic­to­ry (Heather Tim­mons, Quartz): very dis­tress­ing. Seri­ous ques­tion: how many racist attacks are there on a dai­ly basis in Amer­i­ca? I’m won­der­ing what the com­par­a­tive uptick is.
  5. Why some fear this election’s last­ing dam­age to Amer­i­can Chris­tian­i­ty (Sarah Pul­liam Bai­ley, Washing­ton Post): “When reports emerge about whom evan­gel­i­cals vot­ed for, they usu­al­ly mean ‘white evan­gel­i­cals,’ gloss­ing over a grow­ing racial divi­sion with­in Chris­tian­i­ty.”
  6. Trump Won. Here’s How 20 Evan­gel­i­cal Lead­ers Feel. (Chris­tian­i­ty Today): this is well worth read­ing and not that long.
  7. Don’t Expect The Supreme Court To Change Much (Cass Sun­stein, Bloomberg View): Sun­stein is a Har­vard Law pro­fes­sor.
  8. The Elec­tion Is Over. Let’s Get Polit­i­cal (Jonathan Lee­man, Gospel Coali­tion): “Every week, our con­gre­ga­tions gath­er as embassies of heav­en. Every week, our pas­tors make a polit­i­cal speech, and we go out as ambas­sadors with a polit­i­cal mes­sage. ‘The King offers par­don for every rebel who would repent!’”

Oth­er News That Caught My Eye

  1. China’s plan to orga­nize its soci­ety relies on ‘big data’ to rate every­one (Simon Deny­er, Wash­ing­ton Post): this is the most ter­ri­fy­ing thing I’ve read all week. I men­tioned this to a Chi­nese cit­i­zen and she said she’d only heard about it from Amer­i­cans and was skep­ti­cal it would hap­pen as described.
  2. Vat­i­can Blind­ed to Real­i­ty in Venezuela (Fran­cis Rooney, Real Clear Reli­gion): “As the cri­sis spi­rals out of con­trol, Venezuela is in dan­ger of becom­ing this hemisphere’s Syr­ia.”

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Some Thoughts About The Election

This is an email I sent to the stu­dents in my min­istry the morn­ing fol­low­ing the 2016 pres­i­den­tial elec­tion:

I would like to say some­thing to the despon­dent and the jubi­lant: the despon­dent should not be too despon­dent and the jubi­lant should not be too jubi­lant.

To The Despondent:

You just woke up and feel as though you woke up in a dif­fer­ent coun­try than the one you thought you lived in. You feel as though you don’t belong. I want to encour­age you: this will pass. There are rarely per­ma­nent defeats in pol­i­tics. You will get anoth­er try at the pres­i­den­cy in four years and at the leg­isla­tive branch in two years. Remem­ber when Oba­ma rode into office? The Democ­rats had the House, the Sen­ate, and the Exec­u­tive Branch along with most state guber­na­to­r­i­al and leg­isla­tive offices. The days of the Repub­li­can par­ty seemed over, yet now the Repub­li­cans have usurped the Democ­rats in every one of those roles. Your turn will come again. Be patient.

A few prac­ti­cal pieces of advice for you in the mean­while:

1) If you did not reg­is­ter to vote, do it now while you’re moti­vat­ed. It will not take much time and is one of the few pro­duc­tive things you can actu­al­ly do right now.

2) You may be tempt­ed to blame the oth­er side’s vic­to­ry on the basest of motives. The oth­er side is racist. The oth­er side is misog­y­nis­tic. The oth­er side is dri­ven by hate. Please hear this: they don’t think they are. “But they are — I know it!” Even if you are right that there are vile motives float­ing around inside their souls, you will not change their minds by point­ing that out. Instead, you must under­stand your oppo­nents in order to per­suade them. If you are gen­uine­ly shocked that a large chunk of Amer­i­cans are afraid of the Demo­c­ra­t­ic par­ty and what it would have done with four to eight more years of pow­er, you need to read more wide­ly.  Add to your read­ing list authors such as Mol­lie Hem­ing­way, Ross Douthat, Thomas Sow­ell, Matthew Lee Ander­son, Rus­sell Moore, Rod Dreher, and David French. If you use Twit­ter, fol­low each of them. If you don’t, pay atten­tion to their writ­ings. They pop up from time to time in the Fri­day emails I send out — begin delib­er­ate­ly read­ing the entries you think you’ll dis­agree with. Also, con­sid­er watch­ing Fox News from time to time.

3) Pray. This is some­thing you will have a chance to do at Chi Alpha tonight. #just­say­ing

To The Jubilant:

It’s a good feel­ing when your side wins. Enjoy the moment, but rec­og­nize how ephemer­al it is. When­ev­er one par­ty sweeps into pow­er across mul­ti­ple branch­es of gov­ern­ment, cor­rup­tion and infight­ing ensues. Your team is like­ly in for a rough time two years from now in the midterm elec­tions and will face a seri­ous chal­lenge four years down the road.

A few prac­ti­cal pieces of advice for you:

1) Rec­og­nize that some of your friends are gen­uine­ly ter­ri­fied right now. Peo­ple who are made in God’s image — some of whom are your broth­ers and sis­ters in Christ — are in pain. Be empa­thet­ic. Even if you think that their emo­tions are overblown, acknowl­edge that their emo­tions are real.

2) Pre­pare for dis­ap­point­ment. Politi­cians rarely deliv­er what you hoped for. The Democ­rats did­n’t deliv­er immi­gra­tion reform when Oba­ma was in office even though the Democ­rats held the House and the Sen­ate. The Repub­li­cans will almost cer­tain­ly get bogged down on issues that lat­er prove to be incon­se­quen­tial and as a result will let some of your high­est pri­or­i­ties slip out of their grasp. Two years is not that long and Repub­li­can offi­cials will refuse to believe that’s prob­a­bly all the time they have.

To Everyone:

Yes­ter­day Amer­i­ca elect­ed a pres­i­dent for the next four years, but we know the King who reigns for­ev­er. So acknowl­edge the pres­i­dent, “but in your hearts revere Christ as Lord” (1 Peter 3:15a).

Remem­ber Philip­pi­ans 3:20: “our cit­i­zen­ship is in heav­en. And we eager­ly await a Sav­ior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Elec­tions mat­ter, but eter­ni­ty mat­ters more. Keep per­spec­tive today and always.

God bless and I hope to see you at wor­ship tonight. I’ll talk more about these things there and we will pray.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 74

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Men Are More Like­ly to Be Sex­u­al­ly Attract­ed to Their Oppo­site-Sex Friends (Drake Baer, Sci­ence of Us): “the study found that guys are more like­ly to define a female friend as ‘a mem­ber of the oppo­site sex to whom I am attract­ed and would pur­sue giv­en the oppor­tu­ni­ty’ and ladies to define their oppo­site-sex friends as sim­ply ‘a friend of the oppo­site sex.’” For an amus­ing take on this idea, see this three-minute video (it’s got over 9 mil­lion views).
  2. The New Evan­gel­i­cal Moral Minor­i­ty (Kele­fa San­neh, New York­er): this is a well-writ­ten essay focus­ing on the South­ern Bap­tist ethi­cist Rus­sell Moore, of whom I am a huge fan and with whom I usu­al­ly agree. High­ly rec­om­mend­ed, although the author’s snark shows through occa­sion­al­ly. The author, inci­den­tal­ly, is the son of famed Chris­t­ian mis­si­ol­o­gist Lamin San­neh.
  3. In Love and Mar­riage, Prac­tice Doesn’t Make Per­fect (Scott Stan­ley, Psy­chol­o­gy Today):  “We found that hav­ing more sex­u­al and cohab­it­ing part­ners before mar­riage is asso­ci­at­ed with low­er rela­tion­ship qual­i­ty once mar­ried. In par­tic­u­lar, hav­ing only ever lived with or had sex with one’s spouse was asso­ci­at­ed with high­er mar­i­tal qual­i­ty.” The author is a research pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Den­ver. The research upon which this arti­cle was based is avail­able here.
  4. Pos­i­tive Par­ent­ing is Ide­al, But Many Chil­dren Need Time-Outs, Too (Robert Larzelere, Insti­tute For Fam­i­ly Stud­ies): “Yes, the worst out­comes were for the type of author­i­tar­i­an par­ent­ing that Dr. Coul­son oppos­es, which can be defined as strict enforce­ment with­out love. But the sec­ond-worst 10-year out­comes were for over­ly per­mis­sive par­ents…” When we sing that God is a good, good Father we should should remem­ber we are cel­e­brat­ing the fact that he both encour­ages and dis­ci­plines. 
  5. North Kore­a’s War On Chris­tian­i­ty: The Globe’s Num­ber One Reli­gious Per­se­cu­tor (Doug Bandow, Forbes): “[Chris­t­ian Sol­i­dar­i­ty World­wide] reports doc­u­ment­ed cas­es of believ­ers being ‘hung on a cross over a fire, crushed under a steam­roller, herd­ed off bridges, and tram­pled under­foot.’”
  6. The Case Against Democ­ra­cy (Caleb Craine, The New York­er): I’m a monar­chist, truth be told. In the King­dom I call home we don’t get a vote, but we wel­come any­one who wish­es to immi­grate. Join us! #king­je­sus  

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 73

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Here is the 2010 arti­cle I men­tioned in my ser­mon: Study of the ther­a­peu­tic effects of prox­i­mal inter­ces­so­ry prayer (STEPP) on audi­to­ry and visu­al impair­ments in rur­al Mozam­bique (Google schol­ar link). And the book I men­tioned, Mir­a­cles by Craig Keen­er, is in Green Library at BS2548 .K44 2011. 
  2. The Bur­ial Place Of Jesus Exposed For The First Time In Cen­turies: An Inter­view On What It Orig­i­nal­ly Looked Like And How We Know This Is The Right Loca­tion (Justin Tay­lor, Gospel Coali­tion): “Read­ers might won­der, though, how we know this is real­ly the place Jesus was buried…. What does the Bible say? How about archae­ol­o­gy? Do we know what first-cen­tu­ry tombs looked like? How big were these tombs?”
  3. Papyrus offers non­bib­li­cal men­tion of Judean king­dom in Jerusalem (Michael Chabin, Reli­gion News Service): “Israeli archae­ol­o­gists have unveiled the ear­li­est known non­bib­li­cal Hebrew-lan­guage ref­er­ence to Jerusalem, dat­ing back to the time of the First Tem­ple in the sev­enth cen­tu­ry B.C.” Note that there is some con­tro­ver­sy about the papyrus.
  4. Nei­ther Trump Nor Clin­ton Is The End Of The Repub­lic (Conor Frieder­s­dorf, The Atlantic): “[Amer­i­ca] sur­vived chat­tel slav­ery that made a mock­ery of found­ing prin­ci­ples, Shay’s Rebel­lion, the Whiskey Insur­rec­tion, the burn­ing of its cap­i­tal by the British, the Trail of Tears, The Dred Scott deci­sion, the afore­men­tioned civ­il war, the assas­si­na­tions of pres­i­dents, Plessy vs. Fer­gu­son, an impe­ri­al­ist for­ay into the Philip­pines, the Espi­onage and Sedi­tion Acts, a flu pan­dem­ic that killed 20 mil­lion world­wide and an esti­mat­ed 675,000 Amer­i­cans, the Great Depres­sion, the glob­al rise of fas­cism, World War II, an expan­sion­ist Com­mu­nist dic­ta­tor­ship with nuclear weapons that infil­trat­ed the U.S. gov­ern­ment, Jim Crow, Water­gate, urban riots, the Sex­u­al Rev­o­lu­tion, and the Sep­tem­ber 11 attacks. But now it’s all over [because of this elec­tion].” See also Friedersdorf’s arti­cle How  Mil­lions Of Good Peo­ple Can Vote Dif­fer­ent­ly Than You Will.
  5. The Unin­tend­ed Con­se­quences of Law (Joe Bosquin, Builder): “Large, sweep­ing statutes like Prop 13 have con­se­quences that con­tin­ue to man­i­fest decades after they are passed. In this case, it’s a dearth of entry-lev­el hous­ing.”

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 72

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Some­one is Learn­ing How To Take Down The Inter­net (Bruce Schneier, per­son­al blog): Schneier is one of the most trust­ed voic­es in the field of com­put­er secu­ri­ty. For a fol­low-up, see this arti­cle which includes thought­ful mus­ings on the prob­a­bil­i­ty and con­se­quences of such a take­down.
  2. Scan­dal? What Scan­dal? (Mark Hem­ing­way, The Week­ly Stan­dard):  “A recent NBC poll found that only 19 per­cent of Amer­i­cans approve of the media, a rat­ing well below that of Clin­ton or even Trump. And the mis­sives in Podesta’s inbox reveal good rea­sons for the medi­a’s rep­u­ta­tion to be in the dump­ster.” For a less alarmed take, see Wik­iLeaks and the Oily Wash­ing­ton Press (Jack Schafer, Politi­co).
  3. Relat­ed: The Fact Check­ers Keep Destroy­ing Fact-Check­ing (Tim­o­thy Car­ney, Wash­ing­ton Exam­in­er): “Lots of jour­nal­ists, includ­ing myself, wor­ry about what hap­pens when the pub­lic broad­ly los­es faith in the media.”
  4. The Guilt-free Gospel of Don­ald Trump (Daniel Burke, CNN): a help­ful expla­na­tion of Trump’s reli­gious beliefs.
  5. One third-par­ty can­di­date has a real shot at gain­ing elec­toral votes, and you may not have even heard of him: How Evan McMullin Could Win Utah And The Pres­i­den­cy (Ben­jamin Mor­ris, FiveThir­tyEight): for what it’s worth, I have heard a sur­pris­ing num­ber of peo­ple I respect say that they will vote for McMullin instead of Trump or Clin­ton. These peo­ple are gen­er­al­ly Chris­t­ian intel­lec­tu­als and are not at all rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion. As a result they know he will not win the elec­tion, but feel he is some­one they can vote for with a clear con­science.
  6. How to Cut Cake Fair­ly and Final­ly Eat It Too (Eri­ca Klar­re­ich, Quan­ta Mag­a­zine): “Two young com­put­er sci­en­tists have fig­ured out how to fair­ly divide cake among any num­ber of peo­ple, set­ting to rest a prob­lem math­e­mati­cians have strug­gled with for decades. Their work has star­tled many researchers who believed that such a fair-divi­sion pro­to­col was prob­a­bly impos­si­ble.”
  7. This Is The Most Under-Report­ed Con­flict In The World Right Now (Chris Blattman, per­son­al blog): Ethiopia is fac­ing tough times.

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 71

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Set Our Hearts On Fire Again (Zac Hicks, Desir­ing God) : “Christ-cen­tered wor­ship [is] a cycli­cal process of two actions. Let’s call those actions dis­place­ment and replace­ment.” This one was rec­om­mend­ed by a stu­dent. The real meat is the last half.
  2. The Shift from Author­i­ty to Preference—And Its Con­se­quences for the Church (Os Guin­ness, 9 Marks): This is long but worth­while. “in today’s world, free­dom of con­science is con­fused with free­dom of choice and there­fore ren­dered duti­less and shorn of its rights.”
  3. A Fight In The Lep­er Colony (Doug Wil­son, per­son­al blog): “what we [have] is a vile woman run­ning against a vile man, and we must choose between them, God says, because we are a vile peo­ple. We get a pres­i­den­tial cam­paign between a cor­rup­to­crat and a clown, and this is because God has now nar­rowed our choice down to what would best rep­re­sent this stiff-necked gen­er­a­tion.” For a more gen­tle approach, see Joe Carter’s insight­ful Why Evan­gel­i­cals Are Divid­ed Over Trump and the inter­view with Rus­sell Moore titled The Evan­gel­i­cal Civ­il War.
  4. The New Cul­ture Of Life (Ruth Gra­ham, Slate): “In con­ver­sa­tions over the past sev­er­al weeks with activists and oth­er young peo­ple who care deeply about end­ing abor­tion, I found many who are skep­ti­cal of the movement’s long-held ties to the GOP and the Chris­t­ian right. Instead, they are using the lan­guage of fem­i­nism, human rights, and the Black Lives Mat­ter move­ment to make their case for a new cul­ture of life.”
  5. Chi­na tar­gets par­ents with reli­gion rules in Xin­jiang (Al Jazeera): a take on China’s reli­gious crack­down from a Mus­lim per­spec­tive. “While Chi­na offi­cial­ly guar­an­tees free­dom of reli­gion, minors are not sup­posed to par­tic­i­pate in reli­gious activ­i­ty.” 
  6. Real Insights About Pornog­ra­phy and Mar­riage (Nick Wolfin­ger, blog): “Even more curi­ous is the role of reli­gion. Porn only seems to threat­en mar­i­tal sta­bil­i­ty for cou­ples who don’t attend church reg­u­lar­ly” (empha­sis added). The author is a pro­fes­sor of soci­ol­o­gy.
  7. Human Rights Cam­paign threat­ens Johns Hop­kins over New Atlantis “Sex­u­al­i­ty and Gen­der” report (Al Mohler, The Brief­ing): “One of the things Chris­tians must keep in mind is that sci­ence is a human endeav­or. Sci­ence sim­ply doesn’t exist inde­pen­dent of, well, sci­en­tists, that is human beings. It isn’t some kind of inde­pen­dent author­i­ty…. That is to say, there is no such thing as a sci­ence that is free of ide­ol­o­gy when it comes to human beings, after all, study­ing them­selves.”

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 70

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

This edi­tion is com­ing out ear­ly in the morn­ing because I’m about to hop on a plane to preach at a retreat in Vir­ginia. Your prayers for fruit­ful min­istry are appre­ci­at­ed!

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Red Tape: Chi­na Wants To Con­strict Chris­t­ian Activ­i­ties With 26 New Rules (Sarah Zyl­stra, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): there are inter­est­ing par­al­lels between the way Stan­ford reg­u­lates stu­dents and how states such as Chi­na and Rus­sia reg­u­late their cit­i­zens. #seri­ous­lytho
  2. How Chris­tian­i­ty Flour­ish­es (Jared Wil­son, Gospel Coali­tion): “I can­not find any­where in the New Tes­ta­ment where it teach­es Chris­tians how to be a major­i­ty pres­ence in the world.”
  3.  Jon­ah Gold­berg On Why He Won’t Vote For Hilary or Trump (Seth Steven­son, Slate): the Solzhen­it­syn quote alone makes the arti­cle worth­while.
  4. Why Believ­ing In Mir­a­cles Could Be Haz­ardous To Your Health (David Brig­gs, Wash­ing­ton Post): if you think med­i­cine and faith are opposed to each oth­er, you have bad the­ol­o­gy. Matthew 9:12 seems rel­e­vant.
  5. Don’t Take A Test On A Hot, Pol­lut­ed Day (Alex Tab­barok, Mar­gin­al Rev­o­lu­tion): “I find both of these results hard to believe which doesn’t nec­es­sar­i­ly mean that they shouldn’t be believed.”
  6. Is glob­al­iza­tion bad for the glob­al poor? This study ran an exper­i­ment to find out. (Vox): “Some­thing as com­pli­cat­ed as glob­al­iza­tion is nev­er going to be just good or just bad. We need to divide the good and the bad, and fig­ure out how to address the lat­ter with­out elim­i­nat­ing the for­mer.”
  7. Undo­ing Insu­lar­i­ty: A Small Study of Gen­der Soci­ol­o­gy’s Big Prob­lem (Char­lot­ta Stern, Econ Jour­nal Watch): “gen­der soci­ol­o­gy insu­lates its sacred beliefs from ideas that chal­lenge those beliefs, even when the chal­leng­ing ideas are very well-ground­ed. The sacred beliefs are to the effect that the bio­log­i­cal dif­fer­ences between the sex­es are minor and that the cul­tur­al dif­fer­ences between (or among) the gen­ders are the result of social process­es and have lit­tle basis in bio­log­i­cal dif­fer­ences.”

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 69

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. How To Pray A Psalm (Justin Tay­lor, Gospel Coali­tion): prayer life need a boost? Give this a try. 
  2. A Col­lege Is A Com­mu­ni­ty But It Can­not Be A Home (Conor Frieder­s­dorf, The Atlantic): for­get col­lege. This whole world is not your home — 1 Peter 2:11; Hebrews 13:14.
  3. Is Pla­gia­rism A Sin? (Ger­vase Markham, per­son­al blog): this is well-argued and rais­es issues I had not con­sid­ered before.
  4. Split Over Don­ald Trump and Cut Off by Cul­ture Wars, Evan­gel­i­cals Despair (Lau­rie Good­stein, NY Times): an unusu­al­ly per­cep­tive piece from the often obliv­i­ous-to-reli­gion New York Times.
  5. Sci­ence Denial­ism: Pot. Ket­tle. Black. (David Hed­dle, per­son­al blog): a nuclear physi­cist gives an stim­u­lat­ing sum­ma­ry of cos­mo­log­i­cal fine-tun­ing and how both the­ists and skep­tics often mis­un­der­stand it.
  6. Eco­nom­ic Free­dom and Reli­gion: An Empir­i­cal Inves­ti­ga­tion (SSRN): “Our cross-sec­tion­al dataset includes 137 coun­tries aver­aged over the peri­od 2001–2010. Sim­ple cor­re­la­tions show that Protes­tantism is asso­ci­at­ed with eco­nom­ic free­dom, Islam is not, with Catholi­cism in between.”
  7. Can Islam and Lib­er­al­ism Coex­ist? (Isaac Chotin­er, Slate): an absolute­ly fas­ci­nat­ing inter­view with Sha­di Hamid. “Dur­ing the course of our con­ver­sa­tion… we dis­cussed why lib­er­als have trou­ble tak­ing reli­gion seri­ous­ly, the future of Islamist pol­i­tics in Turkey and Egypt, and what the rise of Don­ald Trump has meant for Amer­i­can Mus­lims.”

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 68

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Mis­sion­ar­ies are strug­gling to work under new Rus­sia law ban­ning pros­e­ly­tiz­ing (Michael Ali­son Chan­dler, Wash­ing­ton Post): “A month after the restric­tions went into effect on July 20, at least sev­en peo­ple had been charged under it…  The list includes a Bap­tist preach­er from the Unit­ed States who was charged with hold­ing reli­gious ser­vices in his home and adver­tis­ing them on pub­lic bul­letin boards. He was con­vict­ed and fined, but he is appeal­ing the case.”
  2. ‘Hill­song’ Casts a Sec­u­lar Lens on an Evan­gel­i­cal Band (NY Times, Joe Coscarel­li): “Hillsong’s cre­ative direc­tor… described embrac­ing the rock-star expo­sure as ‘try­ing to draw atten­tion to your­self for the sole premise of draw­ing atten­tion away from your­self’ — to God.”
  3. 7 Books on the White-Black Racial Divide You Should Read (Ivan Mesa, Gospel Coali­tion): because you don’t have enough books to read at Stan­ford.
  4. We Gave Four Good Poll­sters the Same Raw Data. They Had Four Dif­fer­ent Results. (NY Times, Nate Cohn): “Well, well, well. Look at that. A net five-point dif­fer­ence between the five mea­sures, includ­ing our own, even though all are based on iden­ti­cal data. Remem­ber: There are no sam­pling dif­fer­ences in this exer­cise.” I didn’t know this at all. Wow. We know less about the elec­tion than we thought.
  5. “If you are a very tal­ent­ed per­son, you have a choice: You either go to New York or you go to Sil­i­con Val­ley.” (Peter Thiel said it, and this link is to an op-ed by Aaron Renn in a Chica­go paper defend­ing it.) For a con­trary take, read this com­ment from Mar­gin­al Rev­o­lu­tion.
  6. No, We Should­n’t Start Wor­ry­ing About Glob­al Inequal­i­ty — Pover­ty’s The Prob­lem (Forbes, Tim Worstall): “[Reduc­ing inequal­i­ty is] a bad goal. One rea­son being that rich peo­ple get­ting poor­er reduces inequal­i­ty. And if inequal­i­ty reduc­tion is our goal then we should there­fore wel­come such things as reces­sions.” Found on a student’s twit­ter feed.
  7. What If Evo­lu­tion Bred Real­i­ty Out Of Us? (NPR, Adam Frank): read­ing this called to mind some­thing Chester­ton observed way back in 1908:

    It is idle to talk always of the alter­na­tive of rea­son and faith. Rea­son is itself a mat­ter of faith. It is an act of faith to assert that our thoughts have any rela­tion to real­i­ty at all. If you are mere­ly a scep­tic, you must soon­er or lat­er ask your­self the ques­tion, “Why should ANYTHING go right; even obser­va­tion and deduc­tion? Why should not good log­ic be as mis­lead­ing as bad log­ic? They are both move­ments in the brain of a bewil­dered ape?” The young scep­tic says, “I have a right to think for myself.” But the old scep­tic, the com­plete scep­tic, says, “I have no right to think for myself. I have no right to think at all.” — Ortho­doxy, G. K. Chester­ton

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.