Tag: academia

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 29

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. C.S. Lewis Was A Secret Gov­ern­ment Agent (Chris­tian­i­ty Today, Har­ry Lee Poe): It’s not as excit­ing as the title sounds, but it’s still cool. C.S. Lewis did some work for MI6. That’s the same agency as James Bond.  JAMES BOND.
  2. Why I wor­ry exper­i­men­tal social sci­ence is head­ed in the wrong direc­tion (Chris Blattman, per­son­al blog). This is an excel­lent piece by a polit­i­cal sci­ence pro­fes­sor at Colum­bia.
  3. Utah Reduced Chron­ic Home­less­ness By 91 Per­cent. Here’s How. (NPR, Kel­ly McEv­ers). Props to the Mor­mons. It reminds me of an old piece by Mal­colm Glad­well: Mil­lion Dol­lar Mur­ray.
  4. Phil­an­thropy Should Be Con­tro­ver­sial (Bloomberg View, Justin Fox): Fas­ci­nat­ing through­out — the last two para­graphs were quite sur­pris­ing to me.
  5. John Ker­ry Should Rec­og­nize Chris­t­ian Geno­cide (USA Today, Kirsten Pow­ers): I’ve post­ed about this before and will like­ly keep doing so. The sit­u­a­tion is insane.
  6. Why Chris­tians Must Speak Out Against Don­ald Trump’s Mus­lim Remarks (Wash­ing­ton Post, Rus­sell Moore). Relat­ed: Is An Immi­gra­tion Ban on Mus­lims Uncon­sti­tu­tion­al? (Eric Pos­ner, a law prof at U Chica­go).  Moore has been on a tear late­ly, see also his What We Lose When We Prayer Shame Politi­cians After A Mass Shoot­ing (Wash­ing­ton Post, Rus­sell Moore). “The first response to a word of our fel­low cit­i­zens in per­il should be a human response of empa­thy. For reli­gious peo­ple, that means a call to pray for them, and to encour­age oth­ers of like mind to do so…. When that becomes just anoth­er cul­ture war bat­tle­field, we’ve lost more than a set of pol­i­cy pro­pos­als. We’ve lost the social cohe­sion we need to do any­thing.”
  7. How Oba­ma’s Gun-Con­trol Push Invert­ed the Pol­i­tics of the No-Fly List (The Atlantic, David Gra­ham): this is a depress­ing com­men­tary on the polar­iza­tion of Amer­i­can pol­i­tics. See also Eric Posner’s com­ments: The Repub­li­can-Demo­c­ra­t­ic Divide on Civ­il Lib­er­ties. Relat­ed — Par­ty­ism Now Trumps Racism (Bloomberg View, Cass Sun­stein) and Polit­i­cal Iden­ti­ty Is Now Fair Game For Hatred: How Repub­li­cans and Democ­rats Dis­crim­i­nate (Vox, Ezra Klein).
  8. Quick Links:

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 27

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

To be frank, most of what I found inter­est­ing this week was turkey. The pick­ings are lit­tle slim­mer than oth­er weeks:

  1. The Chris­t­ian Cen­tu­ry No One Pre­dict­ed (Justin Tay­lor, per­son­al blog): “it was also a rever­sal in that Chris­tian­i­ty moved from being cen­tered in Chris­t­ian nations to being cen­tered in non-Chris­t­ian nations. Chris­ten­dom, that remark­able con­di­tion of church­es sup­port­ing states and states sup­port­ing Chris­tian­i­ty, died. The idea of Chris­t­ian priv­i­lege in soci­ety was all but killed. And yet the reli­gion seemed stronger than ever at the end of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry.”
  2. Ross Douthat on The Joy of ISIS (NY Times): “But if the West’s offi­cial alter­na­tive to ISIS is the full Bel­gium (basi­cal­ly good food + bureau­cra­cy + euthana­sia), if West­ern soci­ety seems like it’s closed most of the paths that human beings have tra­di­tion­al­ly fol­lowed to find tran­scen­dence, if West­ern cul­ture los­es the abil­i­ty to even imag­ine the joy that comes with full com­mit­ment, and not just the remis­sive joy of slough­ing com­mit­ments off — well, then we’re going to be sup­ply­ing at least some recruits to groups like ISIS for a very long to come.”
  3. Why Tol­er­ate Reli­gion? (First Things, Rafael Domin­go):  “The right to reli­gion is dif­fer­ent from free­dom of con­science. Con­science is a sort of pro­tec­tive shell around people’s pri­va­cy: it safe­guards them from abu­sive intru­sions by the law. Con­science marks a pri­vate lim­it of the legal sys­tem, not a pub­lic one.… The right to reli­gion demands tol­er­a­tion; free­dom of con­science demands accom­mo­da­tion.”
  4. Fear and Vot­ing on the Chris­t­ian Right (CNN, Thomas Lake). “They called her a big­ot, a homo­phobe, even a racist, which was strange, because the two gay men were white and so was Bet­ty Odgaard. The angry peo­ple on the Inter­net told Bet­ty she would die soon, that her death would be good for Amer­i­ca, and then she would prob­a­bly go to hell. Bet­ty had oth­er ideas about her final des­ti­na­tion, but she agreed it was time to go.”
  5. There’s an Awful Cost To Get­ting a Ph.D. That No One Talks About (Quartz). Also of inter­est to Chris­tians con­sid­er­ing a doc­tor­al pro­gram, The Illu­sion of Respectabil­i­ty (Chris­tian­i­ty Today, Allen Guel­zo).
  6. Chica­go School of Free Speech (Wall Street Jour­nal, L. Gor­don Crovitz): one school’s response to the tumult sweep­ing col­lege cam­pus­es. (may be behind a pay­wall)

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 25

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

There’s a lot of heavy con­tent in this one. Buck­le your seat­belt. With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. Alco­hol, Black­outs, and Cam­pus Sex­u­al Assault (Texas Month­ly, Sarah Hep­o­la): I think this is the most thought­ful sec­u­lar piece I’ve read on the issue. “Con­sent and alco­hol make tricky bed­fel­lows. The rea­son I liked get­ting drunk was because it altered my con­sent: it changed what I would say yes to. Not just in the bed­room but in every room and cor­ri­dor that led into the squint­ing light. Say yes to adven­ture, say yes to risk, say yes to karaoke and pool par­ties and argu­ments with men, say yes to a life with­out fear, even though such a life is nev­er pos­si­ble… We drink because it feels good. We drink because it makes us feel hap­py, safe, pow­er­ful. That it often makes us the oppo­site is one of alcohol’s das­tard­ly tricks.”
  2. Fatal Flaws In That Reli­gion And Gen­eros­i­ty Study (The Stream, George Yancey). Yancey is a soci­ol­o­gy prof. Relat­ed: Are Reli­gious Kids Real­ly Mean­er Than Their Coun­ter­parts? by a social psy­chol­o­gist.
  3. Now for a ton of links relat­ed to the racial inci­dents and respons­es at Yale and Miz­zou (which seem dif­fer­ent to me but which hap­pened in such close prox­im­i­ty that they are linked in the nation­al dia­log).
  4. In glob­al news: On The Brink: Chris­tian­i­ty Fac­ing Mid­dle East Purge With­in Decade, Group Says (Fox News). Sto­ries like this have led one law­mak­er to intro­duce a bill to Pri­or­i­tize Refugee Sta­tus For Chris­tians Flee­ing ISIS (The Hill). See also Islam Is A Reli­gion Of Vio­lence by Joel Miller, where­in he argues that the lack of Trini­tar­i­an doc­trine cor­rupts the Mus­lim con­cep­tion of God.
  5. Chris­t­ian Belief Cost This Man His Job: (Wall Street Jour­nal, Jason Riley): appar­ent­ly the fire chief of Atlanta was fired because of some­thing he said in a book he wrote. Note that this is an op-ed, not a news sto­ry.
  6. Hat­ing Queer­ness With­out Hat­ing The Queer (The Atlantic, Emma Green): basi­cal­ly an arti­cle-length inter­ac­tion with Albert Mohler’s book We Can­not Be Silent.
  7. Quick Links:

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 21

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. How big of a deal do you have to be for POTUS to inter­view you? Pres­i­dent Oba­ma & Mar­i­lynne Robin­son: A Con­ver­sa­tion In Iowa (NY Review of Books). You might recall that Robin­son is speak­ing at Stan­ford soon and also that I men­tioned her essay “Fear” a few emails back.
  2. Won­der­ing why peo­ple are flee­ing Syr­ia? Check out Syria’s War: A Five Minute His­to­ry (a Vox video). This is real­ly well-done. 
  3. There is also vio­lence erupt­ing in Israel. For­eign Pol­i­cy asks Can Any­one Pre­vent A Third Intifa­da?  Inci­den­tal­ly, if you won­der why peo­ple are skep­ti­cal of the way news con­cern­ing Israel is report­ed, take a look at Return­ing to the Copy Desk, Briefly (Kevin Williamson, Nation­al Review). It is a take­down of a NY Times arti­cle show­ing how much bias can creep into an appar­ent­ly objec­tive arti­cle (this is from the right cri­tiquing the left — for coun­terex­am­ples search for clips from the Dai­ly Show). Bot­tom line: it’s real­ly hard to find trust­wor­thy news about Israel.
  4. Lying About Our Reli­gion, and Oth­er Prob­lems With Polling (Reli­gion Dis­patch­es). There real­ly is a prob­lem devel­op­ing with polling, which is bad news because we rely upon polling in our nation­al life to tell us what the pub­lic thinks. Nate Sil­ver is also wor­ried about this — Polling Is Get­ting Hard­er, But It’s A Vital Check On Pow­er (FiveThir­tyEight).
    • An insight­ful obser­va­tion from the “Lying About Our Reli­gion” arti­cle: “In a democ­ra­cy with hun­dreds of mil­lions of peo­ple, how do you know what the pub­lic thinks and wants? How do you fig­ure out what binds them togeth­er, besides an annu­al oblig­a­tion to the IRS and a love of fire­works? In short: how do you know what the pub­lic is? Like many hard ques­tions, these prob­lems have been ren­dered large­ly invis­i­ble, in no small part because “The Pub­lic” and “The Amer­i­can Peo­ple” are favorite fic­tion­al char­ac­ters for politi­cians and jour­nal­ists, who speak of them with­out a trace of pre­ci­sion. So let’s indulge in a quick real­i­ty check. The Super Bowl—that nation­al spec­ta­cle that unites us around the flick­er­ing LCD hearth—had 115 mil­lion view­ers in the Unit­ed States last Feb­ru­ary; in oth­er words, near­ly two-thirds of us weren’t watch­ing it. The most-viewed polit­i­cal spec­ta­cle of the year, the State of the Union address, draws around 10% of the pop­u­la­tion. Barack Oba­ma won the 2012 pres­i­den­tial elec­tion with 62 mil­lion votes, mean­ing that few­er than 20% of us vot­ed for him. The peo­ple have spoken…kind of.”
  5. Quick links:

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 18

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

With­out fur­ther ado, I give you the inter­est­ing things:

  1. Down­ward­ly Mobile For Jesus (Lawrence Lana­han, Al Jazeera): this is a real­ly well-writ­ten and engag­ing sto­ry that weaves togeth­er faith, race, pover­ty and jus­tice.
  2. If you are in the social sci­ences, read this jour­nal arti­cle from Behav­ioral and Brain Sci­ences: Polit­i­cal Diver­si­ty Will Improve Social Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence (sum­ma­ry by one of the authors here). There is an arti­cle with relat­ed insights at The Amer­i­can Soci­ol­o­gist: How Ide­ol­o­gy Has Hin­dered Soci­o­log­i­cal Insight. There are many implied reli­gious issues at play besides the polit­i­cal ones which are the focus of these two pieces.
  3. Sad truths: The Decline and Fall Of Amer­i­can Polit­i­cal Debate (John David­son, The Fed­er­al­ist). David­son says “our frag­men­ta­tion and insu­lar­i­ty has reached a dan­ger­ous tip­ping point: we no longer agree on what’s real.” Read espe­cial­ly the sec­tion labeled “Take Two Recent Exam­ples.”
  4. A sur­pris­ingly fas­ci­nat­ing arti­cle: More Tit­il­lat­ed Than Thou: How the Amish Con­quered the Evan­gel­i­cal Romance Mar­ket (Ann Newu­mann, The Baf­fler). Real­ly.
  5. An unex­pect­ed per­spec­tive: Why The Best Thing This Gen­er­a­tion Can Do Is Put Down The Drink (Alex­ia LaFe­ta, Elite Dai­ly): the com­ments sec­tion, unsur­pris­ing­ly, is filled with vit­ri­olic objec­tions. Some of the lan­guage in the arti­cle, inci­den­tal­ly, is less than refined and gen­teel.
  6. This is Timi’s mom: Funke Opeke: Nige­ri­a’s Cyber Rev­o­lu­tion­ary (Femke van Zei­jl, Al Jazeera). I hope her name is pro­nounced the way I am pro­nounc­ing it in my head, because that would be awe­some. Also, Timi’s mom is a boss.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 17

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

  1. Fear (Mar­i­lynne Robin­son, NY Review Of Books): I don’t often find overt­ly the­o­log­i­cal pieces in the New York Review of Books, much less ones whose open­ing lines are, “Amer­i­ca is a Chris­t­ian coun­try. This is true in a num­ber of sens­es.” She’s gonna get some hate mail.
  2. Some things that made me chuck­le:
  3. Why Do Good Uni­ver­si­ties Tend To Be Good At Every­thing? (Quo­ra ques­tion): Short but insight­ful.
  4. What Stan­ford Taught Me About Grace (Seth Vil­le­gas, per­son­al blog): Seth is an alum­nus of our min­istry who is cur­rent­ly doing grad work at Fuller The­o­log­i­cal Sem­i­nary.
  5. Reli­gion and the Repub­lic (David Forte, With­er­spoon Insti­tute): the author (a law pro­fes­sor) explains the impor­tance of reli­gious speech in the pub­lic square. This seems like a good place to men­tion one of my favorite aca­d­e­m­ic papers: The Mis­sion­ary Roots of Lib­er­al Democ­ra­cy.
  6. From the I‑know-I-shared-this-last-week-but-want-to-share-it-with-the-new-stu­dents depart­ment: How To Stay Chris­t­ian On Cam­pus (David Math­is, Desir­ing God): I expect­ed some­thing very dif­fer­ent than what I got. Rec­om­mend­ed.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 16

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, on Fri­days I’ve been shar­ing articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

  1. From the rec­om­mend­ed-by-a-stu­dent depart­ment: How To Stay Chris­t­ian On Cam­pus (David Math­is, Desir­ing God): I expect­ed some­thing very dif­fer­ent than what I got. Rec­om­mend­ed.
  2. From the per­ilous times depart­ment:
  3. From the unex­pect­ed-insights-from his­to­ry-depart­ment: Morals Leg­is­la­tion, Revis­it­ed (Books and Cul­ture, David Skeel): Books and Cul­ture is an evan­gel­i­cal ver­sion of the NY Times Review of Books. This arti­cle is writ­ten by a law prof at Penn review­ing a Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty Press book about the evan­gel­i­cal ori­gins of the liv­ing con­sti­tu­tion approach to law.
  4. From the every­body-is-quot­ing-it depart­ment: Microag­gres­sion and Moral Cul­tures (Camp­bell and Man­ning, Com­par­a­tive Soci­ol­o­gy): I have seen so many peo­ple pump­ing this aca­d­e­m­ic arti­cle I am astound­ed. Three to take a look at: Conor Frieder­s­dorf in the Atlantic, Megan McAr­dle in Bloomberg View, and Jonathan Haidt on his per­son­al blog. The orig­i­nal arti­cle is descrip­tive — the response pieces tend to be eval­u­a­tive.
  5. From the prin­ci­ples-you-will-prob­a­bly-need-to-know-one-day depart­ment: When Does Your Reli­gion Legal­ly Excuse You From Doing Part of Your Job? (Wash­ing­ton Post. Eugene Volokh): this one came out right after my last email update. Volokh is a law prof at UCLA.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 12

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar. Past emails are archived at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links

  1. From the too-close-to-home depart­ment: The Cod­dling of The Amer­i­can Mind (Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, The Atlantic): the the­sis of this essay is that a “cam­pus cul­ture devot­ed to polic­ing speech and pun­ish­ing speak­ers is like­ly to engen­der pat­terns of thought that are sur­pris­ing­ly sim­i­lar to those long iden­ti­fied by cog­ni­tive behav­ioral ther­a­pists as caus­es of depres­sion and anx­i­ety.” This is a long piece but is worth read­ing even if you sus­pect it will infu­ri­ate you. There is some insight­ful com­men­tary on Red­dit argu­ing that it’s not stu­dents who have changed but admin­is­tra­tors.
  2. From the race-and-reli­gion depart­ment: A Year After Fer­gu­son, Have White Chris­tians Learned Any­thing? (Rus­sell Moore, Wash­ing­ton Post)
  3. From the con­tem­po­rary events depart­ment:
  4. From the ISIS depart­ment:
  5. From the eat-your-wheaties depart­ment: Want ‘Sus­tained Hap­pi­ness’? Get Reli­gion, Study Sug­gests (Sarah Pul­liam Bai­ley, Wash­ing­ton Post): if you have the desire, check out the orig­i­nal study in the Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Epi­demi­ol­o­gy.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 6

In the time of King David, the Bible says that the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

  1. From the sex­u­al­i­ty depart­ment: in light of the Supreme Court’s deci­sion to rede­fine mar­riage to include same-sex cou­ples I’ve got some sug­gest­ed read­ings.
  2. From the some­thing-com­plete­ly-dif­fer­ent depart­ment: On Obsti­na­cy In Belief (C.S. Lewis, The Sewa­nee Review): I was not aware of this C.S. Lewis essay before this week. It was reward­ing.
  3. From the if-it-is-not-news-can-it-be-dis­ap­point­ing-news depart­ment: How Aca­d­e­mics View Con­ser­v­a­tive Protes­tants (Yancey, Reimer, and O’Connell, Soci­ol­o­gy of Reli­gion): The lead author, a soci­ol­o­gist, blogs at Black, White and Gray and I fre­quent­ly ben­e­fit from what he shares there.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 2

In the time of King David, the Bible says that the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32).

In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world.

To that end, I share articles/resources I have found help­ful recent­ly in think­ing about broad­er cul­tur­al and soci­etal issues (be sure to see the dis­claimer at the bot­tom). I’m think­ing I’ll send these rough­ly once a week. May these give you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

  1. From the depress­ing depart­ment: Hot Girls Want­ed (Ken­neth More­field, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): a sober­ing review of a Net­flix doc­u­men­tary (from Sun­dance) about the “ama­teur” porn indus­try. Read it if you have a hard time explain­ing why pornog­ra­phy is a bad thing. Pre­pare to be bummed.

  2. From the faith and pol­i­tics depart­ment: Is Oba­ma Real­ly a Chris­t­ian? (David French, Nation­al Review): this is the most detailed arti­cle I have read about Pres­i­dent Obama’s faith.

  3. From the high­er edu­ca­tion depart­ment: I’m a Lib­er­al Pro­fes­sor, and My Lib­er­al Stu­dents Ter­ri­fy Me (Edward Schloss­er, Vox): the arti­cle is bet­ter than you might expect from the click­bait title. It’s a cri­tique of the cur­rent prac­tice of iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics at Amer­i­can uni­ver­si­ties by some­one sym­pa­thet­ic to iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics.

  4. From the learn­ing to think clear­ly depart­ment: The Land of We All (Richard Mitchell, The Gift of Fire): this essay teas­es out the impli­ca­tions of this insight: “Think­ing can not be done cor­po­rate­ly. Nations and com­mit­tees can’t think. That is not only because they have no brains, but because they have no selves, no cen­ters, no souls, if you like. Mil­lions and mil­lions of per­sons may hold the same thought, or con­vic­tion or sus­pi­cion, but each and every per­son of those mil­lions must hold it all alone.” Warn­ing: the for­mat­ting is hor­rid. It is worth read­ing any­way. Either use the Read­abil­i­ty book­marklet, an app like Pock­et, or just cut and paste it into a text doc­u­ment on your com­put­er.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and will at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles.