Tag: terrorism

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 438

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

This is vol­ume 438, which is 666 in base 8. 👀

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Don’t For­get About Niger­ian Chris­tians (Samuel Sey, per­son­al blog): “Over the last 15 years, More than 50,000 Niger­ian Chris­tians have been killed for their faith, 18,000 church­es have been destroyed, and mil­lions more have been dis­placed. In 2023, around 5,000 Chris­tians were killed world­wide because of their faith—90% of them were Nige­ri­ans.  Nige­ria is the dead­liest coun­try for Chris­tians. Every Chris­t­ian in north­ern (and some cen­tral states) Nige­ria is prob­a­bly griev­ing the loss of a spouse or a child (or both) from per­se­cu­tion.”
  2. As Kids, They Thought They Were Trans. They No Longer Do. (Pamela Paul, New York Times): “Stud­ies show that around eight in 10 cas­es of child­hood gen­der dys­pho­ria resolve them­selves by puber­ty and 30 per­cent of peo­ple on hor­mone ther­a­py dis­con­tin­ue its use with­in four years, though the effects, includ­ing infer­til­i­ty, are often irre­versible.… Trans activists often cite low regret rates for gen­der tran­si­tion, along with low fig­ures for detran­si­tion. But those stud­ies, which often rely on self-report­ed cas­es to gen­der clin­ics, like­ly under­state the actu­al num­bers. None of the sev­en detran­si­tion­ers I inter­viewed, for instance, even con­sid­ered report­ing back to the gen­der clin­ics that pre­scribed them med­ica­tion they now con­sid­er to have been a mis­take. Nor did they know any oth­er detran­si­tion­ers who had done so.”
    • Unlocked. The main point is hor­ri­fy­ing and one I’ve shared many times in this chan­nel before. A sec­ondary point which is quite inter­est­ing is how intent the author is on mak­ing this the fault of her polit­i­cal oppo­nents. Her audi­ence needs to know that her tribe is still trust­wor­thy despite mas­sive mis­takes on this issue. Par­ti­san­ship poi­sons the things it touch­es.
  3. Birth rates are falling in the Nordics. Are fam­i­ly-friend­ly poli­cies no longer enough? (Hen­ry Mance, Finan­cial Times): “…child­less­ness is also ris­ing among those who are in a rela­tion­ship. Many cou­ples are wait­ing too long. ‘Peo­ple call me a lot in Fin­land. [They say] ‘I’m 42, my part­ner has had three mis­car­riages and she says she will not con­tin­ue. And I under­stand I will nev­er be a father. I’m the only child of my par­ents, and there’s nobody left, and help me.’ Rotkirch is wary of an empha­sis on fer­til­i­ty treat­ments. Women’s fer­til­i­ty drops in their late thir­ties and for­ties: soci­ety has to adapt. ‘If you do every­thing that typ­i­cal min­is­ters of finance tell you to do, you are 45 — you have a house and a doc­tor­ate and it’s too late. The ide­alised life course is real­ly at odds with female repro­duc­tive biol­o­gy.’”
  4. Some Israel/Hamas arti­cles:
    • The UN’s Ter­ror­ism Teach­ers (Hil­lel C. Neuer, The Free Press): “UN Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al António Guter­res said he was ‘hor­ri­fied’ to dis­cov­er that UNRWA [Unit­ed Nations Relief and Works Agency for Pales­tine Refugees in the Near East] employ­ees par­tic­i­pat­ed in the inva­sion and mas­sacre of Octo­ber 7.… UNRWA employ­ees have held Israeli hostages cap­tive in their homes, using UNRWA facil­i­ties to move them from place to place.… It was only after Israel’s gov­ern­ment pro­vid­ed evi­dence that 12 of the agency’s employ­ees were actu­al­ly involved in the Octo­ber 7 mas­sacre that UNRWA and the Biden admin­is­tra­tion took some action.”
      • Wowsers.
    • How Pales­tine Hijacked the U.S. Civ­il Rights Move­ment (Gil Troy, Tablet Mag­a­zine): “The dif­fer­ences between the Pales­tin­ian nation­al move­ment and the Amer­i­can civ­il rights move­ment are obvi­ous and fun­da­men­tal. Pales­tini­ans have played no role in Amer­i­can his­to­ry or the his­to­ry of slav­ery. Pales­tini­ans played no role in the civ­il rights strug­gle. The Pales­tin­ian-Israeli clash, which is occur­ring a world away from Amer­i­ca, is nation­al not racial. Most Israelis are dark-skinned, while some Pales­tini­ans are light-skinned. Non­vi­o­lence fueled the civ­il rights strug­gle, while the Pales­tin­ian move­ment keeps per­fect­ing new forms of polit­i­cal vio­lence and ter­ror-porn, from hijack­ing to sui­cide bomb­ing.”
  5. The Mean­ing­less Inco­her­ence Of “LGBTQ+” (Andrew Sul­li­van, Sub­stack): “The trou­ble is that words have mean­ings, and the term ‘LGBTQ+’ — like the term ‘His­pan­ic’ or ‘Lati­no’ — is not like NATO. It doesn’t refer to a sin­gle, iden­ti­fi­able group, expe­ri­ence, or com­mu­ni­ty. It refers to mul­ti­ple ones. And each is dis­tinct, dis­crete and often very dif­fer­ent. When you exam­ine its com­po­nent parts, you real­ize that the Ls and Gs and Bs and Ts, let alone the Is and the +s, dif­fer dra­mat­i­cal­ly in basic things like psy­chol­o­gy, lifestyle, income, geog­ra­phy, edu­ca­tion, and pol­i­tics.… We’re con­stant­ly told, of course, that all gays and les­bians have col­lec­tive­ly co-opt­ed and des­tig­ma­tized the q‑word. But polling shows that only 3 — 4 per­cent of the entire LGBTQ+ world call them­selves ‘queer’. So the MSM rou­tine­ly uses a word for the entire ‘LGBTQ+’ world that 96 per­cent of this com­mu­ni­ty rejects. It’s up there with ‘Lat­inx’ as an accu­rate descrip­tor.”
    • Sul­li­van is one of the most influ­en­tial gay pub­lic intel­lec­tu­als. There are a lot of things he and I dis­agree about, but I near­ly always find his per­spec­tives illu­mi­nat­ing.
  6. Two arti­cles about a weird­ly intense con­tro­ver­sy about Alis­tair Begg:
    • Throw-Away Cul­ture is the Spir­it of the Sex­u­al Rev­o­lu­tion, Too. (Samuel D. James, Sub­stack): “A per­son who inter­prets their sex­u­al desires to be some sort of immov­able iden­ti­ty that must be ver­i­fied and actu­al­ized is in a very lam­en­ta­ble state. But what about the per­son who inter­prets their quick tem­per, their sus­pi­cion of oth­er Chris­tians, and their desire to build a plat­form atop the ruins of oth­ers’, as like­wise an immov­able iden­ti­ty— ‘I just know what time it is’? Theirs is hard­ly bet­ter. The Chris­t­ian life doesn’t work like that.”
    • Alis­tair Begg Meets the Polit­i­cal­ly Cor­rect (Rus­sell Moore, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): “Might Begg be draw­ing the line in the wrong place—too much in the direc­tion of show­ing grace? Sure. Might I be draw­ing it in the wrong place—too much in the direc­tion of main­tain­ing truth? Again, yes. He risks con­fus­ing peo­ple. I risk hurt­ing peo­ple. That’s why I think we both attempt to sort these out with fear and trem­bling and a will­ing­ness to be cor­rect­ed.”
  7. Reli­gious peo­ple coped bet­ter with Covid-19 pan­dem­ic, research sug­gests (Fred Lewsey, Cam­bridge Research News): “Where men­tal health declined, it was around 60% worse on aver­age for the non-reli­gious com­pared to peo­ple of faith with typ­i­cal lev­els of ‘reli­gios­i­ty’. Inter­est­ing­ly, the pos­i­tive effects of reli­gion were not found in areas with strictest lock­downs, sug­gest­ing access to places of wor­ship might be even more impor­tant in a US con­text. The study also found sig­nif­i­cant uptake of online reli­gious ser­vices, and a 40% low­er asso­ci­a­tion between Covid-19 and men­tal health for those who used them.”
    • How hor­ri­ble the pan­dem­ic must have been for those with­out faith. I hat­ed it and I’m a min­is­ter!

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 218

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. “We May Have To Shoot Down This Air­craft” (Gar­rett Graff, Politi­co): “We can’t see the air­craft. We don’t know where it is because we don’t have any radars point­ing into the U.S. Any­thing in the Unit­ed States was con­sid­ered friend­ly by def­i­n­i­tion.” A grip­ping account of the Flight 93 sto­ry.
  2. Active Learn­ing Works But Stu­dents Don’t Like It (Alex Tabar­rok, Mar­gin­al Rev­o­lu­tion): “A care­ful­ly done study that held stu­dents and teach­ers con­stant shows that stu­dents learn more in active learn­ing class­es but they dis­like this style of class and think they learn less. It’s no big surprise–active learn­ing is hard and makes the stu­dents feel stu­pid. It’s much eas­i­er to sit back and be enter­tained by a great lec­tur­er who makes every­thing seem sim­ple.”
  3. How Evan­gel­i­cals Invent­ed Lib­er­als’ Favorite Legal Doc­trine (Matthew Lee Ander­son, The Fed­er­al­ist): “…with­in the many ironies of his­to­ry, the social and polit­i­cal instru­ments a per­fec­tion­ist move­ment deploys may be eas­i­ly co-opt­ed for ends and pur­pos­es nev­er imag­ined in their devel­op­ment. That is, if late-twen­ti­eth-cen­tu­ry evan­gel­i­cal activists sowed the wind, today’s activists have reaped the whirl­wind.” I love arti­cles that present a top­ic I think I know some­thing about and pro­ceed to show me some­thing I had nev­er known before.
  4. A Famous Argu­ment Against Free Will Has Been Debunked (Bahar Gholipour, The Atlantic): “It would be quite an achieve­ment for a brain sig­nal 100 times small­er than major brain waves to solve the prob­lem of free will. But the sto­ry of the Bere­itschaftspo­ten­tial has one more twist: It might be some­thing else entire­ly.”
  5. Vik­tor Orban Among The Chris­tians (Rod Dreher, The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive): “Orban is what Trump’s biggest fans wish he was (but isn’t), and what Trump’s ene­mies think him to be (but isn’t). If Don­ald Trump had the smarts and skills of Vik­tor Orban, the polit­i­cal sit­u­a­tion in the US would be much, much dif­fer­ent — for bet­ter or for worse, depend­ing on your point of view.” I don’t have much inter­est in Hun­gar­i­an pol­i­tics, but this fas­ci­nat­ed me. 
  6. When the Cul­ture War Comes for the Kids (George Pack­er, The Atlantic): “I asked myself if I was mov­ing to the wrong side of a great moral cause because its tone was too loud, because it shook loose what I didn’t want to give up. It took me a long time to see that the new pro­gres­sivism didn’t just car­ry my own pol­i­tics fur­ther than I liked. It was actu­al­ly hos­tile to prin­ci­ples with­out which I don’t believe democ­ra­cy can sur­vive.” This arti­cle came high­ly rec­om­mend­ed, but it only got inter­est­ing to me about halfway through — and then wow.
  7. Con­ser­v­a­tives Clash on the Goal of Gov­ern­ment (Jonathan Lee­man, Prov­i­dence): “There is no neu­tral­i­ty. The pub­lic square is a bat­tle­ground of gods. Our cul­ture wars are wars of reli­gion. For the time being, lib­er­al­ism keeps us from pick­ing up six­teenth-cen­tu­ry swords for those wars, which is no small achieve­ment. But don’t assume it won’t con­trol us with the sub­tler tools of a twen­ty-first cen­tu­ry legal total­i­tar­i­an­ism.” Insight­ful reflec­tions on how Chris­tians should form their polit­i­cal posi­tions.

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Things Glen Found Interesting A While Ago

Every week I’ll high­light an old­er link still worth your con­sid­er­a­tion. This week we have Elisha and the She‐bears (Peter J Williams, Twit­ter): an insight­ful Twit­ter thread about a dis­turb­ing OT sto­ry. The author is the War­den of Tyn­dale House at Cam­bridge. First shared in vol­ume 179.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 191

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Why Hol­ly­wood megachurch­es like Hill­song hide their true teach­ings (Drew Goins, Wash­ing­ton Post): “Celebri­ty megachurch­es have every incen­tive to obscure where they stand on LGBTQ peo­ple. One of the con­tem­po­rary enter­tain­ment industry’s strongest claims to social rel­e­vance is stars’ par­tic­i­pa­tion in the fight for LGBT equal­i­ty.”
    • David French fired back: Will Woke Pro­gres­sives Allow Celebri­ties to Be Chris­t­ian? (David French, Nation­al Review): “Here is the dis­tinc­tion that makes no sense. An ortho­dox Chris­t­ian and (to take an exam­ple) a mar­ried sec­u­lar gay employ­ee work side by side. They dis­agree with each oth­er about mat­ters absolute­ly fun­da­men­tal to their lives and iden­ti­ties. The sec­u­lar gay employ­ee believes the Christian’s world­view is false. The Chris­t­ian employ­ee believes the sec­u­lar gay employee’s world­view is false. Why is it unique­ly intol­er­a­ble or even inju­ri­ous for the gay employ­ee to have to share the work­place (much less the indus­try) with the Chris­t­ian? Do they not have the same oblig­a­tions to set aside their dif­fer­ences and treat each oth­er with dig­ni­ty and respect?”
    • A Stan­ford illus­tra­tion: Stan­ford Live part­ners with alleged anti-LGBTQ pro­mot­er for Frost (Car­o­line Ghisolfi, Stan­ford Dai­ly)- “The report alleged that the Anschutz Foun­da­tion fund­ed sev­er­al con­ser­v­a­tive anti-LGBTQ orga­ni­za­tions between 2011 and 2013, includ­ing the Alliance Defend­ing Free­dom (ADF), a con­ser­v­a­tive Chris­t­ian activist group which has ‘repeat­ed­ly advo­cat­ed for the crim­i­nal­iza­tion of homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, both in the U.S. and inter­na­tion­al­ly.’ ” This is an unusu­al way to describe ADF, which is a promi­nent legal orga­ni­za­tion with an envi­able 9–0 record at the Supreme Court. David French, who wrote the arti­cle in the pre­vi­ous bul­let point, is for­mer senior coun­sel for ADF.
  2. Regard­ing Jussie Smol­lett:
    • What The Jussie Smol­lett Sto­ry Reveals (John McWhort­er, The Atlantic(: “Smol­lett doesn’t need the mon­ey he would get from a court set­tle­ment, and he isn’t try­ing to deny some­one high­er office. So why in the world would he fake some­thing like that attack—if he did indeed fake it? The rea­son might be that he has come of age in an era when noth­ing he could have done or said would have made him look more inter­est­ing than being attacked on the basis of his col­or and sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion.” — the most insight­ful take I’ve seen
    • This is fas­ci­nat­ing: Fake Hate Crimes Data­base — the quan­ti­ty of these hoax­es strength­en’s McWhort­er’s point in the pre­vi­ous arti­cle
    • Politi­cians use Jussie Smol­lett, while a 1‑year-old boy shot in the head is set aside (John Cass, Chica­go Tri­bune):- “A few weeks ago, after Smol­lett began telling his tale — in which he’s the hero fight­ing oppres­sion and hatred — a 1‑year-old child was shot in the head.It looked like a street gang may have been tar­get­ing his moth­er. She’s been shot before. The child, Dejon Irv­ing, is on life support.I don’t think there were two dozen detec­tives assigned to Dejon Irving’s case. But he’s not a star to be used by politi­cians in pur­suit of pow­er. He’s not a symbol.Politicians don’t tweet his name. He’s just a lit­tle boy from Chica­go, shot in the head.” Ouch.
    • Peo­ple Fake Can­cer, Too (Fred­die deBoer, per­son­al blog): “I don’t with­hold sym­pa­thy until I ‘get all the facts’ and I don’t begin from a posi­tion of total neu­tral­i­ty. I begin from a posi­tion of sym­pa­thy and lis­ten­ing regard­less of the fact that some peo­ple fake can­cer.”
  3. The Risk Of Pro­gres­sives Talk­ing Over Mar­gin­al­ized Com­mu­ni­ties (Jesse Sin­gal, per­son­al blog): “…if you’re a pro­gres­sive who is call­ing for the Wash­ing­ton foot­ball team to change its name, or for Ralph Northam to resign, because of the harm that foot­ball team name and that gov­er­nor did to mar­gin­al­ized peo­ple, it should feel very weird that the actu­al groups most affect­ed most­ly dis­agree with you, no? Or if it doesn’t feel weird, why doesn’t it feel weird?” — this is an impor­tant point I rarely see dis­cussed.
  4. White suprema­cist Coast Guard offi­cer stock­piled firearms and hit list of Democ­rats for mass ter­ror attack (Haley Britzky, Task & Purpose):“A search of Has­son’s home revealed 15 firearms and over 1,000 rounds of ammo along with a hit list of tar­gets that includ­ed includ­ing promi­nent Demo­c­ra­t­ic politi­cians — includ­ing Sen­ate Minor­i­ty Leader Chuck Schumer, House Speak­er Nan­cy Pel­soi [sic], Demo­c­ra­t­ic new­com­er Rep. Alexan­dria Oca­sio-Cortez — and media per­son­al­i­ties like MSNBC’s Joe Scar­bor­ough and Chris Hayes.” 👀
  5. Why Join A Fra­ter­ni­ty (Rod Dreher, The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive): rec­om­mend­ing this one for the update at the bot­tom of the post: “There is so much wrong­head­ed­ness in the way uni­ver­si­ties attempt to reg­u­late fra­ter­ni­ties, which has led to dire out­comes, and it is only going to get worse.”
  6. Dear Gay Catholic Priests (Jen­nifer Fitz, Patheos): “I’ve been read­ing about your plight in the New York Times. So let’s go ahead and clear some­thing up right now: Most Catholics don’t give a rip who it is you’re not hav­ing sex with. We know that absti­nence is hard.”
  7. Chris­tian­i­ty Today Appoints Tim­o­thy Dal­rym­ple as New Pres­i­dent and CEO (Mark Gal­li, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): “He took his pas­sions for min­istry, learn­ing, and ath­let­ic achieve­ment with him to Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty. When his gym­nas­tics career end­ed in a bro­ken neck, he plunged into cam­pus min­istry and over­seas mis­sions trips. He became pres­i­dent of Stanford’s Cam­pus Cru­sade (Cru) chap­ter. It was also at Stan­ford where he met his wife, Joyce. Both helped to lead a Chris­t­ian uni­ty move­ment on cam­pus that brought togeth­er stu­dents from all the university’s Chris­t­ian fel­low­ships to wor­ship God with one anoth­er.” #nerd­na­tion

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Things Glen Found Interesting A While Ago

Every week I’ll high­light an old­er link still worth your con­sid­er­a­tion. This week we have Every Place Has Detrac­tors. Con­sid­er Where They’re Com­ing From. (Megan McAr­dle, Bloomberg View): “There is grave dan­ger in judg­ing a neigh­bor­hood, or a cul­ture, by the accounts of those who chose to leave it. Those peo­ple are least like­ly to appre­ci­ate the good things about where they came from, and the most like­ly to dwell on its less attrac­tive qual­i­ties.” Bear this in mind when lis­ten­ing to con­ver­sion tes­ti­monies (both sec­u­lar and reli­gious). (first shared in vol­ume 62)

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent.

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 102

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Tran­script of New Orleans May­or Landrieu’s address on Con­fed­er­ate mon­u­ments (Derek Cos­son, The Pulse): “To lit­er­al­ly put the con­fed­er­a­cy on a pedestal in our most promi­nent places of hon­or is an inac­cu­rate recita­tion of our full past, it is an affront to our present, and it is a bad pre­scrip­tion for our future.”
  2. Rod Dreher’s A Mon­u­men­tal His­to­ry offers a gen­er­al agree­ment with Lan­drieu’s speech along with a thought­ful defense of Robert E. Lee. “I am only some­what trou­bled by the Lee monument’s removal. That’s not because of any sym­pa­thy for the Con­fed­er­a­cy — it deserved to lose, and the suf­fer­ing of the South in and after the war was, I believe, God’s judg­ment on it for the sin of slav­ery…. [nonethe­less] Lee was a far more com­plex man than many peo­ple today seem to real­ize.” (Dreher is also a Louisiana res­i­dent)
  3. Col­lege Fresh­men Are Less Reli­gious Than Ever (Allen Downey, Sci­en­tif­ic Amer­i­can): “Most of this growth [of ‘no reli­gious pref­er­ence’] comes at the expense of Catholi­cism, which dropped from 32 per­cent to 23 per­cent, and main­stream Protes­tant denom­i­na­tions includ­ing Bap­tists (from 17 per­cent to 7 per­cent), and Methodists (from 9 per­cent to 3 per­cent). At the same time the num­ber of stu­dents choos­ing ‘Oth­er Chris­t­ian’ increased from 5 per­cent to 13 per­cent.”
  4. UK Mus­lims Report­ed Abe­di (Rod Dreher, The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive): “What else would you have had these Mus­lims do? Sounds like they did exact­ly what they were sup­posed to do… [On the oth­er hand] what more would you have author­i­ties do? If he had not act­ed out… what do you do?” Things are com­plex. And yes, this is the same Rod Dreher as in the sec­ond entry on this list. He’s pro­lif­ic. 
  5. Sex­u­al regret in US and Nor­way: Effects of cul­ture and indi­vid­ual dif­fer­ences in reli­gios­i­ty and mat­ing strat­e­gy (Ben­dix­en, Asao, Wyck­off, Buss and Ken­nair, Per­son­al­i­ty and Indi­vid­ual Dif­fer­ences):  From the abstract: “Men were sig­nif­i­cant­ly less like­ly to regret hav­ing had casu­al sex than women and were sig­nif­i­cant­ly more like­ly to regret pass­ing up casu­al sex­u­al oppor­tu­ni­ties than women… Final­ly, North Amer­i­cans and Nor­we­gians did not dif­fer sig­nif­i­cant­ly in over­all amount of sex­u­al regret nor in pat­terns of sex dif­fer­ences in sex­u­al regret.” I’m always fas­ci­nat­ed by gen­der dif­fer­ences that tran­scend cul­tures. 

Things Glen Found Amusing

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it).

Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it.

Archives at http://glenandpaula.com/wordpress/category/links.