Celebration of Discipline: Simplicity

Blog read­ers: Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford is engag­ing in our annu­al sum­mer read­ing project. As we read through Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline by Richard Fos­ter, I’ll post my thoughts here (which will large­ly con­sist of excerpts I found insight­ful). They are all tagged sum­mer-read­ing-project-2019. The sched­ule is online.

book cover - Celebration Of Discipline

I’m trav­el­ing right now and don’t have a lot of time to write up my thoughts on this chap­ter, so I’ll sim­ply say that while I like this Fos­ter’s thoughts on sim­plic­i­ty this chap­ter reminds me of how quick­ly he wrote the book. His thoughts are unfor­tu­nate­ly jum­bled at times, espe­cial­ly when it comes to eco­nom­ics. He has a good advice for indi­vid­u­als, but he seems to con­fuse wise indi­vid­ual choic­es with wise social struc­tures. That aside, there’s a lot of sol­id advice in this chap­ter about liv­ing a sim­ple life.

Fos­ter does­n’t define sim­plic­i­ty clear­ly, but he most­ly seems to mean being con­tent, being gen­er­ous and being sus­pi­cious of indul­gence. I’m actu­al­ly sur­prised he did­n’t make gen­eros­i­ty one of his twelve cen­tral spir­i­tu­al dis­ci­plines. Gen­eros­i­ty with a side of sim­plic­i­ty seems more faith­ful to the Bib­li­cal wit­ness than sim­plic­i­ty with a side of gen­eros­i­ty. Regard­less, he made the focus sim­plic­i­ty (per­haps so he can bring in com­ments about sim­plic­i­ty in speech on pages 93–94).

If I had to pick one quote that stood out to me, it would be this one:

“The cen­tral point for the Dis­ci­pline of sim­plic­i­ty is to seek the king­dom of God and the right­eous­ness of his king­dom first and then every­thing nec­es­sary will come in its prop­er order…. Focus upon the king­dom pro­duces the inward real­i­ty, and with­out the inward real­i­ty we will degen­er­ate into legal­is­tic triv­ia. Noth­ing else can be cen­tral. The desire to get out of the rat race can­not be cen­tral, the redis­tri­b­u­tion of the world’s wealth can­not be cen­tral, the con­cern for ecol­o­gy can­not be cen­tral…. The per­son who does not seek the king­dom first does not seek it at all.”

Richard Fos­ter, Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline, pages 86–87.

There are many peo­ple who pur­sue a sim­ple lifestyle for oth­er rea­sons. God­ly sim­plic­i­ty isn’t pri­mar­i­ly about reduc­ing your car­bon foot­print or engag­ing in effec­tive altru­ism. The sim­plic­i­ty we pur­sue is root­ed in our uncom­pli­cat­ed devo­tion to God.

One last com­ment and a bit of a tan­gent: “It is time we awak­en to the fact that con­for­mi­ty to a sick soci­ety is to be sick” (page 80). Sil­i­con Val­ley in gen­er­al and Stan­ford in par­tic­u­lar have very unhealthy ten­den­cies, and to the extent we feel ful­ly at home here we reveal unhealth­i­ness in our­selves. In this regard I often reflect on 2 Peter 2:7–8, “Lot, a right­eous man, who was dis­tressed by the depraved con­duct of the law­less (for that right­eous man, liv­ing among them day after day, was tor­ment­ed in his right­eous soul by the law­less deeds he saw and heard).” If we are nev­er dis­tressed at Stan­ford then we are not pay­ing suf­fi­cient atten­tion to God, to Stan­ford, or to both.

Any­way, I hope you are chal­lenged by this week’s read­ing! Remem­ber that next week we are read­ing both the chap­ter on soli­tude as well as the pref­ace.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 211

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Amer­i­can jour­nal­ists have duty to report on tragedies in coun­tries like Sudan. (Isa­ha Sesay, USA Today): “If the suf­fer­ing of these girls and their par­ents is not enough to make us pay atten­tion to what has hap­pened in Chi­bok, there is some­thing else to con­sid­er: the threat to glob­al secu­ri­ty. The fate of these girls is in many ways a reflec­tion of the Niger­ian fed­er­al government’s long­stand­ing inabil­i­ty to main­tain peace and sta­bil­i­ty in the north­east of the coun­try. Amer­i­cans should see the dis­ap­pear­ance of the Chi­bok girls as a flare, illu­mi­nat­ing the exis­tence of an ‘ungoverned space’ that is fer­tile ground for a pow­er­ful ter­ror­ist group.”
  2. Face­book and Google track what porn you’re watch­ing, even when you’re in incog­ni­to (Iso­bel Ash­er Hamil­ton, Busi­ness Insid­er): “Researchers from Microsoft, Carnegie Mel­lon, and the Uni­ver­si­ty of Penn­syl­va­nia ana­lyzed 22,484 pornog­ra­phy sites using a site called webXray to iden­ti­fy track­ing tools feed­ing data back to third par­ties. ‘Our results indi­cate track­ing is endem­ic on pornog­ra­phy web­sites: 93% of pages leak user data to a third-party,’ the study concludes.”
    • Num­bers 32:23 comes to mind: “be sure that your sin will find you out.”
    • An unex­pect­ed con­se­quence of porn: Stream­ing online pornog­ra­phy pro­duces as much CO2 as Bel­gium (Michael Le Page, New­Sci­en­tist): “The trans­mis­sion and view­ing of online videos gen­er­ates 300 mil­lion tonnes of car­bon diox­ide a year, or near­ly 1 per cent of glob­al emis­sions. On-demand video ser­vices such as Net­flix account for a third of this, with online porno­graph­ic videos gen­er­at­ing anoth­er third.”
  3. An Epi­dem­ic of Dis­be­lief (Bar­bara Bradley Hager­ty, The Atlantic): “Historically, inves­ti­ga­tors had assumed that some­one who assaults a stranger by the rail­road tracks is noth­ing like the man who assaults his co-work­er or his girl­friend. But it turns out that the space between acquain­tance rape and stranger rape is not a wall, but a plaza. When Cleve­land inves­ti­ga­tors uploaded the DNA from the acquain­tance-rape kits, they were sur­prised by how often the results also matched DNA from unsolved stranger rapes. The task force iden­ti­fied dozens of mys­tery rapists this way.” Infu­ri­at­ing and high­ly recommended. 
  4. Oil-patch evan­gel­i­cals: How Chris­tian­i­ty and crude fueled the rise of the Amer­i­can right (Dar­ren Dochuk, Wash­ing­ton Post): “In the face of the Rock­e­feller­s’ pro­gres­sive way, Tex­an oil­ers cham­pi­oned a the­ol­o­gy of per­son­al encounter with scrip­ture and an active High­er Being. They her­ald­ed church auton­o­my and gospel teach­ings about pros­per­i­ty and end times, a mes­sage that antic­i­pat­ed the vio­lent dis­rup­tions of the oil age and the need to save souls and reap God’s — and the earth’s — rich­es before the world’s end.” The author is a his­to­ry pro­fes­sor at Notre Dame and describes an aspect of mod­ern evan­gel­i­cal his­to­ry I had not heard before.
    • An inter­view with the above author: Anoint­ed with Oil: Evan­gel­i­cals and the Petro­le­um Indus­try (Thomas Kidd, The Gospel Coali­tion): “Oil his­to­ri­ans may be sur­prised to hear it, but in some instances oil’s cor­po­rate struc­tures evolved direct­ly out of the the­o­log­i­cal com­mit­ments of its leaders.” The first piece felt a lit­tle hos­tile to me, where­as this one did not at all. 
  5. Stan­ford oppos­es bill that would let col­lege ath­letes in Cal­i­for­nia prof­it from endorse­ments (Ian Park, Stan­ford Dai­ly): “The NCAA earns more than $1 bil­lion in annu­al rev­enue from broad­cast­ing rights and cham­pi­onships. In return, stu­dent-ath­letes receive lit­tle to no com­pen­sa­tion, oth­er than schol­ar­ships. Accord­ing to a study by Drex­el Uni­ver­si­ty and the Nation­al Col­lege Play­ers Asso­ci­a­tion, schol­ar­ships aren’t enough for many stu­dent-ath­letes, as sur­veyed ath­letes had to pay col­leges schol­ar­ship short­falls of as much as $17,000.”
    • In oth­er and com­plete­ly unre­lat­ed local news: SF does not have the high­est rents in the Bay Area (Adam Brin­klow, Curbed): “Menlo Park, home of Face­book, has the high­est rents in the region, aver­ag­ing $4,638 per month. Palo Alto also beat out SF with a star­tling $3,857 per month price tag.” 
    • Else­where in the arti­cle we learn that Red­wood City rents aver­age $1,956. I love Men­lo Park, but there’s no way it is twice as nice as Red­wood City. Sheesh!
  6. Trump vs. Dems: ‘Racist,’ ‘socialist’ lines drawn for 2020 (Lisa Mas­caro, AP News): “With tweets and a vote, Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump and House Democ­rats estab­lished the sharp and emo­tion­al­ly raw con­tours of the 2020 elec­tion cam­paigns. In the process, they have cre­at­ed a fraught polit­i­cal frame: ‘racists’ vs. ‘socialists.’”
    • What Pelosi Ver­sus the Squad Real­ly Means (David Brooks, New York Times): “Liberalism arose out of the fact that polit­i­cal rev­o­lu­tions, while excit­ing at the out­set, usu­al­ly end up in bru­tal­i­ty, dic­ta­tor­ship and blood. Work­ing with­in the sys­tem is best. Peo­ple who came of age in the past few decades did not grow up in an atmos­phere of assumed lib­er­al­ism. They often grew up in an atmos­phere that cri­tiques it.”
    • ‘It Makes Us Want to Sup­port Him More’ (Peter Nicholas, The Atlantic): “A few con­ced­ed that Trump occa­sion­al­ly fires off an inap­pro­pri­ate tweet, but said his accom­plish­ments in office over­shad­ow any offense. If any­thing, they said, his lan­guage springs from an authen­tic­i­ty they find refresh­ing. None of the peo­ple I spoke with con­sid­ered his com­ments about the con­gress­women racist.”
    • Peo­ple Who Have Screamed ‘Racism’ For Decades Won­der Why No One Is Lis­ten­ing To Them About Trump (Baby­lon Bee): this would nor­mal­ly go down in the amus­ing sec­tion because the head­line is from a satire site, but this is one of those times where the Bee’s insight is rel­e­vant: “‘I mean, we com­pared John McCain to George Wal­lace,’ stat­ed Demo­c­rat Mag­gie Wilkins, ‘and I’m not sure who to com­pare Trump to in order to show he’s an even more wors­er racist.’ Activists are con­sid­er­ing com­ing up with oth­er words to express that Trump is a worse kind of racist. They con­sid­ered ‘white supremacist,’ but they’ve been using that a lot late­ly, so it would only mean to most peo­ple that Trump is as bad as the Bet­sy Ross flag. So they tried to invent a new term — dou­ble plus racist — to express how extra racist Trump is, but then remem­bered they already used that on Mitt Romney.”
  7. 5 Rea­sons to Dis­en­tan­gle Sex­u­al­i­ty and Race (Rebec­ca McLaugh­lin, The Gospel Coali­tion): “Christian sex­u­al ethics were as shock­ing to their orig­i­nal first-cen­tu­ry Gre­co-Roman con­text as they are today. If Chris­tians are to learn from his­to­ry, the les­son must be this: hold fast to Scripture’s rad­i­cal demands, whether the cul­tur­al tide is com­ing in or out. You won’t know which side of his­to­ry you’re on until the last day.” Dis­claimer: I know the author and have col­lab­o­rat­ed with her on events at Stan­ford.

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Things Glen Found Interesting A While Ago

Every week I’ll high­light an old­er link still worth your con­sid­er­a­tion. This week we have When Chil­dren Say They’re Trans (Jesse Sin­gal, The Atlantic): “ …to deny the pos­si­bil­i­ty of a con­nec­tion between social influ­ences and gender‐identity explo­ration among ado­les­cents would require ignor­ing a lot of what we know about the devel­op­ing teenage brain—which is more sus­cep­ti­ble to peer influ­ence, more impul­sive, and less adept at weigh­ing long‐term out­comes and con­se­quences than ful­ly devel­oped adult brains—as well as indi­vid­ual sto­ries like Delta’s.” This is a long and bal­anced piece which has gar­nered out­rage in some online cir­cles. First shared in vol­ume 157.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

Celebration of Discipline: Study & Foreword

Blog read­ers: Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford is engag­ing in our annu­al sum­mer read­ing project. As we read through Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline by Richard Fos­ter, I’ll post my thoughts here (which will large­ly con­sist of excerpts I found insight­ful). They are all tagged summer‐reading‐project‐2019. The sched­ule is online.

book cover - Celebration Of Discipline

“Jesus made it unmis­tak­ably clear that the knowl­edge of the truth will set us free. ‘You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free’ (John 8:32). Good feel­ings will not free us. Ecsta­t­ic expe­ri­ences will not free us. Get­ting ‘high on Jesus’ will not free us. With­out a knowl­edge of the truth, we will not be free.”

Richard Fos­ter, Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline, page 63

This week we come to the dis­ci­pline of study. Fos­ter’s def­i­n­i­tion of study is a lit­tle wordy and hand-wavy for me. I think what he’s get­ting at is this: study is think­ing deeply about some­thing until we under­stand it and its sig­nif­i­cance. When done well, it changes the way we think in the future.

Here are some sug­ges­tions:

  • While you are young, read a few “how to think” books. If you are for­tu­nate, these will be assigned in some of your class­es. If they are not, they are worth seek­ing out on your own. Don’t assume that just because you got into Stan­ford and are get­ting decent grades that you’re all set in this area. How To Read A Book by Adler is sol­id gold, as is any­thing by Richard Mitchell (aka The Under­ground Gram­mar­i­an). Start with Less Than Words Can Say (legal­ly avail­able online). I think my favorite thing of his is “The Land of We All” from The Gift of Fire. I remem­ber find­ing Stanovich’s How To Think Straight About Psy­chol­o­gy help­ful when I was in col­lege, as I did Car­son­’s Exeget­i­cal Fal­lac­i­es.
  • Resolve to read books by dead peo­ple. C. S. Lewis’s intro­duc­tion to Athana­sius’ On The Incar­na­tion explains why well: “It is a good rule, after read­ing a new book, nev­er to allow your­self anoth­er new one till you have read an old one in between. If that is too much for you, you should at least read one old one to every three new ones. Every age has its own out­look. It is spe­cial­ly good at see­ing cer­tain truths and spe­cial­ly liable to make cer­tain mis­takes. We all, there­fore, need the books that will cor­rect the char­ac­ter­is­tic mis­takes of our own peri­od. And that means the old book­s…. To be sure, the books of the future would be just as good a cor­rec­tive as the books of the past, but unfor­tu­nate­ly we can­not get at them.” His intro­duc­tion is avail­able many places online and I high­ly rec­om­mend it- https://www.bhmc.org.uk/uploads/9/1/7/7/91773502/lewis-incarnation-intro.pdf
  • Real­ly do make it your goal to pass an ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test on every major issue: be able to artic­u­late any posi­tion you reject so clear­ly that a well-informed observ­er would think you real­ly believe it. You can­not mean­ing­ful­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until you can say “I under­stand.”
  • If you fol­low cur­rent events, an excel­lent prac­tice is to write down what you think the out­comes of a cer­tain pol­i­cy or deci­sion are like­ly to be. Then go back a few months lat­er and com­pare your pre­dic­tions with real­i­ty. You’ll learn a lot about your blind spots and assump­tions. Also write down what you would do if you were in charge and what you think would like­ly hap­pen. This is more uncer­tain, but you will start to notice ways that real­i­ty sur­pris­es you and would have affect­ed your plans. The key in either case is writ­ing it down — don’t trust your mem­o­ry. Writ­ten words have an out­ra­geous stub­born­ness that does not per­mit you to believe you thought some­thing dif­fer­ent than you actu­al­ly did.

Some tips for study­ing the Bible in par­tic­u­lar:

  • Fos­ter rec­om­mends pick­ing a book of the Bible and read­ing it every day for a month. This isn’t as daunt­ing as it may seem. The aver­age per­son reads about 250 words per minute and the book of Eph­esians has a lit­tle under 2,500 words. Depend­ing on your read­ing speed, you can go from begin­ning to end in 10 min­utes.
  • No time to sit down and read? Con­sid­er an audio Bible. The first audi­ences of the Bible heard it oral­ly, and so you’re just fol­low­ing in their foot­steps.
  • Get a sim­ple one-vol­ume Bible com­men­tary to help you with the chal­leng­ing parts. You can find an excel­lent set of sug­ges­tions at Best Bible Com­men­taries.
  • If you wind up going into min­istry, invest in a more sub­stan­tive set of com­men­taries. Com­men­taries can be quite expen­sive, so first get a one-vol­ume overview and then build on it over time.
    • Here’s what I do: when­ev­er I start a new ser­mon series, I get two or three new com­men­taries to help me pre­pare. I go to bestcommentaries.com and choose from among the high­est-rat­ed ones labeled P or D. So if I need­ed a com­men­tary on 1 Corinthi­ans, I would go to https://www.bestcommentaries.com/1‑corinthians/ and buy either Fee or Gar­land or both. It’s eas­i­er to do this when you’re preach­ing through books of the Bible (a series on James, for exam­ple). If you’re doing top­i­cal stuff then think about what one of your main pas­sages will be and buy a com­men­tary for that book of the Bible. Over time you’ll build a very sol­id library that way.
    • Avoid buy­ing entire com­men­tary sets; even the best series are uneven. It’s wis­er to buy the best few com­men­taries for each book of the Bible.
  • Sup­ple­ment your pur­chased com­men­taries with the amaz­ing (and free) set of notes com­piled by Dal­las Sem­i­nary pro­fes­sor Thomas Con­sta­ble. Down­load the PDF ver­sions to your hard dri­ve and you’ll even have access to them when you’re on a retreat or a mis­sion trip some­where.

I sus­pect Stan­ford stu­dents have a hard­er time with the dis­ci­pline of study than with almost any of the oth­ers, because study­ing for grades becomes so con­sum­ing. I fre­quent­ly talk with stu­dents who lament their inabil­i­ty to read the books they want to read. It’s impor­tant to remem­ber that Fos­ter believes all study can be spir­i­tu­al­ly ben­e­fi­cial — even study­ing for grades. If noth­ing else, you’re devel­op­ing skills in this sea­son that will serve you well for the rest of your life.

Also, bear in mind that you can often choose to focus your stud­ies in a class in a way that will be spir­i­tu­al­ly ben­e­fi­cial. Tak­ing a class on democ­ra­cy? Use it as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to engage with Wood­ber­ry’s work on the reli­gious roots of demo­c­ra­t­ic gov­er­nance. Tak­ing a class on African-Amer­i­can his­to­ry in the 1900’s? Read about the black church. Study­ing the phi­los­o­phy of sci­ence? Read what Chris­tians have said about it. Skim our resource The Gospel and Green Library to find sug­gest­ed books on a wide range of top­ics.

And if you know you’re going to strug­gle dur­ing the school year, take advan­tage of the sum­mer to do some seri­ous spir­i­tu­al read­ing beyond the sum­mer read­ing project!

A few notes on the foreword:

Skip­ping back many pages to the fore­word… I real­ly like what Fos­ter says here. I had us save it until now because his thoughts seem linked to the idea of study to me — the fore­word is an extend­ed reflec­tion on the nature of the spir­i­tu­al dis­ci­plines. I will close with a few com­ments on this excerpt:

It is crit­i­cal for us to under­stand that the Spir­i­tu­al Dis­ci­plines pos­sess no moral rec­ti­tude or right­eous­ness in and of them­selves. They are, most def­i­nite­ly, not “works right­eous­ness,” as is some­times said. They place us–body, mind, and spirit–before God. That is all. The results of this process are all of God, all of grace. Now, the oppo­site of grace is “works.” Works has to do with earn­ing, and there sim­ply is noth­ing we can ever do to earn God’s approval. Or God’s love.”

Richard Fos­ter, Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline, pages xiv-xv

As Dal­las Willard once said, grace is opposed to earn­ing not effort. 2 Peter 1:3–8 charts out the rela­tion­ship between grace and effort nice­ly: “His divine pow­er has giv­en us every­thing we need for a god­ly life… for this very rea­son make every effort to add to your faith good­ness…”

His grace pro­vides all that we need, there­fore we should strive with all of our might. He gives us the plat­form upon which to stand, there­fore we must stand to our full height.

Next week we move from the inner to the out­er dis­ci­plines as we dis­cuss liv­ing with sim­plic­i­ty. Get ready!

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 210

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

It’s good to be back after last week’s hia­tus.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. AI Trained on Old Sci­en­tif­ic Papers Makes Dis­cov­er­ies Humans Missed (Madeleine Gre­go­ry, Moth­er­board): “In a study pub­lished in Nature on July 3, researchers from the Lawrence Berke­ley Nation­al Lab­o­ra­to­ry used an algo­rithm called Word2Vec sift through sci­en­tif­ic papers for con­nec­tions humans had missed. Their algo­rithm then spit out pre­dic­tions for pos­si­ble ther­mo­elec­tric mate­ri­als, which con­vert heat to ener­gy and are used in many heat­ing and cool­ing appli­ca­tions.”
  2. Can Chris­t­ian Com­pas­sion Influ­ence How We Treat Migrants? (Alan Cross, The Bul­wark): “Com­pas­sion is not inher­it­ed, either in indi­vid­u­als nor in nations. It must be cul­ti­vat­ed and that cul­ti­va­tion often hap­pens in tri­al when we are test­ed. Amer­i­ca is being test­ed right now. How will we respond to the migrants com­ing to us des­per­ate for help and refuge? How will we respond to the sight of Oscar and Vale­ria drown­ing and being found face down on the banks of Rio Grande in each other’s arms?”
    • Relat­ed: In the ‘bat­tle at the bor­der,’ evan­gel­i­cal lead­ers jos­tle for Trump-era media rel­e­van­cy (Julia Duin, GetRe­li­gion): “Unless you’ve been under a rock recent­ly, you know much of the coun­try is fix­at­ed on the mess at our bor­der. What’s not as vis­i­ble is how evan­gel­i­cal Chris­tians are fight­ing among them­selves over all of this.”
    • And yet: Repub­li­cans turn more neg­a­tive toward refugees as num­ber admit­ted to U.S. plum­mets (Han­nah Har­tig, Pew Research): “By more than two-to-one (68% to 25%), white evan­gel­i­cal Protes­tants say the U.S. does not have a respon­si­bil­i­ty to accept refugees. Oth­er reli­gious groups are more like­ly to say the U.S. does have this respon­si­bil­i­ty. And opin­ions among reli­gious­ly unaf­fil­i­at­ed adults are near­ly the reverse of those of white evan­gel­i­cal Protes­tants: 65% say the U.S. has a respon­si­bil­i­ty to accept refugees into the coun­try, while just 31% say it does not.”
  3. Man­ly wed­ding rings for tough guys who are dudes (Dan Brooks, The Out­line): “I don’t hunt, but I briefly con­sid­ered buy­ing a cam­ou­flage ring, part­ly to sig­nal my deep com­mit­ment to irony and part­ly to get bet­ter ser­vice at the auto parts store.” I real­ly enjoyed this essay, and I hope that many of you have need of wed­ding bands in the not-too-dis­tant future.
  4. Evan­gel­i­cal Chris­tians Face A Deep­en­ing Cri­sis (Peter Wehn­er, The Atlantic): “Cop­pock men­tioned to me the pow­er­ful exam­ple of St. Ambrose, the bish­op of Milan, who was will­ing to rebuke the Roman Emper­or Theo­do­sius for the latter’s role in mas­sacring civil­ians as pun­ish­ment for the mur­der of one of his gen­er­als. Ambrose refused to allow the Church to become a polit­i­cal prop, despite con­cerns that doing so might endan­ger him. Ambrose spoke truth to pow­er. (Theo­do­sius end­ed up seek­ing penance, and Ambrose went on to teach, con­vert, and bap­tize St. Augus­tine.) Prox­im­i­ty to pow­er is fine for Chris­tians, Cop­pock told me, but only so long as it does not cor­rupt their moral sense, only so long as they don’t allow their faith to become polit­i­cal­ly weaponized. Yet that is pre­cise­ly what’s hap­pen­ing today.”
    • Rec­om­mend­ed by an alum­nus. I wish that the Amer­i­can church was more vis­i­bly dis­mayed at some of Trump’s obvi­ous sins. I remind peo­ple of all polit­i­cal incli­na­tions that you can sup­port someone’s over­all agen­da and still rebuke them for acts of wicked­ness. In fact, being will­ing to do so makes your sup­port more mean­ing­ful. So vote for who­ev­er you want, and hold the lead­ers you sup­port to a high stan­dard.
  5. Taiwan’s Sta­tus is a Geopo­lit­i­cal Absur­di­ty (Chris Hor­ton, The Atlantic): “’Taiwan’s gov­ern­ment is demo­c­ra­t­i­cal­ly elected—we have a pres­i­dent, we have a par­lia­ment,’ For­eign Min­is­ter Joseph Wu said plain­tive­ly at a brief­ing for for­eign media ear­li­er this year. At the time, his gov­ern­ment was try­ing to be includ­ed in the World Health Assem­bly. (It was ulti­mate­ly blocked by Chi­na.) ‘We issue visas, we issue pass­ports,’ he said, prac­ti­cal­ly plead­ing. ‘We have a mil­i­tary and a cur­ren­cy … Tai­wan exists by itself; Tai­wan is not a part of any oth­er coun­try.’”
  6. Robespierre’s Amer­i­ca (Bret Stephens, New York Times): “The data con­firm what one hears and expe­ri­ences anec­do­tal­ly all the time: In the prover­bial land of the free, peo­ple live in mor­tal fear of a moral faux pas. Opin­ions that were con­sid­ered rea­son­able and nor­mal a few years ago are increas­ing­ly deliv­ered in whis­pers. Pro­fes­sors fear their stu­dents. Pub­lish­ers drop books at the slight­est whiff of social-media con­tro­ver­sy.”
  7. Gay Rites Are Civ­il Rites (Scott Alexan­der, Slate Star Codex): “‘Civ­il reli­gion’ is a sur­pris­ing place for social jus­tice to end up. Gay pride start­ed at Stonewall as a giant ****-you to civ­il soci­ety. Home­less peo­ple, addicts, and sex work­ers told the police where they could shove their respectable val­ues. But there was anoth­er major world reli­gion that start­ed with beg­gars, lep­ers, and pros­ti­tutes, wasn’t there? One that told the Phar­isees where to shove their respectable val­ues.”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Things Glen Found Interesting A While Ago

Every week I’ll high­light an old­er link still worth your con­sid­er­a­tion. This week we have a com­pelling series of arti­cles on Chi­na by a his­to­ry pro­fes­sor at Johns Hop­kins (who also hap­pens to be a Stan­ford grad): China’s Mas­ter Plan: A Glob­al Mil­i­tary Threat, China’s Mas­ter Plan: Export­ing an Ide­ol­o­gy, China’s Mas­ter Plan: A World­wide Web of Insti­tu­tions and China’s Mas­ter Plan: How The West Can Fight Back (Hal Brand, Bloomberg). The mon­ey quote from the sec­ond arti­cle: “If the U.S. has long sought to make the world safe for democ­ra­cy, China’s lead­ers crave a world that is safe for authoritarianism.” First shared in vol­ume 156.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

Celebration of Discipline: Fasting

Blog read­ers: Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford is engag­ing in our annu­al sum­mer read­ing project. As we read through Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline by Richard Fos­ter, I’ll post my thoughts here (which will large­ly con­sist of excerpts I found insight­ful). They are all tagged sum­mer-read­ing-project-2019. The sched­ule is online.

book cover - Celebration Of Discipline

I think two insights from this chap­ter are par­tic­u­lar­ly salient for today:

“Through­out Scrip­ture fast­ing refers to abstain­ing from food for spir­i­tu­al pur­pos­es. It stands in dis­tinc­tion to the hunger strike, the pur­pose of which is to gain polit­i­cal pow­er or attract atten­tion to a good cause. It is also dis­tinct from health diet­ing which stress­es absti­nence from food for phys­i­cal, not spir­i­tu­al, pur­pos­es.”

Richard Fos­ter, Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline, page 48

When­ev­er peo­ple tell me that they are fast­ing from social media I always feel puz­zled.

I like the con­cept, I just don’t like call­ing it fast­ing. Tak­ing a break from Insta­gram is just self-con­trol and does­n’t need a spe­cial label. Fast­ing is refrain­ing from some­thing that you need to sur­vive — it shows that God is more pre­cious to you than life. Cut­ting out Face­book does­n’t rise to that lev­el.

When we expand the word fast­ing to include any act of self-depri­va­tion, we prime our­selves to ignore actu­al fast­ing. “I don’t need to fast food. I fast social media.”

A lit­tle lat­er Fos­ter says

“Regular or week­ly fast­ing has had such a pro­found effect in the lives of some that they have sought to find a Bib­li­cal com­mand for it, so that it may be urged upon all Chris­tians. The search is in vain. There sim­ply are no Bib­li­cal laws that com­mand reg­u­lar fast­ing. Our free­dom in the gospel, how­ev­er, does not mean license; it means oppor­tu­ni­ty. Since there are no laws to bind us, we are free to fast on any day.”

Richard Fos­ter, Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline, page 51

Read­ing these words again over 20 years after I first stum­bled upon them I real­ize how influ­en­tial they have been to me. If you skimmed over them while rac­ing through the chap­ter, I encour­age you to read over them again slow­ly. These words apply to far more than fast­ing.

Some additional thoughts:

The prac­ti­cal details in this chap­ter are sol­id gold. If you’ve nev­er fast­ed for at least three days, I encour­age you to fol­low Fos­ter’s advice on pages 56–60. Start with skip­ping two meals (a 24 hour fast), then after a few rep­e­ti­tions skip three meals (a 36 hour fast), and then once you feel ready plan to skip meals for three to sev­en days. Since the first three days are the hard­est, if you’re going to fast three days then you might as well do sev­er­al more unless you have a rea­son not to (pro­fes­sion­al oblig­a­tions, an ath­let­ic train­ing sched­ule, etc). After that, do what makes the most sense to you.

Also, don’t lie about your fast­ing. Young Chris­tians do this all the time because they believe that if any­one dis­cov­ers that they are fast­ing then it does­n’t count. That’s a mis­un­der­stand­ing. What Jesus for­bids is draw­ing atten­tion to your fast so that peo­ple admire you. Here are His words in the NIV:


“When you fast, do not look somber as the hyp­ocrites do, for they dis­fig­ure their faces to show oth­ers they are fast­ing. Tru­ly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you fast, put oil on your head and wash your face, so that it will not be obvi­ous to oth­ers that you are fast­ing, but only to your Father, who is unseen; and your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

Matthew 6:16–18

The point is to not draw atten­tion to what you are doing, and the sim­ple truth is that exces­sive eva­sions actu­al­ly wind up draw­ing more atten­tion to your fast­ing than a straight­for­ward acknowl­edge­ment. So if some­one asks you point blank if you are fast­ing, just say, “Yes.” Or if one of your friends asks, “Do you need me to buy your lunch for you? I’m hap­py to spot you.” Then tell them, “Oh, that’s all right. I’m not eat­ing lunch today. Thanks.”

Final­ly, if you strug­gle with an eat­ing dis­or­der then you prob­a­bly should not fast until you achieve a healthy rela­tion­ship with food. As a gen­er­al rule, spir­i­tu­al­iz­ing your dys­func­tions leads to bad out­comes.

Next week we look at the dis­ci­pline of study!

Celebration of Discipline: Prayer

Blog read­ers: Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford is engag­ing in our annu­al sum­mer read­ing project. As we read through Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline by Richard Fos­ter, I’ll post my thoughts here (which is an email I send to the par­tic­i­pants). They are all tagged summer‐reading‐project‐2019. The sched­ule is online if you’d like to read along.

book cover - Celebration Of Discipline

This week’s spir­i­tu­al dis­ci­pline is prayer. I found this chap­ter a lit­tle dis­ap­point­ing because I’ve read Fos­ter’s book Prayer, and it’s the best book on prayer I’ve ever read. Most books on prayer make me feel guilty for not pray­ing enough, but his book encour­aged me so much that I kept putting it down to pray right away. This chap­ter was good, but it’s only the embry­on­ic form of Fos­ter’s best writ­ing on this sub­ject. If you like what he says here, order Prayer right now.

A few thoughts in response to this week’s read­ing:

  1. First, you should also read this one-page C.S. Lewis essay “If God Is Sov­er­eign, Why Should We Pray?” It will answer ques­tions that I am con­fi­dent some of you have. You can also find this essay as chap­ter 11 of his book God In The Dock — the ver­sion I linked to is slight­ly abridged, so if you own God in the Dock I sug­gest you read it there.
  2. Sec­ond, there are so many tid­bits of advice scat­tered through­out this chap­ter that I urge you to just focus on one at a time. Just as a sci­en­tist learns best when they adjust one vari­able at a time, we will gain the most if we incor­po­rate insights slow­ly.
  3. Third, I think the sin­gle most impor­tant sen­tence in this chap­ter might be, “I deter­mined to learn to pray so that my expe­ri­ence con­formed to the words of Jesus rather than try to make his words con­form to my impov­er­ished expe­ri­ence” (page 37). If that is your men­tal­i­ty you will expe­ri­ence tremen­dous growth and see great things.
  4. Fourth, some­thing he does­n’t empha­size as much as I would like is that a huge part of prayer is call­ing upon God’s nature (i.e, call­ing on the name of the Lord) and call­ing upon His promis­es. Our faith is root­ed in His faith­ful­ness, both His faith­ful­ness to His char­ac­ter and His faith­ful­ness to His com­mit­ments. A great way to do this is by pray­ing Scrip­ture. Andy Nasel­li has a sol­id arti­cle about this: 12 Rea­sons You Should Pray Scrip­ture.
  5. Fifth and final­ly, I very much appre­ci­ate how he empha­sized pray­ing for your pas­tor (page 43). I tell you frankly and with­out shame that I cov­et your prayers. As Paul said in 1 Thess 5:25, “pray for us.” Don’t know how to pray for a pas­tor? Paul basi­cal­ly asked the church to pay for his pro­tec­tion and effec­tive­ness. Specif­i­cal­ly, he asked peo­ple to pray for open doors for his min­istry (Col 4:3), the abil­i­ty to preach clear­ly (Col 4:4), fear­less­ness in min­istry (Eph 6:19), Spir­it-led words as he preached (Eph 6:19), that the gospel would spread through his min­istry (2 Thess 3:1), for deliv­er­ance from those who wished him harm (2 Thess 3:2, Romans 15:31), favor for his min­istry (Romans 15:31), for deliv­er­ance from despair and chal­leng­ing cir­cum­stances (2 Cor 1:9–11, Philip­pi­ans 1:19), for safe and suc­cess­ful min­istry trips (Romans 15:32), and for him to return safe­ly to a friend (Phile­mon 1:22). Pray just a few of those things for me and I’ll be grate­ful!

Next week’s chap­ter is on fast­ing and it’s super-prac­ti­cal. If I recall cor­rect­ly, it was the chap­ter on fast­ing that made the most sig­nif­i­cant impres­sion upon me when I first read this book back in col­lege. I hope it helps you as much as it did me!

Seventeen Years of Ministering at Stanford

Some thoughts from sev­en­teen years of min­istry at Stan­ford. HUGE THANKS to every­one who has been part of this won­der­ful jour­ney. Let’s see where the next sev­en­teen take us!

Sev­en­teen years ago today my wife and I drove into Palo Alto in a rent­ed yel­low Penske truck. God had called us to min­is­ter to Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty and we were report­ing for duty.

The years since then haven’t always been easy, but they have been extreme­ly reward­ing. Here are some thoughts run­ning through my mind on this anniver­sary:

  1. God does the work. I remem­ber sit­ting down with a stu­dent a few months ago. She had sought me out after com­ing to faith through read­ing. She had nev­er been to a Chi Alpha wor­ship ser­vice. She had nev­er heard me preach. She had just spent time think­ing and read­ing. Even­tu­al­ly she was con­vinced and her life was changed. So many of the best things we’ve seen hap­pen in min­istry have hap­pened inde­pen­dent­ly of any plan or effort of ours. God does the work and gra­cious­ly invites us to tag along.
  2. Uni­ver­si­ty min­istry real­ly does touch the world. Last year, Paula hung a map on our wall and we began putting a dot on the map when­ev­er an inter­na­tion­al stu­dent ate a meal in our home. In one year we had over 50 inter­na­tion­al stu­dents from over 25 nations sit down to eat with us. In Acts 19:9–10 we read that because Paul spent two years min­is­ter­ing dai­ly at an edu­ca­tion­al insti­tu­tion “all the Jews and Greeks who lived in the province of Asia heard the word of the Lord.” That strat­e­gy still works today.
  3. Uni­ver­si­ty min­istry real­ly does build god­ly lead­ers. By my count, we have alum­ni work­ing in the gov­ern­ments of three nations, we’ve got alum­ni serv­ing as pro­fes­sors at five uni­ver­si­ties (includ­ing three pro­fes­sors at Stan­ford), we’ve had two alum­ni make the Forbes “30 Under 30” list, one make the MIT Tech­nol­o­gy Review’s “35 Inno­va­tors Under 35” list, sev­er­al serv­ing as pas­tors and mis­sion­ar­ies, and many more doing amaz­ing things all over the world. Some of these alum­ni came to Christ through our min­istry while oth­ers were dis­ci­pled in their exist­ing faith. We are thrilled at all God has done in them and in awe of what He is doing through them.
  4. We could­n’t have done it alone. I’ve got to extend a huge thank YOU to every­one who has sup­port­ed us in our min­istry. We are so grate­ful to every­one who has prayed for us, to all the staff who have worked along­side us, to the gen­er­ous peo­ple who have giv­en to help make this min­istry pos­si­ble, and to the stu­dents who have par­tic­i­pat­ed in our min­istry. None of this could have hap­pened with­out your part­ner­ship. We are grate­ful to you and also grate­ful to God for you.

So any­way, that’s what I’m think­ing about after sev­en­teen years of min­istry on the Farm. I’m excit­ed to see what God does over the next sev­en­teen!

P.S. If you just stum­bled upon this blog post while brows­ing the site and would like to begin receiv­ing our prayer emails, you can sign up here.

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 209

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

FYI: there’s an excel­lent chance I won’t be send­ing my Fri­day roundup next week.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. Christ in the Camps (Caitlin Flana­gan, The Atlantic): “I humbly reach out to the only fac­tion of Amer­i­cans I know of who have the ear of the admin­is­tra­tion and who care about chil­dren: my broth­ers and sis­ters in Christ who attend evan­gel­i­cal church­es. It seems clear that we are in the midst of a pro­found human­i­tar­i­an cri­sis and that chil­dren are being forced to suf­fer in ter­ri­ble ways. Maybe it was nev­er sup­posed to be this way; maybe the sys­tem just got over­whelmed. But this is a disaster.” Sear­ing. Rec­om­mend­ed by an alum­nus. 
    • The hor­ri­fy­ing con­di­tions fac­ing kids in bor­der deten­tion, explained (Dara Lind, Vox): “It is appar­ent that even an admin­is­tra­tion act­ing with the best inter­ests of chil­dren in mind at every turn would be scram­bling right now. But pol­i­cy­mak­ers are split on how much of the cur­rent cri­sis is sim­ply a resource prob­lem — one Con­gress could help by send­ing more resources — and how much is delib­er­ate mis­treat­ment or neglect from an admin­is­tra­tion that doesn’t deserve any more mon­ey or trust.
    • Why a Gov­ern­ment Lawyer Argued Against Giv­ing Immi­grant Kids Tooth­brush­es (Ken White, The Atlantic): “This admin­is­tra­tion is mere­ly the lat­est one to sub­ject immi­grant chil­dren to abu­sive con­di­tions. It’s been 35 years since Jen­ny Flo­res was strip-searched in an adult facil­i­ty. Before Sarah Fabi­an defend­ed con­crete floors and bright lights for Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump, she defend­ed putting kids in soli­tary con­fine­ment for Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma. The fault lies not with any one admin­is­tra­tion or politi­cian, but with the cul­ture: the ICE and CBP cul­ture that encour­ages the abuse, the cul­ture of the legal apol­o­gists who defend it, and our culture—a large­ly indif­fer­ent Amer­i­ca that hasn’t done a damn thing about it.”
    • Indi­rect­ly relat­ed: I’m a Jour­nal­ist but I Didn’t Ful­ly Real­ize the Ter­ri­ble Pow­er of U.S. Bor­der Offi­cials Until They Vio­lat­ed My Rights and Pri­va­cy (Seth Harp, The Inter­cept): “As I was walk­ing out, I said to Mon­civias and Vil­lar­real, ‘It’s fun­ny, of all the coun­tries I’ve been to, the bor­der guards have nev­er treat­ed me worse than here, in the one coun­try I’m a cit­i­zen of, in the town where I was born.’” This is unset­tling. 
  2. Peo­ple Who Pay Peo­ple to Kill Peo­ple (Rene Chun, The Atlantic): “The authors deter­mined that 2 per­cent of all mur­ders in Aus­tralia were con­tract killings and that con­tracts were, in some cas­es, sur­pris­ing­ly afford­able. One unful­filled con­tract was for 500 Aus­tralian dol­lars; anoth­er job was com­plet­ed for just $2,000.” This is wild to me because those are close to the amounts that a min­is­ter might get paid for preach­ing at a retreat or offi­ci­at­ing a wed­ding. Who knew assas­sins and min­is­ters had sim­i­lar pay scales? Rec­om­mend­ed by a stu­dent.
  3. Some LGBT links (large­ly occa­sioned by Pride Month).
    • A Match Made In Heav­en (Nathaniel Frank, Wash­ing­ton Post): “What may seem like a straight­for­ward chance to cel­e­brate progress actu­al­ly masks a fault line that has divid­ed our move­ment since its start: whether our goal is equal­i­ty or lib­er­a­tion, a fight for the right to be treat­ed like every­one else or the free­dom to be authen­ti­cal­ly our­selves. Do we seek belong­ing in the world as it is (includ­ing the mil­i­tary, mar­riage and par­ent­ing) or the chance to trans­form the world, by throw­ing off repres­sive norms, into a place where all of us — queer and non-queer alike — can be more free?”
    • Response: Stonewall’s ‘Gift’ (Rod Dreher, The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive): “To an old-school Cas­san­dra like me — one of the Cas­san­dras who was mocked in the 2000s as a para­noid — this entire col­umn reads like an I told you so, and a vin­di­ca­tion of the Law of Mer­it­ed Impos­si­bil­i­ty (‘It will nev­er hap­pen, and when it does, you big­ots will deserve it’). Not that it does a bit of good now.”
    • Rug­by Australia’s “Own Goal” (Peter Singer, Project Syn­di­cate): “Rugby Aus­tralia would have a stronger basis for its deci­sion if Folau’s post had expressed hatred toward homo­sex­u­als and could have been inter­pret­ed as an incite­ment to vio­lence against them. But the post no more express­es hatred toward homo­sex­u­als than cig­a­rette warn­ings express hatred toward smokers.” Yes, this is the famous philoso­pher Peter Singer. I rarely agree with him, but in this case I strong­ly do.
    • The Reli­gious Roots of Pride (Brett Krutzsch, The Advo­cate): “What most Amer­i­cans do not know when they gaze on the parade’s near­ly-naked dancers, ‘dykes on bikes,’ and trans­gen­der teenagers is that Pride parades exist because of a devout Pen­te­costal minister.” The author is a pro­fes­sor of reli­gion at Haver­ford Col­lege. One quib­ble: describ­ing Troy Per­ry as a “devout Pen­te­costal” is not accu­rate. He said, “
I knew that I was not start­ing anoth­er Pen­te­costal church. I was start­ing a church that would be tru­ly ecu­meni­cal.” (source: the his­to­ry of the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Com­mu­ni­ty Church­es). It would be fair to say “ex-Pen­te­costal min­is­ter Troy Per­ry”, though. His back­ground was news to me.
  4. The Chris­t­ian Case for Mar­i­jua­na (Jonathan Mer­ritt, New York Times): “America is sick, and the Chris­t­ian call to com­pas­sion oblig­ates the faith­ful to act. Chron­ic pain and ill­ness now affect tens of mil­lions of Amer­i­cans, and in many cas­es the cause eludes the bright­est med­ical minds. To fight these ail­ments, Amer­i­cans have been pre­scribed mind-alter­ing anti-depres­sants, high­ly addic­tive pain reliev­ers and opi­oids, and all man­ner of legal sub­stances with a list of side effects so long that drug com­mer­cials feel like ‘Sat­ur­day Night Live’ shorts.”
  5. The Per­cep­tion Gap: How False Impres­sions are Pulling Amer­i­cans Apart (Sean Stevens, Het­ero­dox Acad­e­my): Democ­rats and Repub­li­cans sig­nif­i­cant­ly over­es­ti­mate how many peo­ple on the ‘other side’ hold extreme views. Typ­i­cal­ly, their esti­mates are rough­ly dou­ble the actu­al num­bers for a giv­en issue…. Edu­ca­tion seems to increase, rather than mit­i­gate, the Per­cep­tion Gap (just as increased edu­ca­tion has found to track with increased ide­o­log­i­cal prej­u­dice). Col­lege edu­ca­tion results in an espe­cial­ly dis­tort­ed view of Repub­li­cans among lib­er­als in particular.” The orig­i­nal research is at https://perceptiongap.us/ (rec­om­mend­ed by a stu­dent)

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Things Glen Found Interesting A While Ago

Every week I’ll high­light an old­er link still worth your con­sid­er­a­tion. This week we have The Prob­lem with Dull Knives: What’s the Defense Depart­ment got to do with Code for Amer­i­ca? (Jen­nifer Pahlka, Medi­um): “I have a dis­tinct mem­o­ry of being a kid in the kitchen with my mom, awk­ward­ly and prob­a­bly dan­ger­ous­ly wield­ing a knife, try­ing to cut some tough veg­etable, and defend­ing my actions by say­ing the knife was dull any­way. My mom stopped me and said firm­ly, ‘Jenny, a dull knife is much more dan­ger­ous than a sharp knife. You’re strug­gling and using much more force than you should, and that knife is going to end up God Knows Where.’ She was right, of course…. But hav­ing poor tools [for the mil­i­tary] doesn’t make us fight less; it makes us fight badly.” (some empha­sis in the orig­i­nal removed). High­ly rec­om­mend­ed. First shared in vol­ume 155.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.

Celebration of Discipline: Meditation

book cover - Celebration Of Discipline

Blog read­ers: Chi Alpha @ Stan­ford is engag­ing in our annu­al sum­mer read­ing project. As we read through Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline by Richard Fos­ter, I’ll post my thoughts here (which is an email I send to the par­tic­i­pants). They are all tagged summer‐reading‐project‐2019. The sched­ule is online if you’d like to read along.

The first of the spir­i­tu­al dis­ci­plines we’re going to look at is med­i­ta­tion. Fos­ter help­ful­ly dis­tin­guish­es what he is talk­ing about from East­ern med­i­ta­tion: “East­ern med­i­ta­tion is an attempt to emp­ty the mind; Chris­t­ian med­i­ta­tion is an attempt to fill the mind. The two ideas are quite dif­fer­ent” (page 20).

In East­ern med­i­ta­tion (or mind­ful­ness as we tend to call it today) very often peo­ple seem to be try­ing to gain self-aware­ness — to dis­cov­er what they think and feel. In Chris­t­ian med­i­ta­tion, on the oth­er hand, we are try­ing to gain God-aware­ness — to dis­cov­er what He thinks and feels. As Fos­ter puts it, “Chris­t­ian med­i­ta­tion, very sim­ply, is the abil­i­ty to hear God’s voice and obey his word” (page 17).

Live Without Hurry

I sus­pect this chap­ter’s biggest chal­lenge for most Stan­ford stu­dents is the sug­ges­tion to live through­out the day in such a way that you are pre­pared for med­i­ta­tion:

If we are con­stant­ly being swept off our feet with fran­tic activ­i­ty, we will be unable to be atten­tive at the moment of inward silence. A mind that is harassed and frag­ment­ed by exter­nal affairs is hard­ly pre­pared for med­i­ta­tion. The church Fathers often spoke of Otium Sanc­tum: “holy leisure.” It refers to a sense of bal­ance in life, an abil­i­ty to be at peace through the activ­i­ties of the day, an abil­i­ty to rest and take time to enjoy beau­ty, an abil­i­ty to pace our­selves. With our ten­den­cy to define peo­ple in terms of what they pro­duce, we would do well to cul­ti­vate “holy leisure.” And if we expect to suc­ceed in the con­tem­pla­tive arts, we must pur­sue, “holy leisure” with a deter­mi­na­tion that is ruth­less to our date­books.

Cel­e­bra­tion of Dis­ci­pline, page 27

I often think about a con­ver­sa­tion between John Ort­berg (the pas­tor of near­by Men­lo Church) and Dal­las Willard (men­tioned in Fos­ter’s book on page xxi). At the time, Ort­berg was work­ing at a very fast-paced megachurch in Chica­go, so he called Willard to ask what he need­ed to do to be spir­i­tu­al­ly healthy. Willard paused for a long time, and then said, “You must ruth­less­ly elim­i­nate hur­ry from your life.”

Ruth­less­ly. Elim­i­nate. Hur­ry.

In oth­er words, treat hur­ry as the ene­my of your soul. This is not a call to be unpro­duc­tive. It is a call to refuse to be dri­ven by arti­fi­cial urgency.

So my first chal­lenge to you is twofold:

  1. Live with­out hur­ry this sum­mer. Be pro­duc­tive with­out allow­ing feel­ing fran­tic to take root in your soul.
  2. Pre­pare to live with­out hur­ry in the fall. Prac­ti­cal­ly, this prob­a­bly means sign­ing up for one few­er class than you think you’re sup­posed to.

Meditate Upon Scripture

Fos­ter dis­cuss­es sev­er­al types of med­i­ta­tion, but empha­sizes med­i­ta­tion upon Scrip­ture as the foun­da­tion. I agree com­plete­ly. Make med­i­ta­tion upon Scrip­ture a main­stay in your life.

And so my sec­ond chal­lenge to you is three­fold:

  1. Pick a sto­ry from the Bible and med­i­tate upon it one day this week. Try to envi­sion the sto­ry from the point of view of all the par­tic­i­pants (David, Goliath, Saul, the Israelite army, David’s broth­ers, etc). Imag­ine how dif­fer­ent tones of voice would affect your inter­pre­ta­tion of the sto­ry (try to think of sev­er­al ways the woman could have told Jesus, “Sir, I per­ceive you are a prophet” and say them aloud). Inhab­it the sto­ry.
  2. Pick a com­mand­ment from the Bible and med­i­tate upon it one day this week. Be spe­cif­ic — don’t just think of a rule, actu­al­ly find a verse that gives the com­mand. Now run through the verse empha­siz­ing and then reflect­ing upon each word or phrase in turn. For exam­ple, Philip­pi­ans 4:8 — “Final­ly, broth­ers and sis­ters, what­ev­er is true, what­ev­er is noble, what­ev­er is right, what­ev­er is pure, what­ev­er is love­ly, what­ev­er is admirable—if any­thing is excel­lent or praiseworthy—think about such things.”
    1. Start with the first key phrase — “WHATEVER IS TRUE… think about such things. Lord, why does truth mat­ter so much? And you say ‘what­ev­er is true.’ What­ev­er? Does that mean there is spir­i­tu­al bless­ing in 2+2=4? Help me under­stand.”
    2. And then move on to the next phrase. “WHATEVER IS NOBLE…. think about such things. God, what does it mean for some­thing to be noble? What’s a noble thing I can think about?” etc.
    3. Run through all eight types of things we are to fill our mind with.
    4. Even­tu­al­ly get to “THINK ABOUT SUCH THINGS. Lord — what fills my mind? Is it pos­i­tive and encour­ag­ing stuff like this? What’s a bet­ter way for me to think about _____? What is the true, noble, right, pure, love­ly, admirable, excel­lent or praise­wor­thy thing I can see in this sit­u­a­tion?”
  3. Pick a promise from the Bible and med­i­tate upon it one day this week. Take time to dwell upon its impli­ca­tions. Exam­ple, Luke 6:38 says , “Give, and it will be giv­en to you. A good mea­sure, pressed down, shak­en togeth­er and run­ning over, will be poured into your lap. For with the mea­sure you use, it will be mea­sured to you.” Med­i­ta­tion upon this promise might look like this: begin by envi­sion­ing your­self receiv­ing a bag full of good things, tight­ly packed to the point of over­flow­ing. And then ask, “God, what would I have done dif­fer­ent­ly this week if I real­ly believed this promise?” And then, “How have I seen this in my life or the lives of those I know?” Keep reflect­ing on the promise and its impli­ca­tions.

That’s my chal­lenge — med­i­tate upon Scrip­ture this week in each of these ways. Pick your own sto­ry, com­mand, and promise. If you don’t know what to choose, just flip through the gospels until you find one of each. Grab­bing them from the gospels is a great way to “fix your eyes upon Jesus” as Heb 12:2 tells us to.

If you’re will­ing, email me back and let me know what pas­sages you intend to med­i­tate upon. And then after­wards let me know how it went!

Things Glen Found Interesting, Volume 208

On Fri­days I share articles/resources about broad cul­tur­al, soci­etal and the­o­log­i­cal issues. Be sure to see the expla­na­tion and dis­claimers at the bot­tom. I wel­come your sug­ges­tions. If you read some­thing fas­ci­nat­ing please pass it my way.

Things Glen Found Interesting

  1. I Pray for Refugees Because I Was One. And God Was Faith­ful. (Sun­day Htoo, Chris­tian­i­ty Today): “When I was in the jun­gle and run­ning for my life, I felt that I would be safe. I felt that some­one I did not know was pray­ing for me. Some­one is run­ning for their life right now in Bur­ma, or anoth­er coun­try torn by war. Please pray for him, for her, for the chil­dren, for the elder­ly, and for a woman who may be preg­nant. Your prayer is full of meaning.” If you ignore every oth­er arti­cle to which I link this week, read this.
    • Rel­e­vant: Migrant chil­dren describe neglect at Texas bor­der facil­i­ty (Cedar Attana­sio, Garance Burke and Martha Men­doza, AP News): “‘In my 22 years of doing vis­its with chil­dren in deten­tion I have nev­er heard of this lev­el of inhumanity,’ said Hol­ly Coop­er, who co-directs Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, Davis’ Immi­gra­tion Law Clin­ic and rep­re­sents detained youth…. the Bor­der Patrol is hold­ing 15,000 peo­ple, and the agency con­sid­ers 4,000 to be at capacity.”
    • Also: Is it Chris­t­ian or ille­gal to aid migrants? A hung Tuc­son jury, a fork in the road of faith (Bri­an McLaren, USA Today): “religious lib­er­ty means the free­dom to save refugees in the desert.” I met McLaren once and had a nice con­ver­sa­tion with him. There is zero chance he remem­bers me. There are parts of this op-ed with which I stren­u­ous­ly dis­agree, rec­om­mend­ed nonethe­less.
  2. The Illib­er­al Right Throws a Tantrum (Adam Ser­w­er, The Atlantic): “The Amer­i­can creed has no more devot­ed adher­ents than those who have been his­tor­i­cal­ly denied its promis­es, and no more fair-weath­er friends than those who have tak­en them for granted.”
    • In response: Is The Reli­gious Right Priv­i­leged? (Ross Douthat, New York Times): “Politically, lib­er­al­ism has imposed via the judi­cia­ry, the least demo­c­ra­t­ic branch, a con­sti­tu­tion­al right to abor­tion, a form of lethal vio­lence that the church oppos­es for the same rea­sons it oppos­es infan­ti­cide — and after 50 years of small‑d demo­c­ra­t­ic activism by pro-lif­ers, the pro-choice side seems to be hard­en­ing into a view that such activism is as un-Amer­i­can as racism. Legal­ly, elite lib­er­al­ism is increas­ing­ly embrac­ing argu­ments that would make it dif­fi­cult or impos­si­ble for the church to oper­ate hos­pi­tals and adop­tion agen­cies today, and per­haps col­leges and gram­mar schools tomor­row. And in its inter­nal life, beneath the post-Protes­tant ten­den­cy I’ve just described, pro­gres­sive pol­i­tics is also nur­tur­ing a fash­ion­able occultism, whose rit­u­als may be prac­ticed some­what iron­i­cal­ly or per­for­ma­tive­ly but whose anti-Catholi­cism seems quite sincere.”
    • Relat­ed: Two Painful Truths of America’s Reli­gious Cul­ture War (David French, Nation­al Review): “Here are two painful truths: Sec­u­lar gov­ern­ment is break­ing its promise of lib­er­ty, and the Amer­i­can church is break­ing its promise of virtue.”
  3. What Real­ly Hap­pened to Malaysia’s Miss­ing Air­plane (William Langewi­esche, The Atlantic): “The idea that a sophis­ti­cat­ed machine, with its mod­ern instru­ments and redun­dant com­mu­ni­ca­tions, could sim­ply van­ish seems beyond the realm of pos­si­bil­i­ty. It is hard to per­ma­nent­ly delete an email, and liv­ing off the grid is near­ly unachiev­able even when the attempt is delib­er­ate. A Boe­ing 777 is meant to be elec­tron­i­cal­ly acces­si­ble at all times…. All sorts of the­o­rists have made claims, ampli­fied by social media, that ignore the satel­lite data, and in some cas­es also the radar tracks, the air­craft sys­tems, the air-traf­fic-con­trol record, the physics of flight, and the basic con­tours of plan­e­tary geog­ra­phy. ” Rec­om­mend­ed by a stu­dent (and, it seems, half the inter­net — this is wide­ly con­sid­ered a must-read arti­cle). The author is a pro­fes­sion­al pilot and a vet­er­an jour­nal­ist
  4. ‘Sing Hal­lelu­jah to the Lord’ has become the unof­fi­cial anthem of the anti-extra­di­tion protest move­ment (Ken­neth Tan, Shang­hai­ist): “Alarmed by reports of police bru­tal­i­ty, many church groups gal­va­nized to par­tic­i­pate in peace protests, call­ing on the author­i­ties to stop the vio­lence. Their pres­ence on the front lines of the protests were help­ful in mak­ing the demon­stra­tions look more like an out­door wor­ship ser­vice rather than the ‘organized riot­s’ the gov­ern­ment said it had to crack down on to bring back law and order.”
    • Relat­ed: A new kind of Hong Kong activism emerges as pro­test­ers mobi­lize with­out any lead­ers (Alice Su, LA Times): “This time around, pro­test­ers are delib­er­ate­ly lead­er­less, Leung said. ‘It looks quite orga­nized and well-dis­ci­plined. But I’m quite sure you can­not find any­one man­ag­ing the whole thing,’ Leung said, adding that the pro­test­er­s’ logis­ti­cal prac­tices — bring­ing sup­plies, set­ting up med­ical sta­tions, rapid mass com­mu­ni­ca­tion — were ‘in-built’ from the last few years of prac­tice. ‘It’s just like a machine or a self-learn­ing AI that can run by themselves,’ he said.”
    • Relat­ed: check out this drone footage of the protests (3 min­utes, YouTube).
  5. Repa­ra­tions came up in the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives on June­teenth. Here are two tes­ti­monies that caught a lot of atten­tion:
    • Read Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Tes­ti­mo­ny on Repa­ra­tions (Olivia Paschal & Madeleine Carlisle, The Atlantic): “The typ­i­cal black fam­i­ly in this coun­try has one-tenth the wealth of the typ­i­cal white fam­i­ly. Black women die in child­birth at four times the rate of white women. And there is, of course, the shame of this land of the free boast­ing the largest prison pop­u­la­tion on the plan­et, of which the descen­dants of the enslaved make up the largest share. The mat­ter of repa­ra­tions is one of mak­ing amends and direct redress, but it is also a ques­tion of citizenship.” (or watch the five minute video on YouTube)
    • My Tes­ti­mo­ny On Repa­ra­tions (Cole­man Hugh­es, Quil­lette): “But the peo­ple who were owed for slav­ery are no longer here, and we’re not enti­tled to col­lect on their debts. Repa­ra­tions, by def­i­n­i­tion, are only giv­en to vic­tims. So the moment you give me repa­ra­tions, you’ve made me into a vic­tim with­out my con­sent. Not just that: you’ve made one-third of black Americans—who con­sis­tent­ly poll against reparations—into vic­tims with­out their con­sent, and black Amer­i­cans have fought too long for the right to define them­selves to be spo­ken for in such a con­de­scend­ing manner.” (or watch the six minute video on YouTube)
    • Some­what, kin­da relat­ed: ‘Affirmative Action Is Not About Equal­i­ty. It’s About Cov­er­ing Ass.’ (Evan Goldstein,Chronicle Review): “What hap­pened is that I went through a trau­ma. I was accused of assault­ing a woman with whom I was hav­ing an extra­mar­i­tal affair. I was pub­licly humil­i­at­ed. I had to with­draw an appoint­ment as under­sec­re­tary of edu­ca­tion in the last years of Reagan’s sec­ond term. I was a crack-cocaine addict; it almost killed me. My wife at the time, God bless her, stayed with me, and we sub­se­quent­ly had two fine sons. But at the time, I was dying. I found Jesus. I got my life togeth­er. They stuck with me at the Kennedy School, but I just couldn’t bear the feel­ing of condescension.” This is an inter­view with Glenn Loury, who was the first black tenured econ pro­fes­sor at Har­vard. He is now an econ­o­mist at Brown.
  6. Ide­ol­o­gy and Facts Col­lide at Ober­lin Col­lege (Daniel McGraw, Quil­lette): “It slow­ly became evi­dent that this case was not about free expres­sion and assem­bly or racial injus­tice and civ­il rights. It was about some­thing more banal. A cow­ard­ly col­lege admin­is­tra­tion picked on a small and vul­ner­a­ble busi­ness in an attempt to fend off accu­sa­tions of racism it was fac­ing from its own students.”
    • Hon­est­ly, this Twit­ter thread about it is even bet­ter. Jaw-drop­ping details. Read it first and then the above arti­cle if you want a more well-round­ed nar­ra­tive.
  7. How Should Chris­tians Have Sex? (Kate­lyn Beaty, New York Times): “I long for more robust cat­e­gories of right and wrong besides con­sent — a base­line, but only that — and more than a gen­er­al reminder not to be a jerk. I can get that from Dan Sav­age, but I also want to know what Jesus thinks.”

Less Serious Things Which Also Interested/Amused Glen

Things Glen Found Interesting A While Ago

Every week I’ll high­light an old­er link still worth your con­sid­er­a­tion. This week we have A One Para­me­ter Equa­tion That Can Exact­ly Fit Any Scat­ter Plot (Alex Tabar­rok, Mar­gin­al Rev­o­lu­tion): “Overfitting is pos­si­ble with just one para­me­ter and so mod­els with few­er para­me­ters are not nec­es­sar­i­ly prefer­able even if they fit the data as well or bet­ter than mod­els with more parameters.” Researchers take note. The under­ly­ing math­e­mat­ics paper is well‐written and inter­est­ing: One Para­me­ter Is Always Enough (Steven T. Pianta­dosi) — among oth­er things, it points out that you can smug­gle in arbi­trar­i­ly large amounts of data into an equa­tion through a sin­gle para­me­ter because a num­ber can have infi­nite dig­its. Obvi­ous once stat­ed, but I don’t know that it ever would have occurred to me. First shared in vol­ume 154.

Why Do You Send This Email?

In the time of King David, the tribe of Issachar pro­duced shrewd war­riors “who under­stood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chron 12:32). In a sim­i­lar way, we need to become wise peo­ple whose faith inter­acts with the world. I pray this email gives you greater insight, so that you may con­tin­ue the tra­di­tion of Issachar.

Disclaimer

Chi Alpha is not a par­ti­san orga­ni­za­tion. To para­phrase anoth­er min­is­ter: we are not about the donkey’s agen­da and we are not about the elephant’s agen­da — we are about the Lamb’s agen­da. Hav­ing said that, I read wide­ly (in part because I believe we should aspire to pass the ide­o­log­i­cal Tur­ing test and in part because I do not believe I can fair­ly say “I agree” or “I dis­agree” until I can say “I under­stand”) and may at times share arti­cles that have a strong par­ti­san bias sim­ply because I find the arti­cle stim­u­lat­ing. The upshot: you should not assume I agree with every­thing an author says in an arti­cle I men­tion, much less things the author has said in oth­er arti­cles (although if I strong­ly dis­agree with some­thing in the arti­cle I’ll usu­al­ly men­tion it). And to the extent you can dis­cern my opin­ions, please under­stand that they are my own and not nec­es­sar­i­ly those of Chi Alpha or any oth­er orga­ni­za­tion I may be per­ceived to rep­re­sent. Also, remem­ber that I’m not report­ing news — I’m giv­ing you a selec­tion of things I found inter­est­ing. There’s a lot hap­pen­ing in the world that’s not mak­ing an appear­ance here because I haven’t found stim­u­lat­ing arti­cles writ­ten about it. If this was for­ward­ed to you and you want to receive future emails, sign up here. You can also view the archives.