Notes from Faith in the Halls of Power

I read D. Michael Lind­say’s Faith in the Halls of Pow­er: How Evan­gel­i­cals Joined the Amer­i­can Elite a while ago and have been mean­ing to post some excerpts from it for a while now. It’s a fas­ci­nat­ing soci­o­log­i­cal study of Amer­i­can evan­gel­i­cal lead­ers (not just the lead­ers of Amer­i­can evan­gel­i­cal­ism but also lead­ers in soci­ety who are evan­gel­i­cals). In addi­tion to exist­ing research, Lind­say based his con­clu­sions on inter­views with 360 lead­ers drawn from four cat­e­gories: polit­i­cal lead­ers, intel­lec­tu­al lead­ers, busi­ness lead­ers, and min­istry lead­ers.

Here are some para­graphs that caught my atten­tion.

Page 33:

I found the fol­low­ing quote from Ger­man the­olo­gian Mar­tin Luther on one polit­i­cal leader’s desk: “The very ablest youth should be reserved and edu­cat­ed not for the office of preach­ing, but for gov­ern­ment, because in preach­ing the Holy Spir­it does it all, where­as in gov­ern­ment one must exer­cise rea­son in the shad­owy realms where ambi­gu­i­ty and uncer­tain­ty are the order of the day.”

And this is why we count it a suc­cess when our grad­u­ates go into the work­force, gov­ern­men­tal ser­vice, or acad­e­mia. We do want some grad­u­ates to fol­low us into voca­tion­al min­istry but not most.

Page 77:

At the same time, evan­gel­i­cals were estab­lish­ing cam­pus out­reach groups. Some, such as the Prince­ton Evan­gel­i­cal Fel­low­ship, had been present on elite cam­pus­es for a cou­ple of decades. The Cru­sad­er Club—later renamed the Ambassadors—began as a group of evan­gel­i­cal stu­dents from Princeton’s Class of 1912. Their influ­ence is remark­able. One of its founders, for exam­ple, was Samuel Shoe­mak­er, who lat­er helped estab­lish Alco­holics Anony­mous. Shoemaker’s twelve-step pro­gram for over­com­ing addic­tion was for­mu­lat­ed in this cam­pus group.

Cam­pus min­istry has a dis­pro­por­tion­ate impact on cul­ture — I’ll have to add this to my list of anec­dotes. It’s going to go right up there with the long-term impact of the Holy Club at Oxford watch what we do is secret online .

Page 79:

Anoth­er impor­tant fac­tor is that evan­gel­i­cal young adults tend to become evan­gel­i­cal adults: They are much less like­ly than oth­ers to aban­don their faith. Hence, evan­gel­i­cal chil­dren attend­ing selec­tive uni­ver­si­ties become alum­ni and donors. This devel­op­ment may be at the crux of the evan­gel­i­cal intel­lec­tu­al renais­sance.

He foot­notes Hout, Gree­ley, and Wilde “The Demo­graph­ic Imper­a­tive in Reli­gious Change in the Unit­ed States”, Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Soci­ol­o­gy 107:468–500 (2001) for this data. I’m encour­aged by this obser­va­tion — I’ve intu­itive­ly known for a while that if stu­dents make it through col­lege with a fer­vent faith in Christ they’re like­ly to main­tain it for a life­time. It’s nice to see that research agrees with me. 😉

Page 85:

Evan­gel­i­cals’ sup­port is geared not only to the Ivy League but also to a vari­ety of selec­tive, non­sec­tar­i­an insti­tu­tions. For exam­ple, one of the CEOs I spoke to gives schol­ar­ship mon­ey to his under­grad­u­ate insti­tu­tion, Amherst Col­lege. The funds are pri­mar­i­ly award­ed to active stu­dent vol­un­teers in such a way that ‘the schol­ar­ships have [typ­i­cal­ly] been giv­en to Chris­tians.’ Sev­er­al peo­ple told that they pre­fer not to give mon­ey to what they call the ‘crap­py schools’ that pop­u­late the evan­gel­i­cal sub­cul­ture but instead pre­fer to con­tribute funds to ‘seri­ous’ places like Har­vard and Yale, while tar­get­ing par­tic­u­lar schol­ars or pro­grams that wel­come and engage evan­gel­i­cals.

Very inter­est­ing. Very inter­est­ing indeed. If any­one wants to estab­lish a Cen­ter for Evan­gel­i­cal (or even Pen­te­costal) Spir­i­tu­al­i­ty at Stan­ford, give me a call. I have some ideas…

Page 90:

This kind of intel­lec­tu­al explo­ration of Chris­tian­i­ty is not uncom­mon among the lead­ers I inter­viewed, espe­cial­ly those who attend­ed sec­u­lar uni­ver­si­ties. Typ­i­cal­ly, these explo­rations begin with pri­vate reflec­tion and indi­vid­ual read­ing, often books by evan­gel­i­cal authors seek­ing to offer a defense of Chris­t­ian con­vic­tions. The most pop­u­lar of these writ­ers is C. S. Lewis, who was an Oxford tutor and Cam­bridge pro­fes­sor of medieval lit­er­a­ture. Lewis, who died in 1963, wrote dozens of schol­ar­ly and pop­u­lar books, but per­haps his most famous is Mere Chris­tian­i­ty, a slim vol­ume pub­lished in 1952. The book is based on a series of fif­teen-minute radio talks he deliv­ered on the BBC in the 1940s. Near­ly one in four of the peo­ple I inter­viewed men­tioned Lewis’ influ­ence on their own spir­i­tu­al jour­ney, and many have read his works mul­ti­ple times. One CEO told me, “I’ve read Mere Chris­tian­i­ty six times… I almost have it mem­o­rized.”

While these inves­ti­ga­tions usu­al­ly begin in pri­vate, most of the peo­ple I spoke to said a cam­pus group helped solid­i­fy their faith. These groups are the back­bone of evan­gel­i­cal net­works.

It’s good to know that Chi Alpha is a ver­te­brae in the back­bone of the major evan­gel­i­cal net­works in Amer­i­ca, because some­times we feel like ves­ti­gial organs. I need to get the last sen­tence of that quote into the hands of every Assem­blies of God pas­tor in my dis­trict. 😉

Also, it’s worth not­ing that most con­verts read lit­er­a­ture before con­vert­ing (at least, those who go on to posi­tions of influ­ence do). I should give away more books…

Page 91:

Col­lec­tive­ly, they [the evan­gel­i­cal cam­pus min­istries] reached a siz­able num­ber of under­grad­u­ates. At Prince­ton alone, for exam­ple, I found approx­i­mate­ly four hun­dred under­grad­u­ate students—close to 10 per­cent of the stu­dent body—regularly involved in one or more evan­gel­i­cal groups on cam­pus. And the num­ber of stu­dents involved with the Har­vard chap­ter of Cam­pus Cru­sade has increased five­fold over the last two decades. These find­ings mir­ror wider trends with­in the Ivy League. They still do not reach large seg­ments of the stu­dent body (except per­haps at Prince­ton), but these and oth­er evan­gel­i­cal groups like Inter­Var­si­ty Chris­t­ian Fel­low­ship and cam­pus min­istries for par­tic­u­lar eth­nic groups have seen sim­i­lar groups. Tak­en togeth­er, these point to a sig­nif­i­cant shift on the cam­pus­es of America’s top uni­ver­si­ties.

Woot!

Pages 140–141

“Being There,” an essay by poet and jour­nal­ist Steve Turn­er, has become a man­i­festo for expand­ing the evan­gel­i­cal pres­ence in main­stream cul­ture. Turn­er urges evan­gel­i­cals to cre­ate pro­fes­sion­al and per­son­al com­mu­ni­ties in cul­tur­al cen­ters so that they can reach gen­er­al audi­ences. This is some­times referred to as a “min­istry of pres­ence.” Increas­ing­ly evan­gel­i­cals have rec­og­nized the val­ue of “being present” in cen­ters of elite cul­tur­al pro­duc­tion…. Across the evan­gel­i­cal land­scape a “the­ol­o­gy of the city” has emerged. Sev­er­al peo­ple I spoke to said they were inspired by a pas­sage in Jere­mi­ah 29 where the prophet admon­ished the exiled Jews to seek the peace and pros­per­i­ty of their cities, even though they were in areas pop­u­lat­ed, and ruled, by Baby­lon­ian pagans. I was struck by the num­ber of people—all of whom were work­ing places of elite cul­tur­al production—who referred to this pas­sage. Evan­gel­i­cals liv­ing and work­ing in these cos­mopoli­tan cen­ters iden­ti­fy with the exiled Jews, for any of them feel a great deal of ten­sion between the worlds of their faith and their pro­fes­sion. They referred to urban cen­ters as “flash­points” on the “bat­tle lines” between peo­ple of faith and their sec­u­lar oppo­nents and point­ed to mis­sion­ary activ­i­ties of the ear­ly church that cen­tered along trade routes. These are jus­ti­fi­ca­tions evan­gel­i­cals offer for their involvement—not nec­es­sar­i­ly expla­na­tions that they give to out­siders, but ways they legit­i­mate their involve­ment to fel­low believ­ers.

The essay he ref­er­ences is Steve Turn­er “Being There: A Vision For Chris­tian­i­ty and the Arts” Trin­i­ty Sem­i­nary Review 21 (1999): 25–33 – I can’t find it online, oth­er­wise I would link to it.

Page 165:

As anoth­er busi­ness leader told me [explain­ing why he wasn’t a pas­tor], “There are plen­ty of Chris­tians work­ing on Sun­day morn­ing…. There is no more Chris­t­ian hour in the coun­try than from eleven to noon on Sun­day morn­ings. But Tues­day after­noon seemed open.”

Page 177–178:

Evan­gel­i­cal busi­ness lead­ers also say faith influ­ences adver­tis­ing and cor­po­rate spon­sor­ships. I inter­viewed Jockey’s CEO, Debra Waller, in the company’s Man­hat­tan show­room, which was lined with larg­er-than-life pho­tos of mod­els in Jock­ey under­wear. I told Waller that I had nev­er con­duct­ed an inter­view sur­round­ed by so much human flesh. She replied, “Well, we have inten­tion­al­ly decid­ed to stay away from the more provoca­tive, sexy type of adver­tis­ing.” When pressed about the extent to which her evan­gel­i­cal faith shapes adver­tis­ing deci­sions, Waller, who remains per­son­al­ly involved in approv­ing all of the firm’s adver­tis­ing, point­ed out that all Jock­ey mod­els wear wed­ding rings in pho­to shoots involv­ing both men and women, imply­ing that the cou­ple in the ads is mar­ried. She also stip­u­lates, “a man and a woman can’t look like a pret­zel…. Peo­ple hug­ging each oth­er in this sit­u­a­tion would be very believ­able,” but the ad must not demon­strate any­thing more “inti­mate” than that.

Heh. It’s that sto­ry that made me want to read the book after I stum­bled across it in Andy Crouch’s review

jack and the beanstalk the real sto­ry online down­load

afro samu­rai res­ur­rec­tion dvd of Lind­say’s work.

Pages 10 and 220:

Sur­pris­ing­ly, more than half of all lead­ers talked about embrac­ing the evan­gel­i­cal approach to faith—“deciding to fol­low Jesus,” in evan­gel­i­cal parlance—after high school. Evangelicalism’s most pro­lif­ic poll­ster, George Bar­na, has found that “if peo­ple do not embrace Jesus Christ as their sav­ior before they reach their teenage years, the chance of their doing so at all is slim.” This sug­gests that Amer­i­can lead­ers’ spir­i­tu­al jour­neys are notice­ably dif­fer­ent from those of the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion. Faith is impor­tant to them, but they gen­er­al­ly embrace it lat­er in life.… a major­i­ty of those [evan­gel­i­cal lead­ers] I inter­viewed (56 per­cent) embraced evan­gel­i­cal­ism after age sev­en­teen, and over one-quar­ter were not raised in church­go­ing fam­i­lies.

This find­ing is extreme­ly sig­nif­i­cant for explain­ing the strate­gic impor­tance of col­lege min­istry. While most Chris­tians get saved at a young age, those Chris­tians who wind up exert­ing the most influ­ence on soci­ety dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly come from those saved in cam­pus min­istry (espe­cial­ly at elite uni­ver­si­ties) or lat­er. The num­ber I hear tossed around is usu­al­ly 80% — “80% of every­one who gets saved gets saved in chil­dren’s or youth min­istry.” If that is accu­rate (and I don’t know what the real sta­tis­tic is), then some­one who con­verts in col­lege is 5 times as like­ly to become a sig­nif­i­cant leader in our cul­ture as some­one who con­verts as a child.

Page 224

…soci­ol­o­gist Sal­ly Gal­lagher has shown that though evan­gel­i­cals pay lip ser­vice to male head­ship in the fam­i­ly, few fam­i­lies actu­al­ly behave that way. Evan­gel­i­cal women join the Amer­i­can work­force at the same rate as women in the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion. And con­trary to claims that evan­gel­i­cal belief con­tributes to domes­tic vio­lence, church­go­ing evan­gel­i­cals have the low­est rates of domes­tic vio­lence of any reli­gious group in the coun­try. Evan­gel­i­cal fathers are more active and expres­sive with their chil­dren and more emo­tion­al­ly engaged with their wives. This has led soci­ol­o­gist Brad Wilcox to con­clude that if evan­gel­i­cals main­tain a patri­archy, “theirs is a very soft patri­archy.”

That needs to be said more often. Evan­gel­i­cals get a bum rap that we don’t deserve. He foot­notes Sal­ly Gal­lagher Evan­gel­i­cal Iden­ti­ty and Gen­dered Fam­i­ly Life 2003 and Brad Wilcox Soft Patri­archs, New Men: How Chris­tian­i­ty Shapes Fathers and Hus­bands 2004

Page 289:

The Protes­tant and Catholic tra­di­tions have long rec­og­nized the legit­i­ma­cy of two forms of reli­gious orga­ni­za­tion: modal­i­ties and sodal­i­ties. Anchored by geo­graph­i­cal func­tion, a modal­i­ty is a per­ma­nent, local­ized reli­gious struc­ture that serves a range of con­stituents. The tra­di­tion­al church parish exem­pli­fies a reli­gious modal­i­ty, serv­ing young and old alike. By con­trast, a sodal­i­ty focus­es on par­tic­u­lar reli­gious func­tions and is not teth­ered to geog­ra­phy in the same way. Exam­ples include medieval Catholic orders and Protes­tant mis­sion­ary agen­cies. Sodal­i­ties serve more spe­cial­ized func­tions than modal­i­ties. Dur­ing the Ref­or­ma­tion, Luther tried to erad­i­cate sodal­i­ties from the church, but by the time of William Carey in the nine­teenth cen­tu­ry, Protes­tants had redis­cov­ered the tac­ti­cal ben­e­fits of sodal­i­ties, find­ing them help­ful in accom­plish­ing goals that were larg­er than could be under­tak­en by a sin­gle con­gre­ga­tion.

Hey, I’m part of a sodal­i­ty

divx leg­end of zor­ro the

. Who knew? It seems that there’s prob­a­bly a lot of lit­er­a­ture on this that I’ve been com­plete­ly unaware of that would be ger­mane to the con­tem­po­rary debate about para­church orga­ni­za­tions.

Pages 297 & 300:

Dye’s exam­i­na­tion (2002) of the struc­ture of insti­tu­tion­al pow­er in the Unit­ed States reveals that 54 per­cent of the nation’s cor­po­rate lead­ers and 42 per­cent of gov­ern­ment lead­ers today grad­u­at­ed from one of twelve high­ly selec­tive uni­ver­si­ties…. The eight Ivy League cam­pus­es (Brown, Colum­bia, Cor­nell, Dart­mouth, Har­vard, Uni­ver­si­ty of Penn­syl­va­nia, Prince­ton, and Yale), the Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go, Duke Uni­ver­si­ty, Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty, and Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty.

He foot­notes Thomas R. Dye Who Is Run­ning Amer­i­ca? The Bush Restora­tion. 7th ed. (2002).

Two thoughts:
1) Stan­ford made the list!
2) Chi Alpha still isn’t touch­ing most of those cam­pus­es. Sad.hit­man dvd

The Year of the Rat

65524

Win­ter quar­ter is wind­ing down, and so we had our last offi­cial func­tion this Fri­day. One of our stu­dents, Andy, made an awe­some lit­tle treat. Take a cher­ry, cov­er it in choco­late, affix a Her­shey’s kiss to the non-stem end, add some almond chips for ears, and dec­o­rate the face. Voila!

I’m not sure what the prop­er name for this treat is, but I’m per­son­al­ly call­ing them “Calo­rie Vec­tors.”

They’re cute as a but­ton. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, I’ve had to kill five rats in my apart­ment over the last two weeks, so I took vis­cer­al sat­is­fac­tion in slow­ly low­er­ing the lit­tle choco­late rodents into my mouth and swal­low­ing them like a snake.

Any­way, good luck to all my stu­dents with their finals! Enjoy spring break.

amer­i­can in paris an moviedown­load xiii dvd

Chi Alpha Coast to Coast

I just read a great arti­cle about Chi Alpha nation­wide

shake­speare in love online

. It’s full of encour­ag­ing tes­ti­monies — includ­ing sto­ries from sev­er­al of my friends.

There’s one sto­ry I remem­ber from my under­grad days:

Min­istry real estate can be scarce on a sec­u­lar cam­pus. When Treuil came to Lafayette, Chi Alpha had no facil­i­ties.

“I inher­it­ed a two-draw­er file cab­i­net,” he says.

Today, the Lafayette chap­ter owns prop­er­ty esti­mat­ed at $1 mil­lion and com­plete­ly paid for.

A local busi­ness­man paid the rent on a house for about 5 years. A non-Chris­t­ian group was poised to buy the house in 1993 when the land­lord offered to sell the prop­er­ty to Chi Alpha. The catch — Treuil had to raise $90,000 in 90 days.

“We didn’t have the mon­ey, but we took a step of faith,” he says.

In 90 days God pro­vid­ed more than $90,000 in cash from indi­vid­ual offer­ings. Pas­tors opened their pul­pits to Treuil. One man donat­ed a Rolex watch. A woman gave Treuil eel-skin purs­es to sell. About 600 peo­ple con­tributed.

It was pret­ty amaz­ing to watch God pro­vide like that — and now the min­istry there owns not only the orig­i­nal prop­er­ty, but almost an entire block across the street from cam­pus that they use for min­istry. God is doing stuff like that through Chi Alpha min­istries on 250 cam­pus­es! Read the full arti­cle.born divx

Orant

I just learned a cool word: orant

down­load eagle eye online (on Wikipedia

and Brit­tan­i­ca

).

It means to wor­ship or pray with your hands raised. That’s some­thing I do a lot, but I did­n’t know it had a name beyond “rais­ing your hands”.

I don’t expect that I’ll ever have a chance to use this word in casu­al con­ver­sa­tion (and I real­ly don’t think it would be good while lead­ing wor­ship — “I said assume the orant posi­tion. Do it now!”), but it’s a cool word to have bounc­ing around in my head.

Even The Opera?

Even the opera is get­ting in on the mul­ti-site move­ment

faith of my fathers divx down­load .

If you don’t know what I’m refer­ring to, the mul­ti-site move­ment pathol­o­gy dvdrip down­load is a trend among church­es to use tech­nol­o­gy to meet in mul­ti­ple loca­tions at once.

And now the opera is doing it too.

So what do opera and the church have in com­mon that make them both ide­al for a mul­ti-site expe­ri­ence?

Valentine's Day — Chi Alpha Style

Some of the Chi Alpha fel­las made a Valen­tine’s Day video for our Chi Alpha gals. I thought it came out well: http://youtube.com/watch?v=Bs34q2K91Po down­load lena bak­er sto­ry the online

long week­end the movie

It's Been One Of Those Days

Before start­ing the work­day this morn­ing, I fin­ished online traf­fic school (you can do that in Cal­i­for­nia) due to a speed­ing tick­et from the end of last year. One of the more pro­found lessons I learned — and I quote — “do not dri­ve with nails in your tires.” I guess I was speed­ing because I lacked that knowl­edge. Good thing I got that cleared up.

After fin­ish­ing traf­fic school I head­ed for the show­er. Upon emerg­ing, I dis­cov­ered that Dana had very near­ly bro­ken Xan­der’s fin­ger by slam­ming the door on it. His pinky was com­pressed to about 1/4 of its nor­mal diam­e­ter and was a dull gray in col­or. Even after it returned to its nor­mal size and col­or, we were still a lit­tle wor­ried. For­tu­nate­ly, he had a sched­uled doc­tor’s appoint­ment and the doc­tor con­firmed that his fin­ger was A‑OK. And then gave him three shots. Poor guy.

On top of all that, Paula was sick.

And I got around to answer­ing a let­ter from my dis­trict ask­ing me to serve on the Par­lia­men­tary Com­mit­tee at Dis­trict Coun­cil. That’s right — the Par­lia­men­tary Com­mit­tee. I am offi­cial­ly that guy. I told them yes. If you’re invit­ed to serve then you’re already that guy

bride wars down­load ace ven­tu­ra when nature calls divx whether you own up to it or not. It’s like going bald — you might as well embrace it.

Good stuff hap­pened, too. For instance, I got to talk with a Ph.D. can­di­date about faith. She came to the Fran­cis Collins lec­ture and want­ed to fol­low up with some ques­tions. We had a great con­ver­sa­tion. I hope I was help­ful to her. She seemed quite touched when we prayed at the end of our time togeth­er.

But on the whole, it just felt like one of those days.

It's In The Snake Bag

Lind­sey down­load lethal weapon 3 dvdrip bless the beasts chil­dren free tide­land divx movie online cry dan­ger down­load

and I had an email con­ver­sa­tion about a wor­ship team meet­ing tomor­row. The fol­low­ing is an excerpt.

“Where’s the tam­borouine?”
“In the snake bag.”

As I wrote that, I felt like a stereo­typ­i­cal Appalachi­an Pen­te­costal. Of COURSE we keep the musi­cal instru­ments in the snake bag. If our musi­cians don’t have enough faith to retrieve their instru­ments, then clear­ly they’re not wor­thy.

Alas, the real expla­na­tion is a lot more mun­dane.

The snake is a spe­cial type of cable fre­quent­ly used by bands (such as a wor­ship team). We keep ours in a bag. With our tam­bourine, since it fits so nice­ly.

But would­n’t that be awe­some to over­hear when you’re vis­it­ing a church for the first time?

The Evolution of Faith

Dr. Collins, a geneti­cist who strong­ly believes in Christ, lec­tured on “God and the Genome” ear­li­er this week. As a geneti­cist, he strong­ly believes in evo­lu­tion. Watch­ing the Chris­tians on cam­pus respond to his pre­sen­ta­tion has been fas­ci­nat­ing.

A few thoughts:

1) I real­ly wish Chris­tians on all sides of this debate would real­ize that oth­ers are doing the best that they can with the knowl­edge that they have. As they update their knowl­edge, they update their views. For the most part, peo­ple on all sides real­ly do love God and truth. In Philip­pi­ans 1:18 Paul makes the point that he even gives thanks for false teach­ers: “But what does it mat­ter? The impor­tant thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice.” In like man­ner, learn to rejoice in those who dif­fer from you on this issue.

2) On the Bible side of things, I wish more Chris­tians knew just how many dif­fer­ent options there are for inter­pret­ing Gen­e­sis 1 — google for “Frame­work Inter­pre­ta­tion”, “Gap The­o­ry”, “Day-Age View”, and “The­is­tic Evo­lu­tion” to get start­ed. In the end you’ll like­ly con­clude that some of the options are fair­ly implau­si­ble, but they are all worth con­sid­er­ing. For the record, I’m fond of the Frame­work Inter­pre­ta­tion. The idea that Gen­e­sis 1 might not be a chronol­o­gy of cre­ation isn’t some sort of knee-jerk reac­tion to Dar­win­ian ideas. Way back in the 4th cen­tu­ry Augus­tine was look­ing at the text and say­ing, “Some­thing com­plex is going on here.” For a good sum­ma­ry of Augustine’s per­spec­tive, read The Con­tem­po­rary Rel­e­vance of Augus­tine.

3) On the sci­ence side of things, I wish more Chris­tians were open to the idea that sci­en­tists have good rea­sons for the things that they say. There is no vast anti-Bible con­spir­a­cy. Sci­en­tists are look­ing at reams of data and try­ing to syn­the­size it rea­son­ably. That does­n’t imply that every sin­gle claim sci­ence makes is proven true in the long run, but it does mean that we should take sci­en­tists very seri­ous­ly when they tell us there is over­whelm­ing evi­dence that the earth is bil­lions of years old and when we dis­cov­er that there has been con­sen­sus with­in the sci­en­tif­ic com­mu­ni­ty about this for a while now. If you’d like to do a lit­tle more dig­ging on the sci­ence side, these three web­sites are pret­ty good places to start: Sci­Bel

is a fun lit­tle web­site with engag­ing arti­cles, the Fara­day Insti­tute

legal­ly blondes online

has some short but stim­u­lat­ing papers on essen­tial top­ics, and the Amer­i­can Sci­en­tif­ic Affil­i­a­tion has a huge col­lec­tion of arti­cles from a vari­ety of per­spec­tives.

I’ll wind this down by quot­ing from an email I sent to my stu­dents last night.

1) There are two sources of data for Chris­tians — the Word and the world.
2) Facts from the two realms don’t con­tra­dict one anoth­er, but the inter­pre­ta­tions we use to arrange those facts often do.
3) We’ve almost always got more inter­pre­ta­tive options than we real­ize (this is true of both sources of data).

And while I’m talk­ing about sci­ence and faith, I’d like to rec­om­mend an arti­cle about Galileo’s dis­pute with the church. The full sto­ry is some­thing you’ve like­ly not heard before: The Myth of Galileo down­load dia­mond dogs dvd .

Scientist Francis Collins Presents Compelling Case for Faith

I’m sit­ting in the green room (the room a speak­er uses to pre­pare for a speech or per­for­mance) just after Fran­cis Collins fin­ished a phe­nom­e­nal pre­sen­ta­tion on the com­pat­i­bil­i­ty of faith and sci­ence.

He was astound­ing. If you haven’t read his book The Lan­guage of God then I rec­om­mend you pick it up. We’ll be putting a video of his pre­sen­ta­tion up soon at http://franciscollinstalk.stanford.edu

. If you’re impa­tient you can see one of a sim­i­lar pre­sen­ta­tion at MIT last year.

Our venue, Memo­r­i­al Audi­to­ri­um, seats 1,700. Our over­flow room, Bish­op Audi­to­ri­um, seats 324. We had to open five addi­tion­al class­rooms. I’m con­fi­dent we had at least 2,000 peo­ple turn out, but a police offi­cer pro­vid­ing secu­ri­ty was bold enough to sug­gest that the real total was 2,300.

My favorite part of the event? Look­ing at the pro­gram and see­ing six lines.

Wel­come: Lisa Ooi
PhD stu­dent, Chem­i­cal & Sys­tems Biol­o­gy

Intro­duc­tion: Pro­fes­sor William New­some
Chair, Stan­ford Depart­ment of Neu­ro­bi­ol­o­gy the last house on the left online

Lec­ture: Dr. Fran­cis Collins
Direc­tor, Nation­al Human Genome Research Insti­tute

Those six lines sum up the whole event bril­liant­ly — many very bright sci­en­tists see no nec­es­sary con­flict between sci­ence and Chris­tian­i­ty.

Oh — if you’ve been fol­low­ing my blog for a long time, you might remem­ber Lisa Ooi’s name. She’s a long­time Chi Alphan who actu­al­ly lived with Paula and I for a brief sea­son. She did a great job and we’re very proud of her.

My sec­ond-favorite part of the event? Him show­ing the clip of him­self being grilled by Stephen Col­bert. Fun­ny stuff.

Big thanks to Chi Alpha’s co-spon­sors Inter­Var­si­ty Grad­u­ate Chris­t­ian Fel­low­ship blues broth­ers 2000 divx online (the real dri­ving force for this event), the Catholic Com­mu­ni­ty at Stan­ford, and the Ver­i­tas Forum divx push

watch i am sam online

. We could nev­er have pulled off an event of this scale alone. A big spe­cial thanks to Amy Cham­bers and Kyle Heath who shoul­dered a ridicu­lous amount of the admin­is­tra­tive details, to Pete Som­mer for rais­ing a lot of mon­ey to make this hap­pen, to Kyle Pub­ols and Andrea Romero for run­ning micro­phones dur­ing the q & a so very well, to the many stu­dents who helped route peo­ple to over­flow rooms on an instan­t’s notice, and to Lena Ho, Xianne Leiong, Hilary Dyer, Isaac Pen­ny, and all those who sat through lengthy meet­ings to plan this whole thing. Oh, and Dr. Bill New­some did a tremen­dous job. And thanks to the Office for Reli­gious Life and Dean Scot­ty McLen­nan for giv­ing us per­mis­sion to go for it.

Final­ly, a spe­cial thanks to Clare Kasem­set who did a great job on the plan­ning side but fell ill at the last minute and was unable to make it to the event. Hope you enjoy the video, Clare. Get well soon.

I’ll try to get some pho­tos and more thoughts online lat­er. Right now I need to focus on get­ting ready to preach a ser­mon­ic per­spec­tive on the same themes tomor­row night. I’ve got some big shoes to fill.