Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 79

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. First Dinosaur Tail Found Pre­served In Amber (Kristin Romey, Nation­al Geo­graph­ic): this is awe­some. And yo, it’s got feath­ers. Feath­ers! I’ve heard for years that dinosaurs like­ly had feath­ers, but see­ing them is super-cool. Quick, some­one redo the CGI in Juras­sic Park.
  2. Requiem For A Despot (Car­los Eire, First Things): some of you have asked what I thought of Fidel Cas­tro. This sums it up well. He was a car­toon­ish­ly wicked man. The author is a pro­fes­sor of his­to­ry at Yale.
  3. The Neces­si­ty Of Cred­i­bil­i­ty (Nathan J. Robin­son, Cur­rent Affairs): “Cur­rent­ly, peo­ple don’t trust the main­stream media. And the first thing the media must do is acknowl­edge that part of that mis­trust is entire­ly ratio­nal and rea­son­able” (empha­sis in orig­i­nal). An insight­ful cri­tique of the media from the left.
  4. The Media Kow­tow (Mark Hem­ing­way, The Week­ly Stan­dard): this is an old­er piece but still very rel­e­vant.  “For the last sev­er­al years, a huge­ly influ­en­tial por­tion of the Amer­i­can media has vac­il­lat­ed between open­ly admir­ing the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment and pro­vid­ing a forum for its apologists.” With that in mind, read this — Tsai calls Trump, World Com­men­tari­at IQ drops 50 points (Michael Tur­ton, per­son­al blog). The author lives in Tai­wan and has a unique per­spec­tive. His fol­low-up is also worth read­ing.
  5. Sev­en Rea­sons You Should Not Indulge In Pornog­ra­phy (Andy Nasel­li, Theme­lios): “You should not indulge in pornog­ra­phy for at least sev­en rea­sons: (1) It will send you to hell. (2) It does not glo­ri­fy God with your body. (3) It is a poi­so­nous, fleet­ing plea­sure. (4) It fool­ish­ly wastes your life. (5) It betrays your wife and chil­dren. (6) It ruins your mind and con­science. (7) It par­tic­i­pates in sex slavery.”
  6. Jen Hat­mak­er: Hermeneu­tics, Hurt, and Human Affec­tion (Joe Dal­las, per­son­al blog): the fol­low-up con­tains this nugget, “Generally, when you feel right about your­self, you can live with some­one else’s dis­agree­ment or dis­ap­proval. You may not like them say­ing you’re wrong, but you don’t feel a need to pre­vent them from doing so.”
  7. Con­tra Robin­son on School­ing (Slate Star Codex): like all Slate Star Codex arti­cles, this is long, thought­ful, and well-researched. The fol­low-up post is extreme­ly infor­ma­tive.

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 78

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. On Wednes­day I men­tioned how some mod­ern research about speak­ing in tongues aligns very well with Paul’s com­ments about tongues strength­en­ing believ­ers even while their mind is unfruit­ful (1 Cor 14:4, 14). A read­able sum­ma­ry from a few years back is A Neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic Look At Speak­ing In Tongues (Bene­dict Carey, NYT) and also Speak­ing in Tongues: Glos­salalia and Stress Reduc­tion (The Dana Foun­da­tion). If you want to see the actu­al research they are allud­ing to, check out the uni­ver­si­ty press release Lan­guage Cen­ter of the Brain Is Not Under the Con­trol of Sub­jects Who “Speak in Tongues” (U Penn, 2006) or the aca­d­e­m­ic paper­s Sali­vary Alpha-Amy­lase and Cor­ti­sol Among Pen­te­costals on a Wor­ship and Non­wor­ship Day (Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Human Biol­o­gy, 2013) and Glos­so­lalia is asso­ci­at­ed with dif­fer­ences in bio­mark­ers of stress and arousal among Apos­tolic Pen­te­costals (Reli­gion, Brain and Behav­ior, 2012).
  2. A hor­ri­fy­ing look into the mind of 9/11’s mas­ter­mind, in his own words (Marc Thiessen, Wash­ing­ton Post): Indis­putably inter­est­ing. Two caveats: you should look up the name James E. Mitchell for con­text and there are sure­ly those who tes­ti­fy dif­fer­ent­ly than Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Hav­ing said that… fas­ci­nat­ing.
  3. Reli­gious Lib­er­ty Experts Stand Togeth­er, on Cas­es Inside Prison Walls (Ter­ry Mat­ting­ly, On Reli­gion): “There is space enough in our cul­ture to allow dif­fer­ent peo­ple with dif­fer­ent beliefs to live peace­ably in the same land.”
  4. Texas elec­tor who crit­i­cized Trump says he’s resign­ing (Kyle Cheney, Politi­co): “Since I can’t in good con­science vote for Don­ald Trump, and yet have sin­ful­ly made a pledge that I would, the best option I see at this time is to resign my posi­tion as an Elec­tor…. I will sleep well at night know­ing I nei­ther gave in to [the people’s] demands nor caved to my con­vic­tions. I will also mourn the loss of our republic.” The elec­tor is clear­ly a thought­ful Chris­t­ian who made his deci­sion very the­o­log­i­cal­ly. Read his own words about it at Con­flict­ed Elec­tor In A Cor­rupt Col­lege. Even if you dif­fer with his the­ol­o­gy at points, applaud his con­sis­ten­cy. Also note how much Politi­co edit­ed out his the­o­log­i­cal con­vic­tions in their report­ing — a very com­mon occur­rence in major media out­lets.
  5. Gays, Bias, And Pho­ny Sci­ence (Nao­mi Schae­fer Riley,  NY Post): “In the end, nei­ther LaCour nor Hatzen­buehler actu­al­ly did the work to prove their the­ses — because there would be no real con­se­quences if they were caught, and any­way acad­e­mia writ large didn’t want to ‘catch’ them at all.”
  6. The Under­stud­ied Female Sex­u­al Preda­tor (Conor Frieder­dorf, The Atlantic): “In inci­dents of sex­u­al vio­lence report­ed to the Nation­al Crime Vic­tim­iza­tion Sur­vey, 38 per­cent of vic­tims were men…”
  7. Cheat or Go Home: Inside the ‘Dys­func­tion­al Hell’ of Becom­ing a CFB Coach (Matt Hayes, Bleach­er Report): “Auburn offi­cials have always denied it, the NCAA could nev­er nail it down and the statute of lim­i­ta­tions on infrac­tions has long since passed. But here’s the catch: I’ve seen the ledger.” Even if you don’t like sports, this is a worth­while read.

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 77

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. White Chris­t­ian Apoc­a­lypse? (Philip Jenk­ins, The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive): Jenk­ins is a well-known his­to­ri­an. “On one crit­i­cal issue, though, con­tem­po­rary debate and the­o­riz­ing real­ly is tres­pass­ing on my areas of expertise.” Jenk­ins unpacks some long-term trends and their impli­ca­tions for Amer­i­ca’s demo­graph­ic des­tiny.
  2. The End of Iden­ti­ty Lib­er­al­ism (Mark Lil­la, NY Times): One of the more insight­ful things I’ve read late­ly. It’s inspired by the recent elec­tion, but is about some­thing much broad­er — some intrin­sic weak­ness­es of iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics. For a very strong reac­tion against it, read Mak­ing White Suprema­cy Respectable. Again. (Kather­ine Franke, LA Review of Books). Both authors are pro­fes­sors at Colum­bia, which will no doubt make for tense times in the fac­ul­ty lounge.
  3. Yes, Trump will build his bor­der wall. Most of it is already built. (Peter Andreas, Wash­ing­ton Post): “It is impor­tant to remem­ber that Trump’s pre­de­ces­sors care­ful­ly avoid­ed call­ing any new bor­der bar­ri­ers a ‘wall.’” Wow. I did not real­ize how much of the south­ern bor­der is already bar­ri­cad­ed. It would be help­ful if reporter­s peri­od­i­cal­ly brought this fact up for con­text.
  4. Try­ing To Think Through The Log­ic Of Abor­tion Rights (Justin Tay­lor, The Gospel Coali­tion): Tay­lor sum­ma­rizes the argu­ments of two phi­los­o­phy pro­fes­sors. For me, med­i­tat­ing on Luke 1:39–45 has been impor­tant when think­ing about abortion. 
  5. Every­one should have the right to assist­ed sui­cide — or no one should (Feli­cia Nimue Ack­er­man, Vox): “a soci­ety that ‘pathologizes’ sui­ci­dal feel­ings of indig­ni­ty and degra­da­tion in rape vic­tims while endors­ing them in the ter­mi­nal­ly ill is, I con­tend, engag­ing in a hor­ri­fy­ing, odi­ous form of bigotry.” The author is a phi­los­o­phy pro­fes­sor at Brown.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 76

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Some thoughts about slav­ery and the Bible — Does The Bible Sup­port Slav­ery? (a lec­ture giv­en by the war­den of Tyn­dale House at Cam­bridge Uni­ver­si­ty, the link is to the video with notes) and Does God Con­done Slav­ery In The Bible? (Part One — Old Tes­ta­ment) and also Part Two — New Tes­ta­ment (longer pieces from Glenn Miller at Chris­t­ian Think­tank). All three are quite help­ful.
  2. Struc­tur­al Racism (John Piper, Desir­ing God): “if your mind is Bible-sat­u­rat­ed, you would con­sid­er it absolute­ly aston­ish­ing if struc­tur­al racism were not per­va­sive wher­ev­er sin is per­va­sive. In oth­er words, Bible-shaped peo­ple should expect to see struc­tur­al racism almost every­where in a fall­en world.”
  3. How Methodists Invent­ed Your Kid’s Grape Juice Sug­ar High (Luke Har­ring­ton, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): why many church­es use grape juice for com­mu­nion.
  4. More post-elec­tion thoughts:
    1. Why Can’t I Mourn? (Kyle James Howard, per­son­al blog): “For many, it appears that it is unac­cept­able for me to grieve racism and abor­tion equal­ly. That for many, a Chris­t­ian only has the capac­i­ty to grieve one or the oth­er but not both.”
    2. No, the Major­i­ty of Amer­i­can Evan­gel­i­cals Did Not Vote for Trump (Joe Carter, Gospel Coali­tion): you may recall that I sug­gest­ed some­thing sim­i­lar in last week’s email — here’s a wide-rang­ing expla­na­tion. There is no doubt more to be said on this.
    3. You Are Still Cry­ing Wolf (Scott Alexan­der, Slat­eStar­Codex): “I real­ize that all of this is going to make me sound like a crazy per­son and put me com­plete­ly at odds with every respectable thinker in the media, but luck­i­ly, being a crazy per­son at odds with every respectable thinker in the media has been a pret­ty good tick­et to pre­dic­tive accu­ra­cy late­ly, so whatever.” This is a long and detailed argu­ment that Trump is not racist (or at least not more racist than lots of peo­ple). I was sur­prised at how well it held my inter­est. See also Ross Douthat’s insight­ful twit­ter cri­tique of the arti­cle. For a con­trary point of view (sort of — it’s less about Trump and more about what Trump sig­ni­fies), see Racism Prob­a­bly Is Get­ting Worse. (I Hope I’m Wrong.) (Tyler Cowen, Bloomberg View). If you read one, read all three.
    4. Stunned By Trump, The New York Times Finds Time For Some Soul-Search­ing (Michael Cieply, Dead­spin): “By and large, tal­ent­ed reporters scram­bled to match sto­ries with what inter­nal­ly was often called ‘the narrative.’ We were occa­sion­al­ly asked to map a nar­ra­tive for our var­i­ous beats a year in advance, square the plan with edi­tors, then gen­er­ate sto­ries that fit the pre-des­ig­nat­ed line.” This piece is impor­tant and depress­ing.
    5. The coali­tion for diver­si­ty whose diver­si­ty did diver­si­ty just win? (Tyler Cowen, Mar­gin­al Rev­o­lu­tion): do not let the con­fus­ing title put you off. Cowen argues that the Repub­li­cans are in some sens­es sig­nif­i­cant­ly more diverse than the Democ­rats.
    6. #Nev­erTrump And Pres­i­dent Trump (Jake Meador, Mere Ortho­doxy): “The church’s great­est the­olo­gians have long said that a prop­er­ly Chris­t­ian com­mon­wealth will be con­cerned not with the greater good—the most good for the most people—or with the pri­vate good of Chris­tians alone, but with the com­mon good.”
    7. How cov­er­ing the Red­skins name debate pre­pared me for Don­ald Trump’s win (Dan Stein­berg, Washing­ton Post): “They told me that media Twit­ter wasn’t the real world, that it cre­at­ed a pho­ny idea of con­sen­sus for a stance that wasn’t actu­al­ly ascen­dant. And they argued that a polit­i­cal­ly cor­rect onslaught from big-city elites would only strength­en their convictions.”
    8. Don­ald Trump can absolute­ly ban Mus­lims from enter­ing the US, with­out Con­gress (Zack Beauchamp, Vox): “I [asked] sev­er­al experts on US immi­gra­tion law. Their answer was unan­i­mous: Trump would be able to imple­ment his ban. In fact, he would be able to do it easily.” I didn’t know the pres­i­dent had this pow­er. Sur­pris­ing giv­en our sys­tem of checks and bal­ances.
    9. The Cul­ture That Cre­at­ed Don­ald Trump Was Lib­er­al Not Con­ser­v­a­tive (Jim Lewis, The Inter­cept): “Liberals were sure the dev­il would come slouch­ing out of Alaba­ma or Texas, beat­ing a bible and shout­ing about sodomy and sin. They didn’t expect him to be a busi­ness­man who lives on Fifth Avenue and 57th Street.” This is some­thing I saw allud­ed to in the pri­maries but haven’t seen men­tioned in a while. 

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting — Election Edition (vol 75)

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting — Election Edition

Before I say any­thing else, I feel the need to say I did­n’t have an agen­da when select­ing these arti­cles oth­er than try­ing to under­stand what hap­pened and what it means. I’m not try­ing to make a case for or against any­one — I just want some insight.

The Elec­tion: What Hap­pened?

  1. Few pre­dict­ed Trump had a good shot of win­ning. But polit­i­cal sci­ence mod­els did. (Andrew Prokop, Vox). Social sci­en­tists — believe in your discipline! 
  2. How Half Of Amer­i­ca Lost It’s F**king Mind (David Wong, Cracked): If you can’t under­stand how peo­ple vot­ed for Trump, read this. Apolo­gies for the lan­guage, but I seri­ous­ly think this piece should be con­sid­ered for a Pulitzer. 
  3. The smug style in Amer­i­can lib­er­al­ism (Emmitt Rensin, Vox): “If the smug style can be reduced to a sin­gle sen­tence, it’s, Why are they vot­ing against their own self-inter­est? But no par­ty these past decades has effec­tive­ly rep­re­sent­ed the inter­ests of these dis­pos­sessed. Only one has made a point of open­ly dis­dain­ing them too.” This is an old­er piece which turned out to have strong pre­dic­tive val­ue. Shared by a stu­dent. There is one fac­tu­al error I feel oblig­ed to point out: Kim Davis won. She got what she want­ed. It’s reveal­ing that even some­one sym­pa­thet­ic like Rensin doesn’t seem to real­ize that. 
  4. Fur­ther Thoughts: How Social Jus­tice Ide­ol­o­gy Fuels Racism and Sex­ism (Alas­tair Roberts, blog): “the over­reach of pro­gres­sive lib­er­als, who are chron­i­cal­ly out of touch with social and nat­ur­al real­i­ty, has played a promi­nent part in pro­vok­ing the rise of a move­ment that is resis­tant to shame and guilt, as these had for­mer­ly been weaponized to con­trol them.”
  5. What This Means, How This Hap­pened, What To Do Now (Nathan Robin­son, Cur­rent Affairs): “Pro­gres­sives need to under­stand how peo­ple who are dif­fer­ent from them think. No more writ­ing them off as racist and deplorable. Even if they are, what good does that do? You need to under­stand racists not so you can sym­pa­thize with them, but so you can fig­ure out what shapes people’s beliefs, and help them reach dif­fer­ent beliefs.”
  6. The Age Of Accept­able Lies (Mike Cosper, Gospel Coali­tion): “In oth­er words, we don’t want Trump to be a misog­y­nist, since it under­mines our abil­i­ty to vote for him. So his words find new inter­pre­ta­tions. Or we don’t want Hillary to have a record of dis­re­gard for both the rule of law and poli­cies that pro­tect nation­al secu­ri­ty. So we don’t believe her email scan­dal means any­thing. Or we don’t want the Bible to say hard things about sex­u­al­i­ty. So we don’t believe it does.” This arti­cle is about some­thing broad­er than but ger­mane to the elec­tion. Read this one even if you skip most arti­cles in this sec­tion.

Thoughts From Peo­ple Who Vot­ed For Trump
I have over­heard sev­er­al peo­ple ask­ing how any­one could have vot­ed for Trump. Here are a few first-per­son accounts.

  1. Bethel Church’s Bill John­son: Why I Vot­ed For Don­ald Trump (Bill John­son, Gospel Herald) 
  2. Don­ald Trump Key To Isa­iah 45 Prophe­cy? (Lance Wall­nau, Charis­ma News): I’ve heard more than one per­son ref­er­ence this idea.
  3. After much prayer and soul-search­ing, I have reluc­tant­ly decid­ed to vote for the Trump-Pence tick­et. Here’s why. (Joel Rosen­berg, per­son­al blog)
  4. I Am  (Cassie Hewlett, per­son­al blog). The title is not a reli­gious ref­er­ence. A stu­dent shared this one with me.

Impli­ca­tions / Con­se­quences Of The Elec­tion

  1. What Trump Might Mean For The Econ­o­my (Chris­tos Makridis, Fast Com­pa­ny): yes, that’s our Chris­tos. Proud of the way you put your schol­ar­ship out there for the pub­lic, man. Keep it up!
  2. Two Con­cerns for the Reli­gious Right Under Pres­i­dent Trump (Col­in Hansen, Gospel Coali­tion): “First, many evan­gel­i­cal lead­ers had lost touch with the rest of the move­ment. And sec­ond, the rest of the move­ment had lost touch with the con­cerns with their minor­i­ty broth­ers and sisters.” If you only read one thing in this sec­tion, read this.
  3. 4 Prob­lems Asso­ci­at­ed With White Evan­gel­i­cal Sup­port Of Don­ald Trump (Thabiti Anyab­wile, Gospel Coali­tion): one sig­nif­i­cant caveat about both this and the pre­vi­ous arti­cle — I expect that the 80% sta­tis­tic will dwin­dle under more care­ful inves­ti­ga­tion. Con­sis­tent­ly in the polls before the elec­tion there was a marked dif­fer­ence between peo­ple who self-iden­ti­fied as evan­gel­i­cal and those who actu­al­ly attend­ed evan­gel­i­cal church­es. The 80% num­ber is about the for­mer. We don’t yet have data on the lat­ter.
  4. A rash of racist attacks have bro­ken out in the US after Don­ald Trump’s vic­to­ry (Heather Tim­mons, Quartz): very dis­tress­ing. Seri­ous ques­tion: how many racist attacks are there on a dai­ly basis in Amer­i­ca? I’m won­der­ing what the com­par­a­tive uptick is.
  5. Why some fear this election’s last­ing dam­age to Amer­i­can Chris­tian­i­ty (Sarah Pul­liam Bai­ley, Washing­ton Post): “When reports emerge about whom evan­gel­i­cals vot­ed for, they usu­al­ly mean ‘white evangelicals,’ gloss­ing over a grow­ing racial divi­sion with­in Christianity.”
  6. Trump Won. Here’s How 20 Evan­gel­i­cal Lead­ers Feel. (Chris­tian­i­ty Today): this is well worth read­ing and not that long.
  7. Don’t Expect The Supreme Court To Change Much (Cass Sun­stein, Bloomberg View): Sun­stein is a Har­vard Law pro­fes­sor.
  8. The Elec­tion Is Over. Let’s Get Polit­i­cal (Jonathan Lee­man, Gospel Coali­tion): “Every week, our con­gre­ga­tions gath­er as embassies of heav­en. Every week, our pas­tors make a polit­i­cal speech, and we go out as ambas­sadors with a polit­i­cal mes­sage. ‘The King offers par­don for every rebel who would repent!’”

Oth­er News That Caught My Eye

  1. China’s plan to orga­nize its soci­ety relies on ‘big data’ to rate every­one (Simon Deny­er, Wash­ing­ton Post): this is the most ter­ri­fy­ing thing I’ve read all week. I men­tioned this to a Chi­nese cit­i­zen and she said she’d only heard about it from Amer­i­cans and was skep­ti­cal it would hap­pen as described.
  2. Vat­i­can Blind­ed to Real­i­ty in Venezuela (Fran­cis Rooney, Real Clear Reli­gion): “As the cri­sis spi­rals out of con­trol, Venezuela is in dan­ger of becom­ing this hemisphere’s Syria.”

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Some Thoughts About The Election

This is an email I sent to the stu­dents in my min­istry the morn­ing fol­low­ing the 2016 pres­i­den­tial elec­tion:

I would like to say some­thing to the despon­dent and the jubi­lant: the despon­dent should not be too despon­dent and the jubi­lant should not be too jubi­lant.

To The Despondent:

You just woke up and feel as though you woke up in a dif­fer­ent coun­try than the one you thought you lived in. You feel as though you don’t belong. I want to encour­age you: this will pass. There are rarely per­ma­nent defeats in pol­i­tics. You will get anoth­er try at the pres­i­den­cy in four years and at the leg­isla­tive branch in two years. Remem­ber when Oba­ma rode into office? The Democ­rats had the House, the Sen­ate, and the Exec­u­tive Branch along with most state guber­na­to­r­i­al and leg­isla­tive offices. The days of the Repub­li­can par­ty seemed over, yet now the Repub­li­cans have usurped the Democ­rats in every one of those roles. Your turn will come again. Be patient.

A few prac­ti­cal pieces of advice for you in the mean­while:

1) If you did not reg­is­ter to vote, do it now while you’re moti­vat­ed. It will not take much time and is one of the few pro­duc­tive things you can actu­al­ly do right now.

2) You may be tempt­ed to blame the oth­er side’s vic­to­ry on the basest of motives. The oth­er side is racist. The oth­er side is misog­y­nis­tic. The oth­er side is dri­ven by hate. Please hear this: they don’t think they are. “But they are — I know it!” Even if you are right that there are vile motives float­ing around inside their souls, you will not change their minds by point­ing that out. Instead, you must under­stand your oppo­nents in order to per­suade them. If you are gen­uine­ly shocked that a large chunk of Amer­i­cans are afraid of the Demo­c­ra­t­ic par­ty and what it would have done with four to eight more years of pow­er, you need to read more wide­ly.  Add to your read­ing list authors such as Mol­lie Hem­ing­way, Ross Douthat, Thomas Sow­ell, Matthew Lee Ander­son, Rus­sell Moore, Rod Dreher, and David French. If you use Twit­ter, fol­low each of them. If you don’t, pay atten­tion to their writ­ings. They pop up from time to time in the Fri­day emails I send out — begin delib­er­ate­ly read­ing the entries you think you’ll dis­agree with. Also, con­sid­er watch­ing Fox News from time to time.

3) Pray. This is some­thing you will have a chance to do at Chi Alpha tonight. #just­say­ing

To The Jubilant:

It’s a good feel­ing when your side wins. Enjoy the moment, but rec­og­nize how ephemer­al it is. When­ev­er one par­ty sweeps into pow­er across mul­ti­ple branch­es of gov­ern­ment, cor­rup­tion and infight­ing ensues. Your team is like­ly in for a rough time two years from now in the midterm elec­tions and will face a seri­ous chal­lenge four years down the road.

A few prac­ti­cal pieces of advice for you:

1) Rec­og­nize that some of your friends are gen­uine­ly ter­ri­fied right now. Peo­ple who are made in God’s image — some of whom are your broth­ers and sis­ters in Christ — are in pain. Be empa­thet­ic. Even if you think that their emo­tions are overblown, acknowl­edge that their emo­tions are real.

2) Pre­pare for dis­ap­point­ment. Politi­cians rarely deliv­er what you hoped for. The Democ­rats did­n’t deliv­er immi­gra­tion reform when Oba­ma was in office even though the Democ­rats held the House and the Sen­ate. The Repub­li­cans will almost cer­tain­ly get bogged down on issues that lat­er prove to be incon­se­quen­tial and as a result will let some of your high­est pri­or­i­ties slip out of their grasp. Two years is not that long and Repub­li­can offi­cials will refuse to believe that’s prob­a­bly all the time they have.

To Everyone:

Yes­ter­day Amer­i­ca elect­ed a pres­i­dent for the next four years, but we know the King who reigns for­ev­er. So acknowl­edge the pres­i­dent, “but in your hearts revere Christ as Lord” (1 Peter 3:15a).

Remem­ber Philip­pi­ans 3:20: “our cit­i­zen­ship is in heav­en. And we eager­ly await a Sav­ior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Elec­tions mat­ter, but eter­ni­ty mat­ters more. Keep per­spec­tive today and always.

God bless and I hope to see you at wor­ship tonight. I’ll talk more about these things there and we will pray.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 74

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Men Are More Like­ly to Be Sex­u­al­ly Attract­ed to Their Oppo­site-Sex Friends (Drake Baer, Sci­ence of Us): “the study found that guys are more like­ly to define a female friend as ‘a mem­ber of the oppo­site sex to whom I am attract­ed and would pur­sue giv­en the oppor­tu­ni­ty’ and ladies to define their oppo­site-sex friends as sim­ply ‘a friend of the oppo­site sex.’” For an amus­ing take on this idea, see this three-minute video (it’s got over 9 mil­lion views).
  2. The New Evan­gel­i­cal Moral Minor­i­ty (Kele­fa San­neh, New York­er): this is a well-writ­ten essay focus­ing on the South­ern Bap­tist ethi­cist Rus­sell Moore, of whom I am a huge fan and with whom I usu­al­ly agree. High­ly rec­om­mend­ed, although the author’s snark shows through occa­sion­al­ly. The author, inci­den­tal­ly, is the son of famed Chris­t­ian mis­si­ol­o­gist Lamin San­neh.
  3. In Love and Mar­riage, Prac­tice Doesn’t Make Per­fect (Scott Stan­ley, Psy­chol­o­gy Today):  “We found that hav­ing more sex­u­al and cohab­it­ing part­ners before mar­riage is asso­ci­at­ed with low­er rela­tion­ship qual­i­ty once mar­ried. In par­tic­u­lar, hav­ing only ever lived with or had sex with one’s spouse was asso­ci­at­ed with high­er mar­i­tal quality.” The author is a research pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Den­ver. The research upon which this arti­cle was based is avail­able here.
  4. Pos­i­tive Par­ent­ing is Ide­al, But Many Chil­dren Need Time-Outs, Too (Robert Larzelere, Insti­tute For Fam­i­ly Stud­ies): “Yes, the worst out­comes were for the type of author­i­tar­i­an par­ent­ing that Dr. Coul­son oppos­es, which can be defined as strict enforce­ment with­out love. But the sec­ond-worst 10-year out­comes were for over­ly per­mis­sive parents…” When we sing that God is a good, good Father we should should remem­ber we are cel­e­brat­ing the fact that he both encour­ages and disciplines. 
  5. North Kore­a’s War On Chris­tian­i­ty: The Globe’s Num­ber One Reli­gious Per­se­cu­tor (Doug Bandow, Forbes): “[Christian Sol­i­dar­i­ty World­wide] reports doc­u­ment­ed cas­es of believ­ers being ‘hung on a cross over a fire, crushed under a steam­roller, herd­ed off bridges, and tram­pled underfoot.’”
  6. The Case Against Democ­ra­cy (Caleb Craine, The New York­er): I’m a monar­chist, truth be told. In the King­dom I call home we don’t get a vote, but we wel­come any­one who wish­es to immi­grate. Join us! #king­je­sus  

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 73

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Here is the 2010 arti­cle I men­tioned in my ser­mon: Study of the ther­a­peu­tic effects of prox­i­mal inter­ces­so­ry prayer (STEPP) on audi­to­ry and visu­al impair­ments in rur­al Mozam­bique (Google schol­ar link). And the book I men­tioned, Mir­a­cles by Craig Keen­er, is in Green Library at BS2548 .K44 2011. 
  2. The Bur­ial Place Of Jesus Exposed For The First Time In Cen­turies: An Inter­view On What It Orig­i­nal­ly Looked Like And How We Know This Is The Right Loca­tion (Justin Tay­lor, Gospel Coali­tion): “Readers might won­der, though, how we know this is real­ly the place Jesus was buried…. What does the Bible say? How about archae­ol­o­gy? Do we know what first-cen­tu­ry tombs looked like? How big were these tombs?”
  3. Papyrus offers non­bib­li­cal men­tion of Judean king­dom in Jerusalem (Michael Chabin, Reli­gion News Service): “Israeli archae­ol­o­gists have unveiled the ear­li­est known non­bib­li­cal Hebrew-lan­guage ref­er­ence to Jerusalem, dat­ing back to the time of the First Tem­ple in the sev­enth cen­tu­ry B.C.” Note that there is some con­tro­ver­sy about the papyrus.
  4. Nei­ther Trump Nor Clin­ton Is The End Of The Repub­lic (Conor Frieder­s­dorf, The Atlantic): “[America] sur­vived chat­tel slav­ery that made a mock­ery of found­ing prin­ci­ples, Shay’s Rebel­lion, the Whiskey Insur­rec­tion, the burn­ing of its cap­i­tal by the British, the Trail of Tears, The Dred Scott deci­sion, the afore­men­tioned civ­il war, the assas­si­na­tions of pres­i­dents, Plessy vs. Fer­gu­son, an impe­ri­al­ist for­ay into the Philip­pines, the Espi­onage and Sedi­tion Acts, a flu pan­dem­ic that killed 20 mil­lion world­wide and an esti­mat­ed 675,000 Amer­i­cans, the Great Depres­sion, the glob­al rise of fas­cism, World War II, an expan­sion­ist Com­mu­nist dic­ta­tor­ship with nuclear weapons that infil­trat­ed the U.S. gov­ern­ment, Jim Crow, Water­gate, urban riots, the Sex­u­al Rev­o­lu­tion, and the Sep­tem­ber 11 attacks. But now it’s all over [because of this election].” See also Friedersdorf’s arti­cle How  Mil­lions Of Good Peo­ple Can Vote Dif­fer­ent­ly Than You Will.
  5. The Unin­tend­ed Con­se­quences of Law (Joe Bosquin, Builder): “Large, sweep­ing statutes like Prop 13 have con­se­quences that con­tin­ue to man­i­fest decades after they are passed. In this case, it’s a dearth of entry-lev­el housing.”

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 72

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Some­one is Learn­ing How To Take Down The Inter­net (Bruce Schneier, per­son­al blog): Schneier is one of the most trust­ed voic­es in the field of com­put­er secu­ri­ty. For a fol­low-up, see this arti­cle which includes thought­ful mus­ings on the prob­a­bil­i­ty and con­se­quences of such a take­down.
  2. Scan­dal? What Scan­dal? (Mark Hem­ing­way, The Week­ly Stan­dard):  “A recent NBC poll found that only 19 per­cent of Amer­i­cans approve of the media, a rat­ing well below that of Clin­ton or even Trump. And the mis­sives in Podesta’s inbox reveal good rea­sons for the medi­a’s rep­u­ta­tion to be in the dumpster.” For a less alarmed take, see Wik­iLeaks and the Oily Wash­ing­ton Press (Jack Schafer, Politi­co).
  3. Relat­ed: The Fact Check­ers Keep Destroy­ing Fact-Check­ing (Tim­o­thy Car­ney, Wash­ing­ton Exam­in­er): “Lots of jour­nal­ists, includ­ing myself, wor­ry about what hap­pens when the pub­lic broad­ly los­es faith in the media.”
  4. The Guilt-free Gospel of Don­ald Trump (Daniel Burke, CNN): a help­ful expla­na­tion of Trump’s reli­gious beliefs.
  5. One third-par­ty can­di­date has a real shot at gain­ing elec­toral votes, and you may not have even heard of him: How Evan McMullin Could Win Utah And The Pres­i­den­cy (Ben­jamin Mor­ris, FiveThir­tyEight): for what it’s worth, I have heard a sur­pris­ing num­ber of peo­ple I respect say that they will vote for McMullin instead of Trump or Clin­ton. These peo­ple are gen­er­al­ly Chris­t­ian intel­lec­tu­als and are not at all rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion. As a result they know he will not win the elec­tion, but feel he is some­one they can vote for with a clear con­science.
  6. How to Cut Cake Fair­ly and Final­ly Eat It Too (Eri­ca Klar­re­ich, Quan­ta Mag­a­zine): “Two young com­put­er sci­en­tists have fig­ured out how to fair­ly divide cake among any num­ber of peo­ple, set­ting to rest a prob­lem math­e­mati­cians have strug­gled with for decades. Their work has star­tled many researchers who believed that such a fair-divi­sion pro­to­col was prob­a­bly impossible.”
  7. This Is The Most Under-Report­ed Con­flict In The World Right Now (Chris Blattman, per­son­al blog): Ethiopia is fac­ing tough times.

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 71

1 Chronicles 12:32 - they "understood the times"
1 Chron­i­cles 12:32 — they “under­stood the times”

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Set Our Hearts On Fire Again (Zac Hicks, Desir­ing God) : “Christ-centered wor­ship [is] a cycli­cal process of two actions. Let’s call those actions dis­place­ment and replace­ment.” This one was rec­om­mend­ed by a stu­dent. The real meat is the last half.
  2. The Shift from Author­i­ty to Preference—And Its Con­se­quences for the Church (Os Guin­ness, 9 Marks): This is long but worth­while. “in today’s world, free­dom of con­science is con­fused with free­dom of choice and there­fore ren­dered duti­less and shorn of its rights.”
  3. A Fight In The Lep­er Colony (Doug Wil­son, per­son­al blog): “what we [have] is a vile woman run­ning against a vile man, and we must choose between them, God says, because we are a vile peo­ple. We get a pres­i­den­tial cam­paign between a cor­rup­to­crat and a clown, and this is because God has now nar­rowed our choice down to what would best rep­re­sent this stiff-necked generation.” For a more gen­tle approach, see Joe Carter’s insight­ful Why Evan­gel­i­cals Are Divid­ed Over Trump and the inter­view with Rus­sell Moore titled The Evan­gel­i­cal Civ­il War.
  4. The New Cul­ture Of Life (Ruth Gra­ham, Slate): “In con­ver­sa­tions over the past sev­er­al weeks with activists and oth­er young peo­ple who care deeply about end­ing abor­tion, I found many who are skep­ti­cal of the movement’s long-held ties to the GOP and the Chris­t­ian right. Instead, they are using the lan­guage of fem­i­nism, human rights, and the Black Lives Mat­ter move­ment to make their case for a new cul­ture of life.”
  5. Chi­na tar­gets par­ents with reli­gion rules in Xin­jiang (Al Jazeera): a take on China’s reli­gious crack­down from a Mus­lim per­spec­tive. “While Chi­na offi­cial­ly guar­an­tees free­dom of reli­gion, minors are not sup­posed to par­tic­i­pate in reli­gious activity.” 
  6. Real Insights About Pornog­ra­phy and Mar­riage (Nick Wolfin­ger, blog): “Even more curi­ous is the role of reli­gion. Porn only seems to threat­en mar­i­tal sta­bil­i­ty for cou­ples who don’t attend church reg­u­lar­ly” (empha­sis added). The author is a pro­fes­sor of soci­ol­o­gy.
  7. Human Rights Cam­paign threat­ens Johns Hop­kins over New Atlantis “Sex­u­al­i­ty and Gen­der” report (Al Mohler, The Brief­ing): “One of the things Chris­tians must keep in mind is that sci­ence is a human endeav­or. Sci­ence sim­ply doesn’t exist inde­pen­dent of, well, sci­en­tists, that is human beings. It isn’t some kind of inde­pen­dent author­i­ty…. That is to say, there is no such thing as a sci­ence that is free of ide­ol­o­gy when it comes to human beings, after all, study­ing themselves.”

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.